Cse In News

Opinion: Women’s quota Bill undermines merit

I believe in Chanakya Neeti and Chanakya said, “A woman should never be left dependent on another person. Doing so may result in a flaw in his character. Therefore, a woman should be protected in the same way as you protect the safe of your house. Never trust anyone in the matter of a woman.” Reservation Bill, to me, is nothing but a dependency model which corrupts the system. Is it Beneficial? While the intention behind the Women’s Reservation Bill may be noble, it is essential to critically examine whether such quotas are genuinely beneficial for women’s progress. As a woman, I feel offended that after 75 years of independence, we are looking for reservation when women are already contributing strongly to every sector, right from technology to the gig economy. What made the government sit up now and bring in a Bill to create a stir in society? We had Indira Gandhi, the first and, so far, the only female Prime Minister of India. She served in this role for multiple terms and played a crucial role in shaping Indian politics. Pratibha Patil who was India’s first woman President in 2007, broke gender barriers in the highest office in the country. Mamata Banerjee as the Chief Minister of West Bengal and a prominent political figure has had a significant impact on the State’s politics and India’s national politics. But we don’t want to talk about them in the current political scenario. Their contributions will all be questioned but their contribution to the nation cannot be ignored. Let’s see more. Savitribai Phule, a pioneer in women’s education in India, along with her husband Jyotirao Phule, founded the first girls’ school in Pune and worked relentlessly for women’s education. Dr Kamala Sohonie was the first Indian woman to have a doctorate in science and was instrumental in shaping science education for women in India. Her acceptance into and work at the Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, paved the way for women to be accepted into the institution for the first time in its history. In technology and space, we had Kalpana Chawla who became the first woman of Indian descent in space. Her contributions to aerospace engineering and space exploration are celebrated worldwide. Tessy Thomas, known as the ‘Missile Woman of India’, played a pivotal role in the development of ballistic missile technology. In the corporate world, Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw founded Biocon, one of India’s largest biotechnology companies, that made significant contributions to the biotech and pharmaceutical sectors. Indra Nooyi worked her way up to be the CEO of PepsiCo, one of the world’s largest food and beverage companies. In sports PV Sindhu became the first Indian woman to win a silver medal in badminton at the Olympics (2016) and has consistently performed at a high level in international competitions. Mary Kom is a six-time world champion and an Olympic bronze medallist. In wrestling Geeta Phogat, Babita Phogat, Sakshi Malik, Vinesh Phogat, Navjot Kaur, Pooja Dhanda, Divya Kakran. Oh, sorry, can’t talk about them. They were recently fighting for justice for women. Arundhati Roy, a prominent Indian author, public intellectual and activist, has earned international recognition and critical acclaim. Sunita Narain, director general of the Centre for Science and Environment, is one of India’s most prominent environmentalists and has made significant contributions to the country’s environmental policy and conservation efforts. Anandamayi Ma was a prominent spiritual teacher and philanthropist known for her teachings on love, compassion and selflessness. She has inspired millions of people not only in India but across the world. In Higher Education Women’s enrolment in higher education has increased nearly twice as fast as male enrolment over the last four decades. As per the All-India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE) 2019-20, the gross enrolment ratio of female students stands at 27.3%, more than that of male students, which is 26.9%. The percentage of female enrolment to total enrolment has increased from 45% in 2014-15 to around 49% in 2020-21. The survey findings also reveal a sharp rise in female student enrolment at MA, MCom and MSc levels in the last five years. Women have been breaking barriers, challenging traditional gender roles and proving their worth in a male-dominated society. They are now leaders, entrepreneurs, and role models for others. Thus, with women being on an upward trajectory in all fields, it is a regressive move to introduce reservations for them, which basically signals to them and others that without such support they cannot make it on their own. One of the fundamental principles of a fair and just society is meritocracy, where individuals are rewarded based on their abilities and qualifications rather than their gender, caste, or any other characteristic. The Women Reservation Bill, by design, reserves a certain percentage of seats for women, regardless of their qualifications or experience. While it aims to increase women’s representation in politics, it may inadvertently undermine the concept of meritocracy. Reserving seats for women can lead to tokenism, where women are selected merely to fulfil the quota requirement rather than for their competence. This not only does a disservice to women but also weakens the quality of representation in legislative bodies. True empowerment should focus on ensuring that women who enter politics do so based on their skills and commitment to public service. For Publicity? Is it just another Bill to gain publicity? Quotas are meant to create a division in society. Women’s Reservation Bill only makes it more challenging to achieve the broader goals of empowerment and equality. Rather than relying solely on quotas, efforts should be directed toward improving women’s access to education and economic opportunities. When women have the knowledge, skills and financial independence, they are better equipped to compete on an equal footing in any field, including politics. Instead of relying on legislative quotas, society should actively promote women’s participation in politics through awareness campaigns, mentorship programmes and support networks. Encouraging women to enter politics voluntarily, based on their interests and capabilities, will lead to a more genuine and lasting impact. True equality should be achieved by breaking down barriers and ensuring that women have the skills and opportunities to succeed in any field, rather than relying on quotas that may inadvertently undermine their progress. As Gloria Steinem once famously said, “Women are always saying, ‘We can do anything that men can do.’ But men should be saying, ‘We can do anything that women can do’.” It’s time India took note of its women and what they can do for the country.

Estimating emissions accurately essential for effective mitigation and management strategies

Methane emissions contribute to climate change and air pollution and are thus a major environmental concern. This was revealed by programme manager of solid waste management and circular economy at the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) in India, Richa Singh during a live discussion on CSE’s new report named ‘Methane Emissions from Dumpsites in India.’ She highlighted that therefore estimating these emissions accurately is essential for effective mitigation and management strategies. She mentioned that Methane estimation models play a crucial role in assessing the environmental impact of landfills and devising effective mitigation strategies, adding that when it comes to Indian landfills, these models often produce variable results, posing challenges for policymakers and environmentalists. Singh says there are two ways of estimating methane emissions from landfills or dumpsites theoretically and experimentally. According to her various theoretical models such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change models, the Landfill Gas Emissions Model, and the Modified Triangular Method are commonly used to predict annual methane emissions, despite their continued reception of criticism due to their poor accuracy and insufficient validation. Richa says there is a huge disparity in methane emission estimates from Indian landfills/dumpsites, mainly attributed to factors such as inconsistent data collection, variable landfill practices, informal waste disposal, methodological differences, changes over time, and regulatory variations. She mentioned that landfills are the largest third emitter of methane after oil and gas as well as agriculture sectors respectively. Based on the volume of waste generated, its composition, and how it is managed, it is estimated that 1.6 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalent greenhouse gas emissions were generated from solid waste treatment and disposal in 2016, or 5 percent of global emissions and a further 2.6 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent is expected in 2050 should there be no behavioural change. Regarding this, Dr Singh called for the scientific construction of landfills, with the necessary tools to harvest methane and avoid it roaming in the atmosphere. She noted that as one of the greenhouse gases, methane is 28 times more likely to trap heat than carbon dioxide, hence CSE calls for concerted efforts to standardise data collection, invest in modern waste management infrastructure as well as develop region-specific models. Dr Singh noted that methane acts as ground-level ozone, which is a hazardous air pollutant responsible for millions of premature deaths. Citing CSE’s new report, Methane Emissions from Dumpsites in India, Dr. Sigh highlighted major recommendations being; phasing out the disposal of biodegradable organics in the landfills and instead decompose them in a way that it can be harvested and used as fuel instead. She also recommended the scientific treatment of biodegradable waste, using biotechnology methods to treat biodegradable waste to produce a nutrient-rich solid material and biogas containing carbon dioxide and methane. This can include further processing for the biogas to burn to produce electricity that can be used to power the plant. The third major recommendation is to remediate the legacy-based dumpsites. Still, during the discussion of the report, Dr Singh pointed out that the variability in methane estimation models for Indian landfills arises from a combination of factors, including waste composition, data availability, climate variability, waste management practices, population density, and regulatory frameworks, adding that to improve the accuracy of these models, increased collaboration between researchers, policymakers and waste management authorities can help address these challenges and pave the way for more effective methane mitigation strategies in Indian landfills. She pointed out that to reconcile differing results, it is crucial to critically assess the methodologies, data sources, and assumptions used in different studies. Combining multiple approaches and conducting ongoing monitoring can provide a more accurate picture of methane emissions from dumpsites in Delhi or any other area. This discussion comes 63 days prior to COP 28 in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, where global leaders with lock heads and discuss how to triple renewable energy output to 11,000 gigawatts by 2030, more than double low carbon hydrogen production to 180 million tons per year by 2030 as well as transform food and agriculture systems through greater investment in agri-tech, smarter water use and food production in an accelerated time frame.

