Cse In News

Addressing the gender gap in climate policies

“However, this COP30, women from indigenous communities played a key role in amplifying the urgency of climate change and the action needed to scale up mitigation and adaptation,” says Sunita Narain, director general, Centre for Science and Environment. Former UN high commissioner for human rights Mary Robinson summed it up succinctly when she said, “Climate change is a manmade problem that requires a feminist solution.” Women, already suffering from existing inequalities, are most affected by the climate crisis, with direct impacts on their livelihood, health and safety. COP30, at Belem, adopted a new Gender Action Plan (GAP), including a focus on care work, women’s health, and violence against women. Mirai Chatterjee, chairperson, SEWA Cooperative Federation, says, “We welcome the expanded scope of the Belem GAP, and its emphasis on women’s involvement at all levels of climate-related discussion and action, especially informal women workers. The integration with decent work, care work and social protection like health, is also an important feature. Now we look forward to its implementation with adequate resources and monitoring.” GAP was first adopted in 2017 and the final document submitted at Belem will form the framework for climate action which will, if implemented correctly, ensure that gender equality remains at the heart of the UN climate process. Countries such as India must internalise the fact that women and girls face unique climate risks and disproportionate stress from natural disasters. If the right policies are not put in place now, at least 158 million women and girls will fall into poverty by 2050, while 236 million could face food insecurity. Mainstreaming gender into climate policies will ensure that existing inequalities do not get integrated into climate politics. “Women are often the first to feel the impacts of climate change, but they are also leading some of the most meaningful responses. Their knowledge and leadership are not just valuable; they are essential. We need to stop seeing women as peripheral to climate action. Their lived experience brings insight that science alone cannot offer — and at COP30, we saw a growing recognition of that,” says Christopher Nial, senior partner, FINN Partners, Global Health Impact. Women’s groups must get more finance and technical know-how to tackle climate-crisis impacts; they must be mentored on preventive aspects as well. India doesn’t have enough disaggregated data in the field of climate. Without this, gender can’t be mainstreamed effectively into climate decisions. Real evidence is key to tracking progress and plugging gaps. The current GAP prescribes five priorities — capacity building, gender balance and leadership, coherence, gender-responsive implementation, and monitoring and reporting. GAP has to include the voices of women and girls, particularly from marginalised communities. It is here that the current GAP misses the gendered dimension of transformation, an insistence on advancing gender equality, and the need to invest in care and support economies and services. “However, this COP30, women from indigenous communities played a key role in amplifying the urgency of climate change and the action needed to scale up mitigation and adaptation,” says Sunita Narain, director general, Centre for Science and Environment.

दिल्ली से प्रदूषण हो जाएगा गायब, बस करने होंगे ये 6 काम, CSE ने जारी की डिमांड

राजधानी की हवा को साफ करने के लिए सेंटर फॉर साइंस एंड एनवायरनमेंट (CSE) ने 6 पॉइंट की डिमांड जारी किया है। सीएसई ने साफ कहा है कि दिल्ली की हवा साफ करने के लिए गाड़ियों को कंट्रोल करने से बेहतर कुछ नहीं है। इसके लिए पब्लिक ट्रांसपोर्ट को मजबूत करना जरूरी है। सीएसई ने कहा है कि प्रदूषण के सोर्स पर लगाम लगाना कैसे जरूरी है। गाड़ियों से मौसम बदलता है। इसकी वजह से प्रदूषण नियंत्रित होने पर भी कमी नहीं आ पाती। इसलिए वे चाहते हैं कि GRAP एक डिसेन्ट्रलाइज्ड हो जिससे कि इसे लोकल ऐक्शन प्लान में जोड़कर इसे GRAP का लागू करने की नौबत ही न आए। इस तरह से ये कहा गया है कि क्लाइमेट चेंज है इसमें ये भी कारगर नहीं है। इसे तुरत बंद किया जाना चाहिए।

New Delhi's Toxic Air Quality: A Public Health Emergency

Despite a 77.5 percent decrease in stubble burning since 2021, Delhi’s air quality reached its worst in half a decade this winter. As illustrated above, the contribution of stubble burning to PM2.5 levels has dropped to negligible proportions. The CPCB’s report has measured AQI only between 1 January and 7 November each year, discounting some of the most severely polluted days. Regardless, the proportional contribution of stubble burning has reduced substantially since 2021, even during the peak period of early November. This aligns with the most recent data from the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), which highlighted that local emissions from vehicles and combustion sources are the most significant contributors.

Govt declares Delhi has had the lowest AQI in 8 years. Rahul Gandhi urges for a debate on pollution

