• Director General Office

Making trade work for climate

The world cannot dodge the question of global trade and consumption anymore Should India oppose the European Union’s (EU’s) plan for a carbon border tax — duty on imported goods like aluminium, steel, cement, and electricity from countries with less stringent greenhouse gas standards? The answer is both “yes” and “no”. Let me explain the complexity, as global trade is critically linked to GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions. The EU’s move is purported to pressure other countries to impose similar taxation and thereby reduce emissions. But the question is if this plan, which reeks of protectionism in an increasingly inequitable world, will take us towards a more cooperative world required to combat climate change. In the early 1990s, when world leaders came together to discuss and then sign the Framework Convention on Climate Change, they recognised ecological globalisation. It was understood that the emissions would add to the warming of the planet and inevitably lead to catastrophic weather changes that knew no borders. It was understood that carbon dioxide was a long-lived gas — it lasts over centuries in the atmosphere. And therefore, what was emitted, say, in the 1780s — at the start of the industrial revolution — was still in the atmosphere and would “force” the temperatures to rise. I am repeating this well-known fact to reiterate that ecological globalisation require countries to act together and to act differentially — equity was understood to be at the core of the climate change conundrum. It was not a moral question but an imperative. If rich countries emitted in the past, poor countries for their development would emit in the future. But this was also the time when the world was busy signing free-trade agreements — stitching the economies together so that global trade would be unfettered and flourish. The reason for this furious activity — expressly opposed by many in the developing world, including India — was that the already rich world was finding the cost of production too high there. It would be cheaper for its industries to set up shop in parts of the world, like in China, where labour was cheap, labour conditions were weak, and environmental safeguards could be ignored. It worked. Reduced the cost of production enabled consumption and economic growth in the rich countries. In the three decades since then, the world has changed dramatically. Today, China is the biggest exporter; it has overtaken all other countries, including the US. With economic meltdown in several countries as a result of the pandemic, its share in global trade is only increasing. It is then no surprise that China is also the world’s biggest GHG emitter — it emitted 10.35 giga-tonnes (Gt) of carbon dioxide in 2020 as compared to 5 Gt by the next top polluter, the US. In this way the rich parts of the world also “exported” their emissions to the balance sheet of “other” countries — called embedded emissions — and continued to consume goods at cheaper rates. In 2015, an individual in the US consumed 50 per cent more goods and services than in 1990. The real tragedy is that rich countries did not reduce their emissions. So even as manufacturing moved to “other” countries, their emissions, driven by the consumption of goods and electricity, continued to rise. At the same time, the emerging world — China, India, Brazil, Indonesia, Vietnam, and all the “other” world exporters — saw their emissions rise. This is why we are on the edge of the climate precipice today. The EU wants to fix this through its carbon border tax. But it is ham-handed at best — deeply divisive and flawed. The fact is that the erstwhile proponents of free trade have changed colours; protectionism is on the rise as they want to manufacture domestically, and the EU is no different. But today, it’s a different world. The former naysayers are vested in this system. They believe growth happens when they manufacture cheap and export to the world. So, how can this system be reformed through this one clumsy action? It will only add to the distrust between the old and the new producers of goods, and emissions. Then, it is also a fact that the border tax will add to the revenue of the EU — the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) estimates that at $44 per tonne, the carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) income, as it is called, will rise by $2.5 billion in the EU and fall by $5.9 billion for the exporting countries. It will further the inequity; and it won’t go far enough to change the production-consumption pattern and reduce emissions. The world cannot dodge the question of global trade and consumption anymore. It needs a carbon tax — enough to disincentivise consumption and to make production systems climate-friendly. But the monies collected from this tax, including the EU carbon border tax, should be spent in countries worst impacted by climate change. If climate change is a global problem, so must be its resolution. The EU carbon border tax is neither here nor there in the way ahead.

• Director General Office

Making trade work for climate

The world cannot dodge the question of global trade and consumption anymore Should India oppose the European Union’s (EU’s) plan for a carbon border tax — duty on imported goods like aluminium, steel, cement, and electricity from countries with less stringent greenhouse gas standards? The answer is both “yes” and “no”. Let me explain the complexity, as global trade is critically linked to GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions. The EU’s move is purported to pressure other countries to impose similar taxation and thereby reduce emissions. But the question is if this plan, which reeks of protectionism in an increasingly inequitable world, will take us towards a more cooperative world required to combat climate change. In the early 1990s, when world leaders came together to discuss and then sign the Framework Convention on Climate Change, they recognised ecological globalisation. It was understood that the emissions would add to the warming of the planet and inevitably lead to catastrophic weather changes that knew no borders. It was understood that carbon dioxide was a long-lived gas — it lasts over centuries in the atmosphere. And therefore, what was emitted, say, in the 1780s — at the start of the industrial revolution — was still in the atmosphere and would “force” the temperatures to rise. I am repeating this well-known fact to reiterate that ecological globalisation require countries to act together and to act differentially — equity was understood to be at the core of the climate change conundrum. It was not a moral question but an imperative. If rich countries emitted in the past, poor countries for their development would emit in the future. But this was also the time when the world was busy signing free-trade agreements — stitching the economies together so that global trade would be unfettered and flourish. The reason for this furious activity — expressly opposed by many in the developing world, including India — was that the already rich world was finding the cost of production too high there. It would be cheaper for its industries to set up shop in parts of the world, like in China, where labour was cheap, labour conditions were weak, and environmental safeguards could be ignored. It worked. Reduced the cost of production enabled consumption and economic growth in the rich countries. In the three decades since then, the world has changed dramatically. Today, China is the biggest exporter; it has overtaken all other countries, including the US. With economic meltdown in several countries as a result of the pandemic, its share in global trade is only increasing. It is then no surprise that China is also the world’s biggest GHG emitter — it emitted 10.35 giga-tonnes (Gt) of carbon dioxide in 2020 as compared to 5 Gt by the next top polluter, the US. In this way the rich parts of the world also “exported” their emissions to the balance sheet of “other” countries — called embedded emissions — and continued to consume goods at cheaper rates. In 2015, an individual in the US consumed 50 per cent more goods and services than in 1990. The real tragedy is that rich countries did not reduce their emissions. So even as manufacturing moved to “other” countries, their emissions, driven by the consumption of goods and electricity, continued to rise. At the same time, the emerging world — China, India, Brazil, Indonesia, Vietnam, and all the “other” world exporters — saw their emissions rise. This is why we are on the edge of the climate precipice today. The EU wants to fix this through its carbon border tax. But it is ham-handed at best — deeply divisive and flawed. The fact is that the erstwhile proponents of free trade have changed colours; protectionism is on the rise as they want to manufacture domestically, and the EU is no different. But today, it’s a different world. The former naysayers are vested in this system. They believe growth happens when they manufacture cheap and export to the world. So, how can this system be reformed through this one clumsy action? It will only add to the distrust between the old and the new producers of goods, and emissions. Then, it is also a fact that the border tax will add to the revenue of the EU — the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) estimates that at $44 per tonne, the carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) income, as it is called, will rise by $2.5 billion in the EU and fall by $5.9 billion for the exporting countries. It will further the inequity; and it won’t go far enough to change the production-consumption pattern and reduce emissions. The world cannot dodge the question of global trade and consumption anymore. It needs a carbon tax — enough to disincentivise consumption and to make production systems climate-friendly. But the monies collected from this tax, including the EU carbon border tax, should be spent in countries worst impacted by climate change. If climate change is a global problem, so must be its resolution. The EU carbon border tax is neither here nor there in the way ahead.

• Down To Earth

UP-दिल्ली और हरियाणा समेत कई राज्यों में घट रहा है वन घनत्व

नई दिल्ली [संजीव गुप्ता]। सरकारी स्तर पर हरित क्षेत्र बढ़ाने के दावे भले कितने किए जाते रहे हों, लेकिन बहुत बार पौधारोपण कागजों में ही कर दिया जाता है। शायद इसीलिए झारखंड, पंजाब, हरियाणा, मध्य प्रदेश, उत्तर प्रदेश और छत्तीसगढ़ समेत 14 राज्यों और केंद्र शासित प्रदेशों में वन घनत्व घट रहा है। इसी वजह से इन राज्यों के वन क्षेत्र में कार्बन अवशोषण क्षमता भी घट रही है। हालांकि, दिल्ली, बिहार, उत्तराखंड, जम्मू-कश्मीर एवं हिमाचल में कार्बन सोखने की क्षमता में पहले के मुकाबले इजाफा दर्ज किया गया है।यह जानकारी सामने आई है सेंटर फार साइंस एंड एन्वायरमेंट (सीएसई) की हालिया रिपोर्ट 'स्टेट आफ इंडियाज एन्वायरमेंट 2021 : इन फिगर' से। यह रिपोर्ट बताती है कि भारतीय वन लकड़ी एवं गैर लकड़ी वन उत्पाद के रूप में पारिस्थितिक सेवाएं देते हैं। कई बड़े राज्यों में ये सेवाएं घट रही हैं जो इस बात का प्रमाण है कि संसाधनों का अत्यधिक दोहन हो रहा है। वर्ष 2015-16 के मुकाबले वर्ष 2016-17 और वर्ष 2017-18 में खासतौर पर यह कमी स्पष्ट रूप से देखने को मिली है।

• Sustainable Food Systems

Maharashtra FDA finds Dabur, Patanjali, Zandu, Saffola, Himalaya and others have substandard honey

DA found out that there was adulteration of sugars like mannose, maltose, maltotriose in honey of many reputed brands. It was also found that the natural components of honey have been artificially altered. Mumbai: Maharashtra Food and Drug Administration on Monday said that the department had launched a statewide campaign to check the quality of honey. Maharashtra FDA claims that the department took 86 samples from producers, sellers and distributors of various honey producing companies for analysis. FDA seized 3480.25 kg stock of honey worth Rs 36.19 lakh because of the adulteration found by FDA. As per FDA, analysis of sugar based on NMR test of honey samples revealed adulteration of sugars like mannose, maltose, maltotriose in honey of many reputed brands. At the end of the analysis, it was also found that the natural components of honey have been artificially altered. The possibility of adverse effects on human health by consuming this type of honey cannot be ruled out. Out of these 86 samples, reports of 52 honey samples are out. In these reports it is shown that the sample of brands like Zandu, Dabur, Patanjali, Saffola, Uttarakhand Honey, Baidyanath, Dilive, Apis Himalaya, Hamdard Natural blossom, Shri Shri Tatva Baidyanath, Twigs, Twenty Four Mantra Organic, Madhupushp, Madhuban, Loose, Phondaghat, Reliance Healthy Life, Under the Mango Tree, Rasana, Organic Certified Honey, Himalaya, were found of substandard quality. FDA further added that further legal action is being taken against sellers, distributors and producers/manufacturers under the Food Safety and Standards Act in cases of substandard food articles. Before this, in December last year, the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) conducted NMR test and found that brands like Dabur, Patanjali, Zandu, Apis Himalaya failed the test.

• Down To Earth

கிராமப்புறங்களில் நிகழ்ந்த 53% கொரோனா மரணங்கள்; வசதிகளின்றி தவிக்கும் மக்கள்; விழிக்குமா இந்தியா?

