Cse In News

Inaction Endangers Health, Food Safety and Standards Authority of India Fails to Take Strong Action Against Honey Adulteration

Inaction Endangers Health, Food Safety and Standards Authority of India Fails to Take Strong Action Against Honey Adulteration The recent investigation that leading brands were involved in the adulteration of honey shocked Indian consumers. Despite widespread media coverage and call for regulation, the Centre for Science and Environment found that the regulatory body remains lax towards the issue. A report from MANYA SAINI. AN investigation by the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) in December 2020 revealed the extent of the food adulteration business in India with 17 leading producers of honey out of 22 failing the test of purity. The revelation caused widespread reverberations across the country. At a recent webinar, CSE said that the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has failed to take action to combat the menace. Food adulteration is a thriving but highly nefarious business in the country. In the case of honey, CSE laboratory results showed that modified sugar syrup imported from China was mixed with pure honey. The three brands to successfully pass the test were Saffola, Markfed Sohna and Nature’s Nectar. The most significant aspect of the CSE investigation remains that the adultered honey passed all the required standard testing of the FSSAI. The sophisticated and highly evolved practices of honey adulteration have surpassed current directives and thus need heavy revision. Some of the suggestions include a focused approach towards traceability, law enforcement, public testing and regulating the import of sugar syrups. Also Read: Food Adulteration in India is Endangering Health and Boosting Business Denial and Advertising A study by TAM Media Research on advertising volumes revealed that expenditure on honey grew nine times in December 2020 as compared to November 2020. Amid the allegations and findings of CSE becoming public knowledge, leading brands took to all three mediums, print, television and digital to placate the raging consumers and assure them of the quality of their honey. Some of them even had labels strung around the honey containers saying that they were 100% pure. The sophisticated and highly evolved practices of honey adulteration have surpassed current directives and thus need heavy revision. Some of the suggestions include a focused approach towards traceability, law enforcement, public testing and regulating the import of sugar syrups. Amit Khurana, programme director, food safety and toxins unit, CSE, said, “The companies are making such claims because there is no deterrent action. This is exactly why the FSSAI should have come forward, as it is now proved that its tests can fail to detect adulteration.” Amid inaction by the regulatory body, Dabur, counted among the most trusted honey brands of the country, has launched a campaign where it has invited customers to download a purity certificate from their website. Similar is the case with Patanjali, whose founder Baba Randev has shot a television advertisement with claims that the company’s honey is assured of its quality on over 100 parameters. The two are one of the many, who have denied or undermined the findings of the laboratory tests conducted by CSE. The consumers continue to tussle with the brands, while civil society organisations call for new regulations in the honey sector. Traceability – The Way Forward Traceability, simply put, is tracing the food to its original source through a designed system and network. In a recent webinar held by the CSE, Sunita Narain, the director-general observed that while traceability exists for exported food products, a similar channel needs to be developed for food consumed and produced domestically. While organic produce finds itself held at a higher standard, the same accountability must extend to conventional products as well in the interest of public safety and nutrition. Adit Nadig, co-founder of TraceX Technologies during the webinar observed, that the added advantage of this is the empowerment of consumers who would be in a position to question and verify the claims of brands when they present their standards of purity. While organic produce finds itself held at a higher standard, the same accountability must extend to conventional products as well in the interest of public safety and nutrition. “Traceability is inescapable and it is the need of the hour,” said Tarun Bajaj, director of Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA). India through both policy actions of the regulatory bodies, as well as consumer awareness, needs to take active actions to combat food adulteration. Millions of people in the country buy honey and similar products associated with generations of strongly held beliefs of immunity and traditional knowledge. Food and its production must be protected, as it is deeply rooted in the health, nutrition and livelihood of the people.

1 पेड़ की कीमत 75 लाख! SC ने कहा- ऐसे तो कंगाल हो जाएगी सरकार

सुप्रीम कोर्ट की तरफ से गठित एक कमिटी ने 356 पेड़ों का मूल्य 220 करोड़ रुपए आंका है. मामला सेतु भारतमाला परियोजना के तहत 5 रेलवे ओवरब्रिज के निर्माण से जुड़ा है. नई दिल्ली: सुप्रीम कोर्ट की तरफ से गठित एक कमिटी ने बताया है कि एक पेड़ साल भर में 75 हज़ार रुपए का ऑक्सीजन और खाद पैदा करता है. इस लिहाज से पुराने और मजबूत पेड़ों की कीमत 75 लाख या उससे ज़्यादा हो सकती है. कोर्ट ने कहा है कि वह कमिटी की रिपोर्ट और दूसरे तथ्यों को ध्यान में रखते हुए सरकारी परियोजनाओं के लिए पेड़ों को काटने पर प्रोटोकॉल तैयार करेगा. मामला पश्चिम बंगाल में सेतु भारतमाला परियोजना के तहत 5 रेलवे ओवरब्रिज के निर्माण का है. इनके जरिए भारतीय सड़क नेटवर्क को बांग्लादेश और म्यांमार के सड़क नेटवर्क से जोड़ा जाना है. इससे पूर्वी एशिया के देशों के साथ व्यापारिक संबंध मज़बूत होंगे. पूर्वोत्तर भारत के आर्थिक विकास में भी तेज़ी आएगी. परियोजना के लिए 356 पेड़ काटे जाने हैं. एसोसिएशन फ़ॉर प्रोटेक्शन ऑफ डेमोक्रेटिक राइट्स नाम की संस्था ने वकील प्रशांत भूषण के ज़रिए इसका विरोध करते हुए याचिका दाखिल की है. नेशनल हाईवे 112 को रेलवे क्रॉसिंग मुक्त करने के लिए बन रहे इन ओवरब्रिजों के निर्माण का विरोध करते हुए एनजीओ ने कहा है कि जो पेड़ परियोजना के लिए काटे जाएंगे, वह काफी पुराने और मजबूत पेड़ हैं. उन्हें नहीं काटा जाना चाहिए. सरकार को आर्थिक विकास के नाम पर पर्यावरण का नुकसान करने की अनुमति नहीं दी जा सकती. सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने पुराने पेड़ों की कीमत का आकलन करने के लिए 5 पर्यावरणविदों की एक कमिटी बनाई थी. सोहम पांड्या, निशिकांत मुखर्जी, सुनीता नारायण, बिकाश कुमार माजी और निरंजिता मित्रा की इस कमिटी ने कोर्ट को बताया है कि एक पेड़ साल भर में जितना ऑक्सीजन देता है, उसकी कीमत 45 हज़ार रुपए होती है. पेड़ के चलते ज़मीन को जो पोषण मिलता है, जो कंपोस्ट खाद तैयार होती है तो उसकी सालाना उत्पादकता 75 हज़ार रुपए है. इस हिसाब से एक पुराने और मजबूत पेड़, जिसकी आयु 100 साल बाकी है, की कीमत कम से कम 75 लाख रुपए होती है. कमिटी ने 356 पेड़ों का मूल्यांकन 220 करोड़ रुपए आंका है. यह भी कहा है कि अगर आगे चल के सड़क को चौड़ा करने की योजना बनी तो 3 हज़ार करोड़ रुपए के पेड़ काटने पड़ेंगे. सुप्रीम कोर्ट के चीफ जस्टिस एस ए बोबड़े की अध्यक्षता वाली 3 जजों की बेंच ने कमिटी की तरफ से की गई मेहनत की सराहना की. लेकिन कोर्ट ने कहा, "अगर सरकारी परियोजनाओं के दौरान इस तरह से पेड़ों की कीमत कर उसे परियोजना की लागत में जोड़ने को कहा गया, तो कोई भी सरकार कंगाल हो जाएगी. इस मसले पर संतुलित तरीके से विचार कर एक प्रोटोकॉल बनाने की ज़रूरत है." विशेषज्ञ कमिटी ने यह सुझाव भी दिया है कि पेड़ को काटने की बजाय उसे जड़ समेत दूसरी जगह स्थापित करने पर ज़ोर दिया जाना चाहिए. किसी प्रोजेक्ट के लिए पेड़ काटने है पड़ें तो उसकी बजाय सिर्फ 5 पौधे लगाने की नीति गलत है. तने के ऊपरी हिस्से के आकार के आधार पर कटे पेड़ के बदले नए पौधे लगाए जाने चाहिए. यह संख्या 10 से लेकर 50 तक हो सकती है. कोर्ट ने मामले की सुनवाई फिलहाल 2 हफ्ते टाल दी है. एनजीओ के वकील और सरकार से मिल कर सरकारी परियोजनाओं के लिए पेड़ों को काटे जाने पर एक प्रोटोकॉल तैयार करने के लिए कहा है.