Responding to the Rajya Sabha MP Sagarika Ghose's questions about the action that the Union government has taken to address the worsening air quality in the national capital, they claimed that "Delhi has observed the lowest average AQI in the past 8 years, i.e., from 2018 to 2025 (barring 2020 - COVID lockdown)." This claim comes amid a Press Trust of India (PTI) report yesterday stating that India sets its own air quality standards, and that air quality guidelines set by the World Health Organization (WHO) "serve only as advisory values, not binding standards". The government also dismissed global indices such as IQAir's World Air Quality Ranking, the WHO Global Air Quality Database, and the Environmental Performance Index (EPI). The government also told the Rajya Sabha: “With coordinated efforts, the number of good days (AQI<200) in Delhi has increased to 200 days in 2025 from 110 days in 2016. While there is an overall improvement in the AQI this year, very poor days (AQI: 301-400) and severe days (AQI more than 401) have reduced from 71 days in 2024 to 50 days in 2025.” But questions remain about gaps in the government’s air-quality data collection. In early November, reports indicated that only 9 of Delhi’s 37 air quality monitoring stations were operational on Diwali. Moreover, Newslaundry had earlier reported how several of Delhi’s air quality monitoring stations were in violation of basic norms, placed behind trees, beside walls, or hemmed in by buildings that obstruct airflow within the mandatory 20-metre radius. Making matters worse, as the city’s air quality worsened, reports and on-the-ground findings suggested that the government went a step further, spraying water around an air quality monitoring station. This amounts to fudging the data. The matter was presented before the Supreme Court, which directed the Delhi government to submit an affidavit explaining the type of devices used to measure AQI and their effectiveness in recording pollution levels. Even though Parliament has been in session for the past 12 days, the government has not tabled any special discussion on the growing air pollution levels in the national capital, despite repeated demands from the Opposition. Today, the Leader of the Opposition, Rahul Gandhi, called for a detailed discussion in Parliament on air pollution and requested that Prime Minister Narendra Modi present a detailed plan to mitigate it. Claims made, but roadblocks apparent In their response to Ghose, the government also claimed: “So far, 95 Statutory Directions have been issued through the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) to specifically guide and direct various actions towards abatement of air pollution in the region. A monitoring mechanism to oversee the implementation of these directions has been put in place.” But, according to a recent report in The Hindu, one of these key directions has been thwarted by a Supreme Court order and a lack of strict action by authorities, which has resulted in end-of-life vehicles still plying on Delhi’s roads. According to the commission, more than 63 lakh such vehicles still ply in the capital, polluting the air. Meanwhile, The Indian Express reported earlier this week that the CAQM “sought a review of the Supreme Court’s August 12 order, which paused coercive action against end-of-life vehicles”. In August, the court effectively stayed its 2018 order upholding an NGT directive to keep end-of-life, BS-III-and-below vehicles off the roads. But in its latest submission, the CAQM has recommended that the court exclude BS-III and other older vehicles from that relief. According to a recent analysis by the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), despite a decrease in stubble burning this year, air pollution levels remained high in Delhi in October and November “primarily because of vehicular pollution”. Meanwhile, an IIT-Delhi study published last year showed that paving unpaved roads, repairing potholes, and fixing broken footpaths/dividers can reduce PM2.5 levels by a significant 15 percent to 26 percent. In its response to the MP, the government also mentions the implementation of the Supreme Court-mandated (and implemented by the CAQM) Graded Response Action Plan (GRAP), especially during peak winter months. In late November, the CAQM revoked the restrictions under Stage 3 of the GRAP in Delhi-NCR, which mandate a ban on non-essential construction and shifting primary schools to hybrid/online, among other measures. But the commission reiterated that construction and demolition sites previously ordered to shut down for violations will not be allowed to resume work unless they receive specific permission. In their response yesterday, the government also described measures taken to address the “transportation of construction materials and demolition waste, covering of construction materials and demolition waste”. However, according to a Times of India report on Wednesday, "garbage burning and open storage of construction and demolition waste continued unabated across the city." Moreover, the report found that staffers at the National Capital Region Transport Corporation station in Sarai Kale Khan were “unaware of multiple anti-pollution directions” issued by the Delhi government. Despite the government’s claims, even the Chief Justice of India, on December 1, raised doubts about whether the government's action plan had brought about any effective changes. "Why don't you revisit your action plan to see for yourself whether you have brought any effective changes? And if you have, then are they less than what is needed? We think it's important to evaluate whether any of your action plans have proved to be effective, ineffective, or less effective. Despite your hesitance or confidence about whether you would be able to achieve effective change, is it not right to revisit the action plan? Evaluate the steps you have taken so far.”

Need to invest in public transport, provide an alternative to car owners’: Sunita Narain, CSE

In almost any other city in the world, Delhi’s apocalyptic pollution levels would have sparked alarm. In India, however, it is business as usual. Governments are wary of taking action and even the once-activist judiciary is now lying low. This state of affairs is untenable, Sunita Narain, director Centre for Science and Environments says in this episode of Scroll Adda. The situation is severe and massive policy changes will have to be taken. Industries must be shifted to clean fuel, car and motorcycle users must be shifted to buses as well as trains and old, polluting vehicles must be barred from the streets of Delhi. Narain notes the progress that has been made. Fuel today is much cleaner than it was a few years back. But also notes that any such steps forward are rolled back given the sheer increase in the number of private vehicles in Delhi. She is despondent about the Indian state’s response to pollution, arguing that earlier in her career as an environmental activist, institutions were far more responsive to people’s needs.