கொரோனா இரண்டாவது அலையின் தாக்கம் சற்றே தணிந்துள்ளது, அவ்வளவுதான். மற்றபடி கொரோனாவின் கோரப்பிடியில் இருந்து நாம் முழுவதுமாக வெளியே வந்துவிடவில்லை. அதிலும் சரியான மருத்துவக் கட்டமைப்பு இல்லாமல் இந்திய கிராமங்களில் வாழ்கின்ற மக்கள் கொரோனா உட்பட பல நோய்களால் படும்பாடு வார்த்தைகளில் விவரிக்க இயலாது. இதற்கு எடுத்துக்காட்டாக மகாராஷ்டிராவில் உள்ள நந்துர்பர் மாவட்டத்தைச் சொல்லலாம். வடக்கு மகாராஷ்டிராவில் உள்ள நந்துர்பர் மாவட்டம் பழங்குடி மக்கள் வசிக்கும் மிகவும் பின்தங்கிய ஒரு மாவட்டம். கொரோனாவின் இரண்டாவது அலை உச்சத்தில் இருந்தபோது மகாராஷ்டிரா மாநிலத்திலேயே இந்த மாவட்டத்தில்தான் கொரோனா இறப்பு எண்ணிக்கை அதிகமாக இருந்திருக்கிறது என்கிறது `இந்தியா ஸ்பெண்ட்' செய்தி நிறுவனம். Corona test -Represenational Image Corona test -Represenational Image கறுப்புத் தோல் உடையவர்களுக்கு பல்ஸ்ஆக்ஸிமீட்டர் தவறான மதிப்பீட்டைக் காட்டுமா? Also Read கறுப்புத் தோல் உடையவர்களுக்கு பல்ஸ்ஆக்ஸிமீட்டர் தவறான மதிப்பீட்டைக் காட்டுமா? இந்த மாவட்டத்தின் உள்ளடங்கிய கிராமப்பகுதிகளில் உள்ள ஆரம்ப சுகாதார நிலையங்களில் தற்போது கொரோனா பரிசோதனைக்கான ரேப்பிட் டெஸ்டிங் கிட்கள் எதுவும் கிடையாது. அதுமட்டுமல்லாமல் கொரோனா இரண்டாவது அலையின் தாக்கம் சற்று ஓய்ந்துள்ளதால் அங்குள்ள கோவிட் கேர் மையங்களும் மூடப்பட்டுவிட்டன. இவை எல்லாவற்றுக்கும் மேலாக கொரோனா தவிர வேறு எந்தவோர் அவசர சிகிச்சைக்காகவும் ஆக்சிஜன் தேவைப்பட்டால்கூட அப்பகுதியில் வசிப்பவர்கள் மருத்துவ சிகிச்சைக்காக மைல் கணக்கில் பயணம் செய்ய வேண்டியிருக்கிறது. கடந்த மே மாதம் கொரோனா பெருந்தொற்று உச்சத்தில் இருந்தபோது ஏற்பட்ட மரணங்களில் 53% மரணங்கள் கிராமப்புறங்களில் நிகழ்ந்துள்ளன என்று அறிவியல் மற்றும் சுற்றுச்சூழலுக்கான மையம் (Centre for Science and Environment) தெரிவித்துள்ளது. மிகக் குறிப்பாகக் கிராமப்புறங்களில் உள்ள ஆரம்ப சுகாதார மையங்களில் போதுமான கட்டமைப்பு வசதிகள் இல்லை என்பதையே மேற்சொன்ன புள்ளிவிவரம் நமக்கு உணர்த்துகிறது. கொரோனாவின் மூன்றாவது அலை மெள்ள மெள்ள மேலெழும்பிக்கொண்டிருக்கும் இந்தக் காலகட்டத்தில் கிராமப்புற சுகாதாரக் கட்டமைப்புகள் எவ்விதத்தில் அமைந்துள்ளன என்பதைக் கண்டறிவதற்காக, நந்துர்பர் மாவட்டத்தின் கிராமப் பகுதிகளுக்கு `இந்தியா ஸ்பெண்ட்' பயணம் மேற்கொண்டது. மகாராஷ்டிராவின் நந்துர்பர் மாவட்டத்தின் கிராமப்புற சுகாதாரக் கட்டமைப்புகள் கொரோனா பெருந்தொற்றை எதிர்கொள்வதற்கு எவ்விதத்திலும் தயாராக இருக்கவில்லை. காலாவதியான ஊசிகள் மற்றும் மாத்திரை, மருந்துகளே அங்குள்ள ஆரம்ப சுகாதார நிலையங்களின் மருந்தகங்களில் இருக்கின்றன. கொரோனா பெருந்தொற்றைத் தவிர வழக்கமான அவசர சிகிச்சைகளுக்குத் தேவையான வசதிகளைக்கூட அங்குள்ள ஆரம்ப சுகாதார நிலையங்கள் கொண்டிருக்கவில்லை. A health worker administers the vaccine A health worker administers the vaccine AP Photo/Mahesh Kumar A `தடுப்பூசி போடுவதில் தாமதம்; இந்தியாவின் ஜிடிபி குறையும்!' - எச்சரிக்கும் IMF Also Read `தடுப்பூசி போடுவதில் தாமதம்; இந்தியாவின் ஜிடிபி குறையும்!' - எச்சரிக்கும் IMF இங்குள்ள ஆரம்ப சுகாதார நிலையங்களில் கொரோனாவைக் கண்டறிய உதவும் ரேபிட் டெஸ்டிங் பரிசோதனையைச் செய்யும் வசதிகள் இல்லை. அதுமட்டுமல்லாமல் கொரோனா பெருந்தொற்றுப் பரவலின் ஆரம்பக்காலத்தில் மாவட்ட நிர்வாகம் அங்கு கோவிட் கேர் சென்டர்களை ஏற்படுத்தியது. ஆனால், தற்போது அவற்றில் பெரும்பாலானவை மூடப்பட்டுவிட்டன. எனவே, ஏதேனும் ஒரு கொரோனா நோயாளிக்கு ஆக்சிஜன் தேவைப்பட்டால் அவர் அந்த மாவட்டத்தின் தாலுகா மருத்துவமனைக்கு அழைத்துச் செல்லப்பட வேண்டும். ஆனால், சரியான சாலை வசதிகள் இல்லாத அக்கிராமங்களில் உள்ள சுகாதார நிலையங்களில், ஆம்புலன்ஸ் சேவையும் சரியாக இருப்பதில்லை. கொரோனா படுத்தும் பாடு ஒருபுறம் என்றால், இங்குள்ள மக்கள் பாம்புக்கடியாலும் அதிக அளவில் பாதிக்கப்படுகின்றனர். கடந்த மழைக்காலத்தின்போது நந்துர்பர் மாவட்டத்தின் சம்பிபடா என்ற கிராமத்தைச் சேர்ந்த கலுபாய் வல்வி என்பவரை பாம்பு கடித்திருக்கிறது. ஆனால், அவரின் கணவர் அவரை பக்கத்திலுள்ள ஜங்தி என்கிற கிராமத்திலுள்ள ஆரம்ப சுகாதார நிலையத்துக்கு அழைத்துச் செல்லவில்லை. அதற்குப் பதிலாக 2,000 ரூபாய்க்கு டாக்ஸி ஒன்றை வாடகைக்கு அமர்த்தி இரண்டு மணி நேரம் பயணம் செய்து மோல்கி என்ற ஊரில் இருக்கும் அரசு மருத்துவமனையில் சேர்த்திருக்கிறார். அதற்குச் சில மாதங்களுக்கு முன்பு அவரின் மகளும் பாம்பு கடிக்கு ஆளாக இதேபோலவே அருகிலிருக்கும் ஆரம்ப சுகாதார நிலையத்தைத் தவிர்த்து அரசு மருத்துவமனையில் சேர்த்திருக்கிறார். நல்வாய்ப்பாக இருவரது உயிருமே காப்பாற்றப்பட்டிருக்கிறது. Snake bites Snake bites Pixabay மழைக்காலத்தின்போது நந்துர்பார் மாவட்டத்தின் கிராமப்புறப் பகுதிகளில் வாழ்கின்ற மக்கள் பாம்புக்கடியால் பாதிக்கப்படுவது இயல்பான ஒன்று எனவும், தன் ஆறு பிள்ளைகளின் பாதுகாப்பு குறித்துதான் மிகவும் கவலை அடைவதாகவும் கலுபாய் வல்வி கூறுகிறார். ``ஜங்தி ஆரம்ப சுகாதார நிலையத்தில் எந்தவிதமான அடிப்படை வசதிகளும் இல்லை. குறிப்பாக, இரவு நேரத்தில் பணியாற்றுவதற்கும் அங்கு யாரும் இல்லை. இத்தனைக்கும் இரண்டு மாதங்களுக்கு முன்புதான் இந்த ஆரம்ப சுகாதார நிலையம் புதிய கட்டடத்துக்கு மாற்றப்பட்டிருக்கிறது. ஆனால், தண்ணீர், மின்சாரம் என்று எந்தவொரு வசதியும் இல்லாமல் பெயருக்கு மட்டுமே அது இருக்கிறது. அதனால்தான் பாம்புக்கடியால் பாதிக்கப்பட்ட என் மனைவியையும் மகளையும் இங்கு கொண்டு சேர்க்காமல் மோல்கியில் உள்ள அரசு மருத்துவமனைக்குக் கொண்டு சென்றேன்” என்று வருத்தம் மேலிடப் பேசுகிறார் கலுபாய் வல்வியின் கணவர் நிம்ஜி. நந்துர்பர் மாவட்டத்தில் உள்ள மன்ட்வி என்கிற மற்றுமொரு கிராமத்திலும் பாம்புக்கடியால் பாதிக்கப்படும் மக்களின் எண்ணிக்கை அதிகம். அப்படி பாம்புக்கடியால் பாதிக்கப்படுபவர்களை அங்கிருந்து 10 கிலோமீட்டர் தொலைவிலுள்ள தட்கான் கிராமப்புற மருத்துவமனைக்கோ, 60 கிலோமீட்டர் தொலைவிலுள்ள நந்துர்பர் சிவில் மருத்துவமனைக்கோ அழைத்துச் செல்லுமாறு அங்குள்ள ஆரம்பசுகாதார நிலையமே பரிந்துரைத்துவிடுகிறது என்பதுதான் வேதனையான செய்தியே. பாம்புக்கடியால் மக்கள் பாதிக்கப்படுவது என்பது இவர்கள் சந்திக்கும் அபாயங்களில் ஒன்றுதான். இங்குள்ள பெண்களுக்கு மகப்பேறும் அத்துணை பாதுகாப்பாக இருப்பதில்லை. Pregnant women Pregnant women கொரோனா 3-ம் அலை... பயப்படத் தேவையில்லை... நம்பிக்கை தரும் ஆய்வுகள்! Also Read கொரோனா 3-ம் அலை... பயப்படத் தேவையில்லை... நம்பிக்கை தரும் ஆய்வுகள்! இங்குள்ள ஆரம்ப சுகாதார நிலையங்களில் சரியான மருத்துவ வசதிகள் இல்லாததால் வீட்டிலேயே பெண்களுக்குப் பாதுகாப்பற்ற பிரசவம் நடக்கிறது. இந்தியாவில் உள்ள ஆரம்ப சுகாதார நிலையங்களைச் சென்றடைய பெரும்பாலான இந்திய மக்கள் சராசரியாக 8 கிலோமீட்டர் வரை நடக்கின்றனர். அதிலும் மலைப்பகுதிகளில் வசிக்கும் மக்கள் இந்த 8 கிலோமீட்டரின் பல மடங்கு தூரம் வரை நடந்தே ஆரம்ப சுகாதார நிலையங்களுக்குச் செல்கின்றனர். ஆனால், இதில் மிகவும் துயரமான செய்தி என்னவென்றால் நாடு முழுக்க வெறும் 24,000 ஆரம்ப சுகாதார நிலையங்கள் மட்டுமே இருக்கின்றன என்று பொது சுகாதாரம் சார்ந்து பணியாற்றும் ஆரோக்கிய சேனா என்கிற அமைப்பின் தேசியத் தலைவர் அபிஜித் வைத்யா கூறியிருக்கிறார்.