Age multiplied by Rs 74,500 is the cost of a tree in India: SC panel

Age multiplied by Rs 74,500 is the cost of a tree in India: SC panel A bench headed by Chief Justice of India S A Bobde had set up a committee in February to evaluate the true value of a tree. We all know that trees are priceless because they provide us with the oxygen we breathe. However, for the first time in India, guidelines on the valuation of trees has been set. A Supreme Court-appointed committee has submitted a report in this regard. According to the report submitted, a tree's monetary worth will be counted as - its age multiplied by Rs 74,500. A bench headed by Chief Justice of India S A Bobde had set up a committee in February to evaluate the true value of a tree, when a PIL had challenged the West Bengal government's decision to cut 356 trees to construct five railway overbridges costing Rs 500 crore. The committee comprised Soham Pandya, B K Maji, Niranjita Mitra, N K Mukarji and Sunita Narain. The committee members in January 2020 were asked by the Bench to determine the economic value of trees, based on cost of oxygen they release, and other benefits to the environment. The five-member committee of experts added that a heritage tree with a lifespan of well over 100 years could be valued at more than Rs 1 crore. The report was filed in February last year but made public on Wednesday.

Supreme Court seek response from Centre, West Bengal Govt, Association for Protection of Democratic Rights on valuation of trees

Supreme Court seek response from Centre, West Bengal Govt, Association for Protection of Democratic Rights on valuation of trees The court was hearing an appeal of the NGO, Association for Protection of Democratic Rights (APDR) against the final order of the Calcutta High Court which allowed the felling of 356 trees for the construction of Railway over bridges on NH 35 in West Bengal. The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought response from the central government, West Bengal government and the Association for Protection of Democratic Rights on the report submitted by a committee setting a guideline on the valuation of trees. The bench comprising Chief Justice S.A. Bobde, Justices A.S Bopanna and V.Ramasubramanian was hearing an appeal of the NGO, Association for Protection of Democratic Rights (APDR) against the final order of the Calcutta High Court which allowed the felling of 356 trees for the construction of Railway over bridges on NH 35 in West Bengal. The Apex Court on January 9, 2020 constituted a committee of 5 namely Nishikant Mukerji (managing director, Tiger Environment Centre), Soham Pandya, (secretary and executive director at the Centre of Science for Villages), Sunita Narain(director, Centre for Science and Environment), Bikash Kumar Maji (assistant chief engineer, ROB unit, West Bengal government) and Niranjita Mitra (division forest officer, North 24 Parganas) to examine the issue of loss of trees and to consider the alternatives to the proposed felling of heritage trees. The Expert Committee in compliance of the Courts order has submitted a report taking into account a Cost/Benefit analysis and the capital. The report takes into account the financial value of a full grown tree, which is often ignored by project proponents. As per their analysis, the value of 300 full grown trees which are cut 100 years before their natural age is at least 2.2 billion (220 crores). Also Read: Native challengers to WhatsApp, Twitter The committee has further said, “from the available information and the site visit, what is clear is that these are not ordinary trees. This matter concerns the protection of what can be called ‘historical trees’, which have ‘Irreplaceable value’. Compensatory afforestation cannot replace trees of this value.” The Court also expressed its inclination towards laying down a protocol to be followed for such projects and to make sure that alternatives are considered which are less environmentally damaging.