Delhi Air Pollution: CAQM Constitutes 15-Member Expert Panel; Recommendations Within 2 Months

Delhi Air Pollution: Amid the deplorable air pollution in Delhi-NCR, the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) has constituted an expert committee under the Chairmanship of IIT Madras Professor Ashok Jhunjhunwala. Vehicular emissions remain a major contributor to air pollution in Delhi-NCR, aggravating PM 2.5, Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), Carbon Monoxide (CO), and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) emissions. This poses serious public-health challenges in the region. "The Expert Committee brings together leading academicians, health specialists, automotive research institutions and other experts in the field to recommend a robust, multi-pronged roadmap for emission reduction in the vehicular sector," the committee said, quoted by ANI. The committee would also examine technology readiness, infrastructure demands, cost considerations, and possible incentives to accelerate the shift to Electric Vehicles (EVs) across different categories. Furthermore, it would propose any additional measures needed to curb air pollution from vehicular transport. Who Will Be Part Of The CAQM Committee? Professor Ashok Jhunjhunwala, IIT Madras – Chairman Dr (Professor) Randeep Guleria, Former Director, AIIMS Delhi – Co-Chairman Professor Mukesh Sharma, IIT Kanpur – Member Dr (Professor) Arvind Kumar, Founder, Lung Care Foundation – Member Professor Sagnik Dey, IIT Delhi – Member Representative at the level of Joint Secretary of the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH) – Member Representative at the level of Joint Secretary, Ministry of Heavy Industries (MHI) – Member Archana Mittal, Advisor, NITI Aayog – Member Dr Reji Mathai, Director, ARAI Pune – Member Saurabh Dalela, Director, ICAT Manesar – Member Dr Arunabha Ghosh, CEO, CEEW, New Delhi – Member Anumita Roychowdhury, Executive Director, CSE, New Delhi – Member Amit Bhatt, Managing Director, ICCT New Delhi – Member Dr Anju Goyal, Associate Director, TERI, New Delhi – Member Dr Virendra Sharma, Member Technical, CAQM – Convener

Eggoz Eggs Controversy: अंडों में कैंसर का खतरा? Egoz विवाद की पूरी कहानी”

