Cse In News

Dirty Underside of Green Transition

Last month when the global leaders were busy in deliberating on various aspects of carbon emission and negotiating on the quantum of climate finance required to mitigate global warming at the 30th session of the United Nations Climate Change Conference (CoP30) held in Brazil 2025, a few alarming reports have flagged that a wide array of non-carbon pollutants and environmental threats demand urgent focus to protect human health and ecosystems. In November, Indian newspapers reported that a very high level of uranium had been found in the breast milk of women in six districts of Bihar, indicating a significant threat to infants’ health. The samples tested had uranium concentrations of up to 5.25 micrograms per litre (µg / L), and significant contamination was noted in every sample. There is no permissible limit or benchmark specified for uranium concentration in breast milk. Last year, scientists discovered lead in breast milk samples and found arsenic some years earlier. As winter has set in, the air has been toxic in Delhi for over a month now, with the air quality index (AQI) showing a reading of over 400, which means “hazardous”. Lately, a few citizens sat in protest in front of the India Gate with placards: “We can’t breathe”, “Stop poisoning us”. An analysis of air quality by the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) showed that the level of fine pollutants has shown no improvement since 2022, indicating that pollution control measures being implemented by government agencies have not been effective. “What’s more worrying is the daily synchronised rise of PM2.5 (particulate matter 2.5, which are microscopic particles in the air with a diameter of 2.5 micrometres or smaller) and other toxic gases such as nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and carbon monoxide (CO), creating a toxic cocktail that has gone unnoticed”. Recent studies have identified severe air pollution hotspots and air sheds in cities and districts across Assam, Bihar, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Tripura, Rajasthan, and West Bengal. On November 20, Malaysia suspended operations at a rare earth site and two tin mines in western Perak state following an investigation into complaints that a stretch of Perak River, the second-longest on the Malaysian peninsula, had turned bright blue. Greenpeace called for an investigation to determine what had caused a river in Malaysia near rare earths and tin mines to turn bright blue. Rising demand for ‘critical minerals’ for the manufacture of new technology, considered ‘green and sustainable’, is creating a new form of climate colonialism in the 21st century, as mining of these minerals is highly polluting. Commenting on the hazardous mining of cobalt and copper in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Amnesty International observed: ‘Decarbonising the global economy is leading to further human rights violations’. China has emerged as a major player and also a major polluter in the global critical mineral market. The vital transition from fossil fuels into renewable energy is being captured by super-rich polluters – individuals, companies and countries – reproducing colonial patterns that are entrenching inequalities and fuelling human rights violations, says Oxfam’s new report “Unjust Transition: Reclaiming the Energy Future from Climate Colonialism”, published in September 2025. Although Global South countries hold roughly 70 per cent of transition minerals reserves, the majority of the investments in renewable energy are concentrated in the Global North (50 per cent) and China (29 per cent) – with those profits largely falling into the hands of the richest 1 per cent. Critical minerals are those non-fuel resources that are essential to countries’ economies or development. Critical minerals include copper, lithium, nickel, cobalt, graphite and rare earth elements. These are used widely in clean energy technologies, such as wind turbines, solar panels, EV batteries and motors, as well as in energy transmission infrastructure like power lines. Additional minerals important for the energy transition include aluminium, manganese, silicon and silver, among others. The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that if governments are to meet their announced energy and climate pledges, critical mineral demand could more than double from 2022 levels by 2030 and quadruple by 2050. Extraction and processing of critical minerals are highly concentrated. For example, in 2023, Indonesia held 42 per cent of global nickel reserves and 54 per cent of global nickel production, while the Democratic Republic of Congo held 55 per cent of global cobalt reserves and 74 per cent of global cobalt production. Once mined, the majority of these minerals are shipped to China for processing before they can be applied in end uses. China processes more than half of the world’s lithium, two-thirds of its cobalt, one-third of its nickel and nearly all rare earth elements. Rare earth elements are a subset of critical minerals that includes 17 elements used extensively in clean energy systems and other advanced technologies. These are critical in electric vehicles, renewable energy, military applications and high-tech industries. Rare earth production is also on the rise. In 2024, production jumped to 3,90,000 metric tons worldwide – a threefold rise from 1,32,000 metric tons in 2017. China is the world’s largest producer of rare earths. In 2024, 70 per cent of US rare earths imports originated from China. While the United States is the second-largest producer of rare earths, it trails China significantly. The largest rare earth mining company in the world is China Northern Rare Earth High-Tech, which owns the prolific Bayan Obo rare earth mining complex in Inner Mongolia. A steep rise in the global demand for critical minerals is driving the toxic pollution of some of Asia’s most important rivers, like the Mekong, a thriving ecosystem that meanders through six countries, threatening the health and livelihoods of tens of millions of people living along the Mekong and its tributaries. Those who drink, bathe and fish in the waters every day get exposed to deadly toxins from hundreds of unregulated mines in the region, many of which are located in war-torn, lawless areas of Myanmar. Stimson Center has mapped out on a “massive scale” more than 2,400 sites, many of them unregulated mines across mainland Southeast Asia, that could be releasing dangerous pollutants such as cyanide, mercury, arsenic, and other heavy metals directly into the region’s rivers. Copper and cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of Congo has devastated the ecosystem and compelled the poor miners to work in slave-like conditions. The same story is repeated in other mining hubs of Asia, Africa and Latin America. As in the previous centuries, climate colonialism continues in the name of ‘green technology and sustainable development’. Views expressed are personal. The writer is a professor of Business Administration who primarily writes on political economy, global trade, and sustainable development

Pollution in Beijing was worse than in Delhi:How did China bring AQI below 30; what's stopping India from doing the same?