• Director General Office

Plastic Waste Management in COVID-19: A Review

Abstract—The corporeal attributes of plastics like durability, low density, tensile strength and minimal cost, makes them useful in various sectors. Regardless of their degree of operation and utilization, plastics deteriorate the environment and thus its disposal has gained critical attention. In addition to the already existing challenges, the COVID-19 scenario has made conditions worse. This paper provides an overview of different plastic disposal policies and discusses the readjustments of these policies amidst the COVID -19 pandemic along with their potential environmental implications. This paper has also emphasized the issue of plastic waste management policies, sustainable and green plastic solutions and development of dynamic and responsive waste management system which is followed by recycling of the plastic waste. Advances in technologies and systems for the collection, sorting and reprocessing of recyclable plastics are creating new opportunities for recycling, and with the combined actions of the public, industry and governments it may be possible to divert the majority of plastic waste from landfills to recycling over the nextdecades The pandemic of 2020 has only made matters worse: the use of plastic —particularly single-use and disposable—has increased manifold,” said Sunita Narain, director general, Centre for Science and Environment (CSE).[4]

• Industrial Pollution

Odisha & Telangana pollution control boards ranked best in transparency index: Study

Odisha & Telangana pollution control boards ranked best in transparency index: Study Now allow to copy contents, please see the details at https://affairscloud.com/pollution-control-boards-of-odisha-telangana-ranked-1st-in-transparency-cse-report/

• Environment Education

As Enviro Education Tries To Keep Up With the Times, Govt Plans Stay Unclear

At present, Indian schools teach environment as an infused subject – i.e. it isn’t standalone but is ’embedded’ in all subjects. Several organisations are working to inculcate ideas about the environment and sustainable living among children. But the question remains: how far can these efforts go without the right policy? Arnav Lihantu (15) and his family have been segregating waste in their household for a year now. A year ago, Lihantu took an online audit called ‘Audit@Home’, under the Green Schools Programme (GSP) by the Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi. Through questions like “how much water is used every day”, “what happens to the food leftovers”, “is waste segregated into wet and dry”, “are there any leakages in the house”, etc., Lihantu learnt to make sense of how his household processed its waste – and then learnt to improve. Before the pandemic, Lihantu was one of many students taking the GSP audit at the Pinegrove School, Solan, Himachal Pradesh. Groups of students, guided by their teachers, surveyed the school’s use of natural resources and waste – and in return, the schools received suggestions to improve their current standing to become greener. “After the first round of GSP audit in 2019, students started separating waste at the source,” Virendra Chauhan, a science teacher at the school, said. “The colour-coded dustbins for wet and dry waste were there earlier as well, but the support staff had to segregate the waste all over again. After GSP, it was not required.” When the follow-ups became harder due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the audit was modified for students to take at home. Involving children to find solutions, instead of just talking to them about the problems, leads to greater interest, involvement and understanding, programmes like the GSP have shown. In another example, Teach for Green, an NGO in New Delhi, uses the DIY approach to promote sustainable lifestyles among children. One of its recent activities was to teach schoolgoers to make solar lamps. “Merely donating a solar lamp would not succeed – if it breaks down, they wouldn’t know how to fix it,” cofounder Ajay Kumar said. So in a three-day workshop, the Teach for Green team familiarises students with the basics of circuits and then guides them each towards a self-built lamp. The organisation primarily works with government schools in North India. But during the pandemic, when school visits and in-person workshops weren’t feasible, the NGO held online workshops for students to make paper bags, bird feeders and planters using waste items, continuing its work of ‘solving by creating’. A plastic planter made during one of Teach for Green’s workshops. Photo: Teach for Green PIN IT Members of these organisations say it’s important to catch people young to have a better chance of inculcating sustainable living practices and choices. But this doesn’t mean it’s too late for the children’s parents. For example, the Akshar Foundation in Guwahati teaches underprivileged children – but instead of monetary fees, the foundation’s school asks for the plastic waste from the students’ homes, and teaches them how to recycle it. But then if waste plastic is the fee, wouldn’t it encourage family members to buy more plastic items to be able to pay the fee? “No – we accept any amount of plastic that is consumed at homes” – high or low. “There’s no benchmark. We ask for waste plastic to be submitted to the school so that they don’t burn it back home to dispose of it,” Akshar cofounder Mazin Mukhtar said. “We teach them to reuse it.” In addition, the school’s classrooms have mud walls and bamboo roofs. And in these classrooms, the students learn to make eco-bricks out of waste plastic that are then used to build other items in the school, such as fences for the gardens. There’s also an animal shelter the students maintain. The Mumbai-based for-profit social enterprise Upcycler’s Lab makes flash cards and board games on environmental themes, using wooden dice and recycled paper. Games like ‘Sea Samurais’ and ‘Waste Warriors’ gamify the process of learning about the environment and why it’s important that we protect it. ‘My Eco Alphabet’ by Upcycler’s Lab. Photo: Upcycler’s Lab PIN IT “When the environment is usually taught to young children, it’s loaded with scientific information with a little fun element to it,” Upcycler founder Amishi Parasampuria said. She believes it’s important to introduce children to topics on sustainability early on. Such initiatives are helping spread an environmental sensibility among children, but they also remain niche attempts. Institutional education policies could give them the leg-up to have more widespread impact. At present, students in schools are taught about the environment as an infused subject – that is, environmental education isn’t a standalone subject but appears contextually in all subjects, as a part of an integrated curriculum. Before India adopted the infusion approach, the Uttarakhand Seva Nidhi Environmental Education Centre (USNEEC), Almora, was teaching children about the environment and ecological balance using the village as their laboratory. Since 1992, students in Almora have been taken on field trips for their lessons. “The students were introduced to the quality and the quantity of natural resources available in the village – how much water is available v. how much is needed, how people and the forest depend on each other for fodder and fuelwood, how to identify the species of natural resources, etc.,” Ganga Prasad Pande, an active member of USNEEC, said. After the trip, each student had to document their observations in a workbook. It was a practical and holistic way of teaching them,” Pande said. This exercise happened in addition to regular school hours. The Uttarakhand state government adopted this idea for experiential learning in 2000, using it to augment a subject it had, called “agriculture and craft”. A sheet from a workbook for a class 6 student. Image: USNEEC PIN IT And then, in 2016, Uttarakhand adopted the National Council for Education Research and Training’s infusion approach, in which the environment ceased to be a separate subject. “In chemistry, you study that fertilisers will boost crop production, and in biology you may study that fertilisers are not good for plants,” USNEEC chairman Lalid Pande said. “When you infuse ‘environment’ instead of teaching it separately, the students can get conflicting messages.” “The intention behind an integrated approach for environment education was to embed it within a child-centric and constructivist way of learning, and to not burden students with more subjects …, say, on human rights or disaster management,” Anita Rampal, a professor and former dean of the faculty of education, Delhi University, said. “Thus, at the primary level, though environmental studies integrates science, social studies and environment education, the primary textbooks in language and mathematics also consciously aim at dissolving the existing rigid boundaries within subjects to promote interconnected learning,” she added. This said, according to her, viewing environmental education as a means to a pithy end – like jobs in the green sector – could only diminish the importance of what teachers are trying to do. “If a student wants, she can choose to learn an environment-specific subject at the higher secondary level. What [we must] ensure is that these subjects are creatively developed and actually offered to students to choose from,” Rampal said. The non-governmental Centre for Environment Education Himalaya (CEE-H) and the intergovernmental Commonwealth of Learning, for example, have been offering a ‘green teacher diploma’ course to impart knowledge and skills to teachers to deal with environmental concepts in the classroom and to develop low-cost outdoor activities. Santosh Gaonkar, headmaster of Poira School, Maye Bicholim, Goa, won the National Award for Teachers in 2018 – and is a ‘green teacher diploma’ holder. “It was an extremely beneficial programme,” he said. “They took us outdoors and showed us how we can engage with children; they shared activity planning guides to help us curate interactive activities for students.” “Initiatives like these run on government cooperation and require funding, which we have been seeing very little or nothing of since 2014,” said Abdhesh Gangwar, programme director at CEE-H. It also doesn’t bode well that the new National Education Policy 2020 doesn’t include “environment education” under the relevant section (#4). It only says “curricular integration of essential subjects like environmental awareness will be done, curricular and pedagogical initiatives for environmental education will be done, and knowledge on India will include the environment.”

• Clean Air & Sustainable Mobility

Rain in excess, but Delhi yet to get any good air day this year

NEW DELHI: While Delhi may have recorded five days that were categorised as ‘good’ according to the Air Quality Index in 2020, this year, despite the lockdown and regular showers, the city is yet to record such a day. Delhi may have received more than 500mm of rainfall in July, 2.4 times the normal for the month, but that didn’t clean the air enough for it to be ‘good’. Track the pollution level in your city A ‘good’ air AQI is 50 or below. The lowest rating recorded so far in the current monsoon season is 57, which is classified as 'satisfactory'. Experts said that other sources of local emissions, as well as gaseous pollutants such as CO, O3 and NO2 could be playing a key role even when the rain settled down the PM2.5 and PM10 pollutants. Rain In Excess, But Capital Yet To Get Any Good Air Day This Year Last year, Delhi recorded five ‘good’ air quality days: one in March during the Covid lockdown, and four in August during the monsoon period.

• Down To Earth

Parties must include clean air in their poll manifestos, say anti-pollution activists

Air quality data reported across six of the nine non-attainment cities in Punjab suggests that particulate matter (PM10) concentrations were beyond safe limits on more than 50 per cent of the days in the first half of 2021. Reacting to the SAD-BSP’s 13-point agenda for the 2022 polls, members of an anti-pollution NGO have urged all political parties to feature time-bound plans to tackle air pollution and public health issues prominently in their manifestos. A group of organisations, think tanks, civil society groups have joined hands to form ‘Clean Air Punjab’. The aim of this collective is to work alongside the state authorities to help achieve clean air by ensuring all the non-attainment cities across Punjab implement the ‘Clean Air Action Plan’, said an office-bearer of the NGO. The collective has expressed its displeasure with the Akali Dal–BSP manifesto, which was released on Tuesday as it failed to address the issue of deteriorating air quality in the state. Air quality data reported across six of the nine non-attainment cities in Punjab suggests that particulate matter (PM10) concentrations were beyond safe limits on more than 50 per cent of the days in the first half of 2021. The state also recorded 41,090 deaths due to air pollution in 2019, accounting for almost 19 per cent of all deaths, revealed a study by Down to Earth and Centre for Science and Environment titled ‘State of India’s Environment 2021’. Samita Kaur, citizen activist from Innovative Farmers Group Punjab, said that despite facing its worst health crisis due to air pollution, the authorities were still not ready to accept it. “The air quality in the state has been worsening to an extent where air pollution has now become a major killer. Even during the second wave of Covid-19 lockdown, when most industries were shut, Punjab’s air quality was still a serious matter of concern,” she said, adding that the states green regions like Fazilka and Rupnagar had an air quality index (AQI) of 113 and 129 respectively, which are well beyond safe standards. We need to accept that our state is in a health emergency and there is an immediate need for an intervention and promoting actions to reduce the prevalent severe air pollution. Hence, as members of Clean Air Punjab, we want to strongly urge all political parties to make air pollution management a priority in their election manifestos and to specify time-bound measures to protect public health from the harmful impacts of air pollution,” she stated.