CSE (सेंटर फॉर साइंस एंड एनवायरनमेंट) की स्टडीज़ ने पहले ही भारतीय पोल्ट्री फार्म में एंटीबायोटिक-रेसिस्टेंट बैक्टीरिया की पुष्टि की है। Egoz सिर्फ़ एक प्रोडक्ट का मामला नहीं है — यह पोल्ट्री सेक्टर में एक सिस्टमिक कमी को दिखाता है। पिछले दस सालों में इंडिया का फ़ूड लैंडस्केप काफ़ी बदल गया है। कभी अख़बार में लिपटे सड़क किनारे ठेलों पर बिकने वाले अंडे, अब AC वाले सुपरमार्केट के गलियारों में आ गए हैं—शानदार डिब्बों में पैक होकर और “प्रीमियम,” “एंटीबायोटिक-फ़्री,” “हर्बल-फ़ेड,” और “फ़ार्म फ़्रेश” कहकर बेचे जाते हैं। शहरी इंडिया, जो अब पहले से कहीं ज़्यादा हेल्थ को लेकर जागरूक है, इन दावों पर यकीन कर लेता है और खुशी-खुशी ज़्यादा कीमत चुकाता है। वायरल रिपोर्ट जिसने दहशत फैला दी कुछ दिन पहले, फ़ूड और सप्लीमेंट्स की इंडिपेंडेंट ब्लाइंड लैब टेस्टिंग के लिए जाने जाने वाले एक YouTube चैनल ने एक वीडियो अपलोड किया जिसमें दावा किया गया था कि इगोज़ के अंडों में खतरनाक केमिकल्स होते हैं। नतीजों से पता चला कि ये नतीजे कथित तौर पर NABL से मान्यता प्राप्त लैब के थे। इन नतीजों से पता चला कि पैकेज्ड अंडों में नाइट्रोफ्यूरान और AOZ (3-एमिनो-2-ऑक्साज़ोलिडिनोन) मौजूद थे। कथित तौर पर AOZ का पाया गया कंसंट्रेशन 0.73 से 0.74 µg/kg के बीच था। यह एक ऐसा केमिकल है जो कई देशों में अपने कैंसर पैदा करने वाले नेचर की वजह से बैन है। कुछ ही घंटों में, सोशल मीडिया पर हंगामा मच गया। कंज्यूमर पूछने लगे: “क्या ये अंडे हमें ज़हर दे रहे हैं?” “क्या ये हमारे DNA को बदल सकते हैं?” “क्या यह धीमा ज़हर हेल्थ फ़ूड के तौर पर दिया जाता है?” हंगामे को समझने के लिए, पहले कंपनी के स्केल और दावों को समझना होगा। Egoz कितना बड़ा है? Egoz कोई छोटा प्लेयर नहीं है। यह भारत के तेज़ी से बढ़ते स्टार्टअप इकोसिस्टम का हिस्सा है, जिसे 2017 में IIT खड़गपुर के पुराने स्टूडेंट अभिषेक नेगी, आदित्य सिंह और उत्तम कुमार ने लॉन्च किया था। फाउंडर्स ने एक बड़ी कमी पहचानी: भारत में हर साल 140 बिलियन से ज़्यादा अंडे बनते हैं, फिर भी लगभग 95% मार्केट अनऑर्गनाइज़्ड है। पारंपरिक मंडियों में बिकने वाले खुले अंडों के लिए क्वालिटी कंट्रोल बहुत कम होता है। इन्वेस्टर्स को Egoz के विज़न पर भरोसा था। कंपनी ने ये पैसे जुटाए: IvyCap Ventures की लीडरशिप में Series B (2022) में $8.8 मिलियन Series C (जून 2025) में $20 मिलियन—इसका सबसे बड़ा फंडिंग राउंड आज, Egoz दिल्ली-NCR, बेंगलुरु, हैदराबाद, चेन्नई, मुंबई और पुणे समेत 11 बड़े भारतीय शहरों में काम करता है। आरोप असल में क्या हैं? यह विवाद तब शुरू हुआ जब एक YouTube चैनल ने Egoz के अंडे खरीदे और सैंपल एक सर्टिफाइड लैब में भेजे। लैब ने कथित तौर पर AOZ का पता लगाया, जो एक बैन नाइट्रोफ्यूराज़ोन एंटीबायोटिक ग्रुप का मेटाबोलाइट है। AOZ कई देशों में इसके जीनोटॉक्सिक और कार्सिनोजेनिक पोटेंशियल की वजह से बैन है। यह खोज सीधे तौर पर Egoz के मार्केटिंग दावों के उलट है: “100% एंटीबायोटिक-फ्री अंडे” “हर्बल से बनी मुर्गियां” “ज़ीरो केमिकल्स” कस्टमर्स ने ब्रांड पर प्रॉफिट के लिए पब्लिक हेल्थ से कॉम्प्रोमाइज करने का आरोप लगाया। क्या अंडे सच में आपका DNA बदल सकते हैं? साइंस ने समझाया ऑनलाइन फैले सबसे बड़े डरों में से एक था: “क्या ये अंडे खाने से मेरा DNA बदल जाएगा?” साइंटिफिकली, नहीं। जब आप कोई भी खाना खाते हैं—पौधे का या जानवर का—तो उसमें मौजूद DNA पेट के एसिड और एंजाइम से छोटे न्यूक्लियोटाइड में टूट जाता है। ये आपके जीनोम में खुद को नहीं डालते। आप अंडा, चिकन या चावल खाने से “म्यूटेंट” नहीं बन सकते। तो असली खतरा क्या है? जीनोटॉक्सिसिटी असली खतरा जीनोटॉक्सिसिटी है, जेनेटिक म्यूटेशन नहीं। जीनोटॉक्सिक केमिकल: अपना DNA दोबारा न लिखें। लेकिन वे DNA स्ट्रैंड को नुकसान पहुंचा सकते हैं या गलतियां पैदा कर सकते हैं। खराब DNA रिपेयर से अनकंट्रोल्ड सेल डिवीज़न हो सकता है — जो कैंसर है। नाइट्रोफ्यूरान और AOZ इस जीनोटॉक्सिक कैटेगरी में आते हैं। नाइट्रोफ्यूरान और AOZ क्या हैं? नाइट्रोफ्यूरान बैन एंटीबायोटिक्स की एक क्लास है। AOZ एक मेटाबोलाइट है जो जानवरों को एंटीबायोटिक फुराज़ोलिडोन खिलाने पर बनता है। भले ही ओरिजिनल दवा कुछ घंटों में ब्लडस्ट्रीम से गायब हो जाए, AOZ टिशू (मीट, अंडे) में हफ्तों या महीनों तक रहता है, इसीलिए लैब AOZ के लिए टेस्ट करते हैं, एंटीबायोटिक के लिए नहीं। AOZ मिलने से यह साबित होता है कि मुर्गी किसी समय नाइट्रोफ्यूरान के संपर्क में आई थी। किसान अभी भी बैन एंटीबायोटिक्स का इस्तेमाल क्यों कर रहे हैं? क्योंकि ये हैं: बहुत सस्ते साल्मोनेला और E. कोलाई जैसे बैक्टीरिया के खिलाफ असरदार भीड़भाड़ वाले पोल्ट्री फार्म में काम के, जहां इंफेक्शन तेजी से फैलता है अंडों का प्रोडक्शन और वज़न बढ़ाने में मदद करते हैं यह गैर-कानूनी लेकिन आम तरीका लागत कम रखता है और आउटपुट स्थिर रखता है। क्या 0.74 µg/kg कंज्यूमर्स के लिए खतरनाक है? 0.74 पार्ट्स पर बिलियन (ppb) सुनने में बहुत कम लगता है — और यह है भी। ऐसे अंडे खाने से तुरंत बीमारी नहीं होगी। लेकिन दिक्कत लंबे समय तक एक्सपोजर की है। कार्सिनोजेन्स के लिए, दुनिया भर की रेगुलेटरी बॉडीज़ का मानना ​​है: “कोई भी मात्रा सच में सुरक्षित नहीं है।” बड़ा खतरा: एंटीबायोटिक रेजिस्टेंस (AMR) कैंसर के खतरे से भी ज़्यादा खतरनाक AMR (एंटीमाइक्रोबियल रेजिस्टेंस) है। जब पोल्ट्री बार-बार बैन एंटीबायोटिक्स खाती है: उनके पेट के बैक्टीरिया सुपरबग बन जाते हैं। ये दवा-रेसिस्टेंट माइक्रोब्स अंडे, मीट या खेत के कचरे के ज़रिए इंसानों में फैलते हैं। एक बार इन्फेक्ट होने पर, आम एंटीबायोटिक्स काम करना बंद कर देती हैं। फूड पॉइज़निंग या टाइफाइड का एक मामूली मामला जानलेवा हो सकता है। CSE (सेंटर फॉर साइंस एंड एनवायरनमेंट) की स्टडीज़ ने पहले ही भारतीय पोल्ट्री फार्म में एंटीबायोटिक-रेसिस्टेंट बैक्टीरिया की पुष्टि की है। Egoz सिर्फ़ एक प्रोडक्ट का मामला नहीं है — यह पोल्ट्री सेक्टर में एक सिस्टमिक कमी को दिखाता है। विदेशी देश क्या करते हैं? USA FDA ने 2002 में नाइट्रोफ्यूरान पर बैन लगा दिया था। ज़ीरो-टॉलरेंस पॉलिसी। थोड़ी सी भी पता चलने वाली मात्रा भी प्रोडक्ट को गैर-कानूनी बना देती है। बैच नष्ट कर दिए जाते हैं; कंपनियों को ब्लैकलिस्ट किया गया है यूरोपियन यूनियन। नाइट्रोफ्यूरान पर भी बैन। टेक्निकल डिटेक्शन लिमिट के तौर पर 0.5 µg/kg AOZ तक की इजाज़त। Egoz के अंडे (0.74 µg/kg) इस लिमिट से ज़्यादा हैं — मतलब उन्हें यूरोप में कानूनी तौर पर नहीं बेचा जा सकता। भारत की कानूनी स्थिति क्या है? भारत के कानून उलटे हैं: FSSAI ने नाइट्रोफ्यूरान और AOZ पर बैन लगाया है। लेकिन 1.0 µg/kg की टेस्टिंग टॉलरेंस लिमिट भी तय की है। क्योंकि Egoz के सैंपल में कथित तौर पर 0.74 µg/kg दिखा, इसलिए ब्रांड यह तर्क दे सकता है: “हमारा प्रोडक्ट भारत की कानूनी सुरक्षा लिमिट के अंदर है।” यह रेगुलेटरी गैप ही कन्फ्यूजन की जड़ है। Egos क्या कहता है? फाउंडर अभिषेक नेगी ने सोशल मीडिया पर कंपनी का बचाव किया: “हम कोई भी बैन या परमिटेड एंटीबायोटिक इस्तेमाल नहीं करते।” “हमारे लिए, बैन का मतलब है पूरी तरह बैन।” “हम 11 लेयर की सेफ्टी चेक और 100% हर्बल फीड फॉलो करते हैं।” “हम ट्रांसपेरेंसी बनाए रखते हैं और क्वालिटी से कोई कॉम्प्रोमाइज़ नहीं करेंगे।” Egoz ने कंज्यूमर्स को भरोसा दिलाने के लिए अपनी लैब रिपोर्ट भी ऑनलाइन पोस्ट कीं।

