|
|
Policy watch December 2006 |
PESA: decadent decade
Ten years after it was enacted by the Parliament, the Provision of
Panchayats, Extension to Scheduled Areas Act (PESA) 1996, is yet to be
completely implemented. Nine states (Orissa, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya
Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Maharshtra, Karnataka, Kerala and Bihar) have
scheduled areas where PESA is applicable.
A welcome change
Worried with this slow pace, the Union ministry of Panchayati Raj (MoPR),
has -- in its recently published mid-term report titled State of Panchayati
Raj -- cautioned that non-implementation of PESA may further trigger tribal
unrest.
Citing growing Naxalism and tribal insurgency, the report opines that PESA
is “the single most important statutory instrument for protecting and
promoting tribal rights, and involvement of tribal in local government”.
Given that the Centre and the nine states have been demanding amendments to
the Constitution’s fifth schedule to dilute tribal rights over local
resources, the report’s assertions are a welcome change.
Slow motion: centre, states to be blamed
Immediately after PESA was enacted, the nine states got a year to amend
their respective panchayat acts. Though all of them prepared conformity
acts, implementation of provisions was half-hearted. Most states failed in
issuing executive orders for implementation of PESA, thus making it
ineffective.
Moreover, the Centre also did not do much to expedite implementation.
According to PESA, any provision of law relating to panchayats, which is not
consistent with its (PESA’s) provisions, will expire within a year. Going by
this rule, central legislations like the Land Acquisition Act, Mines and
Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, Indian Forest Act, Forest
Conservation Act and Indian Registration Act should have ceased to exist in
scheduled areas. However, the Centre did not rectify them.
Some Central government’s policies also violated PESA. According to the
mid-term review of MoPR, these include the National Policy on Resettlement
and Rehabilitation 2003, National Water Policy 2002, National Minerals
Policy 2003, National Forest Policy 1988, Wildlife Conservation Strategy
2002 and the National Draft Environment Policy 2004. These need to be
re-examined.
Even now most laws and policies related to natural resources in scheduled
areas remain centralised. PESA aims at fixing this problem.
^top
Bihar says “no” to SEZs
Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar has said special economic zones (SEZs)
will not be set up in the state, as there is too much pressure on the land
there. “Bihar is not ready for this. Creating SEZs is like carving out a new
country from a particular area… local economies do not benefit from them,”
he said. Nitish has something else in store for his state: “We will shortly
announce a land policy, which will set higher compensation for people whose
land is acquired. This will be done in a transparent manner.”
^top
Another pilot project for livelihood in backward
areas
The Planning Commission has initiated a new ‘special district rural
livelihood plan’ in 25 of the country’s poorest districts. It will be
taken up as a pilot project, which will be used for implementation of
schemes like NREGA and Backward Regions Grant Fund (BGRF). The project
aims at preparing district-level rural livelihood plans with focus on
sustainable agricultural development. According to Planning Commission
officials, the scheme is an experiment for addressing the agrarian
crisis. There are no common guidelines and each district will come up
with its own plan. The pilot project is an outcome of deputy chairperson
Montek Singh Ahluwalia’s recent deliberations with district authorities.
Officials say that the commission will interact directly with the
districts, as state governments have been ineffective in implementation
of various poverty eradication schemes.
^top
Jharkhand asks for relaxation in panchayat
conditions
During a recent meeting with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Jharkhand
Chief Minister Madhu Koda requested that the state be relieved of the
condition of holding panchayat elections before accessing the Centre’s
rural development funds. The 12th Finance Commission had mandated that
Jharkhand hold the polls first. Currently, the state does not have any
panchayats. It had last held elections to local bodies in 1971.
Jharkhand has been missing (losing out) Rs 96.40 crore every year in
absence of panchayat bodies. During the meeting the PM remained
non-committal on the demand and stressed that an “honest, transparent
and effective” administration was a must to get all possible help from
the Centre.
^top
Goa EC
goes to court on panchayat elections
Within a month of the Supreme Court empowering state election commissions
(SECs) to hold panchayat elections on time, the Goa SEC has approached the
Bombay High Court in Goa against the state government for delaying the
polls. It has asked the court to direct the Goa government to assist it (Goa
SEC) in discharging its constitutional duty of holding elections within
time. Recently, the SEC had proposed January 28, 2007, as the date for
elections. So far, the state government has not issued any notification in
this regard. The SEC cannot hold elections without the state’s cooperation.