Two hours before publishing this article, we checked the live list of the world’s 50 most polluted cities. Out of 50, 47 cities are in India. In almost all areas of Delhi-NCR, the AQI has crossed 400. This falls under the hazardous category, meaning the final and most dangerous level. Meanwhile, the Chinese Embassy spokesperson in Delhi, Yu Jing, explained how China cleaned the air of its capital and once most polluted city, Beijing. She also offered help to India in reducing pollution. So how did China remove pollution from its cities, and can India not clean its air by adopting the same model? We will find out in today’s Explainer… Why has the air in Delhi-NCR become so bad? For the past one week, Delhi’s average Air Quality Index (AQI) has remained above 300, which falls in the severe category. This is equivalent to smoking around 82 cigarettes in a week. In many areas of Delhi-NCR, air quality is in the severe+ category, with AQI between 400 and 500. On 18 December, Delhi’s maximum AQI reached 566. In the past one month, Delhi’s AQI crossed 300 on 17 days, the most dangerous level. This is equivalent to smoking around 351 cigarettes in a month. Delhi’s pollution was also discussed in Parliament today. On 12 December, Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi had demanded a discussion. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju had assured that a discussion would be held. There are four main reasons behind Delhi’s severe air pollution… Vehicle pollution: According to last year’s report by the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), around 51% of Delhi’s pollution comes from vehicles. This includes the finest pollutant particles PM 2.5, harmful gases and dust. Smoke from chemical factories: The second major cause of Delhi’s pollution is industry. Smoke emitted from factories in and around Delhi contains particulate matter such as PM 2.5 and PM 10. Stubble burning: In neighbouring states like Punjab and Haryana, stubble is burnt between September and November after paddy harvest to prepare fields for wheat sowing. However, stubble burning in Punjab and Haryana has reduced by up to 90% between 2022 and 2025. Despite this, pollution persists in Delhi. Impact of winter: During winter, these factors become even more dangerous. Cold air has very little movement, causing pollution particles to get trapped at lower atmospheric levels. This increases pollution near the ground.

Unreliable data mask just how bad the air quality crisis is in India

A 2024 report by the Centre for Science and Environment, a New Delhi-based think tank, found that 64% of funds under the program went toward reducing dust and only 12% to reducing pollution from vehicles and less than 1% to bringing down industrial air pollution. Recent remarks about pollution from two Indian officials have increased frustration among residents who say policymakers are unwilling to acknowledge the severity of India’s air quality crisis. When Environment Minister Bhupender Yadav told Parliament earlier this month that India’s capital, New Delhi, has seen 200 days with good air quality readings, pollution experts and opposition leaders said he chose a figure that overlooked the worst pollution months. A week later, Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta said the air quality index—a measure of air pollution—was similar to a temperature reading and could be dealt with by spraying water. Crowds jeered at her at a subsequent public event, shouting “AQI” in reference to the city’s poor air quality readings. Gupta had also greenlit a controversial cloud seeding program earlier this year, saying it could produce rain that would lower pollution—despite lack of evidence that the approach would work. Residents in New Delhi and surrounding areas engulfed in toxic smog over the last few months said these are just the latest examples of officials denying the severity of air quality problems. “Instead of doing cloud seeding, I hope the government will wake up and take some real action,” said Anita, a 73-year-old New Delhi resident who goes by only one name. “It’s a shame.” Environmentalists and data experts said India’s air quality measurement standards are looser than in countries such as the United States, so moderate readings often mask dangerous pollution levels. India’s government air quality standards are also less stringent than World Health Organization guidelines. Experts said these gaps can erode public trust, even as few residents fully grasp how harmful polluted air is. Gaps in India’s air quality data India’s air quality is measured through a nationwide network of monitors and sensors, as well as satellite data. The monitors collect robust data, but there are too few of them, said Ronak Sutaria, CEO of Respirer Living, which builds machines and software for air quality monitoring. He said that the system falls short of letting citizens know how polluted the air in their neighborhoods really is. In 2019, India launched the National Clean Air Program, which set targets aiming to reduce pollution by up to 40% in 131 cities by 2026. The program has seen relative success, providing millions of dollars for monitors and water-spraying machines to reduce dust generated from vehicles plying the roads, construction activity and winds that blow desert sand into the cities. However, air pollution experts said the program has done little to reduce pollution from carbon-spewing industries or vehicle emissions, which are among the biggest sources of dirty air. Other sources include the burning of crop stubble on farms, use of wood and cow dung as cooking fuel and burning of garbage. A 2024 report by the Centre for Science and Environment, a New Delhi-based think tank, found that 64% of funds under the program went toward reducing dust and only 12% to reducing pollution from vehicles and less than 1% to bringing down industrial air pollution. “We are making huge investments in air quality monitoring. And so when we are expanding, then it also becomes an imperative that we should be focusing on the quality,” said Anumita Roychowdhury, executive director at the think tank. A public health emergency A study last year by the medical journal Lancet linked long-term exposure to polluted air to 1.5 million additional deaths every year in India, compared to a scenario where the country would have met WHO standards. Yet earlier this month, Prataprao Jadhav, India’s junior health minister, said there is no conclusive data available in the country to establish a direct correlation of death or disease exclusively to air pollution. Shweta Narayan, a campaign lead at the Global Climate and Health Alliance, said that air pollution is still not taken seriously as a public health issue. “Deaths related to air pollution are not being counted. And the reason why it’s not being counted is because there are no systematic mechanisms to do so,” Narayan said. Narayan said pollution causes long-term health problems for everyone exposed, but that it’s especially bad for pregnant women, the elderly and children. “As a consequence of exposure to air pollution, we see a lot of preterm births, miscarriages, low birth weight. Exposure at this stage has a lifelong consequence,” she said. A lack of political will Earlier this month, New Delhi residents took to the streets to protest against dirty air and demand immediate government action in a relatively rare instance of public demonstrations. “We do not know whether … citizens will be able to link air pollution to elections, but perhaps that’s where India is moving toward,” environmentalist Vimlendu Jha said in an interview. “Citizens are fed up.” Jha said authorities are not being honest about the problem and that there is a lack of political will to address the issue. “There’s more headline and image management than pollution management,” he said, adding that the high levels of pollution have been treated as normal by political leaders. “The first thing that the government needs to do is to be honest about the problem that we have,” he said. “The right diagnosis is extremely critical.” Regardless of whether policymakers act, the consequences of dirty air for the residents of India’s capital are evident. “Everyone feels the pollution. People are not able to work or even breathe,” said Satish Sharma, a 60-year-old auto rickshaw driver. Sharma said he has reduced his work hours as his health has deteriorated in the last few weeks because of the pollution. “I want to tell the government to please do something about this pollution,” he said. “Otherwise, people will move away from here.”

