|
National Rural Employment Guarantee Act 2005 (NREGA) |
|
An Ecological Act |
|
|
|
The National Rural Employment
Guarantee Act (NREGA) 2005, was brought into force by the Union
government in February 2006. It is the first nation wide employment
scheme that guarantees employment legally to India’s rural
population. Naturally, it has generated intense speculation and
interest in terms of its interest and scope.
The NREGA is being implemented in 200 most backward districts
(recently extended to 130 districts) across 27 states in the
country. With the recent expansion of the Act in the Union budget,
2007, the government plans to expand NREGA to all the districts of
the country. It guarantees 100 days of unskilled jobs for rural
household. NREGA aims at eradication of extreme poverty and at
making villages self-sustaining through productive assets creation
(such as water tanks and soil conservation works). This is meant to
regenerate the rural natural resource base, which in turn will
result in sustainable livelihoods for residents. The Act puts the
three tier Panchayati Raj Institutions 9PRIs) at the helm of
affairs- beginning with identifying the eligible households to
planning the works to be undertaken.
In the last one year of its operation, the Act on an average has
provided 37.50 man-days of work to a job seeking household against
the legal promise of 100 man days annually, according to a
government assessment. Till February 2007, 1.64 households have been
provided jobs but only 62 crores man days of work has been generated
against 164 crores which should have been generated as per the
provisions of NREGA. While the Act legally binds the state to
provide 100 days of employment to every job-seeking household,
states have not been able to provide jobs for the full tenure.
The number of productive assets created in the last one year of
NREGA is 279,000. Water conservation accounts for 52.7 per cent of
the total works till December 2006. Seven states have not undertaken
any work on water conservation. On the other hand, 10 states account
for 91 per cent of total water conservation works under NREGA. This
points to the fact that focus on water conservation is not uniform
across the 27 states implementing NREGA. Flood control and drought
proofing remain the two least preferred works.
To make the Act participatory in nature, village panchayats are the
nodal implementing bodies implementing 50 percent of the works. The
Act mandates the Panchayats to prepare the village level plans based
on local resources and needs. The District level Plan designed by
the district panchayat is prepared on the basis of the linkages of
assets to be created that will help in local development. This plan,
which is for five years, intends to facilitate advance planning and
to provide a development perspective for the district.
NREGA has certainly come at a crucial time, when rural economy in
the country is facing stress due to myopic policies. Many studies on
rural economy point to the erosion of livelihoods in Indian villages
as the main driver behind rural unemployment. Efforts to salvage the
situation through numerous poverty alleviation schemes have not
helped. Thus, the NREGA faces a two-pronged challenge: the immediate
one of addressing the skyrocketing unemployment crisis in rural
areas, and a longer-term one of contributing to village economy in a
sustained manner.
Effective implementation of the Act would require planning labour-intensive
works for the needy poor on a continuous and sustained basis. These
works must build the right kind of assets to promote development of
local/regional economy. To ensure that the impact of the Act is
sustainable and lasts over the longer term, these assets must be
managed well and in an equitable way to generate benefits for the
poor, as well as to promote pro-poor economic growth.
In this context, the NREGA should be seen more as a
livelihood-generating programme than a wage-earning scheme. It also
offers a unique opportunity to turn around rural development. CSE
has been monitoring the Act at policy and practice levels on its
contributions to sustainable livelihood creation through ecological
regeneration. |
|
|
|
|
|
|