Crisis looms

The year, 2025, has been a continuing saga of climate tragedies for many parts of India. It has also been the year when political rhetoric on how the nation guides the world got shriller. In August, Punjab, our breadbasket, got flooded; millions faced displacement when the Beas and the Sutlej overflowed after extreme rains. The tragedy soon faded away from public memory. Next, in the rugged hills of Uttarakhand, cloudbursts and landslides tore through tens of villages, wiping out entire hamlets, homes, small hotels, and footbridges. People eking out a living from tourism found themselves displaced overnight, their livelihoods lost and lives shattered. Roads and access routes became history. The fragility of mountain livelihoods came to fore as the deluge erased the future of thousands. Earlier, in summer, heat waves enveloped much of central and southern India, hitting the poorest the hardest, particularly in the countryside and small towns. If the north witnessed flooding in August, much of western and central Maharashtra, particularly Marathwada, was cursed in September. Historically drought-prone, that region bore the brunt of heavy rains and floods. A region hardened by years of water stress and neglect was suddenly caught in the vortex of excess rain and flash floods. Grapes, sugarcane, soybeans, maize, and other crops got destroyed completely over thousands of acres, and homes and livestock got washed away. The destruction of poorer households sparked a mental health emergency and left many uncertain about their futures. On India’s east coast, Cyclone Montha wreaked havoc in October. The storm flattened crops and battered farmlands, leaving behind a trail of losses. There was more, but these four episodes are enough to lay bare how shifting climatic patterns are erasing traditional coping strategies of people. India experienced “extreme weather events on 99 per cent of the days in the first nine months” of 2025, the Centre for Science and Environment says in its 2025 climate assessment report. The data are glaring: extreme weather events claimed more than 4,000 human lives — a 48% increase from 2022 — and over 3,000 of those lives were lost during the monsoon in floods and landslides. Crops over 47 million hectares were destroyed — a 400% rise in four years. More than 30 states and Union territories recorded extreme weather for eight consecutive months. The report and the anecdotes portray a broader map of a country torn between ecological volatility and tattered regional economies. Add to it the sudden impact of the tariffs imposed by the president of the United States of America, Donald Trump, and you have a tragedy that is accentuated multiple times over. Taken together, the year’s events expose three interlinked policy gaps. First, water governance remains fragmented, even wanting. Second, disaster-climate finance and preparedness are a hoax. Relief and meagre cash compensation remains the only policy response; they are band aids. Finally, what matters is the political economy. Macro growth and industrial production data can be misguiding. Real resilience requires attention and budgets toward rural infrastructure and local health systems to cope with consequences and adaptation at scale before — not after — a calamity strikes. The climate and economy are two intertwined spirals.