• Down To Earth

Air pollution can't be ignored in poll manifestos: Clean Air Punjab

Chandigarh, Aug 4: Even as the season for poll manifestos seem to have begun in Punjab with the Akali Dal-Bahujan Samaj Party releasing its initial 13-point election agenda, members of 'Clean Air Punjab', which is a network of citizens and civil society Punjab also recorded 41,090 deaths due to air pollution in 2019, accounting for nearly 19 per cent of all deaths, said a Down to Earth and Centre for Science and Environment annual study titled 'State of India's Environment 2021'.->-> View it--> https://www.newkerala.com/news/2021/110717.htm

• Sustainable Mobility

How accessible and connected is our national capital – Delhi for its residents? Not very much, says new CSE study

Unplanned, low-income areas in Delhi have very limited access to affordable and efficient public transport services. Planned and richer areas are comparatively better connected, but are still not up to the mark. If all settlements of Delhi – planned and unplanned — are not equally well connected with public transport services and are not made accessible, the capital will fail to implement fully its sustainable, low-emission forms of travel (like walking, cycling or public transport). As per the estimates of the draft Delhi Master Plan 2041 (MPD 2041), the city’s population will be 27-30 million by 2014, and 50 per cent of this increase will happen due to migration. By then, Delhi would generate 46.2 million motorised trips daily. “If such a massive load of daily motorised travel trips are not shifted to public transport to achieve the MPD 2041 target of modal split of 80:20 in favour of public and shared transport, Delhi will remain locked in pollution and carbon trap,” says CSE executive director Anumita Roychowdhury. “This requires immediate improvement in neighbourhood scale accessibility to bus and metro services and minimisation of interchanges. The expectation of MPD 2041 that 50 per cent of Delhi’s population will be within the influence zone of mass transit by 2041 and mixed-use development will encourage shift towards public transport, can be fulfilled only if neighbourhood-level design and infrastructure improve for safe and efficient access,” she adds. Study methodology This CSE study is a ground-level assessment of infrastructure for accessibility in 16 settlements in the southern part of Delhi that include neighbourhoods of varying economic status. This assessment has a special focus on the vulnerable urban poor. The settlements have been selected based on the Master Plan of Delhi 2021 (MPD21) classification of settlements that are technically classified as “planned” and “unplanned”. These diverse settlements include unauthorised colonies that have been subsequently regularised such as Tughlakabad Extension, Tigri Extension, Govindpuri, Kalkaji, Khanpur, Pooth Kalan and Khirki Extension; resettlement colonies like Garhi and Zamrudpur in East of Kailash; and slum clusters like Jawaharlal Nehru Camp in Kalkaji. There are also villages that have become part of the urban system like Shahpur Jat and Tughlakabad village. This assessment also includes planned settlements with neigbourhoods of higher income groups including East of Kailash, Kailash Colony, Greater Kailash and Chittaranjan Park. While it is challenging to quantify the differences in absolute terms, indicators have been derived from national policies, guidelines, service-level benchmarks, the Ease of Living Index of the Union Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA), and a few global indexes related to liveability and accessibility – the aim was to broadly assess the qualitative differences between settlements. This is a rapid diagnostic study of equity of access, ease and affordability of movement and what determines access in different settlements. “These indicators bring out the relative differences in local conditions related to transport, mobility patterns and connectivity, status of infrastructure and services, accessibility, and the increase in interchanges due to poor connectivity that has a bearing on journey costs,” says Anannya Das, deputy programme manager with the sustainable mobility programme at CSE. Key findings of the study Quite predictably, the planned settlements and higher income neighbourhoods perform better on most criteria compared to unplanned settlements dominated by the poor. But even planned colonies fall short of the benchmark for accessibility as provided in guidelines and standards and are deficient in public transport-oriented design. This is inciting dependence on personal vehicles in these neighbourhoods. Unplanned colonies, on the other hand, are hugely burdened with legacy problems as they have grown incrementally and without any planning support. They are already very densely built with hugely constrained infrastructure. There is barely any space left to manoeuvre as all vacant and open spaces have ceased to exist. The indicative and relative benchmarking bring out the variance as follows: Comparison of locational advantages and disadvantages of settlements shows that planned settlements are 2.8 times better placed than unplanned settlements. Planned areas have, on an average, 1.6 times more road space and 1.4 times more open qualitative spaces. On the criteria of ‘interface between settlement and the city’, planned settlements are about 1.3 times better connected than low-income unplanned settlements. Again, within the low-income settlements, planned low-income settlements have relatively better chances of being located strategically in relation to a major economic hub and important locations within a city. In unplanned low-income settlements, inter-modal transfer requirement increases the waiting time for a mode by 1.1–1.6 times. Most importantly, this increases the cost of the journey. In fact, the monthly cost of transport increases by 1.5–3.5 times. On the criterion ‘quality and affordability of access to public transport services’, planned areas have 1.5 times better access to the connecting and boarding points of public transport systems like Metro stations and pick-up and drop-off stops of buses, than unplanned areas. Planned formal public transport network is more accessible in planned settlements. Low-income unplanned colonies depend on informal and shared IPT like Grameen Sewa to access other systems and services. This adds to the cost as well as the hardships faced by these settlements as these systems do not necessarily penetrate deep due to infrastructure limitations. These modes also have huge route restrictions. On the criterion of how people move and access services and amenities inside settlement clusters, most of the settlements do not have adequate amenities and services like schools, markets, ATMs, convenience stores, pharmacies, etc. within the neighbourhood. As densely built unplanned settlements have limited land availability, and the quality of infrastructure does not comply with applicable design standards, people are forced to depend on mobility services to access several services beyond the neighbourhood. This increases (motorised) transportation requirements as the services are not within walkable distances. In fact, planned areas have 1.3 times better intra-neighbourhood accessibility than unplanned areas. On the criterion of ‘status of accessibility infrastructure within neighbourhoods’, all areas fall short of meeting the requirements of infrastructure for all street activities for safe access and connectivity. Unplanned areas are impacted more. Higher-income planned settlements have about 1.8 time more infrastructure than unplanned settlements. Streets of high-income areas are 1.7 times more walkable, IPT penetration in these areas is 1.9 times higher, and the sense of safety is 1.7 times higher. Next steps A different policy approach for retrofitting change to improve access and services will be needed in settlements. Even though several policies have emerged that have bearing on equitable urban planning including National Habitat Standards, Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Policy, Service-level Benchmarks at the Central level and Delhi Master Plan integrating several sustainability criteria, the framework for implementation is weak. This requires policy focus on local area improvement to make accessibility across settlements – both unplanned and unplanned — more efficient and affordable. Frame guidelines and mandate for improving streets and access infrastructure in both planned and unplanned low-income settlements: Need settlement-wise and neighbourhood-wise plans for improving accessibility and connectivity. Work towards a city-wide deployment of integrated and affordable public transport services that deeply penetrate and connect neighbourhoods efficiently. Integrate housing programmes with transport connectivity and accessibility requirements. Initiate data-driven action for targeted improvement in all settlements and for tracking data on geo-spatial attributes of settlements and from surveys on layouts, built-up areas, availability of open spaces, street and circulation networks, encroachments, mobility patterns, and level of public transport services. Encourage state governments and municipal corporations to create dedicated funds and institutional arrangement for local area improvements and infrastructure augmentation in the settlements.

• Clean Air & Sustainable Mobility

Need viable alternatives to stubble burning’

Govt. must step up eff orts to help farmers move away from toxic practice: experts With the Lok Sabha passing a Bill to formalise the Commission for Air Quality Management for National Capital Region and Adjoining Areas on Wednesday, experts said the government has to now speed up implementation of alternatives to stubble burning. The Centre, facing flak earlier this year from farmers protesting against the farm laws, had committed to removing a clause in the Air Commission Bill that would penalise farmers for burning stubble, an important contributor to noxious air quality. The current text of the Bill does away with this clause. Anumita Roychowdhury, head of Clean Air Programme at the Centre for Science and Environment, said it is unfair to fine farmers without giving them viable alternatives. Three solutions “If just by penalising farmers, stubble burning could be stopped, we should have been able to end it by now. We have evidence that in areas where alternatives are implemented, fire incidents have come down,” she said, The government should instead focus on alternative solutions to burning, she said. “There are three main solutions to stubble burning: in-situ treatment of stubble, ex-situ treatment, and changing cropping pattern. The last one being the deeper and more fundamental solution. For in-situ management, the government is currently giving equipment to farmers to mix the stubble back into the soil, so that they do not have to burn it, but everyone is not getting these machines. The government should ensure their availability to everyone. Similarly, in ex-situ management, some companies have started collecting stubble for their use, but we need more action on this front,” she said. Ms. Roychowdhury said farmers, especially small and marginal farmers, need support for adoption of in-situ strategies, to mulch the straw into the soil and not burn it. “Penalty without access to solutions does not work.” Polash Mukerjee, Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental advocacy group, said farmers burn stubble as other methods are expensive and they have less time before the next sowing season. “Imposing a fine is not going to work in our socio-economic conditions for curbing stubble burning. We need to focus on alternative solutions,” he said. But he said that the current development is bad in terms of deterrence to burn stubble. “Already there is economic distress and now there is no deterrence, so the farm fires could go up during this year’s harvest season,” he said.