Methane Emissions from Landfills Pose Major Environmental Concern, Says CSE Report

New Delhi, India — Methane emissions from dumpsites in India are a significant contributor to climate change and air pollution, according to a live discussion led by Richa Singh, the program manager for solid waste management and circular economy at the Center for Science and Environment (CSE) in India, writes Baboloki Semele. Singh emphasized the importance of accurate methane emission estimates for effective mitigation and management strategies. Estimating methane emissions from landfills or dumpsites can be done theoretically or experimentally, Singh explained. Theoretical models, including those from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the Landfill Gas Emissions Model, and the Modified Triangular Method, are commonly used to predict annual methane emissions but often receive criticism for their poor accuracy and insufficient validation. Singh noted that the estimates of methane emissions from Indian landfills and dumpsites vary widely due to factors such as inconsistent data collection, variable landfill practices, informal waste disposal, methodological differences, changes over time, and regulatory variations. Landfills are the third-largest emitter of methane globally, following the oil and gas and agriculture sectors. According to a 2016 World Bank report, based on the volume of waste generated, its composition, and how it is managed, it is estimated that 1.6 billion metric tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalent greenhouse gas emissions were generated from solid waste treatment and disposal in 2016, or 5 percent of global emissions, and a further 2.6 billion metric tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent is expected in 2050 should there be no behavioural change. Dr. Singh called for the scientific construction of landfills equipped with tools to capture methane, preventing it from entering the atmosphere. Methane, a potent greenhouse gas, is 28 times more effective at trapping heat than carbon dioxide. CSE advocates for standardized data collection, investment in modern waste management infrastructure, and the development of region-specific models to combat methane emissions. Additionally, Dr. Singh highlighted key recommendations from CSE's new report, "Methane Emissions from Dumpsites in India." These include phasing out the disposal of biodegradable organics in landfills and promoting their decomposition for use as fuel. The report also suggests the scientific treatment of biodegradable waste using biotechnology methods to produce digestate, a nutrient-rich solid material, and biogas. The biogas can be further processed to generate electricity. Another major recommendation is the remediation of legacy-based dumpsites. Singh stressed that variability in methane estimation models for Indian landfills results from various factors, including waste composition, data availability, climate variability, waste management practices, population density, and regulatory frameworks. She emphasized that collaboration among researchers, policymakers, and waste management authorities is crucial to improving model accuracy and developing effective methane mitigation strategies. This discussion occurred 63 days ahead of COP 28 in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, where global leaders will convene to discuss plans to triple renewable energy output, double low-carbon hydrogen production, and transform food and agriculture systems through increased investment in agri-tech, smarter water usage, and food production.

India Should Phase Out Biodegradable Waste Disposal In Landfills To Check Methane Emissions: CSE Report

In its latest report, the Centre for Science and Environment has advocated for robust policies to incentivise waste diversion through source separation and the development of critical infrastructure for biodegradable waste treatment India should conduct a nationwide study to accurately estimate methane emissions from legacy waste dumpsites and organic waste processing facilities, and urgently phase out biodegradable waste disposal in landfills, a new report by the Centre for Science and Environment has recommended. The independent think tank’s report, titled “Methane Emissions from Open Dumpsites in India: Estimation and Mitigation Strategies”, also stresses the importance of creating robust markets for reduced-emission products generated from organic waste processing and promoting carbon credits for biomining projects. A key concern raised in the report is the unreliability and inconsistency of data related to municipal solid waste and methane emissions. To address this issue, the report suggests using the first-order decay (FOD) method, which relies on field data and primary research to more precisely estimate methane emissions from landfill sites. The CSE said, A pan-India study needs to be conducted on estimation of methane and other GHGs (greenhouse gases) from each of the legacy waste dumpsites and organic waste processing facilities. There is a lack of data on the quantity of methane originating from the dumpsites and other waste management-related activities. Creating a system of comprehensive methane measurement and monitoring strategies will enable policymakers and regulators to develop data-driven, science-based targets to reduce methane emissions from the waste sector, especially from dumpsites. In its report, the environmental think tank has emphasised the need to phase out the disposal of biodegradable waste in landfills and advocated for robust policies to incentivise waste diversion through source separation and the development of critical infrastructure for biodegradable waste treatment. Large-scale anaerobic digestion facilities are highlighted as a necessity to keep biodegradable waste out of landfills, reducing the burden on downstream mitigation technologies. The report also highlights the need to promote carbon credits for biomining projects and mandates estimating methane potential from capped landfills and dumpsites. Currently, there is a lack of monitoring of methane flux from existing landfill facilities and fugitive gas emissions from bio-digesters and biogas storage balloons in biomethanation plants. The CSE has also advocated for afforestation on reclaimed bioremediated land, emphasising its role as a carbon sequester to mitigate emissions. It said, Afforestation should be promoted in the reclaimed bioremediated land — recovered after biomining of legacy waste dumpsites. The green cover developed on the reclaimed land will act as a carbon sequester. According to BUR-3 (third biennial update report) submitted by the Government of India, forest and tree cover sequestered 331 million tonnes of CO2 in 2016, which is around 15 per cent of the total CO2 emissions in the country. Methane is a potent GHG with a much higher global warming potential than carbon dioxide (CO2). Its atmospheric concentration has more than doubled over the last two centuries primarily due to anthropogenic activities. Methane has a relatively short lifespan — of approximately 12 years — in the atmosphere. However, its global warming potential (GWP) — the ability of the gas to trap heat in the atmosphere — is 25 times more than CO2 and it has been second only to CO2 in causing climate change during the industrial era. Landfills are the third-largest source of methane emissions globally, after oil and gas systems and agriculture. Landfill waste management worldwide accounted for an estimated 1.6 billion tonnes of CO2e (CO2 equivalent) in 2016. According to a report by the World Bank, this number is expected to reach 2.6 billion tonnes of CO2e by 2050. CO2e means the number of metric tons of CO2 emissions with the same global warming potential as one metric ton of another greenhouse gas, according to the United States Environmental Protection Agency. As per India’s third biennial update report (BUR), the country’s methane emissions in 2016 (excluding land use and land-use change and forestry) stood at 409 million tonnes CO2e. Of this, 73.96 per cent came from the agriculture sector, 14.46 per cent from the waste sector, 10.62 per cent from the energy sector and 0.96 per cent from the industrial processes and product use sector.

