The Environment Health Bulletin - October, 2011 | Centre for Science and Environment


The Environment Health Bulletin - October, 2011

 
 
Food safety and Toxins Unit's quarterly newsletter
October, 2011
 
     
     
  chandra_bhushanDear friends,

We are heartened by the positive response we received to the inaugural edition of the Environment Health Bulletin (EHB). Many more people have signed up for EHB and we have received great ideas and suggestions on content as well as design. We have incorporated some of the suggestions and we hope that this edition is an improvement over the last one.

In this edition, we have focused on pesticide regulations as well as regulations of “energy drinks”, especially for caffeine. In June, Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) released its lab study on caffeine content in energy drinks and found high levels of caffeine, upto 320 ppm, in many brands. The Central Committee on Food Standards (CCFS) had set a standard of 145 ppm for caffeine in carbonated beverages as a safe limit. Most of the energy drinks sold in the market have caffeine more than double this safe limit. These drinks also did not have proper labeling of caffeine or its content on their pack.

The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) – our custodian for safe and healthy food – had set up an expert committee on energy drinks. And we have learnt, that this committee, based on literature review has recommended fixing caffeine standard in energy drinks at 320 ppm.

We wrote to FSSAI and members of the expert committee putting forth our point that energy drinks should not be allowed to have more than 145 ppm of caffeine. Dr. B Sesikeran, Director, National Institute of Nutrition responded saying that 320 ppm caffeine in energy drinks is safe. His email and our response is posted on our website.

Here we would like to lay bare a few facts. The expert committee while deciding on the standards referred to those studies on health impacts of caffeine that were done on 'healthy adult population'. While the fact is that energy drinks are largely consumed by adolescents. Today these 'energy drinks' are marketed and sold in practically all shops, and younger children are getting attracted to them. We do not know the health impact of high consumption of caffeine on them.

Neither are there any diet study or long term study on health impacts of caffeine in India nor are there enough studies to show the effect of caffeine with other chemicals like guarana and taurine present in the energy drinks. We believe that in a scenario where basic data is not available, we should not allow more than 145 ppm caffeine in energy drinks and without proper labeling.

In May 2011 CSE filed an RTI application to the union ministry of agriculture on the use of banned pesticides in India. It turns out that India is currently using 67 pesticides that have been banned in different countries across the world. All these pesticides have been reviewed by expert committees of the Central Insecticide Board and all of them have been recommended to be continued; only a handful have been permitted for restricted use.

Endosulfan is also on the list of the 67 pesticides. At present we do not have access to the review reports and therefore cannot comment of the quality of reviews. We have filed another RTI asking for some of the review reports. It is important that we know how ‘banned’ pesticides are being reviewed and the basis on which they are recommended for continued use.

The Supreme Court banned the use, manufacture and sale of endosulfan and constituted a joint committee of the agriculture commissioner and the director general of Indian Council of Medical research (ICMR) to prepare a report on the health and environmental impact of endosulfan. We have been following the joint committee very closely and it can easily be said that the joint committee is working in a non-transparent manner and within the committee the agriculture commissioner's office has overshadowed ICMR's work.

It also turns out that while the endosulfan manufacturers were ‘entertained’ by the joint committee, the civil society and victims have been kept at bay. The irony is that the manufacturers have been saying that endosulfan hasn't affected the health of those in Kasaragod or Dakshin Kanada but they have been pleading with the court to allow them to export endosulfan on the count that stocking the pesticide and not disposing it safely 'can pose environmental hazard'. The ban continues as of now. We are looking forward to the report of the expert committee and will keep you posted on every development.

Last month we saw how the health of our people was again shortchanged. While the Indian honey manufacturers are doing everything to comply to the export norms - to assure that Chinese honey wasn't being transshipped to the US via India - set by the honey industry body of US, Indian consumers are still waiting for their honey to be regulated and be made free of antibiotics and heavy metals. We can only hope that FSSAI moves quickly and set standards to regulate toxins in honey.

There are many more stories and reports in the newsletter and much more is available on our website. Please read on and give your advice and comments. As always, we also look forward to research and story ideas from your side.

 
  -Chandra Bhushan  
     
     
 
 
  cover  
 
 
CSE laboratory test finds that most energy drinks in the market contain excess caffeine. We tested eight brands including Red Bull and Coca Cola's Burn. The aim was to check the levels of caffeine in each of them. The results showed that the caffeine levels in most brands exceeded the standard limit of 145 ppm. There are no regulations for energy drinks and the market is grwoing without any checks
 
 
 
  endo  
 
India uses 67 pesticides that have been banned in countries across the world. And these pesticides were approved by the expert committees
 
         
  endo  
 
US industry shows distrust in Indian honey; launches its own certification system
 
         
  endo  
 
Nationwide ban continues; lack of disposal facility leads to exports
 
 
  endo  
 
No takers for Bhopal's toxic waste lying in the UCIL factory
 
 
  endo  
 
Relook reckoned for the pesticide management bill 2008; set to be tabled in winter session now
 
         
 
 
 
  interview  
 
 
Sanjay Dave, chairman, Codex Alimentarius Commission talks on how hand holding is the need of the hour for developing countries
 
 
 
  interview  
 
 
FSSAI has banned it; its time to get ride of it
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
 
   
         
Bayer finally withdraws Class I Pesticides

USDA to expand E coli tests

GM shadow on Honey
 

  Bird Flu strikes again

India gets its new Food Law

Plachimada Tribunal Bill sent back to state
 

  The study by All India Network Project on Pesticide Residues finds residues of banned pesticides in food items. But the study has not been made public yet.
 
 
     
  image  
     
     
  cselogo  
     
  Centre for Science and Environment41, Tughlakabad Institutional Area, New Delhi. India - 110062 | Tel: +91-11 29955124, 29956110, 40616000 Fax: +91-11 29955879 | E-mail: cse@cseindia.org  
     
 
Follow us on 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
gobar times