• Down To Earth

AGRI TO ‘AGGRO’? Agitating ryots mull political party to fight Assembly poll

he writing is beginning to appear on the walls. With Punjab going to the polls next year and political parties yet to develop a road map that would propel them to the seat of power in the state, farmer unions have begun asserting themselves by continuing their siege of toll plazas to protest the three farm laws of the Centre. While the protests are mostly centred in the Malwa region of the state, especially in Sangrur and Barnala districts, they are expected to spread across the state in the next few months. The polls in Punjab are likely to held in February or March next year. The protests at the moment are being spearheaded by farmer unions under the banner of the Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) and the Bhartiya Kisan Union (Ekta-Ugrahan). Petrol pump premises belonging to a large corporate house are also being targeted. According to the Sangrur block chief of the Bharatiya Kisan Union (Ekta-Ugrahan), Gobinder Singh, the farmers will continue their protests outside the premises of the corporate houses till the central government repeals the farm laws. “When people fight for a cause they have to face some losses on other fronts. We are prepared for that. The farm laws have to be repealed,” he added. While most farm unions have still not publicly announced their desire to float a political party to jointly contest the assembly poll, some favour the idea. “We are simple farmers who have always been led either by the promises of the Congress or the Shiromani Akali Dal. But we have seen no change in our lives. It is time for us to decide our future for ourselves and not for political parties. That can only happen if we form a party and get into the assembly or parliament and raise our voices,” explained Amarjit Singh from Gadhera in Fatehgarh Sahib. Amarjit was not alone. Buta Singh from Rampura Phul is vociferous over the need for a farmer political party to raise their voices in the assembly. “I have raised the issue of our problems and that the farm laws will spell doom for the farming community in front of the political parties, but the leaders simply ignore our fears. I want the farmer unions to get united and float a political party for the next election,” he explained. While the Shiromani Akali Dal has stitched an alliance with the Bahujan Samaj Party, some farm unions have begun courting the Dalit population in the state with an eye on the assembly poll. Dalits comprise over 30 per cent of the population in Punjab and have traditionally been voting for the Congress or the Shiromani Akali Dal. Only a little over three per cent own farmlands in the state. “There will be only one political party in Punjab the day Dalits and farmers join hands. We are seriously looking at the possibility in the future. It may not materialise in the next election. But farmers will decide on who will lead the state and country,” a farm leader said requesting anonymity. ‘KISAAN’ word red herring in Rajya Sabha NEW DELHI: Like a bull charging at a red cloth, Deputy Chairman Harivansh Singh on Wednesday was on the offensive at the use of the word "Kisaan" in the Rajya Sabha by the Opposition members, who were angry at Chairman M Venkaiah Naidu agreeing in the morning to allow debates on the farmers' issues and price rise as a deal with the Government but did not put them on priority in the afternoon session. He adjourned the House for 15 minutes due to ruckus in between, but rushed through passage of three official Bills with a semblance of the debate for 10 minutes each instead of two to three hours allotted by the House business advisory committee (BAC) as announced by the Chairman. Within 75 minutes all three Bills were passed before the House was adjourned for the day. The deputy chairman cut short the Opposition members’ repeatedly on the ground that they were not speaking on the subject since they uttered the word "Kisaan" while speaking on the three Bills. —Our Bureau FPJ VIEW Quite understandably, the farmers, albeit a section of them, are thinking of launching their own political party as they have “realised” their own political party will be their “voice” in Parliament. The suicide rate in the deeply stressed farm sector accounted for 7.4% of the total suicides in the country, resulting in deaths of 5,957 farmers and 4,324 farm labourers, the NCRB said in a latest report. Over 28 farmers and farm labourers die by suicide in India every day, as per the 2021 State of India’s Environment (SoE) report — an annual brought out by Down To Earth in association with Delhi-based non-profit Centre for Science and Environment (CSE). Farmers have started realising their potential “politically”. Dalits comprise over 30% of the population in Punjab and have traditionally been voting for the Congress or the Shiromani Akali Dal. Only a little over 3% own farmlands in the state. So, it is high time, politicians should stop underestimating them and people in power should realise the strength of the farmers’ political party. —Robin Roy Oppn agrees to debate on 7 bills The daily efforts of RS chairman M Venkaiah Naidu have at last succeeded in persuading the oppn parties to debate 7 govt bills, mostly already cleared by LS. The deal was struck after the govt in turn agreed to a discus­sion on a notice by 2 Kerala MPs — CPI’s Binoy Viswam, 65, and Loktantrik Janata Dal’s MV Shre­yams Kumar, 54, for annul­ling Feb’s new IT Rules, manda­ting social media and OTT platforms to set up a grievance redressal me­ch­anism for the users and emp­owering the govt to control them. —Our Bureau Pegasus debate: Oppn parties unite in Houses Our Bureau / New Delhi Eigtheen leaders of the Opposition parties on Wednesday took a “firm and united” stand on the discussion first on Pegasus issue in both Houses of Parliament since it has the national security dimensions and then only the discussion on the farmers’ issue. In a joint statement, they also unequivocally convened that the discussion on the farmers’ issues and agitations arising from the three anti-farmers and black agri laws enacted by Parliament last September should follow the discussion on Pegasus. “It is unfortunate that the government has unleashed misleading campaign to malign the combined Opposition and blame it for the continued disruption in Parliament. The responsibility for the deadlock lies squarely at the doorsteps of the government, which remains arrogant and obdurate and refuses to accept the Opposition’s demand for an informed debate in both the Houses,” the joint statement said. In Parliament -- Parliament clears LLP amendment bill, decriminalises provisions -- BJP leader Roopa Ganguly broke down, asks TMC why not discuss in Parliament on women rape issue, murder of BJP workers in West Bengal -- LS adjourned till Thursday amid oppn protests; 2 bills passed -- RS adjourned till Thursday amid protest, passes AERA bill -- 3 Bills passed in 45 minutes in RS on Wednesday -- 680 committed suicides in CAPFs in last six years: Govt to RS -- 1,948 arrested, 34 convicted under UAPA in 2019: Govt tells RS -- RS passes Deposit Insurance & Credit Guarantee Corporation (Amendment) Bill -- AI accumulated losses of about Rs70,820 crore till March 31, 2020: Govt -- 4,046 applications of Hindus for citizenship still pending; 4,171 given Indian nationality under old law 6 Trinamool lawmakers suspended Kolkata: Six TMC Rajya Sabha MP were suspended for a day over allegedly disorderly behavior in the House. According to Rajya Sabha sources, despite asking the TMC MPs to behave in the House, the TMC MPs holding placards jumped into the Well of the House demanding discussion on Snooping scam, repealing of farm laws and the on the constant price hike on petroleum products. “TMC MP’s Mausam Noor, Abir Ranjan Biswas, Dola Sen, Arpita Ghosh, Santa Chetri and Nadimul Haque were asked to withdraw themselves from the proceedings of the House for the day for disorderly behavior and disobeying the chair,” read the notice of Rajya Sabha. —Our Correspondent Kisan Sansad calls experts on MSP NEW DELHI: The Kisan Sansad, running parallel to Parliament at the Jantar Mantar road since last week, on Wednesday heard the eminent economists and experts as “guests of the House” for the next 2 days on the legal guarantee of the MSP the farmers get from the govt for their produces. The farmers noted the promise of PM Modi to double their income by 2022 seems to be yet another “jumla” (false claim) as they are not yet getting the remunerative prices to cover all expenses incurred in the crops they produce. Those, who turned up at the Sansad included experts like Dr Devinder Sharma, Dr Sucha Singh Gill and Dr RS Ghuman, the SKM said in a statement issued jointly by Balbir Singh Rajewal, Dr Darshan Pal, Gurnam Singh Charuni, Hannan Mollah, Jagjit Singh Dallewal, among others.

• Down To Earth

CSE Report: लाॅकडाउन में नहीं सुधरी नदियों की जल गुणवत्ता, गंगा सहित चार नदियां गंदी हुईं, सात नदियों में नहीं बदला जल गुणवत्ता

रह्मपुत्र एकमात्र ऐसी नदी रही जो लाॅकडाउन के दौरान स्नान के लिए सौ फीसद उपयुक्त हो गई। पहले इसकी गुणवत्ता 87.5.फीसद थी। सीएसई की रिपोर्ट के मुताबिक लाॅकडाउन के दौरान इन नदियों में जो सीवेज गया वह या तो अनुपचारित था या आंशिक रूप से उपचारित। संजीव गुप्ता, नई दिल्ली। दावे भले ही चाहे जो किए गए हों, लेकिन सच यह है कि 2020 के कोविड-19 लाकडाउन के दौरान भी नदियों के पानी की गुणवत्ता में सुधार नहीं हुआ। सेंटर फार साइंस एंड एन्वायरमेंट (सीएसई) की हाल ही में जारी रिपोर्ट 'स्टेट आफ इंडियाज एन्वायरमेंट इन फिगर 2021' ने सच सामने ला दिया है। यह रिपोर्ट बताती है कि भारत की 19 प्रमुख नदियों के पानी की गुणवत्ता में लाॅकडाउन के दौरान कोई उल्लेखनीय सुधार नहीं हुआ, जबकि गंगा सहित पांच नदियां तो और भी गंदी हो गईं। तीन नदियों में जल गुणवत्ता अपरिवर्तित रही तीन नदियों में पानी की गुणवत्ता अपरिवर्तित रही। सिर्फ पांच नदियों में लाकडाउन से पूर्व और लाकडाउन अवधि के दौरान स्नान के लिए प्राथमिक जल गुणवत्ता मानदंड का 100 फीसद अनुपालन दिखा। ब्रह्मपुत्र स्नान के लिए सौ फीसद उपयुक्त ब्रह्मपुत्र एकमात्र ऐसी नदी रही जो लाॅकडाउन के दौरान स्नान के लिए सौ फीसद उपयुक्त हो गई। पहले इसकी गुणवत्ता 87.5.फीसद थी। यह रिपोर्ट इस प्रचलित अवधारणा का भी खंडन करती है कि महामारी नदियों के लिए सार्वभौमिक रूप से अच्छी रही है। सीएसई रिपोर्ट: लाॅकडाउन के दौरान सतही जल निकायों के जैविक प्रदूषण में कमी आई सीएसई की रिपोर्ट के मुताबिक लाॅकडाउन के दौरान इन नदियों में जो सीवेज गया, वह या तो अनुपचारित था या आंशिक रूप से उपचारित। जिन नदियों की जलीय गुणवत्ता में थोड़ा बहुत सुधार हुआ, उसका कारण लगभग सभी उद्योगों के बंद होने से न्यूनतम औद्योगिक अपशिष्ट निर्वहन, पूजा सामग्री और कचरे के निपटान से जुड़ी कोई मानवीय गतिविधि नहीं होना, स्नान, कपड़े धोना, वाहन धोना और मवेशियों को नहलाने जैसी गतिविधियां न होना रहा। इन्हीं सब कारणों से सतही जल निकायों के जैविक प्रदूषण में कमी आई। सीबीआई ने न्यायाधीशों के खिलाफ मानहानिकारक पोस्‍ट डालने के मामले में पांच लोगों को गिरफ्तार किया है। न्‍यायधीशों पर मानहानिकारक पोस्‍ट डालने के मामले में एक्‍शन में सीबीआई, पांच गिरफ्तार, कुछ माननीयों की भूमिका की जांच यह भी पढ़ें इन नदियों की गुणवत्ता हुई बदतर लाॅकडाउन से पूर्व और बाद की गुणवत्ता स्थिति (फीसद में) 1. चंबल 75 46.15 2. ब्यास 100 95.45 3. सतलुज 87.1 78.30 4. गंगा 64.6 46.2 5. स्वर्णरेखा 80 55.33 इन नदियों की गुणवत्ता रही अपरिवर्तित 1. घग्घर 0 0 भूपेश बघेल ने गजेंद्र सिंह शेखावत को दिया आश्वासन- छत्तीसगढ़ में सितंबर 2023 तक हर घर होगा जल भूपेश बघेल ने गजेंद्र सिंह शेखावत को दिया आश्वासन- छत्तीसगढ़ में सितंबर 2023 तक हर घर होगा जल यह भी पढ़ें 2. साबरमती 55.55 55.55 3. माही 92.85 92.85 इनकी जल गुणवत्ता में हुआ मामूली सुधार 1. यमुना 42.8 66.7 2. तापी 77.8 87.50 3. कृष्णा 84.61 94.44 4. कावेरी 90.47 96.96 5. गोदावरी 65.78 78.37 इन नदियों का पानी लाॅकडाउन से पहले और बाद में भी नहाने के लिए सौ फीसद उपयुक्त था