India should phase out biodegradable waste disposal in landfills to check methane emissions: CSE report

India should conduct a nationwide study to accurately estimate methane emissions from legacy waste dumpsites and organic waste processing facilities, and urgently phase out biodegradable waste disposal in landfills, a new report by the Centre for Science and Environment has recommended. The independent think tank's report, titled "Methane Emissions from Open Dumpsites in India: Estimation and Mitigation Strategies", also stresses the importance of creating robust markets for reduced-emission products generated from organic waste processing and promoting carbon credits for biomining projects. A key concern raised in the report is the unreliability and inconsistency of data related to municipal solid waste and methane emissions. To address this issue, the report suggests using the first-order decay (FOD) method, which relies on field data and primary research to more precisely estimate methane emissions from landfill sites. "A pan-India study needs to be conducted on estimation of methane and other GHGs (greenhouse gases) from each of the legacy waste dumpsites and organic waste processing facilities. There is a lack of data on the quantity of methane originating from the dumpsites and other waste managementrelated activities. "Creating a system of comprehensive methane measurement and monitoring strategies will enable policymakers and regulators to develop data-driven, science-based targets to reduce methane emissions from the waste sector, especially from dumpsites," the CSE said. In its report, the environmental think tank has emphasised the need to phase out the disposal of biodegradable waste in landfills and advocated for robust policies to incentivise waste diversion through source separation and the development of critical infrastructure for biodegradable waste treatment. Large-scale anaerobic digestion facilities are highlighted as a necessity to keep biodegradable waste out of landfills, reducing the burden on downstream mitigation technologies. The report also highlights the need to promote carbon credits for biomining projects and mandates estimating methane potential from capped landfills and dumpsites. Currently, there is a lack of monitoring of methane flux from existing landfill facilities and fugitive gas emissions from bio-digesters and biogas storage balloons in biomethanation plants. The CSE has also advocated for afforestation on reclaimed bioremediated land, emphasising its role as a carbon sequester to mitigate emissions. "Afforestation should be promoted in the reclaimed bioremediated land - recovered after biomining of legacy waste dumpsites. The green cover developed on the reclaimed land will act as a carbon sequester. "According to BUR-3 (third biennial update report) submitted by the Government of India, forest and tree cover sequestered 331 million tonnes of CO2 in 2016, which is around 15 per cent of the total CO2 emissions in the country," it said. Methane is a potent GHG with a much higher global warming potential than carbon dioxide (CO2). Its atmospheric concentration has more than doubled over the last two centuries primarily due to anthropogenic activities. Methane has a relatively short lifespan - of approximately 12 years - in the atmosphere. However, its global warming potential (GWP) - the ability of the gas to trap heat in the atmosphere - is 25 times more than CO2 and it has been second only to CO2 in causing climate change during the industrial era. Landfills are the third-largest source of methane emissions globally, after oil and gas systems and agriculture. Landfill waste management worldwide accounted for an estimated 1.6 billion tonnes of CO2e (CO2 equivalent) in 2016. According to a report by the World Bank, this number is expected to reach 2.6 billion tonnes of CO2e by 2050. CO2e means the number of metric tons of CO2 emissions with the same global warming potential as one metric ton of another greenhouse gas, according to the United States Environmental Protection Agency. As per India's third biennial update report (BUR), the country's methane emissions in 2016 (excluding land use and land-use change and forestry) stood at 409 million tonnes CO2e. Of this, 73.96 per cent came from the agriculture sector, 14.46 per cent from the waste sector, 10.62 per cent from the energy sector and 0.96 per cent from the industrial processes and product use sector.

India should phase out biodegradable waste disposal in landfills to check methane emissions: CSE report

India should conduct a nationwide study to accurately estimate methane emissions from legacy waste dumpsites and organic waste processing facilities, and urgently phase out biodegradable waste disposal in landfills, a new report by the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) has recommended. The independent think tank’s report, titled ‘Methane Emissions from Open Dumpsites in India: Estimation and Mitigation Strategies’, also stresses the importance of creating robust markets for reduced-emission products generated from organic waste processing and promoting carbon credits for biomining projects. A key concern raised in the report is the unreliability and inconsistency of data related to municipal solid waste and methane emissions. To address this issue, the report suggests using the first-order decay method, which relies on field data and primary research to more precisely estimate methane emissions from landfill sites. “A pan-India study needs to be conducted on estimation of methane and other GHGs (greenhouse gases) from each of the legacy waste dumpsites and organic waste processing facilities. There is a lack of data on the quantity of methane originating from the dumpsites and other waste management-related activities. “Creating a system of comprehensive methane measurement and monitoring strategies will enable policymakers and regulators to develop data-driven, science-based targets to reduce methane emissions from the waste sector, especially from dumpsites,” the CSE said. In its report, the environmental think tank has emphasised the need to phase out the disposal of biodegradable waste in landfills and advocated robust policies to incentivise waste diversion through source separation and the development of critical infrastructure for biodegradable waste treatment. Large-scale anaerobic digestion facilities are highlighted as a necessity to keep biodegradable waste out of landfills, reducing the burden on downstream mitigation technologies. The report also highlights the need to promote carbon credits for biomining projects and mandates estimating methane potential from capped landfills and dumpsites. Currently, there is a lack of monitoring of methane flux from existing landfill facilities and fugitive gas emissions from bio-digesters and biogas storage balloons in biomethanation plants. The CSE has also advocated afforestation on reclaimed bioremediated land, emphasising its role as a carbon sequester to mitigate emissions. “Afforestation should be promoted in the reclaimed bioremediated land – recovered after biomining of legacy waste dumpsites. The green cover developed on the reclaimed land will act as a carbon sequester. “According to BUR-3 (third biennial update report) submitted by the government of India, forest and tree cover sequestered 331 million tonnes of CO2 in 2016, which is around 15 per cent of the total CO2 emissions in the country,” it said. Methane is a potent GHG with a much higher global warming potential than carbon dioxide (CO2). Its atmospheric concentration has more than doubled over the last two centuries primarily due to anthropogenic activities. Methane has a relatively short lifespan – of approximately 12 years – in the atmosphere. However, its global warming potential – the ability of the gas to trap heat in the atmosphere – is 25 times more than CO2 and it has been second only to CO2 in causing climate change during the industrial era. Landfills are the third-largest source of methane emissions globally, after oil and gas systems and agriculture. Landfill waste management worldwide accounted for an estimated 1.6 billion tonnes of CO2e (CO2 equivalent) in 2016. According to a report by the World Bank, this number is expected to reach 2.6 billion tonnes of CO2e by 2050. CO2e means the number of metric tonnes of CO2 emissions with the same global warming potential as one metric ton of another greenhouse gas, according to the United States Environmental Protection Agency. As per India’s third BUR, the country’s methane emissions in 2016 (excluding land use and land-use change and forestry) stood at 409 million tonnes CO2e. Of this, 73.96 per cent came from the agriculture sector, 14.46 per cent from the waste sector, 10.62 per cent from the energy sector and 0.96 per cent from the industrial processes and product use sector. (PTI)