सुप्रीम कोर्ट की समिति ने बताया आखिर कितनी होती है एक पेड़ की कीमत

सुप्रीम कोर्ट की समिति ने बताया आखिर कितनी होती है एक पेड़ की कीमत अगर आप पेड़ की आर्थिक कीमत जानना चाहते हैं तो यह 74,500 रुपये प्रति वर्ष होती है। यानी पेड़ जितने साल पुराना है, उसको 74,500 रुपये से गुणा कर लें। अब जो रकम आती है, वह उस पेड़ की आर्थिक कीमत है। अभी से पहले भारत में एक पेड़ की आर्थिक कीमत का पता लगाना मुश्किल था, लेकिन अब सुप्रीम कोर्ट द्वारा गठित एक समिति ने पेड़ों की कीमत को लेकर गाइडलाइंस जारी कर दी है। एक करोड़ रुपये से अधिक हो सकती है 100 साल पुराने पेड़ की कीमत समिति ने कहा कि 100 साल से अधिक पुराने पेड़ की कीमत एक करोड़ रुपये से अधिक हो सकती है। इस हिसाब से कई बार जिस प्रोजेक्ट के लिए सैकड़ों पेड़ काटे जाते हैं, वह पूरा प्रोजेक्ट काटे जाने वाले पेड़ों की आर्थिक और पर्यावरणीय कीमत से कम का होता है। सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने पिछले साल जनवरी में पेड़ों से मिलने वाली ऑक्सीजन और दूसरे फायदों के आधार पर कीमत का पता लगाने के लिए समिति गठित की थी। पेड़ों की कीमत सिर्फ लकड़ी के दामों से तय नहीं की जा सकती पेड़ की कीमत सिर्फ लकड़ी के दामों से तय नहीं की जा सकती पेड़ की कीमत हिंदुस्तान टाइम्स के अनुसार, इस समिति ने मुख्य न्यायाधीश एसए बोबड़े वाली बेंच को अपनी रिपोर्ट सौंप दी थी। बेंच ने कहा कि पेड़ों की कीमत सिर्फ उनसे मिलने वाली लकड़ी के दामों के आधार पर नहीं लगाई जा सकती। इसके लिए पेड़ों से होने वाले फायदों को भी देखने की जरूरत है। सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने पश्चिम बंगाल में पांच रेलवे ओवरब्रिज के लिए काटे जाने वाले 365 पेड़ों से जुड़े की मामले की सुनवाई के दौरान समिति बनाई थी। समिति ये लोग थे समिति में शामिल इस समिति में टाइगर एन्वायरमेंट सेंटर के प्रबंधक निदेशक निशिकांत मुखर्जी, सेंटर ऑफ साइंस फॉर विलेज के सचिव सोहम पांड्या, सेंटर फॉर साइंस एंड एन्वायरमेंट की निदेशक सुनीता नारायण, पश्चिम बंगाल सरकार में रेलवे ओवरब्रिज यूनिट के सहायक मुख्य इंजीनियर विकास कुमार माजी और 24 उत्तरी परगना के डिविजन फॉरेस्ट ऑफिसर निरंजित मित्रा को शामिल किया गया था। समिति ने पिछले साल फरवरी में अपनी रिपोर्ट कोर्ट को सौंपी थी, लेकिन अब इसे सार्वजनिक किया गया है। रिपोर्ट हर साल 45,000 रुपये की ऑक्सीजन देता है एक पेड़- समिति समिति ने कहा है कि एक पेड़ की साल की आर्थिक कीमत 74,500 रुपये होती है। इनमें से 45,000 रुपये सिर्फ ऑक्सीजन और 20,000 रुपये जैव उर्वरकों के होते हैं। सूक्ष्म पोषक तत्व और खाद को मिला दें तो कई पेड़ों के दाम उन प्रोजेक्ट्स की कीमत से ज्यादा हो जाते हैं, जिसके लिए इन्हें काटा जाता है। पश्चिम बंगाल के पेड़ काटने के प्रस्ताव पर समिति ने कहा कि इन पेड़ों की कुल कीमत 220 करोड़ रुपये होती है। समिति की सिफारिश कोर्ट ने अभी तक स्वीकार नहीं की सिफारिशें कोर्ट ने अभी तक स्वीकार नहीं की सिफारिशें बता दें कि सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने अभी तक यह रिपोर्ट स्वीकार नहीं की है और केंद्र सरकार, पश्चिम बंगाल सरकार और मामले में शामिल एक NGO से प्रतिक्रिया मांगी है। कोर्ट ने बुधवार को सुनवाई के दौरान कहा, "समिति की सिफारिशें सरकारों को दिवालिया कर देंगी। इसलिए हमें कुछ सुझावों में सुधार की जरूरत है।" समिति ने अपनी सिफारिशों में यह भी कहा है पेड़ों को काटने की बजाय उन्हें दूसरी जगह शिफ्ट करने पर ध्यान दिया जाना चाहिए। जानकारी दो सप्ताह बाद अगली सुनवाई वहीं सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने प्रयासों के लिए समिति की सराहना करते हुए कहा कि इसने भविष्य के प्रोजेक्टों के लिए कई गाइडलाइंस तय की है। अब दो सप्ताह बाद इस मामले की अगली सुनवाई होगी, तब तक संबंधित पक्षों के जवाब आ जाएंगे।

Monetary worth: Kashmir’s Chinar may value ₹2.49 crore

The Chinar trees of Naseem Bagh planted by Mughal emperor Shah Jahan are nearly 335 years old and each one of them may cost up to 2.49 crore ( 24.9 million) rupees, according to a monetary assessment made by a Supreme Court-appointed committee. Kashmir is home to nearly 35,400 Chinar trees – which is classified as Royal Tree of Kashmir and requires lopping permission from the administration – some of which were five to six centuries ago. The Supreme Court-appointed committee put the monetary worth of a tree at 74,500 rupees multiplied by its age, setting a guideline for the first time in India on the valuation of trees, reported Hindustan Times. Out of this, as per the report, the cost of oxygen alone is ₹45,000, followed by the cost of biofertilisers, which are worth ₹20,000. Men walking during heavy snowfall in Srinagar. Photograph by Umer Asif for The Kashmir Walla. The report was submitted before a Supreme Court bench, headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) SA Bobde, that had asked the committee to determine the economic value of trees based on the cost of oxygen they release and other benefits to the environment. The report added that the five-member committee of experts added that a heritage tree with a lifespan of well over 100 years could be valued at more than ₹1 crore. It also claimed that the monetary value of a project is sometimes far less than the economic and environmental worth of the felled trees. The court was hearing a case relating to cutting down of 356 trees for construction of five railway over-bridges (ROBs) in West Bengal, appointed a committee of five experts — Nishikant Mukerji (managing director, Tiger Environment Centre), Soham Pandya, (secretary and executive director at the Centre of Science for Villages), Sunita Narain (director, Centre for Science and Environment), Bikash Kumar Maji (assistant chief engineer, ROB unit, West Bengal government) and Niranjita Mitra (division forest officer, North 24 Parganas).

India, France, and a Night of Ideas to come CLOSE/R

Purana Qila, Delhi. 28th January, 8:00 pm. With the amazingly illuminated Purana Qila in the background, the French institute in India organized the Night of Ideas for the third consecutive year. The goal of the Night of ideas (“La Nuit des idées”) is to celebrate the stream of ideas between countries, cultures and generations on diverse topics. This year, from Fiji to San Francisco via India and Tel Aviv, as the night progressed, the public embarked on an exceptional 24-hour digital experience for a true round-the-world trip of thought. But while all the Nights across the world were primarily are online, in Delhi the French institute in India took up the challenge of organizing an outdoor, on-site event, attended, among other dignitaries, by Ms Barbara Pompili, French Minister of Ecological Transition, on the occasion of her maiden official visit to India. It was a chilly winter evening in Delhi when Minister Barbara Pompili arrived on stage accompanied by the French Ambassador, Mr Emmanuel Lenain. But the ambience was so warm with the light of the full moon overhead that despite the low temperature, the enthusiasm of the public and the speakers alike warmed hearts. “Close(r)” was the topic chosen for this year’s Night of Ideas to debate on how the Covid crisis separates us physically (social distancing, closure of borders) but at the same time unites us. And how in this context, our relationship to time and space has changed over the past year. After a mouth-watering nocturnal stroll in the populated food streets of Old Delhi with Chef Manish Mehrotra and Ambassador Lenain, the first debate started with four eminent speakers. French Minister Barbara Pompili pointed out how the pandemic had highlighted the multiple links of interdependency in our lives, and the need to face the consequences of our actions on climate change and act to address them. When the moderator, journalist Sahar Zaman, asked Ms Pompili how the ecological crisis is a challenge for the conception of humankind as a species, the Minister underlined: “With the Covid-19 pandemic, maybe for the first time ever, we have realised a very simple truth: we are all in the same boat. There is no planet B. And, for me, it is a turning point in the way we cope with the ecological crisis. I believe we can write another future for our planet and generations to come. We have this window of opportunity. It is a small one. But I sense a collective will to succeed, together, as a species. To change our culture of life, to redefine the position we give ourselves in this world.” Surrounded by doyens of their fields, the Minister interacted with Dr Sunita Narain, ecological activist, Dr Susmita Mohanty, spaceship designer, and author and parliamentarian, Dr Shashi Tharoor. Dr Mohanty said that “we have to recalibrate our perception of time as homo sapiens”. Shashi Tharoor asked “Have we really become closer?! He added, “Solidarity is not an instinctive response to Covid, we are moving away from great solidarity with the battle for the vaccine”. After an aesthetically conceived documentary produced by the Alliance française on <em>Hyderabad by Night,</em> torn between the flyovers and the karst landscape, the second debate welcomed the famous Prof. Françoise Combe, specialist of cosmology and galaxies at Collège de France, and innovator and engineer Sonam Wangchuk from Ladakh. Prof. Combe shared:” The 21st century explored not only the solar system but we discovered millions of galaxies where we can expect that some life, as bacteria, probably exists among the other 4000 planets”. Sonam cautioned us that the geological and climate situation in the Himalayas is an “SOS message to the world”. As the audience curled up in warm customised shawls offered by the French institute in India, the Indian artist Natasha Sachdeva questioned her body in space in a normative world. Moving on from environment and science, the next discussion focused on culture, history and economy. Actress Nandita Das, economist Sanjeev Sanyal, writer William Dalrymple, and political scientist Christophe Jaffrelot exchanged views on the changes in our cultural habits of interaction, and the difficulty for economists to plan the future. Sanjeev Sanyal noticed that there is a positive impact of Covid the last ten months: “the Indian ministries often compared to silos” have to work together. He remined us that “traditionally India used to organize huge meetings such as Kumbh Mela in the largest scale” and wishes that “this way of working, continues between the Centre and state governments.” As the audience curled up in warm customised shawls offered by the French institute in India, the Indian artist Natasha Sachdeva questioned her body in space in a normative world. Moving on from environment and science, the next discussion focused on culture, history and economy. Actress Nandita Das, economist Sanjeev Sanyal, writer William Dalrymple, and political scientist Christophe Jaffrelot exchanged views on the changes in our cultural habits of interaction, and the difficulty for economists to plan the future. Sanjeev Sanyal noticed that there is a positive impact of Covid the last ten months: “the Indian ministries often compared to silos” have to work together. He remined us that “traditionally India used to organize huge meetings such as Kumbh Mela in the largest scale” and wishes that “this way of working, continues between the Centre and state governments.”