• Renewable Energy

Tangled Wires: Preparing India’s Power Sector for the Clean Energy Transition

Almost none of the world’s largest polluters have enacted policies compatible with the Paris Agreement’s target of limiting global warming to within 2 degrees Celsius, a threshold past which climate disruption is projected to become even more frequent, severe, and unpredictable. Fortunately, despite the absence of adequate government support, renewable energy has grown at an astonishing pace in recent years thanks to its plummeting cost. India, for example, has more than doubled its stock of wind and solar power in the last five years, driven less by sustainability concerns than by clean energy’s potential for cost-effectively meeting citizens’ pressing development needs. However, the low prices of wind and solar projects disguise the structural costs renewable energy poses for grids when deployed at larger scales. The intermittent, unpredictable nature of the electricity generated by such technologies—in contrast to the stable, on-demand flow of power from traditional fossil fuel generation—requires fundamental changes to how countries invest in and operate their grids. For India, one of the most important steps for coping with the variability of these new sources of energy will be better coordination of the flow of power between the country’s disparate state-run grids. By increasing the volume of energy traded between state utilities, periods of surplus power in one region can compensate for deficits in others, making for a more stable and reliable supply of renewable energy—one that can better displace expensive and polluting fossil fuels. Jonathan Kay Jonathan Kay is a nonresident research assistant in the Carnegie South Asia Program. He was previously a James C. Gaither Junior Fellow. Yet, while such reforms would be difficult under the best of circumstances, they will be particularly challenging given the unique dysfunctions of India’s power sector. With its politically compromised, perennially loss-making electricity distribution companies already struggling to keep the lights on, bolder change appears unlikely. Deeper reforms to India’s power sector are therefore prerequisites to adopting solutions like regional coordination that can ensure the continued growth of renewable energy. The good news is that Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s national popularity and the dominance of his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) at the state level offer the country’s leaders an opportunity to reform the power sector where others have failed. But to take advantage of this opening, Modi must go beyond his modus operandi by investing in incremental institutional solutions rather than one-and-done technical fixes and by serving as a coordinator for India’s states rather than legislating by central fiat. Deeper reforms enabling India to maintain its rapid expansion of renewable energy not only would provide clean, low-cost power to its people but also would help the world offset the failings of more laggard countries, perhaps even putting back within reach the Paris Agreement’s more aggressive target of keeping global warming to within 1.5 degrees Celsius. But the hardest part of this ambitious task lies ahead—in ending the vicious cycles that have plagued India’s power sector for decades. Introduction India’s spectacular embrace of renewable energy is a rare reason for optimism in the fight against climate change. The world’s third-largest carbon emitter has more than doubled its stock of wind and solar power in the last five years, making it one of the only countries in the world whose policies appear compatible with the Paris Agreement’s target of limiting global warming to within 2 degrees Celsius—a threshold past which climate disruption is projected to become even more frequent, severe, and unpredictable.1 Yet the hardest part is still to come. Fossil fuels like coal, which currently accounts for a majority of India’s power-generating capacity, produce a stable and predictable stream of on-demand power. By contrast, power generation from wind and solar energy is more variable and unpredictable: wind turbines only generate electricity when the wind is blowing, and solar panels only generate electricity when the sun is shining. As a result, grid operators may not be able to fully rely on these forms of variable renewable energy, forcing them to turn back to fossil fuel generation. This challenge increases emissions and costs in the short term and slows the buildout of renewable energy in the long term. Coping with variable renewable energy like wind and solar will therefore require deeper changes to how India manages its grid. One of the most important solutions will also be one of the most difficult: the integration of the country’s disparate state-run electricity grids into a more coordinated system capable of using periods of surplus power in one region to compensate for deficits in another. In this way, variable renewable energy can more efficiently service larger geographic areas and more reliably displace expensive and polluting fossil fuels. However, while such reforms would be difficult under the best of circumstances, they will be particularly challenging given the unique dysfunctions of India’s power sector. A long history of politicians manipulating power distribution companies for the sake of short-term electoral objectives has compromised utilities’ finances and the independence they need to undertake structural reform. Without addressing these more fundamental problems, clean energy–enabling solutions like regional coordination are unlikely to succeed. Fortunately, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s national popularity and the dominance of his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) at the state level offer the country’s ruling coalition an opportunity to reform the power sector where others have failed. To take advantage of this opening, however, Modi must go beyond his modus operandi, investing in incremental institutional solutions rather than one-and-done technical fixes and serving as a coordinator for India’s states rather than legislating by central fiat. One potential solution would be to organize a mutually reinforcing package of state-level power sector reforms undertaken by a coalition of the willing formed around a core of BJP-led state governments where Modi can use his personal influence to ensure follow-through. Such a reform package would include the narrower task of encouraging increased regional coordination of energy exchange as well as a broader, complementary set of reforms focused on the pathologies of the distribution companies themselves. Modi and the BJP have strong incentives to invest in such overdue changes. Enabling India’s clean energy transition through comprehensive power sector reform would complement other components of the BJP’s agenda, including support for India’s domestic manufacturing sector and the electrification of rural households. Perhaps most importantly, while India’s adoption of renewable energy to date has been primarily motivated by development concerns rather than sustainability, that might change as the impacts of climate change grow more severe—particularly given the country’s heightened vulnerability to climate change due to its reliance on agriculture, proximity to rising sea levels, and high levels of poverty. Deeper reforms enabling India to maintain its rapid expansion of renewable energy not only would provide clean, low-cost power to its people but also would help the world offset the failings of more laggard countries, perhaps even putting back within reach the Paris Agreement’s more aggressive target of keeping global warming to within 1.5 degrees Celsius. But the hardest part of this ambitious task lies ahead—in ending the vicious cycles that have plagued India’s power sector for decades. A New Era of Intermittent Energy India has long refused in international negotiations on climate change to adopt specific commitments to reduce its carbon emissions, arguing that it and other developing countries should not have to respond as rapidly as wealthy industrialized nations given the former’s pressing development needs and low share of historical emissions.2 Yet despite Western countries’ fears that India would become a “spoiler” for international cooperation on climate change, New Delhi’s development-first stance has proved compatible with a rapid shift toward decarbonizing its energy sector, which constitutes the single largest source of its carbon emissions.3 Installation of new generating capacity for renewable energy in India has outpaced that of fossil fuels in recent years, making the country home to the fifth-largest supply of renewable energy in the world.4 New Delhi recently set its sights on further expanding its supply of renewable energy to 450 gigawatts by 2030 (see figure 1)—a number that would constitute a majority of its total energy capacity and be roughly equal to the current combined renewable energy resources of the United States, Japan, and France.5 Consistent with its international rhetoric, India’s embrace of clean energy has been motivated more by developmental concerns than by sustainability per se; climate change ranks low among Indian voters’ priorities.6 The plummeting cost of solar and wind energy have made renewables cheaper than fossil fuels in most states, offering the chance to simultaneously improve citizens’ electricity access, throw a lifeline to India’s bankrupt public utilities, and slow the growth of India’s carbon emissions. However, India’s current approach to managing its grid means that this synergy may not last. The more wind and solar power that the country installs, the harder and more expensive such energy will be to use, threatening to put the brakes on the nation’s transition to clean energy. Solar and wind energy pose a problem that traditional forms of fossil fuel generation do not: intermittency. Whereas coal or natural gas power produce a stable, continuous flow of electricity, solar panels only generate power when the sun is shining, and wind turbines only generate power when the wind is blowing. Wind and solar generators therefore are expected to stay idle for portions of the day and year. However, while much of this variation obeys certain trends—solar energy generates the most power when the sun nears its zenith, for example, while India’s wind output peaks during monsoon season—the precise scale of such variation is unpredictable. When a cloud bank passes above a solar farm or a dying wind makes the turbines go still, grid operators must find a replacement source of energy. The typical solution is to turn to more reliable forms of power generation like fossil fuels that can produce power on demand. Yet because such power plants cannot be brought online or off-line instantly or without cost, grid operators prefer to keep a stream of stable fossil fuel generation on and running for hours or days at a time as a backstop to the vicissitudes of variable renewable energy (VRE). The downside of this strategy is that, when wind and solar energy hits their peaks, the grid may already be getting all the energy it needs from the fossil fuel backstop. When this happens, VRE generators are consequently curtailed, prevented from selling their energy to the grid. The immediate environmental cost of curtailment is obvious: clean VRE that could be displacing polluting fossil fuels is prevented from doing so. Furthermore, in the long term, the losses from such curtailment to solar and wind operators’ profits may prevent them from constructing more generation capacity going forward. Curtailment also raises the price of energy for consumers since, unlike coal or natural gas, the fuel for VRE—sunlight and wind—is free. Therefore, every additional megawatt of power generated at these facilities is produced at an extremely low marginal cost.7 Finally, during periods when VRE can meet a majority of energy demand, the fossil fuel plants stabilizing the grid decrease their output by running at lower factor capacities, which usually makes them even more inefficient, expensive, and polluting to operate than usual.8 Without measures to adapt, these problems will only worsen as India grows the share of VRE capacity on its grid from 18 percent today to a target of over 40 percent by 2030 (according to International Energy Agency projections).9 While the total generating capacity available to the country’s grid at peak solar and wind output—say, on a gusty spring day with clear skies—might increase, the floor of fossil fuel generation needed to fill in the gap when VRE approaches nil remains largely the same. This means that increasing amounts of VRE are competing to meet the same energy demand left over after the fossil fuel backstop takes its share—unless the fossil fuel backstop itself can be reduced. Addressing Variability Through Regional Coordination While some amount of curtailment is unavoidable at higher levels of VRE, there are several strategies to minimize it. One solution is to ensure that the grid enjoys a more stable and reliable supply of renewable energy in the first place by coordinating energy supply over as wide a geographic area as possible. Transmission lines connect the whole of India into a single national grid. Responsibility for the electricity that passes through that grid, however, largely rests with the states, most of whom give responsibility for procuring and distributing electricity to state-owned power distribution companies, or discoms.10 Discoms typically purchase the bulk of their power through one-on-one, long-term contracts with particular generating facilities within their own state. One problem with this approach is that, at the level of a single state, the weather conditions that affect VRE output change rapidly, meaning that supplies of wind or solar energy can peak or fall dramatically in a matter of minutes or seconds. These rapid fluctuations force each state’s grid operators to maintain a larger cushion of fossil fuel generation to cope with unexpected drops in VRE output. However, the average meteorological conditions experienced across several states are more predictable, with momentary troughs in one area typically balanced by momentary peaks in another. If grid operators were to coordinate to efficiently source and dispatch generation capacity across a larger geographic area, they would be able to draw from a larger and more stable pool of VRE—and thus turn off some of their fossil fuel plants. Regional coordination also helps diversify the kinds of renewable energy in the grid by allowing the strengths of some states to complement the weaknesses of others. Some states may enjoy plentiful supplies of solar energy but little in the way of wind power, for example, or large amounts of nuclear energy or hydropower but less in the way of VRE (see figures 2a and 2b). With regional coordination, however, solar power concentrated in India’s south and west can be sent north and east during the day and wind power from turbines in coastal states can be sent inland at night. By enabling one region’s surplus to meet another region’s shortfall, VRE curtailment in states with a temporary excess of wind or solar power can be reduced, and states with insufficient VRE can avoid turning on new fossil fuel capacity.11 Finally, regional coordination could make more efficient use of the non-VRE backstop itself. Hydropower from the mountains of northern India, for instance—a relatively on-demand form of renewable energy—could in some cases replace fossil fuels in the lowlands as grid stabilizers over the course of the day. Perhaps most important in the short term, a larger fleet of older coal plants could be replaced by a smaller fleet of newer ones. These newer plants would be capable of more easily and quickly reducing their power output during peak VRE generation, reducing curtailment of wind and solar energy, while also running at more efficient factor capacities during troughs in VRE generation, reducing emissions and costs.12 The benefits of regional coordination are obvious, and several studies have found such coordination to be one of the most important steps in the next decade for reducing India’s curtailment of VRE.13 Nevertheless, despite a proliferation in recent years of forums for trading energy across state lines, states continue to procure the vast majority of their energy from in-state generators.14 For example, as