India Should Phase Out Biodegradable Waste Disposal In Landfills To Check Methane Emissions: Report

A new report by the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) has urged India to conduct a nationwide study to accurately estimate methane emissions from legacy waste dumpsites and organic waste processing facilities. The report also recommended that India urgently phase out biodegradable waste disposal in landfills. The report titled 'Methane Emissions from Open Dumpsites in India: Estimation and Mitigation Strategies' also stressed the importance of creating robust markets for reduced-emission products generated from organic waste processing and promoting carbon credits for biomining projects. The unreliability and inconsistency of data related to municipal solid waste and methane emissions were the key concerns raised in the report. To address this issue, the report suggests using the first-order decay (FOD) method, which relies on field data and primary research to more precisely estimate methane emissions from landfill sites. In its report, the environmental think tank has emphasised the need to phase out the disposal of biodegradable waste in landfills and advocated for robust policies to incentivise waste diversion through source separation and the development of critical infrastructure for biodegradable waste treatment. Large-scale anaerobic digestion facilities are highlighted as a necessity to keep biodegradable waste out of landfills, reducing the burden on downstream mitigation technologies. The report also highlighted the need to promote carbon credits for biomining projects and mandates estimating methane potential from capped landfills and dumpsites. The CSE has also advocated for afforestation on reclaimed bioremediation land, emphasising its role as a carbon sequester to mitigate emissions. "Afforestation should be promoted in the reclaimed bioremediation land — recovered after biomining of legacy waste dumpsites. The green cover developed on the reclaimed land will act as a carbon sequester." "According to BUR-3 (third biennial update report) submitted by the Government of India, forest and tree cover sequestered 331 million tonnes of CO2 in 2016, which is around 15 per cent of the total CO2 emissions in the country," it said. Compared to carbon dioxide (CO2), methane is a powerful GHG with a significantly larger potential for global warming. Over the past two centuries, its atmospheric concentration has more than doubled mostly as a result of human activity. Methane only stays in the atmosphere for around 12 years, which is not very long. However, it has a 25 times greater global warming potential (GWP) than CO2, making it the second-leading contributor to climate change during the industrial period. GWP measures a gas's capacity to trap heat in the atmosphere. After oil and gas systems and agriculture, landfills are the third-largest source of methane emissions worldwide. In 2016, it was estimated that landfill waste handling produced 1.6 billion tonnes of CO2e (CO2 equivalent) globally. According to a report by the World Bank, this number is expected to reach 2.6 billion tonnes of CO2e (number of metric tonne of CO2 emissions) by 2050. Notably, as per India's third biennial update report (BUR), the country's methane emissions in 2016 (excluding land use and land-use change and forestry) stood at 409 million tonnes CO2e. Of this, 73.96 per cent came from the agriculture sector, 14.46 per cent from the waste sector, 10.62 per cent from the energy sector and 0.96 per cent from the industrial processes and product use sector.

India should phase out biodegradable waste disposal in landfills to check methane emissions: CSE report

India should conduct a nationwide study to accurately estimate methane emissions from legacy waste dumpsites and organic waste processing facilities, and urgently phase out biodegradable waste disposal in landfills, a new report by the Centre for Science and Environment has recommended. The independent think tank's report, titled "Methane Emissions from Open Dumpsites in India: Estimation and Mitigation Strategies", also stresses the importance of creating robust markets for reduced-emission products generated from organic waste processing and promoting carbon credits for biomining projects. A key concern raised in the report is the unreliability and inconsistency of data related to municipal solid waste and methane emissions. To address this issue, the report suggests using the first-order decay (FOD) method, which relies on field data and primary research to more precisely estimate methane emissions from landfill sites.

India should phase out biodegradable waste disposal in landfills to check methane emissions: CSE report

India should conduct a nationwide study to accurately estimate methane emissions from legacy waste dumpsites and organic waste processing facilities, and urgently phase out biodegradable waste disposal in landfills, a new report by the Centre for Science and Environment has recommended. The independent think tank’s report, titled “Methane Emissions from Open Dumpsites in India: Estimation and Mitigation Strategies”, also stresses the importance of creating robust markets for reduced-emission products generated from organic waste processing and promoting carbon credits for biomining projects. A key concern raised in the report is the unreliability and inconsistency of data related to municipal solid waste and methane emissions. To address this issue, the report suggests using the first-order decay (FOD) method, which relies on field data and primary research to more precisely estimate methane emissions from landfill sites. “A pan-India study needs to be conducted on estimation of methane and other GHGs (greenhouse gases) from each of the legacy waste dumpsites and organic waste processing facilities. There is a lack of data on the quantity of methane originating from the dumpsites and other waste management-related activities. “Creating a system of comprehensive methane measurement and monitoring strategies will enable policymakers and regulators to develop data-driven, science-based targets to reduce methane emissions from the waste sector, especially from dumpsites,” the CSE said. In its report, the environmental think tank has emphasised the need to phase out the disposal of biodegradable waste in landfills and advocated for robust policies to incentivise waste diversion through source separation and the development of critical infrastructure for biodegradable waste treatment. Large-scale anaerobic digestion facilities are highlighted as a necessity to keep biodegradable waste out of landfills, reducing the burden on downstream mitigation technologies. The report also highlights the need to promote carbon credits for biomining projects and mandates estimating methane potential from capped landfills and dumpsites. Currently, there is a lack of monitoring of methane flux from existing landfill facilities and fugitive gas emissions from bio-digesters and biogas storage balloons in biomethanation plants. The CSE has also advocated for afforestation on reclaimed bioremediated land, emphasising its role as a carbon sequester to mitigate emissions. “Afforestation should be promoted in the reclaimed bioremediated land — recovered after biomining of legacy waste dumpsites. The green cover developed on the reclaimed land will act as a carbon sequester. “According to BUR-3 (third biennial update report) submitted by the Government of India, forest and tree cover sequestered 331 million tonnes of CO2 in 2016, which is around 15 per cent of the total CO2 emissions in the country,” it said. Methane is a potent GHG with a much higher global warming potential than carbon dioxide (CO2). Its atmospheric concentration has more than doubled over the last two centuries primarily due to anthropogenic activities. Methane has a relatively short lifespan — of approximately 12 years — in the atmosphere. However, its global warming potential (GWP) — the ability of the gas to trap heat in the atmosphere — is 25 times more than CO2 and it has been second only to CO2 in causing climate change during the industrial era. Landfills are the third-largest source of methane emissions globally, after oil and gas systems and agriculture. Landfill waste management worldwide accounted for an estimated 1.6 billion tonnes of CO2e (CO2 equivalent) in 2016. According to a report by the World Bank, this number is expected to reach 2.6 billion tonnes of CO2e by 2050. CO2e means the number of metric tons of CO2 emissions with the same global warming potential as one metric ton of another greenhouse gas, according to the United States Environmental Protection Agency. As per India’s third biennial update report (BUR), the country’s methane emissions in 2016 (excluding land use and land-use change and forestry) stood at 409 million tonnes CO2e. Of this, 73.96 per cent came from the agriculture sector, 14.46 per cent from the waste sector, 10.62 per cent from the energy sector and 0.96 per cent from the industrial processes and product use sector.