PM2.5 level rises beyond safe limit in Gurgaon, Teri Gram pollution hotspot

Gurgaon: The city's air quality index (AQI) on Wednesday went up to 276 from the previous day's 260. An analysis of PM2.5 data from air quality monitoring stations over the past 10 days shows that pollution is concentrated in a few chronic pockets instead of being distributed evenly across the region. Data from Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) indicates that Teri Gram has emerged as the city's most critical pollution hotspot so far this month, recording PM2.5 levels above 300 on six days. The station reported levels of 304 on Dec 1, 333 on Dec 2, 326 on Dec 4, 342 on Dec 6, 345 on Dec 7 and 323 on Dec 9. Sector 51 has reported consistently high baseline pollution as well, with short periods of relief. PM2.5 levels remained in the poor category for most of the first 10 days of the month, recording 283 on Dec 1, 292 on Dec 2, 251 on Dec 3, 262 on Dec 4 and 295 on Dec 5. After a brief dip to 179 on Dec 7, pollution rose again to 327 on Dec 8 and remained high at 297 on Dec 9. At Manesar's industrial belt, monitored at Sector 2 IMT, PM2.5 levels crossed 320 for four consecutive days between Dec 1 and 4, with readings of 323, 331, 327 and 302. Levels dropped slightly to 282 on Dec 6, 254 on Dec 8 and 238 on Dec 9. Vikas Sadan showed noticeable day-to-day variation rather than persistent high levels. PM2.5 levels fell to 159 on Dec 2 and 162 on Dec 9, although the area also recorded temporary spikes to 293 on Dec 4 and 290 on Dec 5. Gwal Pahari remained the least polluted among the five stations, although it too experienced seasonal smog. While there were brief spikes above 300 in early Dec, PM2.5 levels generally stayed lower than in the city's core hotspots. Lower traffic density and better air movement due to its elevation helped keep pollution comparatively lower. "The data shows that the air crisis is driven by persistent micro hotspots rather than uniform pollution across the city. With Teri Gram, Sector 51 and IMT Manesar repeatedly recording unsafe air, civic agencies need to focus on location-specific enforcement and source-wise control instead of broad city-level measures that do not address these chronic pockets," said Shubhansh Tiwari from the Centre for Science and Environment. "We have identified hotspots where pollution levels remain consistently high. Targeted enforcement drives are under way in these areas, including checks on construction dust, industrial emissions and waste burning. Strict action is being taken against violators, and monitoring is being intensified," said Krishan Kumar, regional officer, Haryana State Pollution Control Board.

NHRC Conference Highlights Public Services for Human Dignity

Ms. Sunita Narain, Director General of the Centre for Science and Environment, stressed the necessity of recognizing the right to a clean environment as fundamental to living with dignity. She urged stakeholders to innovate and support scalable solutions in sanitation, energy, and public health sectors, reinforcing that rights should reflect true lived experiences, not mere policy frameworks. The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) of India hosted a pivotal National Conference today, themed ‘Ensuring Everyday Essentials: Public Services and Dignity for All,’ at Bharat Mandapam in New Delhi. This event, held in observance of Human Rights Day, was chaired by NHRC Chairperson, Justice V. Ramasubramanian, who emphasized the importance of public services and individual dignity in upholding the country’s status as a welfare state. Justice Ramasubramanian pointed out that elected representatives create policies aimed at public welfare, while civil servants are responsible for executing these policies. He stressed that public servants play a crucial role in bridging the gap between policy formulation and the delivery of benefits to citizens, citing ideals from the Ramayana to illustrate the importance of efficiency in achieving maximum benefit swiftly and cost-effectively. Reflections on Progress and Human Rights Delivering the keynote address, Dr. P. K. Mishra, Principal Secretary to the Prime Minister, highlighted Human Rights Day as a reaffirmation of India’s democratic principles. He noted the country’s significant strides in recent years, particularly in enhancing living standards through housing, nutrition, healthcare, and employment security. Citing Article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Dr. Mishra pointed out India’s transition from focusing solely on civil and political rights to a more comprehensive approach that includes socio-economic and cultural entitlements.

दिल्ली-NCR में इस बार पॉल्यूशन का 'टॉक्सिक कॉकटेल', इन 5 नए खतरों की आहट

CSE की अनुमिता रॉयचौधरी कहती हैं कि यह ट्रेंड दिखाता है कि मौसम पर निर्भरता कम होनी चाहिए, लोकल स्रोतों पर नियंत्रण जरूरी है.