things stand now, if Tamil Nadu were to find itself curtailing a surplus of wind energy in the same moment that adjacent Karnataka were ramping up coal production to meet an energy deficit, the two states likely wouldn’t exchange power. As a result, Karnataka would pay for expensive and polluting coal power, and wind farm operators in Tamil Nadu would shut off their clean energy rather than making a profit. Each state would lose money and pollute more. One possible obstacle to regional coordination is cost: accommodating an increased flow of electricity between states and regions without congestion requires significant investments in transmission infrastructure.15 However, this investment would likely be more than offset by the more efficient use of generation capacity—and greater use of cheap renewable energy—that increased energy exchange between states would enable.16 The deeper obstacle to regional coordination is precisely that, however much money such coordination might save in the long run, state utilities have even stronger incentives to prioritize shorter-term interests—including by maintaining personalized control over energy dispatch rather than committing themselves to a more independent and centralized system. The reasons for this disconnect lie in a decades-long history of political capture and financial disarray that has left India’s power companies tools of politics first and effective utilities second. Distribution Dysfunction One of the state’s foremost priorities in India’s early years as an independent country was the provision of electricity to its citizens through the expansion of its grid and investment in new generation capacity. Fortunately, in many states, cheap coal and hydropower were plentiful. Yet the combination of this natural abundance and the importance of electricity to India’s citizens created a huge temptation for states to give out electricity for free to shore up voters’ support. The power sector quickly became an instrument of mass patronage.17 Before long, as India’s electricity demand grew, states could no longer afford to offer steep electricity subsidies while still paying to lay down new transmission lines and build new power plants. Yet voters had grown used to receiving these subsidies, and politicians had grown used to giving them out to win support from key constituencies. Consequently, rather than raise prices, most states turned to a system called cross-subsidization: charging industrial consumers like factories more for their power and using the profits to maintain subsidies for key voting blocs like farmers. Yet this strategy, too, soon ran into problems. For one thing, some industrial consumers disconnected from the grid entirely, generating their own electricity from on-location power plants, which meant they were no longer financing consumer subsidies.18 Additionally, by raising the cost of doing business, the cross-subsidy regime likely depressed the growth of the country’s industrial sector itself, and thus its ability to pay inflated electricity bills.19 Commandeered by politicians and severed from the accountability of market forces, the discoms’ operating losses have mounted over the years, forcing them to cut back on investments in generation, the grid, and consumer billing infrastructure. This state of affairs has only led to further losses: even after years of attempted reforms, more than one-fifth of the power sent to Indian consumers today is either lost en route due to poor distribution infrastructure or never billed at all, roughly twice the share in other South Asian countries like Bangladesh or Sri Lanka and four times that in the United States or China.20 Inadequate investment has also led to chronic power shortages, which themselves have in some cases been triaged in favor of key electoral constituencies.21 In principle, both politicians and consumers have incentives to reform the system. Massive losses in the power sector strain India’s public finances, cut into funding for other programs, and ultimately depress economic growth. Meanwhile, consumers may get subsidized electricity, but only in exchange for frequent blackouts. However, apart from a few success stories—including in Gujarat under the leadership of then chief minister Modi—reforms have proved elusive, and a vicious cycle of discom debt and low-quality power has endured.22 One problem is credibility. Investing in power infrastructure often requires immediate increases in prices but may take years to yield any results, so consumers have to believe that governments will actually deliver on their promises of higher quality power in the future. Yet governments often either lack the discipline to think on this kind of time horizon or simply worry that the voters will fail to remain committed to such an arrangement.23 Indeed, many would-be reformers have been ejected from office before their work could be completed, only to see the next ruling party return to the old cross-subsidies system.24 As a result, the condition of most states’ power sectors has remained largely unchanged for decades. The most comprehensive study to date of the state politics of energy distribution in India, Mapping Power, concluded that there is no single solution to these vicious cycles, or even necessary conditions for success.25 When states enjoy the financial cushion of cheap power or plentiful revenue from industrial consumers, for example, they may be better able to invest in new infrastructure without immediately increasing the prices consumers pay for electricity, but they may also feel less pressure to reform in the first place.26 The electoral landscape also matters: the presence of substantial numbers of urban or industrial customers willing to pay more for high-quality electricity or the absence of well-organized farmers’ movements with incentives to retain subsidies may both be conducive to reform.27 However, states without these conditions have sometimes succeeded in reforming where states enjoying both conditions have failed.28 Meanwhile, states with stable political leadership may be more likely to reform than those experiencing frequent changes between ruling parties, where politicians have less latitude to think beyond the next election.29 Nevertheless, parties in power for several successive administrations can still fail to move the needle.30 The enduring dysfunction of India’s discoms is perhaps one of the most important barriers to the country’s economic development today, with poor-quality power acting as a drag on economic development while the power sector’s disastrous finances soak up public funds that could be used for more targeted investments or welfare initiatives.31 Furthermore, so long as discoms remain financially insolvent, politically compromised, and insulated from the pressure to turn a profit, they will also pose an obstacle to India meeting its renewable energy goals—starting with regional coordination. One general problem is that even if investments in the transmission infrastructure necessary to engage in regional coordination would be offset by savings over time, discoms often neglect long-term planning in favor of a short-term fixation on stopping the bleeding of revenue losses.32 Whether from a lack of foresight or a simple lack of funds, they might opt for solutions with lower upfront costs that are ultimately more expensive over their lifespan, such as building more coal plants than necessary, for example, rather than making the structural changes necessary to take full advantage of potential new renewable energy capacity. In such cases, solutions like regional coordination that require significant costs and efforts up front but pay for themselves over multiple administrations may never be seriously considered. Discoms also have more specific motivations to resist regional coordination and the increase in interstate energy trade it would entail. Remaining in exclusive relationships with instate power generators, for example, allows discoms to more easily delay or even default on their payments, a common practice for coping with their frequent revenue shortfalls.33 By contrast, most arrangements for regional coordination would require a timelier settlement of payments—within days rather than months—a prospect that, in turn, would require that discoms maintain more cash on hand than is currently standard practice.34 Similarly, while more centralized and coordinated systems of dispatch would typically require that discoms commit to projecting their energy demand in advance, doing so might make it more challenging for them to use another favored tool of financial triage: simply deciding not to provide electricity when it gets too expensive, and then in some cases choosing to win voters’ support by making special efforts to purchase and dispatch power to certain areas in the lead-up to elections.35 Finally, with few funds to spare, discoms’ tolerance for experimentation may be marginal. Investments in transmission, for instance, may take longer to pay for themselves than anticipated, further straining discoms’ balance sheets in the short term. Discoms also might run afoul of approaches to regional coordination that would require them to pay fines for differences between their projected and actual energy use. And some coordination arrangements might force discoms to pool their reserve generating capacity, potentially requiring states to maintain more robust generating reserves than is common practice in India or risk having other states’ lack of generating reserves prevent them from averting a blackout.36 Although arrangements can generally be designed to limit risk, decisionmakers may nevertheless fear punishment if their efforts at innovation result in conspicuous short-term failures. More to the point, they may believe that they have little to gain even if the risk were to pay off. This is perhaps the single most important obstacle to reforming the pathologies mentioned above: despite New Delhi’s regular clarion calls for reform, discoms face limited pressure to turn a profit. The obvious candidates to pressure discoms to improve their operational performance, including through innovations like regional coordination, would be the state electricity regulatory commissions (SERCs). However, many SERCs have seen their institutional capacity, independence, and legitimacy compromised by state governments determined to protect the cross-subsidy regime from being challenged (as one of the SERCs’ primary functions is to set electricity prices), limiting their ability to push discoms to undertake any reforms.37 Consumers, for their part, often see little relationship between the cost of electricity and the subsidized price they pay, which makes them less likely to push politicians to cut the discoms’ supply-side operating losses.38 Finally, while the central government can attempt to create incentives for improved discom performance, it has limited leverage: unless New Delhi is willing to allow the wholesale collapse of a state’s power sector, it must continue bailing out distribution companies regardless of whether the states themselves are to blame for their problems.39 Commentators have noted that past efforts have fallen short by “providing a carrot but not much by way of a stick.”40 In the next stage of its transition to clean energy, India needs efficiently run utilities that are capable and motivated enough to take on risks for the sake of their consumers, not discoms that are tools of patronage first and power companies second. But if states can barely survive under the status quo, more disruptive and structural reforms like regional coordination are unlikely to materialize. Business as usual and reactive policy will likely remain the safest option for individual state politicians and bureaucrats unless the will to reform can be built elsewhere. Breaking the Cycle Vicious cycles rarely end of their own accord. In most Indian states, the fundamental problems with the power sector have changed little in the two decades since the major reforms of the 1990s and early 2000s, and they will likely remained trapped in the same pattern of dysfunction unless they are disrupted by an external intervention. The obvious candidate for such an intervention is the central government. Yet past efforts—like the country’s 2003 Electricity Act, for example, or the 2015 Ujwal DISCOM Assurance Yojana (UDAY) scheme—have typically done little to address the power sector’s core political problems, instead focusing on more technical or bureaucratic reforms like establishing new regulatory agencies or restructuring utilities’ debts.41 Such limited efforts have had limited results. UDAY, for example, the most recent major initiative, has had no discernable effect on a key metric of discom performance: the proportion of energy sent to customers for which no revenue is collected, a figure known as aggregate technical and commercial losses (see figure 3).42 Therefore, an alternative approach is necessary, one that begins with state-level rather than federal legislation and that sees the building of political will as a prerequisite to undertaking technical reforms. The ideal solution might follow in the footsteps of the 2017 Goods and Services Tax, a rare instance in which India’s central government and the states came together to implement a sweeping overhaul of a contentious economic issue over which both groups had jurisdiction.43 However, the tax overhaul was in some ways far more straightforward to negotiate than a reform of the states’ power sectors, which would likely require more nuanced efforts to tailor technical proposals and political strategies to the idiosyncrasies of particular state contexts.44 Furthermore, the central government might have ruined any chance at repeating its success by recently reneging on its commitments to compensate the states for their losses under the new fiscal scheme, an outcome that may have created lasting distrust between the two sides.45 Another solution would begin not with all of India but instead with lower-hanging fruit: a coalition of willing, reform-minded states. The primary candidates would be those ruled by members of Modi’s own party, the BJP—a plurality of states accounting for 38 percent of India’s GDP and 40 percent of its population (see figure 4).46 Modi’s unparalleled national popularity and unrivaled dominance within the ranks of the party give him substantial formal and informal influence over state BJP leaders, which could be used to convince them to adopt a more penetrating set of reforms to their power sectors with a degree of political will that past efforts lacked.47 First, Modi could focus on the narrower task of encouraging—or, in the case of BJP-led states, actively pressuring—state governments to step up their engagement with interstate energy markets. These transitions could entail a vast range of possible governance options, from schemes largely retaining state primacy over energy dispatch to more market-based and centralized systems.48 For example, at first, states might choose to continue managing much of their scheduling and dispatch unilaterally, offering only a smaller share of their total fleet of generators up for coordination with other states. Eventually, as states build trust in and capacity for the system and see the benefits of increased cooperation, they might gradually move to a more centralized and market-based system in which state authorities play less of a role.49 This proposal would likely be an easier sell than a direct shift to a national, purely market-based system of power dispatch, as India’s Central Energy Regulatory Commission has recently proposed.50 However, an explicit attempt at regional coordination would, for all the reasons discussed above, be best complemented by a second level of reform focused on fixing the distribution companies themselves. Several policies have proven promising for unraveling the cross-subsidy regime. Participating states might upgrade their feeders, for example, so as to better monitor and curb the energy use of those receiving subsidized electricity, an effort the central government has offered to help fund through its most recent scheme for discom reform.51 They might also replace electricity subsidies with direct cash transfers so that welfare to key constituencies no longer directly prevents the price of electricity from reflecting the cost of supply, a policy that has already proved itself successful in India for reforming subsidies for liquefied petroleum gas canisters.52 The