Delhi AQI Likely To Turn 'Severe' - When Can Air Quality Be Expected To Improve?

Shambhavi Shukla, Programme Manager at Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi, told Mint that the air quality in Delhi is likely to improve from February and March onwards. The Air Quality Index (AQI) in Delhi remained in the "very poor" category on Saturday, December 20. The AQI was recorded at 376 early Saturday, as compared to 374 recorded on Friday. Officials told news agency PTI that dense fog is likely to worsen Delhi's air quality over the weekend, despite the implementation of stringent pollution-control measures. As per the CPCB classification, an AQI between 0 and 50 is considered 'good', 51–100 'satisfactory', 101–200 'moderate', 201–300 'poor', 301–400 'very poor' and 401–500 'severe'. Meanwhile, the India Meteorological Department (IMD) issued a yellow alert for fog, predicting dense fog on Saturday, December 20. Weather officials said foggy conditions are likely to persist during early mornings in the coming days as winter intensifies. When is Delhi AQI expected to improve? Shambhavi Shukla, Programme Manager at Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi, told Mint that the air quality in Delhi is likely to improve from February and March onwards. "The air quality is not good, but better than what is happening right now," she said, adding that, as the year passes by, the monsoon comes from July-end and August onwards, "then you can see the best air quality." View full Image AQI trend from January 1, 2025, to November 30, 2025. (SAFAR)What leads to improved air quality? Shambhavi Shukla explained that when it rains, all the particles settle down. She said that, as of now, there is fog (water droplets and moisture in the air) and particulate matter (PM 10 and PM 2.5). Especially during the monsoon, when there is rain, these particulate matter settle down and "you can see less dust/particles, and it washes off the pollution from the air," Shukla said. Air pollution, foggy conditions during winter Severe air pollution and foggy conditions during winter are persistent challenges, pose significant health hazards, and disrupt daily routines worldwide. A study, titled 'Role of meteorology and air pollution on fog conditions over Delhi during the peak winter 2024', investigated the conditions favouring the prolonged fog events in Delhi during January 2024 using observations, back trajectories, and reanalysis datasets. Analysis of visibility observations revealed that foggy conditions persisted in Delhi for 46 percent of the time during the study period. The existence of three-four days of cold wave to severe cold wave conditions and the lack of passage of strong western disturbances across north and northwest India also favoured the prolonged fog formation. Besides, high relative humidity, shallow boundary layer, stable weather conditions such as the absence of significant surface winds, the existence of cold wave to severe cold wave, temperature inversion (up to 4 °C), poor ventilation, and presence of high particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) facilitated the fog formation.

Unreliable data mask just how bad the air quality crisis is in India

Recent remarks about pollution from two Indian officials have increased frustration among residents who say policymakers are unwilling to acknowledge the severity of India’s air quality crisis. When Environment Minister Bhupender Yadav told Parliament earlier this month that India’s capital, New Delhi, has seen 200 days with good air quality readings, pollution experts and opposition leaders said he chose a figure that overlooked the worst pollution months. A week later, Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta said the air quality index — a measure of air pollution — was similar to a temperature reading and could be dealt with by spraying water. Crowds jeered her at a subsequent public event, shouting “AQI” in reference to the city’s poor air quality readings. Gupta had also greenlit a controversial cloud seeding program earlier this year, saying it could produce rain that would lower pollution — despite lack of evidence that the approach would work. Residents in New Delhi and surrounding areas engulfed in toxic smog over the last few months said these are just the latest examples of officials denying the severity of air quality problems. “Instead of doing cloud seeding, I hope the government will wake up and take some real action,” said Anita, a 73-year-old New Delhi resident who goes by only one name. “It’s a shame.” Environmentalists and data experts said India’s air quality measurement standards are looser than in countries such as the United States, so moderate readings often mask dangerous pollution levels. India’s government air quality standards are also less stringent than World Health Organization guidelines. Experts said these gaps can erode public trust, even as few residents fully grasp how harmful polluted air is. Gaps in India’s air quality data India’s air quality is measured through a nationwide network of monitors and sensors, as well as satellite data. The monitors collect robust data, but there are too few of them, said Ronak Sutaria, CEO of Respirer Living, which builds machines and software for air quality monitoring. He said that the system falls short of letting citizens know how polluted the air in their neighborhoods really is. In 2019, India launched the National Clean Air Program, which set targets aiming to reduce pollution by up to 40% in 131 cities by 2026. The program has seen relative success, providing millions of dollars for monitors and water-spraying machines to reduce dust generated from vehicles plying the roads, construction activity and winds that blow desert sand into the cities. However, air pollution experts said the program has done little to reduce pollution from carbon-spewing industries or vehicle emissions, which are among the biggest sources of dirty air. Other sources include the burning of crop stubble on farms, use of wood and cow dung as cooking fuel and burning of garbage. A 2024 report by the Centre for Science and Environment, a New Delhi-based think tank, found that 64% of funds under the program went toward reducing dust and only 12% to reducing pollution from vehicles and less than 1% to bringing down industrial air pollution. “We are making huge investments in air quality monitoring. And so when we are expanding, then it also becomes an imperative that we should be focusing on the quality,” said Anumita Roychowdhury, executive director at the think tank. A public health emergency A study last year by the medical journal Lancet linked long-term exposure to polluted air to 1.5 million additional deaths every year in India, compared to a scenario where the country would have met WHO standards. Yet earlier this month, Prataprao Jadhav, India’s junior health minister, said there is no conclusive data available in the country to establish a direct correlation of death or disease exclusively to air pollution. Shweta Narayan, a campaign lead at the Global Climate and Health Alliance, said that air pollution is still not taken seriously as a public health issue. “Deaths related to air pollution are not being counted. And the reason why it’s not being counted is because there are no systematic mechanisms to do so,” Narayan said. Narayan said pollution causes long-term health problems for everyone exposed, but that it’s especially bad for pregnant women, the elderly and children. “As a consequence of exposure to air pollution, we see a lot of preterm births, miscarriages, low birth weight. Exposure at this stage has a lifelong consequence,” she said. A lack of political will Earlier this month, New Delhi residents took to the streets to protest against dirty air and demand immediate government action in a relatively rare instance of public demonstrations. “We do not know whether … citizens will be able to link air pollution to elections, but perhaps that’s where India is moving toward,” environmentalist Vimlendu Jha said in an interview. “Citizens are fed up.” Jha said authorities are not being honest about the problem and that there is a lack of political will to address the issue. “There’s more headline and image management than pollution management,” he said, adding that the high levels of pollution have been treated as normal by political leaders. “The first thing that the government needs to do is to be honest about the problem that we have,” he said. “The right diagnosis is extremely critical.” Regardless of whether policymakers act, the consequences of dirty air for the residents of India’s capital are evident. “Everyone feels the pollution. People are not able to work or even breathe,” said Satish Sharma, a 60-year-old auto rickshaw driver. Sharma said he has reduced his work hours as his health has deteriorated in the last few weeks because of the pollution. “I want to tell the government to please do something about this pollution,” he said. “Otherwise, people will move away from here.”