दिल्ली की हवा ‘मौत का कॉकटेल’, पराली नहीं लोकल प्रदूषण असली कातिल

सेंटर फॉर साइंस एंड एनवायरनमेंट (CSE) की नई रिपोर्ट ‘टॉक्सिक कॉकरटेल ऑफ पॉल्यूशन ड्यूरिंग अर्ली विंटर इन दिल्ली–NCR’ बताती है कि अब राजधानी की हवा को सबसे ज्यादा नुकसान स्थानीय स्रोत पहुंचा रहे हैं। वाहन, उद्योग, कचरा जलाना और बिजली संयंत्र मिलकर 85% प्रदूषण पैदा कर रहे हैं।

Delhi-NCR Faces 'Toxic Cocktail' Of Pollution, Says CSE Report Warning Of Five New Dangers As Local Sources Gain In Strength

This year, the pollution crisis in the Delhi-NCR region has stretched from October to December, maintaining consistently severe to critical AQI levels even with minimal contribution from the crop residue burning. A new report by the Centre for Science and Environment, 'Toxic Cocktail of Pollution During Early Winter in Delhi-NCR', identifies local emission sources as the prime culprits and warns of five new dangers that are now expanding and aggravating. The pollution this year, the report said, is a deadly combination of high PM2.5 combined with high NO2 and CO. Experts at the CSE say that minor measures can no longer help; strong, systemic changes are needed to cut emissions from vehicles, industries, and power plants. 1. Longer And Uncontrolled Pollution Season This year, the pollution episode has lasted for over 80 days, extending from October well into December, whereas it used to subside by November. In fact, the AQI has stayed in the 'Very Poor' to 'Severe' category for almost the entire month of November. Scientific Fact: Compared to the previous year, PM2.5 averaged 9% less but equaled the three-year average, remaining steady at around 100 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m³). Reason: During winter, the atmospheric boundary layer turns shallow and traps pollutants. Vehicular emissions increase manifold during peak traffic time-7-10 Am and 6-9 PM-and the PM2.5 increase is pretty rapid. According to the CSE expert Anumita Roychowdhury, this trend reflects a reduced dependence on meteorology, with greater priority given to source control at the local level. 2. Explosion Of Pollution Hotspots And Regional Spread Hotspots of pollution have increased manifold since 2018, where a number of places recorded alarming levels of contamination. Worst Affected: Jahangirpuri recorded an annual PM2.5 average of 119 µg/m³, followed by Bawana and Wazirpur at 113 µg/m³. New Hotspots: Other emerging areas include Vivek Vihar with 101 µg/m³, Nehru Nagar, Alipur, Siri Fort, Dwarka Sector-8, and Patparganj, crossing the 90 µg/m³ mark. Reason: These hotspots, now identified as permanent, are driven by dense traffic, industries, construction activity, and waste burning in North and East Delhi. 3. Local Sources Emerge As Primary Villain: Contribution of 85% Due to heavy rains in Punjab and Haryana, the incidents of stubble burning were considerably fewer this year, contrib­uting less than 5% on most days in October-November, and peaking at only 22% on November 12-13. Scientific Fact: Even with minimal stubble burning, the air remained toxic. PM2.5 affected AQI for 34 days, PM10 for 25 days, and Ozone for 13 days. Reason: This points overwhelmingly to local sources: vehicles (contributing NO2 and CO), industries, power plants, waste burning, and domestic fuels. CSE draws the conclusion from this that although reduced stubble burning prevented severe peak spikes, the dangerous average pollution levels remained stable. ADVERTISEMENT 4. The Silent Threat: Toxic Cocktail of NO2 and CO While headlines might be dominated by PM2.5, the concurrent rise in NO2 and CO levels creates a toxic cocktail often overlooked. Science Fact: NO2 and PM2.5 increase together at morning and evening peaks because of traffic. CO exceeded the 8-hour standard of 2 mg/m³ on more than 30 days at 22 monitoring stations, with a maximum of 55 days in Dwarka Sector-8. Health hazard: This combination is especially hazardous because it deteriorates the lungs, blood, and heart, making the air much more toxic to breathe.

Climate In 2025: Extreme Weather Events That Shaped India's Year

As 2025 draws to a close, it's worth looking back at what's been a genuinely terrifying year for India's climate. If there's one thing this year will be remembered for, it's the extreme weather events that highlighted the country's vulnerability to climate change. The Year's Worst Hits Remember that brutal April heatwave? Delhi was absolutely sweltering, and temperatures crossed 40°C. It doesn't sound that dramatic until you realise it was 4 degrees hotter than similar heatwaves before 1987. Human-induced climate change was the main culprit, affecting not just India but Pakistan too, according to a ClimaMeter study. Then there was Cyclone Montha. The destruction it left behind was staggering, about Rs 53 billion in damages, impacting Andhra Pradesh the most. Tamil Nadu experienced heavy rainfall, while alerts went out to Odisha, West Bengal, Puducherry, and several other regions. Meanwhile, North India faced cold waves, with fog and low temperatures, basically making everyone's daily routine a nightmare. Extreme Weather Events On 99% Of Days The Centre for Science and Environment and Down To Earth dropped their Climate India 2025 report in November, and the findings are shocking. India faced extreme weather events on 99% of days during the first nine months of 2025. When it comes to extreme weather events, we're talking about heatwaves, cold waves, lightning, storms, heavy rain, floods and landslides. As per the report, at least 4,064 lives were lost, and 9.47 million hectares of crops were affected. This is just a summary; the details of the report are far more scary, highlighting the urgent need to work on quick response action during such weather conditions. The northwest region recorded the highest frequency of extreme weather events, with 257 event days, followed closely by the east and northeast at 229 days.