FSSAI has not taken strong action against honey adulteration, CSE says

FSSAI has not taken strong action against honey adulteration, CSE says CHENNAI: The Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) said on Thursday that the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has not taken adequate action on the issue of honey adulteration. An investigation in December 2020 by the CSE unravelled the ‘food fraud’. The finding revealed that 77% of honey samples (17/22), which the CSE got tested in Indian and German laboratories, had failed the tests of purity and were found adulterated with sugar syrups. Only three out of 13 brands had passed all tests. The brands that passed were Saffola, Markfed Sohna, and Nature’s Nectar (one sample). The brands that failed included Dabur, Patanjali, Apis, Zandu, Baidyanath, Hitkary, Dadev, Indigenous, Hi Honey and Societe Naturelle. “We are concerned about the way the FSSAI has addressed this issue. There is no strong and public action to send the right message to honey-selling companies and reassure consumers,” said Sunita Narain, director general, CSE, in a release. “While some actions are being considered, there is no clear message from the FSSAI that there exist such syrups that can bypass Indian standards. In such a situation, the companies continue to claim that their honey passes all FSSAI parameters and thus mislead the consumers,” said Narain. The CSE investigation also highlighted the fact that laboratory tests conducted as per the FSSAI’s standards could not detect adulteration in honey samples. The CSE has called for regulating syrup imports, public testing, better enforcement and traceability to check this nefarious business of honey adulteration. “Honey adulteration not only impacts our health, but also our livelihood and food productivity," said Amit Khurana, programme director, food safety and toxins unit, CSE. It shared laboratory results of two additional samples with the FSSAI on December 17, 2020. These results showed very clearly that deliberate adulteration of up to 50% with sugar syrups was not detectable by the specific marker test for rice syrup (SMR), the CSE said. “This has put paid to the FSSAI’s contention (as declared in a meeting on December 4 with the CSE team) that conducting the SMR test is important to detect adulteration with rice syrup. Our additional tests -- along with the tests on the spiked samples conducted previously – show that modified syrups have been designed to bypass the Indian standards of 2020,” said Khurana. CSE researchers pointed out that the FSSAI had written to the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC), Department of Revenue, to make mandatory the end use declaration by importers as per HS (harmonized system) codes. It has also commissioned a study and asked for data from companies. "Besides these actions, it has convened a meeting with experts from its scientific panel, which focused on revision of standards (developed over the last several years and considered better compared to other countries)," said the release. The CSE investigation received responses from across the country and the world – ranging from consumers of honey, to agencies like the Central Consumer Protection Authority, National Human Rights Commission, etc. Most of these responses have called for necessary action by the FSSAI. "Following the expose by the CSE, media reports quoting Nitin Gadkari, Union minister for micro, small and medium enterprises (MSME) have pointed to the likelihood of action on sugar syrup imports from China. If syrup imports are regulated, it will solve one part of the problem as syrups are now being manufactured in India as well. Therefore, we need better enforcement and traceability of honey,” said Khurana. “It is clear that the business of adulteration has constantly evolved to beat laboratory tests. While India needs to regulate syrup imports, it also needs better public testing, enforcement and traceability in the honey sector. We need food to work for our nutrition; for nature and for livelihoods of communities," said Narain.