India should phase out biodegradable waste disposal in landfills to check methane emissions: CSE report

India should conduct a nationwide study to accurately estimate methane emissions from legacy waste dumpsites and organic waste processing facilities, and urgently phase out biodegradable waste disposal in landfills, a new report by the Centre for Science and Environment has recommended. The independent think tank's report, titled 'Methane Emissions from Open Dumpsites in India: Estimation and Mitigation Strategies', also stresses the importance of creating robust markets for reduced-emission products "A pan-India study needs to be conducted on estimation of methane and other GHGs (greenhouse gases) from each of the legacy waste dumpsites and organic waste processing facilities. There is a lack of data on the quantity of methane originating from the dumpsites and other waste management-related activities." "Creating a system of comprehensive methane measurement and monitoring strategies will enable policymakers and regulators to develop data-driven, science-based targets to reduce methane emissions from the waste sector, Large-scale anaerobic digestion facilities are highlighted as a necessity to keep biodegradable waste out of landfills, reducing the burden on downstream mitigation technologies. The report also highlights the need to promote carbon credits for biomining projects and mandates estimating methane potential from capped landfills and dumpsites. Currently, there is a lack of monitoring of methane flux from existing landfill facilities and fugitive gas emissions from bio-digesters and biogas storage balloons in biomethanation plants. The CSE has also advocated for afforestation on reclaimed bioremediated land, emphasising its role as a carbon sequester to mitigate emissions. "Afforestation should be promoted in the reclaimed bioremediated land — recovered after biomining of legacy waste dumpsites. The green cover developed on the reclaimed land will act as a carbon sequester." "According to BUR-3 (third biennial update report) submitted by the Government of India, forest and tree cover sequestered 331 million tonnes of CO2 in 2016, which is around 15 per cent of the total CO2 emissions in the country," it said. Methane is a potent GHG with a much higher global warming potential than carbon dioxide (CO2). Its atmospheric concentration has more than doubled over the last two centuries primarily due to anthropogenic activities. Methane has a relatively short lifespan — of approximately 12 years — in the atmosphere. However, its global warming potential (GWP) — the ability of the gas to trap heat in the atmosphere — is 25 times more than CO2 and it has been second only to CO2 in causing climate change during the industrial era. Landfills are the third-largest source of methane emissions globally, after oil and gas systems and agriculture. Landfill waste management worldwide accounted for an estimated 1.6 billion tonnes of CO2e (CO2 equivalent) in 2016. According to a report by the World Bank, this number is expected to reach 2.6 billion tonnes of CO2e by 2050. CO2e means the number of metric tons of CO2 emissions with the same global warming potential as one metric ton of another greenhouse gas, according to the United States Environmental Protection Agency

India should phase out biodegradable waste disposal in landfills to check methane emissions: CSE report

India should conduct a nationwide study to accurately estimate methane emissions from legacy waste dumpsites and organic waste processing facilities, and urgently phase out biodegradable waste disposal in landfills, a new report by the Centre for Science and Environment has recommended. The independent think tank’s report, titled “Methane Emissions from Open Dumpsites in India: Estimation and Mitigation Strategies”, also stresses the importance of creating robust markets for reduced-emission products generated from organic waste processing and promoting carbon credits for biomining projects. A key concern raised in the report is the unreliability and inconsistency of data related to municipal solid waste and methane emissions. To address this issue, the report suggests using the first-order decay (FOD) method, which relies on field data and primary research to more precisely estimate methane emissions from landfill sites. “A pan-India study needs to be conducted on estimation of methane and other GHGs (greenhouse gases) from each of the legacy waste dumpsites and organic waste processing facilities. There is a lack of data on the quantity of methane originating from the dumpsites and other waste management-related activities. “Creating a system of comprehensive methane measurement and monitoring strategies will enable policymakers and regulators to develop data-driven, science-based targets to reduce methane emissions from the waste sector, especially from dumpsites,” the CSE said. In its report, the environmental think tank has emphasised the need to phase out the disposal of biodegradable waste in landfills and advocated for robust policies to incentivise waste diversion through source separation and the development of critical infrastructure for biodegradable waste treatment. Large-scale anaerobic digestion facilities are highlighted as a necessity to keep biodegradable waste out of landfills, reducing the burden on downstream mitigation technologies. The report also highlights the need to promote carbon credits for biomining projects and mandates estimating methane potential from capped landfills and dumpsites. Currently, there is a lack of monitoring of methane flux from existing landfill facilities and fugitive gas emissions from bio-digesters and biogas storage balloons in biomethanation plants. The CSE has also advocated for afforestation on reclaimed bioremediated land, emphasising its role as a carbon sequester to mitigate emissions. “Afforestation should be promoted in the reclaimed bioremediated land — recovered after biomining of legacy waste dumpsites. The green cover developed on the reclaimed land will act as a carbon sequester. “According to BUR-3 (third biennial update report) submitted by the Government of India, forest and tree cover sequestered 331 million tonnes of CO2 in 2016, which is around 15 per cent of the total CO2 emissions in the country,” it said. Methane is a potent GHG with a much higher global warming potential than carbon dioxide (CO2). Its atmospheric concentration has more than doubled over the last two centuries primarily due to anthropogenic activities. Methane has a relatively short lifespan — of approximately 12 years — in the atmosphere. However, its global warming potential (GWP) — the ability of the gas to trap heat in the atmosphere — is 25 times more than CO2 and it has been second only to CO2 in causing climate change during the industrial era. Landfills are the third-largest source of methane emissions globally, after oil and gas systems and agriculture. Landfill waste management worldwide accounted for an estimated 1.6 billion tonnes of CO2e (CO2 equivalent) in 2016. According to a report by the World Bank, this number is expected to reach 2.6 billion tonnes of CO2e by 2050. CO2e means the number of metric tons of CO2 emissions with the same global warming potential as one metric ton of another greenhouse gas, according to the United States Environmental Protection Agency. As per India’s third biennial update report (BUR), the country’s methane emissions in 2016 (excluding land use and land-use change and forestry) stood at 409 million tonnes CO2e. Of this, 73.96 per cent came from the agriculture sector, 14.46 per cent from the waste sector, 10.62 per cent from the energy sector and 0.96 per cent from the industrial processes and product use sector. PTI GVS DIV DIV