‘This is how we did it’: China embassy has advice for Delhi pollution; ultra-strict vehicle norms, public transport push key

NEW DELHI: How did Beijing go from being the ‘smog capital of the world' to footnotes in research papers on tackling air pollution? China has lessons for India. In a series of posts on X, spokesperson of the Chinese embassy in India, Yu Jing laid out the path that Beijing followed to drastically improve air quality. "Both China and India know the struggle with air pollution amid rapid urbanization. While the challenge remains complex, China's sustained efforts over the past decade have delivered noticeable improvements..." Jing posted. Beijing's annual PM 2.5 average in 2013 was 101.7 ug/m3. In 2024, it stood at 30.9 ug/m3. In her posts that followed, Jing spoke about the steps taken in transport and industry sectors that led to better air. "How did Beijing tackle air pollution? Step 1: Vehicle emissions control. Adopt ultra-strict regulations like China 6NI (on par with Euro 6). Phase-out retired old, high-emission vehicles. Curb car growth via license-plate lotteries and odd-even / weekday driving rules. Build one of the world's largest metro and bus networks. Accelerate the shift to electric mobility. Work with the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region on coordinated emissions cuts. Cleaner air doesn't happen overnight—but it is achievable," she said. Addressing air pollution from industry, Jing said, "Step 2: Industrial Restructuring. Shut down or remove 3000+ heavy industries. Relocating Shougang, one of China's largest steelmakers, alone cut inhalable particles by 20%. Transform vacated factories into parks, commercial zones, cultural and tech hubs. Example, the former Shougang site became the 2022 Winter Olympics venue. Relieve non-capital functions by relocating wholesale markets, logistics hubs and some educational and medical institutions. Coordinate regional integration by shifting general manufacturing to Hebei, while retaining high-value R&D and services in Beijing." These interventions are not unheard of in India. Cleaner fuel for vehicles as well as industry, a curb on growth of private vehicles and robust public transport have been part of discussions for at least a decade. According to experts, the difference is in the scale and seriousness of the action. "In China, action was not taken just in Beijing but in 26 cities and towns to tackle the problem, which is regional. The first lesson is that the actions they took were urgent, stringent, and at a large scale. They took deep to enable massive energy transition, like getting rid of coal not only in industry but also in household use. Beijing also capped the number of cars that can be sold in a year even as it created infrastructure for public transport. We will find similarities in our plans for Delhi-NCR but the scale is missing," said Anumita Roy Chaudhuri, Executive Director, Research and Advocacy, Centre For Science and Environment. She also said action in Delhi is taken only during air emergencies. "We can't have just emergency measures. The implementation of these actions has to be round-the clock," she said. Sunil Dahiya, Founder and Lead Analyst at the think tank EnviroCatalyst, said, "We already have BS6, which is equivalent to Euro 6, and the latest decision on not allowing BS VI or below vehicles in Delhi seems to be in the right direction. All the steps suggested for vehicular pollution were tried in India, but they didn't work only because there wasn't a political will." On industrial pollution, Dahiya said shifting or removing all industries to a different region might be difficult as we are dealing with the livelihood of people residing in several states. "We can instead come up with better facilities. For instance, small and medium enterprises or manufacturing units mostly use undesignated fuel and lack air pollution control devices. We can introduce better mechanisms with common pollution control devices, emission control devices, and restructuring industrial clusters," he said, adding that since 2019, no strict measures have been taken against power plants.