Coorg beekeepers rue decline in honey trade, seek govt hand-holding for revival

Coorg beekeepers rue decline in honey trade, seek govt hand-holding for revival The beekeepers and producers of ‘Coorg Honey’ said they want the authorities concerned to take their brand across the country and beyond and bring back the halcyon days when the hill district used to be the country’s top honey producer. Be sweet with Coorg Honey. Those were the words of Sri Shambhavananda Swamiji from Sri Ramakrishna Mission who developed a unique method of bee-keeping known as ‘Coorg Standard Hive’ in the hilly district of south Karnataka-Coorg (Kodagu). Now, the beekeepers want the state government to not only make the practice sustainable but also go big on promoting brand ‘Coorg Honey’. Citing a recent investigation by the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), which found that honey sold by major brands in India was laced with modified sugar syrup, the beekeepers and producers of ‘Coorg Honey’ said they want the authorities concerned to take their brand across the country and beyond and bring back the halcyon days when the hill district used to be the country’s top honey producer. After becoming the first president of Sri Ramakrishna Saradashrama in Coorg way back in 1928, Swami Shambhavananda initiated a bee-keeping project in the district knowing that the lush, hilly terrain presented an ideal setting for the practice which could also contribute to the local economy. In 1936, Swamiji set up the ‘Coorg Honey and Wax Producers Co-operative Society Ltd’, which, in time, became the first honey producers’ co-operative in the country. Over the last few years, the practice of bee-keeping and honey collection in the district has declined, to the extent that the Coorg Honey and Wax Producers Co-operative Society Ltd is now forced to procure honey from North Indian states just to keep their brand alive. Speaking to indianexpress.com, Kodira Praveen Chengappa, former president of Coorg Honey and Wax Producers Co-operative Society Ltd, said, “Everyone who comes to Coorg, which is one of the country’s top tourist destinations, wants to take home a pot of ‘Coorg Honey’. However, the beekeepers in the district are not producing honey now like they used to. Since the production has reduced, our society has little option but to buy honey from beekeepers in Chikamagaluru, Karnataka, Bihar, Punjab and other places, who collect pure and original honey. We do a strict quality check then if the honey meets our standards, we sell it under the ‘Coorg Honey’ brand name.” Advertisement Kodira Praveen Chengappa taking honey from his honey bee box. (Express Photo Darshan Devaiah BP) Apis Cerana bees, known as the honey bees of Coorg, still flock around the colourful indigenous flowers, lining the Western Ghats, drawing nectar. However, the practice of beekeeping has been severely hit. “Earlier, many trees were planted and wildflowers, including coffee blossoms, paddy, ragi, were cultivated, drawing bees by the droves. However, honey collection has been severely dented as the use of pesticides these days is killing the bees,” Chengappa said. Apiculture or beekeeping used to be one of the important farming activities in Coorg and contributed substantially to the income of local farmers. “In 1936, Shambhavananda Swamiji started the first honey producers’ co-operative in India at Virajpet in Coorg district. Later, in 1938, he founded the Ramakrishna Ashram and started to impart beekeeping lessons to local youth, who took an interest in the practice, at his office and a honey processing unit. He also sent local enthusiasts to beekeeping training centres in Pune and Coimbatore. He also marketed ‘Coorg Honey’ in Mumbai and other cities,” Chengappa said. Though the production of ‘Coorg Honey’ has declined drastically, the former boss of the co-operative said the demand for the brand remains undiminished and with a bit of hand-holding from the government and other authorities concerned, the district could return to its glory days of honey making. Advertisement Bee hive boxes kept inside a coffee estate in Coorg. (Express Photo by Darshan Devaiah BP) Traditional beekeepers, who have been harvesting honey since ages, are struggling these days as the honey bees of Coorg are declining in number, largely because of the use of pesticides. They said that radiations from mobile towers in the district are proving fatal for the bees. Nagesh, an apiarist at Bittangala village in South Coorg who has been into beekeeping for three decades, told indianexpress.com, “I request our farmers not to use pesticides as it is because of these chemicals that the honey bees are dying. I have also seen the bees dying because of radiation from mobile towers. As much as 30 to 50 per cent of bees are dying due to mobile tower radiation and another 80 per cent because of the use of pesticides.” Nestled in the midst of rolling hills and dense forests, Coorg experiences periodic shifts in climate and temperature, making it a favourable haunt for four major species of honey bees. According to Nagesh, a Coorgi, the honey tastes different as seasons roll and also at time of crop cultivation. “During the harvesting of coffee beans, the honey tastes very different compared to the season when paddy is cultivated,” Nagesh said, adding that the main four species of honey bees found in Coorg are Ponn thene (Apis dorsate) in forest areas, Potti thene (Apis cerena), Kaddi thene (Apis floria) and M ooli thene(Apis trigona), which are domesticated. Beekeepers in Coorg keep around 30 to 50 bee boxes within an area of one to one-and-a-half kilometres, depending on the source of bee forage, in their coffee estate or areca nut farms. Nagesh said bee colonies, these days, is very hard to find as they are facing the risk of a colony collapse disorder where the majority of worker bees in a colony disappear. A beekeeper in Coorg can harvest 2-3 kgs of honey from one box. “Earlier we used to harvest 10 to 20 kgs of honey from one box. During the peak time, honey can be extracted once in 15 days from one box if there are strengthened colonies. However, that is not possible now,” Nagesh said. The horticulture department has started providing Bee Hive Boxes and training to interested people at the beekeeping training centre in Bhagamandala, North Coorg. Founded in 1953, the centre provides three months of training, where students are taken through the basics of bee collecting, bee hiving and honey collecting or extraction, among other practices. Prakash Mandanna, a beekeeper who took his lessons in the practice at Bhagamandala training centre, said, “After enrolling for a training course 10 years ago, I started beekeeping. However, six years later, the bees were afflicted with diseases such as Thai sac brood. Planting of exotic trees such as Silver Oak, Eucalyptus and Acacia Auriculiformis in the coffee estates affected pollinators and altered the native flora of Coorg.” “The loss of forest cover and native trees is also an important reason for less honey bee production in Coorg. The government should focus on revival of bee production through the expansion of forest cover and forage plants in the district,” Mandanna told indianexpress.com. He said the need of the hour is for the state horticulture department to promote beekeeping among the youth in the district. “Our government has undertaken various initiatives to promote beekeeping but the problem is that people are losing interest in the practice as the bees are not available in plantations and forests now. The horticulture department should come forward and support beekeeping in Coorg,” he said. Officials in the horticulture department said various initiatives have been taken up in recent years to increase production of honey and provide subsidy to farmers interested in Apiculture. Speaking to indianexpress.com, Dr Hemalatha, senior assistant director, Horticulture (Apiculture), said, “We have three different schemes at central, state and district levels to help farmers who are interested in apiculture. As part of the state sector, we are giving a budget for beekeeping development and under the central sector scheme, we are providing pollination support. We are also giving residential beekeeping training at the Bhagamandala centre in Coorg where approximately 15 to 20 interested farmers can take a training in beekeeping every year and earn a stipend.” She said the horticulture department is also reaching out to farmers across the state, who are interested in beekeeping. “Our schemes are aimed at helping farmers interested in Apiculture and we are spreading the word through local newspapers and grama sabha meetings. Honey Mela is also organised every year in Bengaluru to promote Apiculture,” Hemalatha said.