reform package could even eschew specific policies in favor of broader objectives, such as maintaining an independent energy regulatory commission, the routes to which could then be worked out within particular states.53 Yet whatever the precise design, if these reforms were undertaken, as power distribution gradually began to develop a degree of financial stability and independence from individual politicians’ priorities, innovations like regional coordination would grow more attainable. Why would this approach succeed where past efforts have failed? For one thing, linking a coordinated agenda for state discom reform to a high-profile, ruling coalition–sponsored national initiative would go a long way toward addressing states’ credibility problem, leveraging Modi’s formidable reputation to convince voters that improvements in quality would actually accompany changes in the prices they pay. Additionally, a more comprehensive, mutually reinforcing package of reforms—including the encouragement of regional coordination, which would by necessity foster a certain amount of discipline and independence if successful—may have more staying power than any one policy in isolation.54 As important as the legislation itself would be, a change of mindset is perhaps most important. This would entail having the Prime Minister’s Office display adequate resolve to use Modi’s prominence both nationally and, more specifically, within the halls of power in BJP-ruled states to ensure that state governments actually implement their reforms—and that state leaders believe they have more to gain from a functional but independent power sector than a captured but broken one. Of course, such an approach would likely require that Modi set his sights lower than a comprehensive national initiative and instead begin only with a few states, such as those with strong BJP majorities where he wields the greatest influence or renewables-intensive states like Tamil Nadu that would have the most to gain from regional coordination arrangements enabling them to sell their electricity surplus. Yet even beginning with a smaller coalition would be enough. A critical mass of states proving the feasibility and benefits of reform would allow investors to vote with their feet and, in turn, would help voters to see the benefits of a better way, encouraging them to exert pressure on their own representatives. These regional arrangements could then gradually expand and deepen, eventually setting the stage for a truly national arrangement.55 Alongside its role as coordinator for the states, the Indian central government—as well as foreign donors and investors—will also have a clear role to play in national projects that can help make both discom reform in general and regional coordination in particular more attractive for states.56 One important area, particularly if energy trade between states increases, would be assisting with investment in transmission infrastructure, including the continued construction of “green energy corridors” capable of carrying large amounts of energy from one region to another.57 The central government could also help enable discom reform and clean energy adoption by bailing out and shutting down inefficient and polluting coal generators early; renegotiating expensive, long-term power purchase agreements; and investing in the technology to help grid operators more accurately predict the supply of VRE and engage with the logistics of market-based, coordinated dispatch.58 Yet while such initiatives—or the myriad regulatory changes necessary to adapt to a new, renewables-heavy energy landscape—are necessary, they are not sufficient absent reform to the discoms themselves. Conclusion While most of India’s actions to mitigate climate change so far have focused on development rather than sustainability concerns, this may change as the impacts of climate change grow more obvious. Mitigating climate change has often been described as a public good insofar as action by one country to curb its emissions benefits all countries.59 However, these benefits (in essence, foregone harms) do not and will not accrue to all countries equally: staying within the threshold of 2 degrees Celsius in global temperature increases targeted by the international community would still translate into rises in temperature far beyond 2 degrees in some countries—including in much of India. Different countries in turn will enjoy vastly different abilities to adapt to the climactic disruptions they do experience. Given the country’s high levels of poverty, reliance on agriculture (which depends in turn on the increasingly fragile monsoon season), and large tracts of land in areas susceptible to rising sea levels or drought, India is one of the countries in the world most vulnerable to climate change.60 Therefore, as crop yields decline, sea levels rise, and diseases like malaria and dengue fever encroach on warmer climes, India may grow less willing to defer climate mitigation in exchange for short-term economic gains and an increased risk of catastrophe in the future.61 At this point, climate policy as an end in itself may assume a more prominent role on the national stage—thereby making the dysfunction of the discoms even more of a political liability. Indeed, discoms’ dysfunction will likely sabotage enablers of clean energy beyond regional coordination as well. The same obstacles to intelligent investment in transmission infrastructure posed by the lack of fiscal space and capacity for long-term planning will likely present challenges for even more complicated and context-dependent decisions about investment in energy storage, for example, or when to shut down, upgrade, or replace older coal plants.62 The political rewards of controlling power dispatch, meanwhile, are already creating incentives to prevent the buildout of small rooftop solar panels—a sector that the Indian government hopes will grow to 40 gigawatts by 2022—since such resources would typically sell their energy directly to other consumers, thereby bypassing the discoms’ system of cross subsidies.63 In other words, unless India reforms its discoms, regional coordination will only be the first of many casualties in its green transition. The timing for reforming India’s power sector is propitious. The BJP has several years before the next general election, and reform is typically best done well in advance of an election when time remains in an administration for the benefits to materialize.64 Additionally, the country’s recovery from the coronavirus pandemic presents a moment of crisis that the central government has already seized to enact painful reforms in other areas, such as privatization of public sector banks.65 Of course, the more organic approach to reform described above would require that Modi depart from his usual governance style, which has been large-scale, top-down, and centralized.66 Much of Modi’s popularity rests on efforts like his sweeping flagship welfare projects, which could be relatively easily designed and deployed from the Prime Minister’s Office without the need to gain wide buy-in from state governments or engage with the vagaries of institutional reform.67 By contrast, a state-based approach to power sector reform—even one that began only with BJP compatriots—would require flexibility, patience, and a willingness to engage with the specifics of each state context. Fortunately, Modi and the BJP have strong incentives to try. Indeed, Modi’s prominent embrace of renewable energy and targeting of ambitious milestones is a sign of his faith that a buildout of renewables will translate into an electoral payoff nationally, just as his push for renewables as chief minister of Gujarat paid off for him there. One incentive is that the power sector is a colossal strain on public finances and a drag on economic growth, which are important considerations for a ruling party whose popularity rests in large part on the promise of prosperity. Reforming discoms would also greatly increase the quality of electricity to India’s households, which may be a natural extension of Modi’s recent, largely successful campaign to electrify 100 percent of India’s villages.68 Energy security might be another motivation: reducing India’s substantial reliance on coal and gas imports by developing a domestic renewable energy manufacturing industry would accord with Modi’s push for Atmanirbhar Bharat (“self-reliant India”).69 This is to say nothing of issues that have not yet generated much electoral momentum but could be tapped into by a political entrepreneur as deft as Modi, such as the health benefits of clean energy. Pollution from coal plants is one of the primary drivers of India’s dismal air quality, for instance, which is estimated to lead to a staggering 2.5 million premature deaths each year.70 Contradictions between business as usual in India’s power sector and its green energy aspirations will only become more obvious as the country’s share of VRE generation capacity increases. Indeed, one study by the prominent Energy and Resources Institute found that, in the absence of flexibility-enabling changes such as regional coordination or battery storage, India’s target of 450 gigawatts of renewable energy by 2030 would be entirely unrealistic.71 By contrast, reforming now—while there is still time and flexibility to plan for high shares of renewable energy rather than simply react to an imminent crisis of curtailment—would let India not just continue the meteoric growth of renewables but accelerate it. Acknowledgments The Carnegie Endowment is grateful to the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office for research funding that helped make the writing of this paper possible. The author is profoundly grateful to Milan Vaishnav, Rohit Chandra, Jessica Seddon, Kartikeya Singh, Megan DuBois, and Abigail Diebold for comments on earlier drafts. He also thanks Ryan DeVries and Amy Mellon for their design, editorial, and production assistance. Any errors are the author’s own. Notes 1 “Each Country’s Share of CO2 Emissions,” Union of Concerned Scientists, August 12, 2020, https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/each-countrys-share-co2-emissions; International Renewable Energy Agency, Renewable Capacity Statistics 2021 (Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency, 2021), 13, 20; and “India—Current Policy Projections,” Climate Action Tracker, September 22, 2020, https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/india/current-policy-projections. 2 Anil Agarwal and Sunita Narain, Global Warming in an Unequal World: A Case of Environmental Colonialism (New Delhi: Center for Science and Environment, 2000); Tejal Kanitkar and T. Jayaraman, “Equity in Long-Term Mitigation,” in India in a Warming World: Integrating Climate Change and Development, ed. Navroz K. Dubash (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2019), 92–113; and Sandeep Sengupta, “India’s Engagement in Global Climate Negotiations From Rio to Paris,” in India in a Warming World, 114–141. 3 Ashok Lavasa, “Reaching Agreement in Paris: A Negotiator’s Perspective,” in India in a Warming World, 169–186; Dhanasree Jayaram, “From ‘Spoiler’ to ‘Bridging Nation’: The Reshaping of India’s Climate Diplomacy,” Revue Internationale et Stratégique 109 (2018): 181–190; and India: Third Biennial Update Report to The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (New Delhi: Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, 2021), 21. 4 Peter Zeniewski et al., India Energy Outlook 2021 (Paris: International Energy Agency, 2021), 38; and International Renewable Energy Agency, Renewable Capacity Statistics 2021, 2–4. 5 PTI, “India to Have 60% Renewable Energy by 2030: Power Minister RK Singh,” Financial Express, July 21, 2020, https://www.financialexpress.com/industry/india-to-have-60-renewable-energy-by-2030-power-minister-rk-singh/2031205; and International Renewable Energy Agency, Renewable Capacity Statistics 2021, 2–4. The following sources were used for figure 1: International Renewable Energy Agency, Renewable Capacity Statistics 2021, 5, 13, 20; “Global Coal Plant Tracker,” Global Energy Monitor, January 2021, https://globalenergymonitor.org/projects/global-coal-plant-tracker/dashboard; and Energy Statistics India 2021 (New Delhi: Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, 2021), 22–23. Projections for 2030 draw from International Energy Agency estimates, which assume that India falls slightly short of current government targets; see Zeniewski et al., India Energy Outlook 2021, 114. 6 Pradip Swarnakar, “Climate Change, Civil Society, and Social Movement in India,” in India in a Warming World, 253–272; and Nives Dolsak and Aseem Prakash, “Are India’s Political Parties Ignoring Climate Change?” Forbes, April 13, 2019, https://www.forbes.com/sites/prakashdolsak/2019/04/13/are-indias-political-parties-ignoring-climate-change/?sh=23f7978662e9. In addition, a recent Pew Research Center survey found that, while 58 percent of Indians believed that “climate change is a very serious problem,” only 37 percent believed that their “national government is doing too little to reduce the effects of climate change.” A survey by the New Delhi–based Association for Democratic Reforms, meanwhile, found that only 12 percent of Indian voters rated water and air pollution among their five most important governance priorities; climate change as a phenomenon, including but not limited to such pollution, did not make the list of voters’ thirty-one most important issues at all. See, respectively, Cary Funk et al., “Concern Over Climate and the Environment Predominates Among These Publics,” Pew Research Center, September 29, 2020, https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2020/09/29/concern-over-climate-and-the-environment-predominates-among-these-publics; and Association for Democratic Reforms, All India Survey on Governance Issues and Voting Behavior 2018 (New Delhi: Association for Democratic Reforms, 2019), 14. 7 While the marginal cost to the generator of an additional unit of VRE is essentially zero, grid operators usually still have to pay for each additional unit at a contracted price. This means that in some cases grid operators may have an incentive to use nonrenewable energy that, though more expensive to generate because of the cost of its fuel, is nevertheless available to them at a lower contracted price. One solution is to have VRE generators with surplus generation capacity pay traditional generators for the right to sell their energy, an approach that can allow maximal use of VRE while providing savings for all parties. For an example of both a market-based and a non-market-based approach, see Lakshmi Alagappan et al., Regulatory Dimensions to Renewable Energy Forecasting, Scheduling, and Balancing in India: Regulatory Practices Analysis and Primer (New Delhi: USAID, 2017), 37. 8 Rahul Tongia, Santosh Harish, and Rahul Walawalkar, “Integrating Renewable Energy Into India’s Grid—Harder Than It Looks,” Brookings India, 2018, 14–15, . 9 Zeniewski et al., India Energy Outlook 2021, 114; and Jesse D. Jenkins, Max Luke, and Samuel Thernstrom, “Getting to Zero Carbon Emissions in the Electric Power Sector,” Joule 2, no. 12 (2018): 2506–2508. 10 Under India’s constitution, the electricity sector is a shared responsibility of the states and the central government. However, while the central government plays important roles in the generation and transmission of electricity, distribution—the final step of providing electricity to consumers—has in practice come under the purview of state governments. 11 Thomas Spencer et al., Renewable Power Pathways: Modelling the Integration of Wind and Solar in India by 2030 (New Delhi: Energy and Resources Institute, 2020), 30–34. 12 USAID, Greening the Grid: Pathways to Integrate 175 Gigawatts of Renewable Energy Into India’s Electric Grid, Vol. 1—National Study (New Delhi: USAID, 2017), 84–88; Spencer et al., Renewable Power Pathways, 21–23, 30–34; and Alagappan et al., Regulatory Dimensions to Renewable Energy Forecasting, Scheduling, and Balancing in India, 61. 13 Greening the Grid, 72; and Spencer et al., Renewable Power Pathways, xii–xiii. 14 Vibhuti Garg, “Deepening India’s Short-Term Power Market: New Financial Products Will Boost Trading of Renewable Energy,” Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, September 2020, https://ieefa.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Deepening-India-Short-Term-Power-Market_September-2020.pdf.