^top
Haryana
unveils forest policy
Haryana recently declared its first forest policy. Unlike the National
Forest Policy’s objective of maintaining a 33 per cent forest cover,
Haryana’s policy aims at increasing the area under forest in the state from
the current 6.6 per cent to 10 per cent by 2010, and eventually to 20 per
cent through massive afforestation and social forestry programmes. Being a
dominantly agrarian state, the policy will take up large-scale agro-forestry
by encouraging locals to grow more trees for better and safe economic
returns. Under agro-forestry, medicinal plants will get priority. Marketing
facilities will be provided to farmers through the Haryana Forest
Corporation for selling their produce in national and international markets.
Joint Forest Management committees will be used to manage plantations on
degraded natural forests near villages.
^top
Vidarbha: Amid
suicides, two more fact-finding exercises
A survey of 1.7 million farmer families in Vidarbha, Maharashtra, shows
that three-fourths of the farmers are distressed, and suicide cases have
gone up by 25 times since 2001. Around nine lakh families in the
1,800-odd villages surveyed are under debt, whereas the remaining depend
on farm inputs, which are scarce. Unmarried daughters are a key source
of misery for over three lakh families, as due to poverty, marriages
cannot be solemnised. Some farmers have now showed interest in the state
government’s mass marriage scheme.
The survey also shows that around 12
lakh farmers have struggled as crops failed due to unfavourable climatic
conditions, lack of irrigation facilities or natural calamities. Chronic
diseases are also a major problem area for farmers. Around 40 per cent
farmers have now taken up organic farming.
State chief secretary DK Shankaran had
ordered this survey. Another study (done by Nagpur-based Central
Institute for Cotton Research) into the causes of farmers’ suicide in
Vidarbha says that 20 per cent Bt cotton seeds supplied to farmers in
the region in 2006 were the non-Bt variety. Further, 60 per cent of the
circulated seeds were of the mixed variety with little potency to fight
the dreaded Bollgrad pest. In fact, only 20 per cent of the Bt cotton
seeds supplied in the region were genuine, the institute said.
The state government now thinks this could be one of the reasons for
farmers’ distress. The inputs from the institute will be provided to an
expert group, which is looking into problems of agricultural
indebtedness in the country.
^top
A
development authority for Bundelkhand
Madhya Pradesh chief minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan has declared the
constitution of a Bundelkhand Development Authority. Amid reports of severe
droughts and starvation deaths, the CM said that the development authority
will address the region’s most severe problem: water scarcity. The authority
will consist of local elected representatives.
Bundelkhand suffers from chronic drought despite being home to a number of
rivers. This region in central India is a semi-arid plateau that encompasses
12 districts of northern Madhya Pradesh, and five districts of southern
Uttar Pradesh.
The 6,852-kilometre canal network crisscrossing the Uttar Pradesh area of
the region is ill-maintained and runs dry. It bears testimony to the
administration’s failure in harnessing water supplied by perennial rivers
like Sindh, Pahuj, Betwa, Dhasan, Ken, Baghein, Paisuni and Tons, and their
numerous tributaries. Most canals are relics of the British era and are now
neglected. They have water only up to a distance near the head. Ironically,
the region was once famed for cultivation of beetle leaves, singharas, kamal
gattas, kamal naals and ginger -- all of which consume large quantities of
water.
^top
Pharma companies in
backward districts
Pharmaceutical companies will create around 600 drug banks in backward
districts of India to serve the healthcare needs of families living
below the poverty line. The pharma firms and the department of chemicals
and petrochemicals will collaborate to adopt up to three backward
districts from each state starting January 26, 2007. The Union
government will act as a facilitator. To start with, the state
governments and the department of chemicals and petrochemicals will
provide Rs 15 lakh as seed money to each district. Pharmaceutical
companies will contribute a similar amount in cash or kind. The drug
bank will procure medicines from companies and distribute it for free to
needy families. The scheme is modelled on medicare societies found in
district hospitals of Rajasthan
^top |
|
|