India should phase out biodegradable waste disposal to check methane emissions: CSE

India should conduct a nationwide study to accurately estimate methane emissions from legacy waste dumpsites and organic waste processing facilities, and urgently phase out biodegradable waste disposal in landfills, a new report by the Centre for Science and Environment has recommended. The independent think tank's report, titled "Methane Emissions from Open Dumpsites in India: Estimation and Mitigation Strategies", also stresses the importance of creating robust markets for reduced-emission products generated from organic waste processing and promoting carbon credits for biomining projects. A key concern raised in the report is the unreliability and inconsistency of data related to municipal solid waste and methane emissions. To address this issue, the report suggests using the first-order decay (FOD) method, which relies on field data and primary research to more precisely estimate methane emissions from landfill sites. "A pan-India study needs to be conducted on estimation of methane and other GHGs (greenhouse gases) from each of the legacy waste dumpsites and organic waste processing facilities. There is a lack of data on the quantity of methane originating from the dumpsites and other waste management-related activities. "Creating a system of comprehensive methane measurement and monitoring strategies will enable policymakers and regulators to develop data-driven, science-based targets to reduce methane emissions from the waste sector, especially from dumpsites," the CSE said. In its report, the environmental think tank has emphasised the need to phase out the disposal of biodegradable waste in landfills and advocated for robust policies to incentivise waste diversion through source separation and the development of critical infrastructure for biodegradable waste treatment. Large-scale anaerobic digestion facilities are highlighted as a necessity to keep biodegradable waste out of landfills, reducing the burden on downstream mitigation technologies. The report also highlights the need to promote carbon credits for biomining projects and mandates estimating methane potential from capped landfills and dumpsites. Currently, there is a lack of monitoring of methane flux from existing landfill facilities and fugitive gas emissions from bio-digesters and biogas storage balloons in biomethanation plants. The CSE has also advocated for afforestation on reclaimed bioremediated land, emphasising its role as a carbon sequester to mitigate emissions. "Afforestation should be promoted in the reclaimed bioremediated land — recovered after biomining of legacy waste dumpsites. The green cover developed on the reclaimed land will act as a carbon sequester. "According to BUR-3 (third biennial update report) submitted by the Government of India, forest and tree cover sequestered 331 million tonnes of CO2 in 2016, which is around 15 per cent of the total CO2 emissions in the country," it said. Methane is a potent GHG with a much higher global warming potential than carbon dioxide (CO2). Its atmospheric concentration has more than doubled over the last two centuries primarily due to anthropogenic activities. Methane has a relatively short lifespan — of approximately 12 years — in the atmosphere. However, its global warming potential (GWP) — the ability of the gas to trap heat in the atmosphere — is 25 times more than CO2 and it has been second only to CO2 in causing climate change during the industrial era. Landfills are the third-largest source of methane emissions globally, after oil and gas systems and agriculture. Landfill waste management worldwide accounted for an estimated 1.6 billion tonnes of CO2e (CO2 equivalent) in 2016. According to a report by the World Bank, this number is expected to reach 2.6 billion tonnes of CO2e by 2050. CO2e means the number of metric tons of CO2 emissions with the same global warming potential as one metric ton of another greenhouse gas, according to the United States Environmental Protection Agency. As per India's third biennial update report (BUR), the country's methane emissions in 2016 (excluding land use and land-use change and forestry) stood at 409 million tonnes CO2e. Of this, 73.96 per cent came from the agriculture sector, 14.46 per cent from the waste sector, 10.62 per cent from the energy sector and 0.96 per cent from the industrial processes and product use sector.

As winter approaches, experts point to gaps in the system for monitoring rising air pollution delhi news GeoTv News

With winter approaching — and a sharp rise in air pollution that comes with it — does the National Capital Region have enough equipment to measure the extent of its pollution problem? The Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) list of continuous monitoring stations of ambient air quality in Delhi-NCR shows a total of 80 stations in the national capital region. Half of these stations, i.e. 40, are in Delhi alone. Of these 80 stations in the National Capital Region, nine were found inactive on Sunday, according to the CPCB list. The inactive stations include five out of 40 stations in Delhi, one out of four stations each in Gurgaon and Noida, and the only stations installed in Hapur and Baghpat. The districts of Bahadurgarh, Sonipat, Karnal, Panipat, Bhiwadi and Jind (in Haryana), and Bulandshahr and Muzaffarnagar (in UP) have only one station each. Ghaziabad has four such stations while Greater Noida has two. “As far as Delhi is concerned, we don’t need to add more there,” said Anumita Roychowdhury of the Center for Science and Environment. “But the larger NCR has a lot of data shadow areas. It is only in the last few years that we have started to see the network expanding into the National Capital Region. This requires some justification.” NCR requires more monitors representing different land uses, such as industrial or residential areas. The area of ​​influence of a single analyzer is unknown, said Dipankar Saha, former head of the CPCB’s air laboratory. If it is placed in an industrial area, at a traffic intersection, or in a residential area, it reflects this. The goal is to improve air quality, and our regulatory goal should be to reduce the toxicity level of pollutants. Therefore, measuring particles is not sufficient. “Manual monitoring is necessary so that toxicity levels can be determined. At manual stations, particles collected on filter paper are analyzed to determine the mineral and chemical composition… and what they contain.” As part of its policy to reduce air pollution in the National Capital Region, released last year, the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) said a plan for the air quality monitoring network in the National Capital Region should be developed “based on revised criteria (based on land use, density, Population, urban to regional scale, etc.). He stated that for NCR areas, the CPCB and State Pollution Control Boards have to implement a plan for installation of identified new monitoring stations or those to be relocated. Fifty per cent of these new stations are to be set up Determined by next December, and the rest by the end of next year.

As winter nears, experts flag gaps in system monitoring air pollution spike

With the winter – and the accompanying air pollution spike — around the corner, does the National Capital Region have enough devices to measure the extent of its pollution problem? The Central Pollution Control Board’s (CPCB) list of Continuous Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations in Delhi-NCR shows a total of 80 stations in the National Capital Region. Of these, half, that is 40 stations, are in Delhi alone. Of these 80 stations in the NCR, nine were found inactive on Sunday, going by the CPCB’s list. The inactive stations include five of the 40 stations in Delhi, one out of four stations each in Gurgaon and Noida, and the only stations that have been installed in Hapur and Baghpat. The districts of Bahadurgarh, Sonipat, Karnal, Panipat, Bhiwadi and Jind (in Haryana), and Bulandshahr and Muzaffarnagar (in UP) have only a single station each. Ghaziabad has four such stations while Greater Noida two. Anumita Roychowdhury at the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) said, “As far as Delhi is concerned, we don’t need to add more there. But the larger NCR has a lot of data shadow areas. It is only in the last few years that we have started seeing the expansion of the grid in the NCR. That requires some rationalisation. NCR requires more monitors representative of various land uses, such as industrial or residential areas.” Dipankar Saha, former head of CPCB’s air laboratory, said, “The zone of influence of a single analyzer is not known. If it is placed in an industrial area, or at a traffic junction, or a residential area, it reflects that. The aim is to improve the quality of air, and our regulatory aim should be to reduce the toxicity level of the pollutants. For that, measuring particulate matter is not sufficient.” “Manual monitoring is necessary so that toxicity levels can be determined. In manual stations, particulate matter collected on filter paper is analysed to determine metallic and chemical composition…what it contains.” As part of its policy to curb air pollution in the NCR, released last year, the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) said that a plan needs to be developed for air quality monitoring network in the NCR “based on a revised criteria (based on land-use, population density, urban to regional scale, etc)”. It stated that for NCR districts, the CPCB and State Pollution Control Boards need to implement a plan for installation of identified new monitoring stations or those that are to be relocated. Fifty per cent of these identified new stations were to be set up by this December, and the remaining by end of next year.