झाडे तोडणाऱ्यांनो सावधान; एका झाडाची किंमत तब्बल ७४ लाख ५० हजार रुपये

शंभर वर्षाच्या जुन्या झाडांची पर्यावरणीय किंमत एक कोटी रुपयांहून अधिक निश्चित केली आहे. एका छोट्या झाडाच्या बदल्यात १०, &nbsp;मध्यम आकाराच्या झाडांच्या बदल्यात २५ तर मोठ्या आकाराच्या झाडांच्या बदल्यात ५० रोपे जगवण्याची जबाबदारी द्यावेत कोल्हापूर एका झाडाची पर्यावरणीयकिंमत ७४ लाख ५० हजार रुपये इतकी असल्याचे सर्वोच्च न्यायालयाच्या एका तज्ञ समितीने निश्चित केले आहे. झाडांचे मूल्य ठरवण्यासाठी देशात प्रथमच अशा प्रकारची मार्गदर्शक तत्वे निश्चित करण्यात आली आहेत. यामुळे येत्या काळात उठसूट झाडं तोडण्याला चाप बसणार आहे. शंभर वर्षाच्या जुन्या झाडांची पर्यावरणीय किंमत एक कोटी रुपयांहून अधिक निश्चित केली आहे. एका &nbsp;छोट्या झाडाच्या बदल्यात १०, &nbsp;मध्यम आकाराच्या झाडांच्या बदल्यात २५ तर मोठ्या आकाराच्या झाडांच्या बदल्यात ५० रोपे जगवण्याची जबाबदारी द्यावेत असा निर्णय समितीने दिला आहे. एखाद्या प्रकल्पासाठी जर शंभराहून अधिक झाडे तोडली जाणार असतील तर आता त्यांना एका झाडाच्या बदल्यात दहा झाडे लावावी लागणार आहेत. गतवर्षी फेब्रुवारी महिन्यात सादर झालेला हा अहवाल जनसामान्यांसाठी बुधवारी जाहीर करण्यात आला आहे. पश्चिम बंगालमधील रेल्वेचे पाच उड्डाणपूल बांधण्यासाठी ३५६ झाडे तोडण्यासंदर्भात झालेल्या सुनावणी दरम्यान, सर्वोच्च न्यायालयाने झाडांची किंमत निश्चित करण्यासाठी या तज्ञ समितीला अहवाल देण्याचे निर्देश दिले होते. भविष्यात होणाऱ्या कोणत्याही विकास प्रकल्पासाठी जर झाडे तोडायची असतील तर त्यांची किंमत ठरवण्यासाठी मार्गदर्शक तत्वे निश्चित असावीत यासाठी गतवर्षी जानेवारी महिन्यात या समितीला अहवाल तयार करण्याच्या सूचना सर्वोच्च न्यायालयाने दिल्या होत्या. सदस्यांनी या अहवालात एखादे झाड निसर्गाला तो देत असलेला प्राणवायू व इतर लाभ याचे आर्थिक मूल्य विचारात घेतले आहे. हा अहवाल सर्वोच्च न्यायालयाचे मुख्य न्यायाधीश न्यायमूर्ती शरद बोबडे यांच्या अध्यक्षतेखालील खंडपीठासमोर ठेवण्यात आला होता. संदीप आडनाईकएका झाडाची पर्यावरणीय किंमत ७४ लाख ५० हजार रुपये इतकी असल्याचे सर्वोच्च न्यायालयाच्या एका तज्ञ समितीने निश्चित केले आहे. झाडांचे मूल्य ठरवण्यासाठी देशात प्रथमच अशा प्रकारची मार्गदर्शक तत्वे निश्चित करण्यात आली आहेत. यामुळे येत्या काळात उठसूट झाडं तोडण्याला चाप बसणार आहे. शंभर वर्षाच्या जुन्या झाडांची किंमत एक कोटी रुपयांहून अधिक निश्चित केली आहे. एका छोट्या झाडाच्या बदल्यात १०, मध्यम आकाराच्या झाडांच्या बदल्यात २५ तर मोठ्या आकाराच्या झाडांच्या बदल्यात ५० रोपे जगवण्याची जबाबदारी द्यावेत असा निर्णय समितीने दिला आहे. एखाद्या प्रकल्पासाठी जर शंभराहून अधिक झाडे तोडली जाणार असतील तर आता त्यांना एका झाडाच्या बदल्यात दहा झाडे लावावी लागणार आहेत. गतवर्षी फेब्रुवारी महिन्यात सादर झालेला हा अहवाल जनसामान्यांसाठी बुधवारी जाहीर करण्यात आला आहे. पश्चिम बंगालमधील रेल्वेचे पाच उड्डाणपूल बांधण्यासाठी ३५६ झाडे तोडण्यासंदर्भात झालेल्या सुनावणी दरम्यान, सर्वोच्च न्यायालयाने झाडांची किंमत निश्चित करण्यासाठी या तज्ञ समितीला अहवाल देण्याचे निर्देश दिले होते. भविष्यात होणाऱ्या कोणत्याही विकास प्रकल्पासाठी जर झाडे तोडायची असतील तर त्यांची किंमत ठरवण्यासाठी मार्गदर्शक तत्वे निश्चित असावीत यासाठी गतवर्षी जानेवारी महिन्यात या समितीला अहवाल तयार करण्याच्या सूचना सर्वोच्च न्यायालयाने दिल्या होत्या. सदस्यांनी या अहवालात एखादे झाड निसर्गाला तो देत असलेला प्राणवायू व इतर लाभ याचे आर्थिक मूल्य विचारात घेतले आहे. हा अहवाल सर्वोच्च न्यायालयाचे मुख्य न्यायाधीश न्यायमूर्ती शरद बोबडे यांच्या अध्यक्षतेखालील खंडपीठासमोर ठेवण्यात आला होता. टायगर एन्व्हायरमेंट सेंटरचे व्यवस्थापकीय संचालक निशिकांत मुखर्जी, &nbsp;टायगर सेंटर फॉर सायन्स अँन्ड एन्व्हायरमेंटचे व्यवस्थापकीय संचालक व सचिव व सचिव सोहम पंड्या, सेंटर फॉर सायन्स अँड एन्व्हायरमेंटचे संचालक सुनीता नारायण, पश्चिम बंगालच्या आरओबीचे युनिटचे मुख्य सहाय्यक अभियंता बिलवेशकुमार माझी आणि नोर्थ २४ परगण्याचे विभागीय वन अधिकारी निरंजीता मित्रा या पाच जणांच्या तज्ञ सदस्यांच्या समितीने हा अहवाल दिला आहे.

‘300 felled trees will cost ₹2.2 billion in products, including oxygen’

The Supreme Court on Wednesday took judicial notice of its expert committee report, which said the felling of 300 heritage trees to construct five Railway over-bridges in West Bengal will cost India a staggering ₹2,23,50,00,000 (₹2.2 billion). The 10-digit figure was arrived at by the committee after calculating the products these trees would produce over 100 years of their natural lifetime. The committee's valuation included oxygen, micro-nutrients, compost and bio-fertiliser, besides the trees being valuable members of the natural environment. The committee said an individual tree parts with, free of cost, “products” worth ₹74,500 a year. Though the report was submitted a year ago, the figures of loss quoted in the report managed to alarm a three-judge Bench led by Chief Justice Sharad A. Bobde on Wednesday. Chief Justice Bobde suggested framing a new protocol by which road and highway projects ought to be cleared only after checking the feasibility of other modes of transport like waterways and Railways. In case a road project is inevitable, the value of each tree should be “built into the cost of the project”, Chief Justice Bobde suggested. The court asked advocate Prashant Bhushan to draft the protocol in consultation with the government. The report said the loss of 300 trees would be much more than the ₹500 crore sanctioned for the five rail over-bridges. Besides, the committee noted, traffic congestion would see a further widening of the road in a decade or so. This would mean cutting another 4,056 trees. If so, the report said, the loss would added up to ₹30.21 billion over a period of 100 years. The committee said this would lead to an “environmental and economic catastrophe of horrifying proportions”. The five proposed bridges are part of a mega project financed by the Centre to construct 208 rail over- and under-bridges across 19 States in the country. The “Setu Bharatam Mega Project”, as it is called, has a sanctioned cost of ₹20,800 crore. It is meant to better traffic movement, reduce accidents and avert deaths at rail crossings. The five rail over-bridges, across a 59-km stretch of the Jessore Road in West Bengal, is also part of India’s “Go East” vision to create a transport infrastructure through to Bangladesh and beyond Myanmar and China in the Far East to promote economic development of the country. A total of 22 rail over- and under-bridges have been sanctioned at a cost of ₹2,294 crore as part of the Setu Bharatam project and the “Go East” vision. The expert committee report was by Dr. Soham Pandaya, Executive Director, Centre of Science for Villages Wardha; Bikash Kumar Maji, Assistant Chief Engineer, West Bengal; Niranjita Mitra, District Forest Officer North; and Nishant Mukerji, Director, Tiger Centre, Nagpur. “These historical trees have irreplaceable value. Compensatory afforestation cannot replace trees of this value,” another committee member, Sunita Narain, from the Centre for Science and Environment, said in a separate report. On Wednesday, the Bench also rubbished the government’s circular that Environment Impact Assessment need not be done for road projects spanning under 100 km. “It is an unrealistic assumption that a 100 km road project will not destroy the environment. We will either ask someone to challenge your circular or take suo motu cognisance of it,” Chief Justice Bobde addressed the government side.