Why 50% WFH May Be Easier Said Than Done

For office-goers in Delhi, the 50% work-from-home directive under GRAP may have promised shorter commutes and added flexibility, but, in reality, the measure appears half-baked at best. Many employees remain confused, with some unaware that such a directive even exists, while others say they are planning to implement it or have already done so. Delhi govt on Wednesday announced that it would mandatorily enforce the order in private as well as govt offices from Dec 18. In the past month, when GRAP-III curbs was imposed, many expressed apprehension on social media. One user had posted on X: "Not all offices, only those which come under GNCTD. There are numerous offices under the Centre, which don't fall under GNCTD's purview." Another wrote, "Ye kaise decide hoga ki kaun se 50% ko bhagwan bharose chhodna hai (how will it be decided which 50% is left at the mercy of God)?" The confusion was reflected on the ground. Delhi govt employees were still waiting for official instructions. "It hasn't been implemented yet, and there is no information on when it will be. But there are chances it may begin by Thursday," said an official working at Delhi Secretariat. Meanwhile, private sector staff sent mixed signals. A govt bank official said marketing staff had been advised to work from home, but core banking operations still required employees to report to office. In large private firms, flexibility seemed easier to manage. Tushar, who worked for a London-based company with an office in Delhi, said, "Usually, our office is quite flexible. Even without an order, if we request, we can work from home. But no official communication has come to us regarding WFH under this directive." Many smaller firms did not seem to take the 50% WFH order seriously. Rohit, who runs a small advertising firm, said, "We do not have the manpower to allow work from home. We can't guarantee that staff will be diligent without supervision." Salil Bhatia, director of a financial consultant firm, said, "We haven't implemented it and have no plan to do so. As a chartered accountant firm, auditing requires client visits, and our staff lacks the resources at home to work efficiently. Moreover, there's no one to monitor or answer their queries remotely." Some, however, said they had requested employees to use public transportation. "But we have mandated masks for everyone." TOI found that only a handful of firms have gone for 50% WFH so far—most of them are already running some form of remote work. It remains to be seen how things change from Wednesday. In other cases, companies with permanent WFH staff are splitting teams according to job roles and team strength. An employee at a B2B company explained, "We have done 60-40 — while 60%, like our sales team, are out in the field, 40% who handle desk jobs are working from home after GRAP orders." Even the order itself leaves ample room for interpretation — who qualifies for WFH, what counts as essential work, and how strictly the rules will be enforced. Many offices have been left guessing, while several smaller establishments admit they cannot afford to function with staff working from home. Past GRAP orders for Delhi govt have required 50% attendance, while allowing secretaries to call in staff, creating loopholes. While the order mentions that private offices functioning within the NCT of Delhi are expected to follow the 50% rule with staggered hours and minimal movement, enforcement remains unclear. Exemptions cover hospitals, utilities, transport, enforcement and disaster services. The order also mentions "other essential services", leaving room for interpretation. For instance, the status of contractual or security staff remains unclear. Under GRAP-III, district magistrates and local bodies were tasked with ensuring compliance. An official from one of the DM offices told TOI: "After the order, we will now issue directions to the eligible parties, but yes, the onus is also on the offices themselves." Although violations under Section 5 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, are punishable under sections 15 and 16 — with fines up to Rs 1 lakh, Rs 5,000 per day for ongoing breaches or imprisonment of up to seven years — it is still uncertain who will issue the penalty. Whether compliance will be checked periodically is still too early to predict. Many employees, both in govt and private offices, say it will take a few days before clarity and actual implementation follow. Vivek Chattopadhyay, principal programme manager (clean air and sustainable mobility) at Centre for Science and Environment, said, "The purpose of this move is to reduce the number of vehicles on the road, given that they are a major source of pollution. For listed govt organisations, circulars can be sent directly, especially to the larger ones, as the responsible authorities can manage that." He added: "Many sectors are not very organised, so in practice, implementation can be difficult. It is a bit soon to check the implementation also. That said, periodic checks should be in place, and sectors must be clearly identified and guided with precise directions."

बीजिंग ने प्रदूषण को कैसे हराया? ‘गैस चैंबर’ बनती दिल्ली के लिए चीन की स्टेप-बाय-स्टेप गाइड

दिल्ली में प्रदूषण लगातार चिंता बढ़ा रहा है। नतीजन सरकार की सख्ती के बाद पूरे दिल्ली में वर्क फ्रॉम होम, बिना पीयूसी पेट्रोल न मिलने जैसी सख्त पाबंदियां लागू की गई हैं। 'गैस चैंबर' बनती दिल्ली के लिए चीन के दूतावास की प्रवक्ता यू जिंग ने स्टेप-बाय-स्टेप गाइड शेयर की है। उन्होंने बताया कि कभी दुनिया की ‘स्मॉग कैपिटल’ कहलाने वाला बीजिंग आज वायु प्रदूषण से निपटने की मिसाल है। कहा कि चीन ने बीते एक दशक में ऐसे ठोस कदम उठाए, जिनकी वजह से बीजिंग की हवा में बड़ा सुधार देखने को मिला है। चीनी अधिकारी यू जिंग ने दिल्ली और बीजिंग की तुलना की है। उनके मुताबिक वर्ष 2013 में बीजिंग में पीएम 2.5 का औसत स्तर 101.7 माइक्रोग्राम प्रति घन मीटर था, जो 2024 में घटकर 30.9 माइक्रोग्राम रह गया। उन्होंने कहा कि तेज शहरीकरण के बावजूद चीन ने लगातार प्रयास किए, जिससे हवा की गुणवत्ता में स्पष्ट सुधार संभव हो सका। प्रदूषण कम करने के क्या फॉर्मूले बताए उन्होंने आगे कहा कि बीजिंग में प्रदूषण से निपटने की पहली बड़ी रणनीति वाहन उत्सर्जन को नियंत्रित करना रही। इसके तहत यूरोप के मानकों के बराबर बेहद सख्त नियम लागू किए गए, पुराने और ज्यादा धुआं छोड़ने वाले वाहनों को सड़कों से हटाया गया। निजी गाड़ियों की संख्या नियंत्रित करने के लिए लाइसेंस प्लेट लॉटरी, ऑड-ईवन और सप्ताह के तय दिनों में वाहन चलाने जैसे नियम लागू किए गए। साथ ही मेट्रो और बस नेटवर्क का बड़े पैमाने पर विस्तार किया गया और इलेक्ट्रिक वाहनों को तेजी से बढ़ावा दिया गया। आसपास के क्षेत्रों के साथ मिलकर प्रदूषण घटाने की साझा रणनीति अपनाई गई। फैक्ट्रियों से होने वाले प्रदूषण पर भी चीन ने कड़े कदम उठाए। बीजिंग से 3,000 से अधिक भारी उद्योगों को बंद या दूसरी जगह स्थानांतरित किया गया। देश की बड़ी स्टील कंपनी शौगांग को हटाने से ही हवा में घातक कणों में करीब 20 प्रतिशत की कमी आई। खाली हुई औद्योगिक जमीन को पार्क, व्यावसायिक क्षेत्र और तकनीकी हब में बदला गया। शौगांग का पुराना परिसर 2022 के शीतकालीन ओलंपिक का प्रमुख स्थल भी बना। विशेषज्ञों की राय भारत में भी स्वच्छ ईंधन, निजी वाहनों पर नियंत्रण और मजबूत सार्वजनिक परिवहन जैसे उपायों पर लंबे समय से चर्चा होती रही है। विशेषज्ञों का कहना है कि फर्क कार्रवाई के पैमाने और गंभीरता का है। सेंटर फॉर साइंस एंड एनवायरनमेंट की विशेषज्ञ अनुमिता रॉय चौधरी के अनुसार चीन ने सिर्फ बीजिंग नहीं, बल्कि आसपास के 26 शहरों में एक साथ सख्त कदम उठाए। कोयले के उपयोग को उद्योगों के साथ-साथ घरों से भी हटाया गया और कारों की संख्या पर सख्त सीमा तय की गई। विशेषज्ञों का कहना है कि दिल्ली में अधिकतर कदम सिर्फ आपात स्थिति में उठाए जाते हैं, जबकि प्रदूषण पर नियंत्रण के लिए सालभर लगातार कार्रवाई जरूरी है। वहीं, औद्योगिक प्रदूषण को लेकर यह भी कहा गया है कि उद्योगों को पूरी तरह हटाना मुश्किल है, लेकिन बेहतर तकनीक, साझा प्रदूषण नियंत्रण व्यवस्था और सख्त निगरानी से स्थिति सुधारी जा सकती है।