रोगाणुरोधी प्रतिरोध की मूक महामारी: एक क्विंटुपल व्हैमी

रोगाणुरोधी प्रतिरोध (एएमआर) वैश्विक सार्वजनिक स्वास्थ्य, समकालीन स्वास्थ्य प्रणालियों और अर्थव्यवस्थाओं के लिए एक आसन्न खतरा है। जब रोगाणु जीवनरक्षक दवाओं के प्रति प्रतिरोध विकसित करते हैं, तो बोझ एक शक्तिशाली क्विंटुपल झटका प्रस्तुत करता है जिसे नीति विशेषज्ञों को पहचानना चाहिए और प्रतिक्रिया देनी चाहिए। मनुष्यों, जानवरों और पौधों में दुरुपयोग और अति प्रयोग ने एंटीबायोटिक्स को अप्रभावी बना दिया है। लैंसेट की एक रिपोर्ट में कहा गया है कि एएमआर सीधे तौर पर कम से कम 1.27 मिलियन मौतों के लिए जिम्मेदार था और 2019 में वैश्विक स्तर पर लगभग पांच मिलियन मौतों के लिए अप्रत्यक्ष रूप से जिम्मेदार था। निम्न और मध्यम आय वाले देशों (एलएमआईसी) पर मौतों का बोझ असंगत रूप से अधिक है। मृत्यु दर के अलावा, बढ़ते एएमआर के संभावित प्रभावों में कम प्रभावी उपचार विकल्प, उच्च रुग्णता, अधिक महंगे उपचार और काम से दिनों की अधिक हानि शामिल है। समय के साथ एएमआर के विकास पथ पर अनिश्चितताएं, एंटीबायोटिक उपयोग और एएमआर के बीच कार्यात्मक संबंध, और एएमआर के लिए सीधे जिम्मेदार रुग्णता/मृत्यु दर (अन्य अंतर्निहित कारणों के विपरीत) इस मुद्दे को और अधिक विवादास्पद बनाते हैं। (2) रुकी हुई खोज हालाँकि नवीन एंटीबायोटिक दवाओं की खोज 1950 और 1970 के दशक के बीच चरम पर थी, लेकिन 1980 के दशक से इसमें स्थिरता आ गई है। पिछले तीन दशकों में बाज़ार में लाई गई एंटीबायोटिक्स पहले खोजी गई दवाओं का ही संशोधन हैं। ये बढ़ती अपूर्ण आवश्यकताओं और प्रतिरोध को पूरा करने के लिए अपर्याप्त हैं। (3) सीमित पहुंच एलएमआईसी के पास नए और प्रभावी एंटीबायोटिक दवाओं तक सीमित पहुंच है जो मौजूदा वर्गों के प्रकार हैं। उदाहरण के लिए, 2000 और 2018 के बीच वैश्विक एंटीबायोटिक खपत दर 46 प्रतिशत बढ़ गई है, जो प्रति 1000 जनसंख्या प्रति दिन 9.8 से 14.3 परिभाषित दैनिक खुराक (डीडीडी) तक है। इसके विपरीत, उपभोग दरों में देशों के बीच अंतर दस गुना बढ़ गया है, जो प्रतिदिन प्रति 1000 जनसंख्या पर 5 डीडीडी से लेकर 45.9 डीडीडी तक है। क्लिनिकल इंफेक्शियस डिजीज जर्नल में प्रकाशित एक अध्ययन के अनुसार, 14 में से 11 देशों के पास 2010-19 के बीच विकसित अठारह नए जीवाणुरोधी पदार्थों में से आधे से भी कम तक पहुंच है। (4) बाज़ार की विफलता एक महत्वपूर्ण समस्या 'बिल्कुल-परफेक्ट' एंटीबायोटिक बाज़ार है। एएमआर के विकास और प्रसार को प्रोत्साहित करने या कम करने वाली स्थितियाँ पशु चिकित्सकों और किसानों, डॉक्टरों और रोगियों, उद्योग और सरकारों आदि द्वारा तय किए गए विकल्पों से प्रेरित होती हैं, जो कि एंटीबायोटिक्स का उत्पादन, खरीद और उपयोग करना है। विकल्प, बदले में, बाज़ारों द्वारा निर्धारित होते हैं जो इस बात को सुदृढ़ करते हैं कि क्या, क्या और कितना - एक निर्माता एंटीबायोटिक्स उत्पादन में निवेश कर सकता है और वह कीमत जो उपभोक्ता चुकाएगा। हालाँकि, एंटीबायोटिक्स का बाज़ार दो ताकतों से काफी प्रभावित है। सबसे पहले, एंटीबायोटिक दवाओं के 'सार्वजनिक हित' गुण खपत और वितरण को प्रभावित करते हैं, जिसके परिणामस्वरूप एंटीबायोटिक खपत या उत्पादन का सामाजिक रूप से इष्टतम स्तर कम होता है। दूसरा, एंटीबायोटिक के सेवन से नकारात्मक बाहरी प्रभाव उत्पन्न होते हैं, जैसे कि भविष्य के रोगियों पर प्रतिकूल बाहरी प्रभाव, जिन्हें एंटीबायोटिक दवाओं की आवश्यकता हो सकती है और मोटे तौर पर स्वास्थ्य देखभाल प्रणालियों पर प्रतिकूल प्रभाव पड़ सकता है, जो उपभोग के निर्णय में शामिल नहीं हैं। इन दोनों में से किसी भी मामले में, यदि इसे अपने हाल पर छोड़ दिया जाए, तो बाज़ार 'विफल' हो जाएगा और सामाजिक रूप से इष्टतम परिणाम नहीं मिलेंगे। यह न केवल आर्थिक दक्षता को कमजोर करेगा बल्कि एंटीबायोटिक दवाओं तक पहुंच और एएमआर के प्रभाव के संदर्भ में वितरणात्मक न्याय को भी अक्षम कर देगा। (5) अनुसंधान एवं विकास क्षेत्र से बड़े पैमाने पर पलायन यह भी दिलचस्प है कि एंटी-बैक्टीरियल एजेंट विकास में लगे फार्मा खिलाड़ी मुख्य रूप से छोटी कंपनियां हैं जिनकी वैश्विक स्तर पर नई एंटीबायोटिक खोजों में लगभग 80 प्रतिशत हिस्सेदारी है। इसके विपरीत, बड़ी कंपनियों और गैर-लाभकारी संस्थानों/विश्वविद्यालयों के पास क्रमशः 12 प्रतिशत और 08 प्रतिशत की मामूली हिस्सेदारी है। कई बड़ी दवा कंपनियों ने एंटीबायोटिक अनुसंधान और विकास (आरएंडडी) बंद कर दिया है। बड़ी कंपनियों द्वारा दिया गया एक तर्क यह है कि एंटीबायोटिक विकास का लागत-लाभ अनुपात अन्य लाभदायक दवाओं की तुलना में आर्थिक रूप से प्रतिकूल है। इसके अलावा, एंटीबायोटिक्स सस्ती हैं, कम मात्रा में बिकती हैं, और संक्रमण और प्रकोप की छिटपुट प्रकृति के कारण अप्रत्याशित हैं। इसलिए, एंटीबायोटिक विकास में उच्च जोखिम, कम-रिटर्न प्रस्ताव की आड़ में, बड़ी फार्मा कंपनियां अन्य दवाओं के माध्यम से मुनाफा कमाना जारी रखती हैं। सेंटर फॉर साइंस एंड एनवायरनमेंट (सीएसई) के एक अध्ययन से पता चलता है कि दुनिया की 15 बड़ी फार्मा कंपनियों में से 11 के पास अपनी पाइपलाइन में एंटीबायोटिक्स नहीं हैं। इन 15 विशाल कंपनियों की क्लिनिकल पाइपलाइन में 1007 अणुओं में से केवल 13 ही जीवाणुरोधी एजेंट हैं। यह कैंसर के लिए विकसित 411 एजेंटों, इम्यूनोलॉजी, एलर्जी, सूजन, या श्वसन रोगों के लिए 150, और कार्डियोलॉजी, चयापचय, या गुर्दे की बीमारी क्षेत्रों के लिए 84 एजेंटों के साथ बिल्कुल विपरीत है। उसी उच्च-जोखिम, निम्न-रेटू से जा रहे हैं