Value of a tree with 100 years of life left is Rs 72 lakh, SC told

NEW DELHI: The true value of a tree, with 100 years of its lifespan remaining, would be Rs 72 lakh, taking into account the benefits it would give to nature and mankind, including the cost of oxygen it would emit to the atmosphere, the Supreme Court was informed on Wednesday. A bench headed by CJI S A Bobde had set up a committee in February to evaluate the true value of a tree when a PIL had challenged the West Bengal government's decision to cut 356 trees to construct five railway overbridges (ROBs) costing Rs 500 crore on a 59-km stretch on NH-112 (part of NH-35). The committee comprised Soham Pandya, B K Maji, Niranjita Mitra, N K Mukarji and Sunita Narain. This project is part of the Centre's 'Setu Bharatmala' programme, which aims to make national highways free of all railway crossings by constructing 208 railway over and underbridges in 19 states at a cost of Rs 20,800 crore. The Centre has sanctioned Rs 2,294 crore to West Bengal for 22 ROBs and RUBs on NH-112. The committee said 50 trees had already been cut, but the 306 remaining trees, many of which are of heritage value, would be valued at Rs 220 crore. It said the 59-km stretch is to be part of the 'Go East' policy of the government, which intends to integrate the Indian road network with that of Bangladesh and Myanmar. If the road is widened, it would require cutting down 4,036 more trees, many of which would be big leafy trees of heritage value. Their value would be close to Rs 3,000 crore. But if the real loss to the environment and humanity over the years were to be taken into account, the value of these 4,000 trees would be around Rs 30,000 crore, the committee said. The ministry of environment, forest and climate change is applying the Net Present Value calculations to compute the cost of all trees standing in an area of one hectare (2.4 acres). The NPV varies from a maximum of Rs 56 lakh (for very dense forest) to Rs 27 lakh (open forests). It would make road/railway projects as well as setting up of industrial projects cost intensive and project proponents would scurry for barren land with little tree cover for laying roads/railways or setting up industries. A bench of CJI Bobde and Justices A S Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian said, "If we accept the committee's report, governments will go bankrupt. The calculations need to be rationalised. After rationalisation, their cost can be built into the project cost". The bench also took serious note of the committee's finding that the environment ministry's guidelines exempted environment impact assessment of any road project of less than 100km span. Additional solicitor general Aishwarya Bhati said the Centre did not intend to do away with EIA for road projects over small stretches but left it to state governments to do necessary due diligence. The SC asked advocate Prashant Bhushan to give a draft note on the protocol that would be put in place for calculating the value of trees and also on the legality of the EIA. The court will take up the case after two weeks.

What’s the value of a tree? Age multiplied by ₹74.5k: SC panel

The five-member committee of experts added that a heritage tree with a lifespan of well over 100 years could be valued at more than ₹1 crore. A tree’s monetary worth is its age multiplied by ₹74,500, a Supreme Court-appointed committee has submitted in a report, setting a guideline, for the first time in India, on the valuation of trees. The five-member committee of experts added that a heritage tree with a lifespan of well over 100 years could be valued at more than ₹1 crore -- and that the monetary value of a project, for which hundreds of trees are cut, is sometimes far less than the economic and environmental worth of the felled trees. The report was submitted before a Supreme Court bench, headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) SA Bobde, that had asked the committee members in January 2020 to determine the economic value of trees, based on cost of oxygen they release, and other benefits to the environment. Also read: Coins worth ₹14.86 lakh missing from Union Bank in Odisha The bench, which also included justices AS Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian, stressed on the necessity to do away with the evaluation of trees only on the basis of their timber value and rather focus on the positive impact of trees on the environment. For this purpose, the court, while hearing a case relating to cutting down of 356 trees for construction of five railway over-bridges (ROBs) in West Bengal, appointed a committee of five experts -- Nishikant Mukerji (managing director, Tiger Environment Centre), Soham Pandya, (secretary and executive director at the Centre of Science for Villages), Sunita Narain (director, Centre for Science and Environment), Bikash Kumar Maji (assistant chief engineer, ROB unit, West Bengal government) and Niranjita Mitra (division forest officer, North 24 Parganas). According to the report filed in February last year but made public on Wednesday, a tree is worth ₹74,500 a year. Out of this, the cost of oxygen alone is ₹45,000, followed by cost of biofertilisers, which are worth ₹20,000. Upon adding costs of micronutrients and compost, the report stated, living trees will more often than not outweigh the benefit of most of the projects they are felled for. Commenting on the West Bengal government’s plea to cut 356 trees, some of which were heritage trees, the committee evaluated their worth at ₹220 crore. The Supreme Court has not accepted the report yet, and sought the responses from the central government, West Bengal government and an NGO involved in the case.“The committee’s recommendation will make every government go bankrupt. So, we need to fine tune a few suggestions,” the court observed on Wednesday. The committee also suggested that instead of cutting trees for highway projects, the governments should first explore alternatives such as using existing waterways and railway lines to facilitate traffic and transport infrastructure. In case trees must be removed, the committee said, the first endeavour should be to relocate them, making use of modern technology, and if they must be felled; it also added that planting five saplings in lieu of one tree was not good enough since a 100-year-old tree cannot be equated with a few fresh saplings. It recommended that for a tree with small crown size, 10 saplings should be planted; 25 saplings for a tree with medium crown size; and 50 saplings for a tree with large crown size.Crown is part of the tree from which branches grow above the trunk. The bench, during the hearing on Wednesday, commended the committee’s efforts, adding that it was inclined to lay down certain new guidelines for all future projects which required felling trees in view of the report. It found favour with the recommendation that a developer must look to use existing waterways and railway lines before insisting on a road project that required cutting trees. The top court further expressed its displeasure at a central government notification that did away with the need for an environment impact assessment (EIA) for a road project of less than 100km. “Your notification is untenable. It is based on an assumption that no damage is done to the environment if a project is less than 100km in length. We will examine validity of your notification,” the bench told additional solicitor general Aishwarya Bhati, who appeared for the Union government in the matter. Apart from Bhati, the court also asked the West Bengal government and advocate Prashant Bhushan, who represented the NGO Association for Protection of Democratic Rights, which challenged the decision to cut the trees for the ROB project, to submit responses to the committee’s report. The bench will hear the matter next after two weeks. Speaking to HT, Sunita Narain, a committee member, said: “It is very important to identify and assess the historical and ecological significance of the heritage trees. They cannot be equated with fresh saplings, given the exceptional historical, cultural aesthetic values such trees they have because of their age or their association with an event or a person. All efforts must be made to accord them special protection.”

