| |
Kolkata, January 18, 2008: India’s richest lands – with minerals,
forests, wildlife and water sources – are home to its poorest people.
Mining in India has, contrary to government’s claims, done little for
the development of the mineral-bearing regions of the country: says the
latest publication from New Delhi-based Centre for Science and
Environment (CSE) -- its 356-page 6th State of India’s Environment
Report, titled Rich Lands, Poor People -- Is Sustainable Mining Possible?
The report was released here today by Gopal Krishna Gandhi, the governor
of West Bengal. The release was followed by a panel discussion; the
panelists included writer and activist Mahasweta Devi, former director
of the Dhanbad-based Indian School of Mines S P Banerjee, chairperson of
Coal India Ltd Parthasarathy Ghosh, and CSE director Sunita Narain.
CSE’s ‘State of India’s Environment’ reports have been widely
acknowledged as the most comprehensive and authoritative series of
publications on the subject of environment and development in India. The
report on mining lives up to the reputation and the promise of using
knowledge for change. Extensively researched and richly illustrated,
Rich Lands, Poor People details the issues of mining in different states
of the country, impacts on environment and people, and policy reforms
that are essential to practice more ‘sustainable’ mining.
Keeping in mind the criticality of the subject, CSE has planned a series
of nation-wide releases of the report. The Kolkata release function was
the second in this series.
Rich lands made poor“
If India’s forests, mineral-bearing areas, regions of tribal habitation
and watersheds are all mapped together, they will overlay one another on
almost the same areas,” said Sunita Narain, director, CSE, speaking at
the release function. The CSE report echoes her: “The three
tribal-dominated states of Orissa, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand are the
most productive mineral-bearing states as well; also, the forest cover
in these states is far higher than the national average,” it says.
The report goes on to point out that of the top 50 mineral-producing
districts in the country, almost half are tribal. The average forest
cover in these districts is 28 per cent, much more than the national
average of 20.9 per cent.
The report paints a horrific picture of the devastation that has been
wrought by mining in the country. The statistics are shocking:
* Between 1950 and 1991, mining displaced about 2.6 million people --
not even 25 per cent of these displaced have been rehabilitated. About
52 per cent of these displaced were tribals.
* For every 1 per cent that mining contributes to India’s GDP, it
displaces 3-4 times more people than all the development projects put
together.
* Forest land diversion for mining has been going up. So has water use
and air pollution in the mining hotspots. An estimated 1.64 lakh hectare
of forest land has already been diverted for mining in the country. For
instance, the forests in Bardhaman have been decimated by mining. Iron
ore mining in India used up 77 million tonne of water in 2005-06, enough
to meet the daily water needs of more than 3 million people.
* Mining of major minerals generated about 1.84 billion tonne of waste
in 2006 -- most of which has not been disposed off properly. Coal is the
main culprit: every tonne of coal extracted generates 3-4 tonne of wastes.
“The result of this large-scale ravaging of natural resources is
emerging in the form of growing conflicts in India’s mining zones,” says
Chandra Bhushan, CSE’s associate director and lead writer of the report.
A large part of these zones is in the grip of Naxalism: 40 per cent of
the mineral-rich districts in the top six mineral-producing states are
affected by the movement, which is opposing the lopsided ‘development’
mining brings in.
West Bengal has had its share of the misery. Mining occupies only 0.13
per cent of the total land area in the state, but it is the 10th highest
contributor to the net state domestic product. The CSE report says that
coal mining in the state has had severe impacts ranging from land
subsidence and degradation to health problems related to air pollution,
destruction of water resources and displacement of people. “The two
districts in West Bengal that have the highest concentration of mining
-- Bankura and Purulia -- also have highest area under barren and
wastelands, 4,047 ha and 5,038 ha respectively,” says the report.
According to a study by Walter Fernandes on development-induced
displacement in West Bengal, between 1947 and 2000, 70 lakh people had
been adversely affected by projects of which about 55 per cent, or 39
lakh, were physically displaced. Out of these, only three lakh people
were resettled by the project agencies and the remaining more than 92
per cent had to fend for themselves.
Poor people made poorer“
Mining is being promoted in the country for the wrong reason --
employment. All state governments -- including that of West Bengal --
justify mining arguing that the sector will provide employment, but this
is a chimera. The formal mining industry in India employs just 5.6
people and this number is coming down,” says Narain.
The CSE report uses government’s own data to show how employment has
fallen in the mining sector as a whole. It says the modern mining
industry does not require people. Between 1991 and 2004, the value of
mineral production in India increased four-fold – at the same time,
employment plummeted by 30 per cent.
Take the case of coal mining in West Bengal, says the report. The
state’s production of coal increased by 32 per cent from 1990 to 2003-04
but the average number of people employed daily in coal mines reduced by
32.68 per cent.
In fact, says Chandra Bhushan, “Modern industrial growth requires
resources of the region — minerals, water or energy. It does not require
people. Neither does it necessarily provide local benefits. If it
provides employment benefits, it is outside the poor region in which it
is based. It degrades the land and uses up local water, but does little
to return back the wealth. Worse, the royalty on minerals goes to state
exchequers, not to local communities. This will have to change.”
Is sustainable mining possible?
The CSE report points out that mining cannot be sustainable or truly
environment-friendly: one, because all ore bodies are finite and
non-renewable and two, because even the best managed mines leave“environmental footprints”. But it also concedes that mining and
minerals are necessary. Adds Chandra Bhushan “The issue is not whether
mining should be undertaken or not. Rather, it is about how it should be
undertaken. It is about ensuring that mining is conducted in an
environmentally and socially acceptable manner.”
The report goes on to recommend a range of policy initiatives that could
help India meet this challenge. Some of its main recommendations include
recognizing people’s right to say ‘no’ (mining should not take place
without the consent of the people); independent, impartial preparation
of EIA reports; disallowing mining in forests; framing stronger mine
closure regulations; and “doing more with less -- a key to sustainable
development”.
|