Delhi Air Pollution पर बोला चीनी दूतावास, 'हमने समस्या की जड़ पर वार कर धुएं को उड़ा डाला'

एक समय दुनिया की ‘स्मॉग कैपिटल’ कहलाने वाला बीजिंग आज वायु प्रदूषण पर होने वाले शोध-पत्रों में उदाहरण के तौर पर उद्धृत किया जा रहा है। चीन ने यह बदलाव कैसे किया और उससे भारत क्या सीख सकता है, इस पर भारत में चीन के दूतावास की प्रवक्ता यू जिंग (Yu Jing) ने सोशल मीडिया प्लेटफॉर्म X पर सिलसिलेवार पोस्ट के ज़रिये रोशनी डाली है। यू जिंग ने लिखा है कि तेज़ शहरीकरण के बीच वायु प्रदूषण की चुनौती चीन और भारत, दोनों के लिए समान रही है। लेकिन बीते एक दशक में चीन ने जिस निरंतरता और कठोरता से कदम उठाए, उसके नतीजे साफ़ दिखते हैं। उन्होंने लिखा है कि आंकड़े खुद कहानी कहते हैं। वर्ष 2013 में बीजिंग में PM 2.5 का वार्षिक औसत 101.7 माइक्रोग्राम प्रति घन मीटर था, जो 2024 में घटकर 30.9 माइक्रोग्राम प्रति घन मीटर रह गया। उन्होंने बताया कि इस सुधार के पीछे परिवहन और उद्योग, इन दो बड़े मोर्चों पर निर्णायक कार्रवाई रही। परिवहन क्षेत्र में चीन ने अल्ट्रा-सख्त उत्सर्जन मानक अपनाए, जैसे ‘चाइना 6NI’, जो यूरो-6 के बराबर है। इसके तहत पुराने और ज़्यादा प्रदूषण फैलाने वाले वाहनों को चरणबद्ध तरीके से सड़कों से हटाया गया। निजी कारों की संख्या पर लगाम लगाने के लिए लाइसेंस प्लेट लॉटरी, ऑड-ईवन और सप्ताह-दिवस आधारित ड्राइविंग नियम लागू किए गए। साथ ही, दुनिया के सबसे बड़े मेट्रो और बस नेटवर्क में से एक खड़ा किया गया और इलेक्ट्रिक मोबिलिटी को तेज़ी से बढ़ावा दिया गया। साथ ही बीजिंग-तियानजिन-हेबेई क्षेत्र के साथ मिलकर क्षेत्रीय स्तर पर उत्सर्जन घटाने की रणनीति बनाई गई। उद्योगों के मामले में कदम और भी कठोर थे। 3,000 से ज़्यादा भारी उद्योगों को बंद या शहर से बाहर स्थानांतरित किया गया। चीन की सबसे बड़ी स्टील कंपनियों में से एक शौगांग (Shougang) को हटाने से ही सांस में जाने वाले कणों में 20% तक कमी आई। खाली हुई औद्योगिक ज़मीनों को पार्क, व्यावसायिक केंद्र, सांस्कृतिक और तकनीकी हब में बदला गया। यही नहीं, स्टील कंपनी शौगांग का पुराना परिसर 2022 के विंटर ओलंपिक्स का स्थल बना। देखा जाये तो भारत के विशेषज्ञ भी मानते हैं कि ऐसे उपाय भारत में भी चर्चा का हिस्सा रहे हैं, लेकिन फर्क पैमाने और राजनीतिक इच्छाशक्ति का है। सेंटर फॉर साइंस एंड एनवायरनमेंट की कार्यकारी निदेशक अनूमिता रॉय चौधरी के अनुसार, चीन में कार्रवाई सिर्फ बीजिंग तक सीमित नहीं रही, बल्कि 26 शहरों और कस्बों में एक साथ हुई। वहां कोयले से केवल उद्योगों में ही नहीं, बल्कि घरेलू उपयोग में भी बड़े पैमाने पर छुटकारा पाया गया। वहीं एनवायरोकैटेलिस्ट के संस्थापक सुनील दहिया का कहना है कि भारत में BS-6 जैसे मानक मौजूद हैं, लेकिन उन्हें सख्ती से लागू करने की राजनीतिक इच्छा कमजोर रही है। औद्योगिक प्रदूषण पर वह मानते हैं कि उद्योगों को पूरी तरह हटाना मुश्किल है, लेकिन बेहतर साझा प्रदूषण नियंत्रण ढांचे और सख्त निगरानी से स्थिति बदली जा सकती है। देखा जाये तो बीजिंग की कहानी दरअसल हवा की नहीं, इरादों की कहानी है। यह साबित करती है कि वायु प्रदूषण कोई ‘भाग्य’ नहीं, बल्कि नीति और प्राथमिकताओं का परिणाम है। सवाल तकनीक का नहीं, टालमटोल का है। भारत में हर सर्दी के साथ प्रदूषण आता है और हर सर्दी के साथ आपातकालीन उपायों का नाटक भी। कभी ऑड-ईवन, कभी स्कूल बंद, कभी निर्माण पर अस्थायी रोक और फिर सब कुछ पहले जैसा हो जाता है। यह इलाज नहीं, सिर्फ दर्द निवारक गोली है। जबकि बीजिंग ने इसके उलट किया यानि बीमारी की जड़ पर वार किया। भारत में हम अक्सर आजीविका बनाम पर्यावरण की बहस में फंस जाते हैं। लेकिन बीजिंग दिखाता है कि सही नियोजन से दोनों साथ चल सकते हैं। बीजिंग ने यह साबित कर दिया है कि अगर सत्ता सचमुच साफ हवा को प्राथमिकता बना ले, तो स्मॉग इतिहास बन सकता है। अब बारी हमारी है, क्या हम हर साल धुंध को नियति मानते रहेंगे, या एक दिन उसे फुटनोट बना देंगे? फिलहाल आज के हालात को देखें तो आपको बता दें कि केंद्रीय प्रदूषण नियंत्रण बोर्ड (सीपीसीबी) के अनुसार, राष्ट्रीय राजधानी में वायु गुणवत्ता ‘बहुत खराब’ श्रेणी में रही और वायु गुणवत्ता सूचकांक (एक्यूआई) 358 दर्ज किया गया।

