What’s critical at Durban: removing the firewall between developing and developed countries | Centre for Science and Environment

Tuesday, December 6, 2011 - 17:21
Tuesday, December 6, 2011 - 17:21

What’s critical at Durban: removing the firewall between developing and developed countries


Durban, December 6: Remove the firewall at all costs: this sums up what the rich countries are doing in the climate negotiations at Durban to remove the differentiation between past polluters – responsible for climate change impacts currently occurring – and the future polluters, who need ecological space to grow. 

This is the core of the politics at the Durban conference on climate change. The rich countries are doing all they can, in different ways, to remove this distinction, for until the distinction remains, they will have to take action first to reduce and create carbon space for the poorer countries to increase their emissions.

The CSE team at Durban is tracking a whole host of developments, happening right now in closed rooms, that point to this sinister attempt.

Consider, for instance, an issue on which informal consultations are on-going: 

Proposal 1: Russian Federation to amend article 4, para 2 (f) of the framework convention on climate change

The Climate Change convention provides that “any party may propose amendments to the Convention”. The Russian Federation on May 24 2011 submitted a proposal for discussion at the Durban conference. 

The proposal is to amend Annexures I and II to the convention, which categorise countries based on their contribution to the problem of climate change. 

Annex I lists developed countries, which need to take action to reduce emissions.

Russia now wants this list changed.

It believes that “there have been changes in economic and technological development that have taken place since the adoption of the Convention in 1992”. In other words, countries have grown and so, now, the Convention list is out of date. 

It wants a review of the list so that more countries are added in the list of the first polluters. 

The proposal is being hotly debated – supported as it is by US and Turkey. The US position is that no agreement is written in stone – but clearly what it means is that its emissions should be wiped out in the atmospheric sands of history. 

To be watched. 




India's environment minister Jayanthi Natarajan speaks during a break of Indaba, the final negotiation process of the CoP17 at Durban
NGO's flash protest - NGO's from around the world protest inside the convention center sneaking passed the UN security
Do no support companies that burn waste, said the Global Alliance of Waste Pickers at a protest demonstration during the COP17 at Durban
To boot out or not to boot out the USA: A debate between LDC & The EU

DTE Cover Story

Press Releases

Wednesday, December 7, 2011 - 10:44
India's environment minister says "equity is central to any debate on climate change" | Comments

Makes her first public address in Durban at a side event organised by CSE in association with the ministry

  Contact us
  Durban: Delhi:
  Chandra Bhushan Papia Samajdar
  Email: chandra@cseindia.org Email: papia@cseindia.org
  Phone: +27 732335697 Phone: +91 9811906977
  Skype ID: csechandra  
  Souparno Banerjee  
  Phone: +27 71 023 3222  


Tuesday, December 6, 2011 - 11:46
India's Intervention at the LCA Plenary

Intervention of India in the LCA stocktaking plenary 10:00-11:30 AM; 5th December 2011

Wednesday, November 30, 2011 - 16:55
Cancun Agreements

Report of the Conference of the Parties on its sixteenth session, held in Cancun from 29 November to 10 December 2010

Download pdf


Tuesday, December 6, 2011 - 18:06
The imperative of equity for an effective climate agreement | Comments

By Sunita Narain, director-general, CSE

Download pdf

Tuesday, December 6, 2011 - 18:06
Equity and the transition to a low carbon economy | Comments

By Chandra Bhushan, deputy director, CSE

Download pdf

Tuesday, December 6, 2011 - 18:06
Furthering Climate Justice : Protecting the Vulnerable, Compensation for Impacts | Comments

By Ambuj Sagar, Vipula and Mahesh Chaturvedi Professor of Policy Studies Indian Institute of Technology Delhi

Download pdf