The Silent Epidemic of Antimicrobial Resistance: A Quintuple Whammy

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an imminent threat to global public health, contemporary health systems, and economies. When microbes evolve resistance to lifesaving drugs, the burden presents a powerful quintuple whammy that policy experts must recognize and respond to. (1) Antibiotics becoming ineffective The misuse and overuse in humans, animals, and plants have rendered antibiotics ineffective. A report by Lancet states that AMR was directly responsible for at least 1.27 million deaths and indirectly associated with nearly five million deaths globally in 2019. The burden of fatalities is disproportionately more on low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Besides mortality, the potential impacts of rising AMR include fewer effective treatment options, higher morbidity, more costly treatments, and higher loss of person days from work. Uncertainties over the growth path of AMR over time, the functional relationship between antibiotic use and AMR, and morbidity/mortality directly attributable to AMR (in contrast to other underlying causes) make this issue furthermore contentious. (2) Stagnant discovery Although the discovery of novel antibiotics peaked between the 1950s and the 1970s, it has stagnated since the 1980s. The antibiotics brought to the market in the past three decades are modifications of previously discovered drugs. These are inadequate to serve the growing unmet requirements and resistance. The LMICs have limited access to new and effective antibiotics that are variants of existing classes. For instance, the global antibiotics consumption rate between 2000 and 2018 has shot up 46 percent, from 9.8 to 14.3 defined daily doses (DDD) per 1000 population per day. In contrast, the variation between countries in consumption rates has risen ten-fold, ranging from as low as 5 DDD to 45.9 DDD per 1000 population per day. As per a study published in the Clinical Infectious Diseases Journal, 11 out of 14 countries have access to less than half of eighteen new antibacterials developed between 2010-19. (4) Market Failure A significant problem is the ‘far-from-perfect’ antibiotic market. The conditions encouraging or extenuating the development and spread of AMR are driven by choices made by veterinarians and farmers, doctors and patients, industry and governments, etc., concerning what antibiotics to produce, purchase, and use. Choices, in turn, are determined by the markets that reinforce whether, what, and how much – a producer may invest in antibiotics production and the price that the consumer will pay. However, the market for antibiotics is heavily affected by two forces. First, the ‘public good’ attributes of antibiotics affect consumption and distribution, resulting in less than socially optimal levels of either antibiotic consumption or production. Second, there are negative externalities arising from antibiotic consumption, such as adverse external effects on future patients who may require antibiotics and broadly on the health care systems that are not included in the decision to consume. In either of these two cases, left on its own, the markets will ‘fail’ and not result in socially optimum outcomes. This will not only dilute economic efficiency but also incapacitate distributional justice in terms of access to antibiotics and the impact of AMR. (5) Mass Exodus from R&D space It is also intriguing that the pharma players engaged in anti-bacterial agent development are predominately small firms with nearly 80 percent share in the new antibiotic discoveries globally. In contrast, large firms and non-profit institutes/universities hold minuscule shares of 12 percent and 08 percent, respectively. Many large pharmaceutical companies have discontinued antibiotic research and development (R&D). One argument peddled by large companies is that the cost-benefit ratio of antibiotic development is economically unfavorable compared to other profitable drugs. In addition, antibiotics are inexpensive, sell in a lower volume, and are unpredictable due to the sporadic nature of infections and outbreaks. So, under the guise of high-risk, low-return proposition in antibiotic development, big pharma companies continue to rack up profits through other drugs. A study by the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) finds that 11 of the world’s 15 big pharma companies do not have antibiotics in their pipeline. Only 13 out of the 1007 molecules in the clinical pipeline of these 15 giant companies are antibacterial agents. This contrasts sharply with 411 agents developed for cancer, 150 for immunology, allergy, inflammation, or respiratory diseases, and 84 for cardiology, metabolism, or renal disease areas. Going by the same high-risk, low-return proposition, it is just a matter of time before small companies will face diminishing values and eventually pull out in trying to pick up the slack. Fixing the Market: The Way Forward A combination of ‘push’ and ‘pull’ incentives is required to overcome market failure and create a robust antibiotic R&D ecosystem. The push incentive, such as support in innovation and R&D funds for new antibiotics regardless of success in market access, will tend to reduce the developers’ costs and risks through financial, tax, and technical inducements. An example could be funders' pooling and sharing of failure risks, including governments and private firms. On the other hand, the pull incentive, such as rewards for new, scientifically viable, and market-relevant antibiotics, will reduce the risk of insufficient future revenues by utilizing mechanisms and ensuring developers’ financial viability. While the governments will have to play a more significant role, their efforts must be supplemented by adequate private-sector participation, especially in LMICs. Moreover, it is critical to consider all costs and benefits of antimicrobial use, including those arising from externalities, to inform policymakers on strategies to contain the impact of AMR. To conclude, antibiotics are a ‘global’ public good. Their preservation and development for future generations through ‘sustainable and equitable access’ should be at the forefront of public policy-making to avert a dire health emergency.