Denial, deflection, dodgy data worsen India’s air crisis: ‘not able to breathe’

A 2024 report by the Centre for Science and Environment, a Delhi-based think tank, found that 64 per cent of funds under the programme went towards reducing dust and only 12 per cent to reducing pollution from vehicles and less than 1 per cent to bringing down industrial air pollution. Recent remarks about pollution from two Indian officials have increased frustration among residents who say policymakers are unwilling to acknowledge the severity of India’s air quality crisis. When Environment Minister Bhupender Yadav told parliament earlier this month that India’s capital, New Delhi, has seen 200 days with good air quality readings, pollution experts and opposition leaders said he chose a figure that overlooked the worst pollution months. A week later, Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta said the air quality index, a measure of air pollution, was similar to a temperature reading and could be dealt with by spraying water. Crowds jeered her at a subsequent public event, shouting “AQI” in reference to the city’s poor air quality readings. Gupta had also approved a controversial cloud seeding programme earlier this year, saying it could produce rain that would lower pollution – despite a lack of evidence that the approach would work. Residents in Delhi and surrounding areas engulfed in toxic smog over the last few months said these are just the latest examples of officials denying the severity of air quality problems. “Instead of doing cloud seeding, I hope the government will wake up and take some real action,” said Anita, a 73-year-old Delhi resident, who goes by only one name. “It’s a shame.” Environmentalists and data experts said India’s air quality measurement standards are looser than in countries such as the United States, so moderate readings often mask dangerous pollution levels. India’s government air quality standards are also less stringent than World Health Organization guidelines. Experts said these gaps can erode public trust, even as few residents fully grasp how harmful polluted air is.

From Delhi’s winter smog to year-round NOx: Transport policy must evolve

Every winter, the return of low wind speeds and temperature inversions in Delhi National Capital Region (NCR) reignites the familiar debate on deteriorating air quality. From 2018 to 2024, Delhi recorded poor to severe average monthly air quality on the Air Quality Index (AQI) scale every month between October and February except one. This winter is no exception: as of mid-November, Delhi ranked among the most polluted major cities according to IQAir. However, recent evidence suggests that Delhi’s air pollution crisis is no longer confined to the winter months. Public and policy attention during the colder season typically focuses on the high levels of particulate matter (PM)—microscopic particles of dust, soot, and smoke that penetrate into the lungs. However, another key transport pollutant has been in the news lately, as nitrogen dioxide (NO2) levels in Delhi have surged to three times the national safe limit and almost ten times the stricter World Health Organization guideline in several areas in November. Similar situation prevailed in the preceding years including 2023 and 2024 and the Ministry of Health and Welfare noted that higher NO2 levels in Delhi were associated with increased emergency health visits. NO2 is part of a group of gases known as nitrogen oxides (NOx) that also includes nitric oxide (NO), another major air pollutant from vehicles. NO readily transforms into harmful NO2 in the air, and this NO2 also plays a key role in the formation of ground-level ozone—a secondary pollutant that is harmful to human health and the environment (unlike stratospheric ozone, which forms the protective ozone layer). Recent data from the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB)’s submission to the National Green Tribunal (NGT) have highlighted a concerning rise in ozone pollution across Delhi NCR. Following a Centre for Science and Environment report, CPCB’s analysis of data from multiple monitoring stations revealed that Delhi NCR recorded the highest exceedances of ozone concentrations among Indian regions in 2023. Based on a 2% exceedance threshold—meaning ozone levels are above the limit for more than 2% of monitored hours—exceedances were observed at 25 of 57 locations in 2023, assessed on an 8-hour average. The situation has worsened in summer months: based on a 1-hour average, 2% exceedances were recorded at 21 locations in 2024, up from 6 locations in 2023. CPCB links this rise in ground-level ozone to complex reactions between NOx (produced by transport, power generation, industry, and other sources) and volatile organic compounds—processes that intensify in heat and sunlight, making ozone pollution a particular concern during the summer. It is worth highlighting, however, that NOx is a precursor to not just ground-level ozone but also to secondary PM—one of the multiple sources of pollution contributing to Delhi’s wintertime smog. Short-term or reactive interventions, such as bans on firecrackers, AQI-based graded response action plan measures, or even cloud seeding, can only offer momentary relief. It is time to shift focus toward long-term, structural solutions that address emissions at their root. A 2024 remote sensing study by The Real Urban Emissions (TRUE) Initiative and the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) demonstrated that India’s leapfrog from BS IV to BS VI emission norms delivered substantial real-world emission reductions. For example, average NOx and PM emissions from private cars fell by around 77% and 89%, respectively. Yet the study also identified high real-world NOx emissions among commercial fleets, even in BS VI taxis and light goods vehicles, which emitted 2.4 and 5.0 times more NOx, respectively, than private cars. While the shift to compressed natural gas (CNG) for commercial vehicles has helped reduce PM emissions, CNG commercial fleets still exhibited high real-world NOx emissions. Such gaps may stem from poor maintenance, degraded aftertreatment systems, and sustained high-load operation, among other factors. Identifying high-emitting vehicles using tools like remote sensing and taking corrective action through inspection, repair, or targeted enforcement will be crucial for addressing pollution from vehicles currently on the road. While strengthening compliance and enforcement remains critical, vehicular emissions control must shift to tackling the tailpipe pollutants through forward-looking policy design. The next step will be to advance to zero-exhaust emissions transport like electric vehicles (EVs), especially in Delhi NCR where pollution levels demand faster and deeper action than anywhere else in the country. Delhi has a progressive EV policy that has primarily relied on demand-side incentives for EV buyers and charging providers, helping EVs reach about 11% of new vehicle registrations in 2024 and around 14% as of October 2025. However, this remains well below the initial policy target of 25% of all new registrations by 2024. While fiscal incentives have been effective, scaling them up to induce mass-market adoption would require substantial financial resources. In this context, supply-side regulations, which focus on manufacturers rather than consumers, can deliver emissions reductions and help spur India’s EV manufacturing industry—all at a low cost to government. Supply-side regulations work by shaping what manufacturers produce, ensuring cleaner technologies reach the market. A recent ICCT publication examined how one kind of supply-side regulation—zero-exhaust emission vehicle (ZEV) sales requirements—can accelerate the transition to ZEVs in India. ZEV sales requirements require manufacturers to sell a rising share of zero-exhaust emission vehicles each year, encouraging investment and providing a predictable environment for developing supply chains. Monitoring compliance with ZEV mandates is also administratively simple: regulators only need to track the number of ZEVs sold each year rather than assess complex technical parameters for every vehicle as required by other types of regulations. This simplicity makes such frameworks particularly attractive for state-level or regional authorities, especially in Delhi NCR. Globally, ZEV sales requirements have also sustained ZEV market growth in markets where vehicle purchase incentives have been reduced or ended, as evidenced by data from regions like California, China, Germany, and the United Kingdom. Measures like these are not just beneficial for air quality but also for consumers, promoting continued investments in charging infrastructure and the development of more diverse and affordable model offerings. Delhi NCR needs to shift from reactive, seasonal measures to a forward-looking, data-driven strategy to reduce transport emissions. Introducing ZEV sales requirements would be one way to build on that momentum. As winter gets underway again, the question should not be how to withstand the next few months of hazardous air—but how to break a cycle that now threatens public health year-round.