Rajasthan Secures Over ₹130 Crore in CSR Commitments to Boost Water Conservation Efforts

Rajasthan’s push toward long-term water security received a major boost as corporate and civil society partners committed more than ₹130 crore in CSR support at a recent high-level state consultation in Jaipur. The consultation, centred on “Building Public–Private–People Partnership for a Water-Secure Rajasthan,” was organised by UNICEF in collaboration with the Department of Watershed Development and Soil Conservation and implementing partner Aravali. The platform brought together government departments, CSR organisations, academia and grassroots institutions to chart a coordinated path for sustainable water management. The Government of Rajasthan signed MoUs amounting to ₹100 crore with leading CSR partners including Piramal Foundation, PHD Chamber, Arpan Seva, HPCL and ITC to support Mukhya Mantri Jal Swavlamban Abhiyan (MJSA) 2.0. The commitments aim to strengthen rural infrastructure, promote innovative water-conservation practices, and build capacity at the panchayat level. Additional MoUs worth ₹14 crore were formalised—₹9 crore from PHD RDF Chamber of Commerce and ₹5 crore from Piramal Foundation and Arpan Seva Sansthan—to mobilise ₹100 crore investment for carbon credits through plantation efforts across 10,000 hectares of wasteland. Further pledges of ₹21 crore came from Ambuja Cement, Dharampal Satyapal Group, ITC, Jamnalal Bajaj Trust and HPRRL, along with support for village groundwater cooperatives under the MARVI concept. Deliberations through the day focused on aligning government schemes with CSR strategies, reinforcing the link between water security, rural livelihoods, farmers’ income and climate resilience. Participants identified the need for stronger infrastructure, technology-driven solutions, capacity-building and scalable conservation models. Representatives from more than 20 corporate entities—including Piramal Foundation, ITC, Ambuja, Shree Cement, DS Group, JK Cement and the Jamnalal Kaniram Bajaj Trust—shared insights. Their views were complemented by contributions from 15 NGOs such as Arpan Seva Sansthan, Ibtada, Pradan, FES, Centre for Micro Finance and Gramin Vikas Trust, highlighting on-ground challenges and innovations. Academic and research institutions including ICRISAT, MNIT Jaipur, IIT Roorkee, Kanoria College and Western Sydney University added scholarly depth to the discussions. Padma Shri awardees Laxman Singh and Shyam Sundar Paliwal also provided valuable perspectives rooted in community-led models. Officers from key water-related departments ensured a comprehensive administrative lens to the conversations. Addressing the consultation, Panchayati Raj Minister Madan Dilawar said the CSR commitments mark a decisive step toward a water-secure Rajasthan. He underscored the role of community participation and innovation in ensuring sustainability. In his keynote remarks, he highlighted how CSR-backed interventions under MJSA enhance community ownership and strengthen long-term outcomes. Muhammad Junaid, Director, Watershed Development and Soil Conservation, outlined progress under MJSA and PMKSY, stressing the importance of adopting best practices from ongoing innovations. He said showcasing successful models and interventions is critical to shaping future strategies and action plans. UNICEF reiterated its commitment to climate resilience and environmental sustainability. Paulos Workneh, Chief of WASH, emphasised alignment with the Sustainable Development Goals, particularly SDG 6 and SDG 13. He noted that collaborative efforts since 2023 have strengthened local water-security initiatives. Rushabh Hemani, Chief In-Charge and WASH Specialist, UNICEF Jaipur, noted that the partnership aligns with the state’s 2047 water-security vision, structured into phased milestones for 2030, 2035 and 2047. The consultation also featured experience-sharing sessions with organisations including AIWC Marvi, Centre for Science and Environment, Ambuja Foundation, Jamnalal Kaniram Bajaj Foundation, ITC, PHD Chamber of Commerce, Dharampal Satyapal Group and Shree Cement Foundation. UNICEF presented field insights to guide collaborative planning, marking a significant stride in Rajasthan’s journey toward a water-secure and climate-resilient future.

दिल्ली से भी भयावह है भिवाड़ी का प्रदूषण संकट लेकिन इस पर कोई बात नहीं करना चाहता

लाल ज़ोन में छोटे शहर बीवाड़ी राष्ट्रीय संकट की स्थानीय तस्वीर है. छोटे औद्योगिक शहर बड़े प्रदूषणकारी बन गए हैं. CPCB निरीक्षण, CAG ऑडिट और संसदीय कमेटी की रिपोर्टें बार-बार बताती हैं कि देशभर में पर्यावरण इंजीनियरों, लैब तकनीशियनों और मॉनिटरिंग सिस्टम की भारी कमी है. 2021 की सेंटर फॉर साइंस एंड एन्वायरनमेंट (CSE) रिपोर्ट में पाया गया कि 2009 में प्रदूषित घोषित किए गए 88 औद्योगिक क्लस्टरों में से कई में 2018 तक हवा, पानी और मिट्टी का प्रदूषण और बढ़ गया. 33 क्लस्टरों में वायु गुणवत्ता बिगड़ी, जिनमें मथुरा, बुलंदशहर-खुर्जा, मुरादाबाद और तारापुर शामिल हैं. पिछले साल मेघालय के औद्योगिक शहर बर्नीहाट को IQAir रिपोर्ट में दुनिया के सबसे प्रदूषित शहर के रूप में रैंक किया गया था. हरियाणा का धारूहेड़ा भी एक बड़ा दावेदार है.