Govt forms expert panel to study ground-level ozone, health impact

Union environment ministry has informed NGT that it will constitute a four-member expert panel to study ground-level ozone pollution, mitigation strategies and associated health impacts. The ministry stated that the terms of reference have been finalised. The move follows NGT taking suo motu cognisance of a TOI report titled "Oh-zone! Why this prominent pollutant in Delhi air is becoming a cause for concern," published in April last year. TOI reported that in Aug, NGT directed the ministry of environment, forest and climate change (MoEF&CC) to frame terms of reference for a proposed expert committee to study the alarming rise in ground-level ozone concentration in the capital. In a report dated Dec 16, MoEF&CC stated it finalised the terms of reference in consultation with Central Pollution Control Board and a fresh report will be prepared by the panel. "In compliance with the aforesaid directions, the answering respondent, in consultation with the CPCB, has prepared the proposed ToR for the expert committee along with the suggested list of experts/institutions," it said. The report also mentioned that the panel will examine CPCB's latest ozone report dated Dec 20, which contains updated data on ozone concentrations and its precursors in Delhi. It will define the scope of the study and assess the tentative cost before submitting its report within two months. The panel is set to include Mukesh Sharma of IIT Kanpur, KV George from CSIR-NEERI, Dilip Ganguly from IIT Delhi and Vijay Soni from IMD. According to Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), unlike primary pollutants (emitted directly from sources), ozone is not emitted directly from any source. It forms through intricate chemical reactions involving nitrogen oxides (NOx), volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and carbon monoxide — pollutants released by vehicles, power plants, factories and other combustion sources. In the presence of sunlight, these substances undergo a series of cyclic reactions that result in the formation of ozone near the ground. VOCs also have natural sources, such as vegetation, adding to the complexity, said CSE. In a report dated Jan 20, CPCB stated it analysed 178 monitoring stations across 10 cities, including 57 in Delhi-NCR, and found that the number of stations surpassing the safe standard of ozone levels increased in the summer of 2024 (April to July) compared to the corresponding period in 2023.

As North India chokes, there can be no hiding 'behind the smokescreen of farm fires anymore'

The abandonment of the India–South Africa T20 match amid thick smog on Wednesday has once again thrown a harsh spotlight on the worsening air pollution gripping large parts of north India, with real-time data and new studies pointing to a deeply entrenched winter pollution problem driven largely by local sources. On the day of the match, air quality across several north Indian cities remained firmly in the 'poor' to 'very poor' category. On Thursday noon, in Lucknow, the city-level Air Quality Index (AQI) stood at 201, categorised as 'poor', according to official monitoring data. Station-level readings revealed sharp spatial variation, with AQI touching 297 at Talkatora Industrial Area and 292 at Kendriya Vidyalaya, while relatively greener pockets like Kukrail Picnic Spot recorded lower but still elevated levels around 95. Health advisories warned that prolonged exposure at these levels could cause breathing discomfort for most people, even those without underlying respiratory illness. The conditions on the ground continue to mirror the smog blanket that ultimately forced the T20 match to be called off, raising concerns about athlete safety and spectator exposure. Toxic cocktail; old excuses don't wash anymore Environmental experts say the episode is emblematic of a larger structural crisis. A recent early-winter assessment by the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) has found that pollution levels across Delhi-NCR and increasingly in neighbouring cities have risen to dangerously high levels, despite lower farm fire contributions this season. "Delhi and NCR cannot hide behind the smokescreen of farm fires anymore," said Anumita Roychowdhury, Executive Director at CSE. "Even with a much lower contribution from stubble burning, air quality has turned very poor to severe, clearly exposing the dominance of local sources such as vehicles, industry and combustion." The CSE analysis highlights what it calls a "toxic cocktail" of pollutants during early winter, a synchronised rise in PM2.5, nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) and carbon monoxide (CO), especially during morning and evening traffic peaks. While PM2.5 remains the main driver of AQI spikes, toxic gases linked to vehicular emissions are increasingly reinforcing particulate pollution under shallow winter boundary layers. "What is worrying is that pollution control responses continue to focus disproportionately on dust control, while action on vehicles, waste burning and solid fuels remains weak," Roychowdhury added.