पश्चिम बंगाल में भारत-बांग्लादेश सीमा पर पेड़ों की कटाई का मामला, SC ने केंद्र सरकार से पूछे सवाल

पश्चिम बंगाल में भारत-बांग्लादेश सीमा पर रेलवे ओवर ब्रिज ( RoB) के निर्माण के लिए पेड़ों की कटाई का मामले पर सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने पर्यावरण प्रभाव एसेसमेंट नियमों पर केंद्र सरकार पर सवाल उठाया. नई दिल्ली: पश्चिम बंगाल में भारत-बांग्लादेश सीमा पर रेलवे ओवर ब्रिज ( RoB) के निर्माण के लिए पेड़ों की कटाई का मामले पर सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने पर्यावरण प्रभाव एसेसमेंट नियमों पर केंद्र सरकार पर सवाल उठाया. अदालत ने कहा कि 100 किमी से कम सड़क परियोजना को EIA की आवश्यकता नहीं है,ये नियम टिकने वाला नहीं है. CJI एस ए बोबडे ने कहा अगर सरकार Go East का फैसला करती है तो मौजूदा समुद्री/रेल मार्गों पर विचार क्यों नहीं किया जाता ? चीफ जस्टिस ऑफ इंडिया के अनुसार आप यह मानकर चल रहे हैं कि 100 किमी तक की परियोजना में आप पर्यावरण को नुकसान नहीं पहुंचाते हैं. यह भी पढ़ें व्हाट्सऐप की नई निजता नीति के खिलाफ दाखिल याचिका पर सुनवाई से सुप्रीम कोर्ट का इंकारव्हाट्सऐप की नई निजता नीति के खिलाफ दाखिल याचिका पर सुनवाई से सुप्रीम कोर्ट का इंकार सुप्रीम कोर्ट में शारीरिक रूप से सुनवाई मार्च में शुरू होने की उम्मीद, मराठा आरक्षण केस की सुनवाई 8 मार्चसुप्रीम कोर्ट में शारीरिक रूप से सुनवाई मार्च में शुरू होने की उम्मीद, मराठा आरक्षण केस की सुनवाई 8 मार्च अवैध निर्माण पर BMC के नोटिस का मामला: सोनू सूद ने सुप्रीम कोर्ट से वापस ली याचिकाअवैध निर्माण पर BMC के नोटिस का मामला: सोनू सूद ने सुप्रीम कोर्ट से वापस ली याचिका Read Also: SC ने फ्रेंकलिन टेंपलटन को निवेशकों के 9122 करोड़ रुपये लौटाने का दिया आदेश कोर्ट ने कहा कि प्रथम दृष्टया हम इसे ठहरने वाला नहीं मानते हैं. हम इस बात से सहमत नहीं हैं कि यदि परियोजना 100 किमी से कम है तो आपको EIA की आवश्यकता नहीं है, हम किसी को इसे चुनौती देने के लिए कहेंगे या खुद नोटिस जारी करेंगे. सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने कहा कि कि वे ऐसी परियोजनाओं के लिए एक प्रोटोकॉल तैयार करना चाहते हैं और यह सुनिश्चित करना चाहते हैं कि उन विकल्पों पर विचार किया जाए जो पर्यावरण की दृष्टि से कम हानिकारक हैं. सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने याचिकाकर्ता के वकील प्रशांत भूषण को ड्राफ्ट प्रोटोकॉल तैयार करने को कहा है. अगली सुनवाई दो हफ्ते बाद होगी. Read Also: कृष्‍ण गोवर्धन रोड प्रोजेक्‍ट: SC का यूपी सरकार से सवाल, 'पेड़ों को काटकर सड़कों को सीधा क्‍यों बनाया जाए..' दरअसल पश्चिम बंगाल पर हेरिटेज पेड़ों के मुद्दे पर विशेषज्ञ समिति की रिपोर्ट और समिति के एक सदस्य सुनीता नारायण की एक अलग रिपोर्ट दी गई है. उक्त विशेषज्ञ समिति को एसोसिएशन फॉर प्रोटेक्शन ऑफ डेमोक्रेटिक राइट्स की याचिका पर सुप्रीम कोर्ट द्वारा नियुक्त किया गया था. याचिका में 4036 पेड़ों (लगभग 200 वर्ष या उससे अधिक पुराने और विलुप्तप्राय पेड़ों को शामिल किया गया है) की रक्षा करने का अनुरोध किया गया है, जो सड़क चौड़ीकरण परियोजना और पश्चिम बंगाल में रेलवे ओवर ब्रिज (आरओबी) के निर्माण के लिए काटे जाने हैं. रिपोर्ट में विशेषज्ञ समिति ने प्राकृतिक पूंजी को भी ध्यान में रखते हुए लागत / लाभ विश्लेषण किया है. रिपोर्ट एक पूर्ण विकसित पेड़ के वित्तीय मूल्य को ध्यान में रखती है, जिसे अक्सर परियोजना के प्रस्तावकों द्वारा अनदेखा किया गया है. उनके विश्लेषण के अनुसार, 300 पूर्ण विकसित पेड़ों का मूल्य जो उनकी प्राकृतिक उम्र से 100 साल पहले कम से कम 2.2 बिलियन (220 करोड़) है. इससे पहले पश्चिम बंगाल में भारत-बांग्लादेश सीमा पर रेलवे ओवर ब्रिज ( RoB) के निर्माण के लिए पेड़ों की कटाई के मामले में सुनवाई के दौरान देश के मुख्य न्यायाधीश एस ए बोबडे ने कहा था. ग्रीन कवर को संरक्षित किया जाना चाहिए. ये गिरावट इतनी तेजी से हो रही है कि किसी को भी पता चलने से पहले कई चीजें स्थायी रूप से चली जाएंगी. लोग विकल्प तलाशने को तैयार नहीं हैं। पेड़ों को काटे बिना रास्ता बनाने का कोई तरीका हो सकता है. दरअसल रेलवे लाइनों के पास लगभग 800 मौतें हुईं. सरकार ने 4 किमी फुट ओवरब्रिज के निर्माण का निर्णय लिया, जिसके लिए कई पेड़ों को काटने की आवश्यकता है. अदालत ने कहा था कि हम यह देखना चाहेंगे कि क्या हम कुछ सिद्धांतों का पालन कर सकते हैं. हम कुछ सुझाव चाहेंगे. पेड़ों को काटे बिना रास्ता बनाने का कोई तरीका हो सकता है. यह थोड़ा अधिक महंगा हो सकता है, लेकिन यदि आप संपत्ति को महत्व देते हैं, तो यह बेहतर होगा. पीठ ने कहा कि वो विशेषज्ञ पैनल की रिपोर्ट आने पर विचार करेंगे. दरअसल 9 जनवरी 2020 को सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने पर्यावरण विशेषज्ञों की एक समिति का गठन किया है जो पश्चिम बंगाल में भारत-बांग्लादेश सीमा पर रेलवे ओवर ब्रिज ( RoB) के निर्माण और बारासात से पेट्रापोल तक राष्ट्रीय राजमार्ग-112 के चौड़ीकरण के लिए 350 से अधिक पेड़ों की कटाई के विकल्प का सुझाव देगी. पीठ ने कहा कि जब हम एक विरासत के पेड़ को काटते हैं तो इन सभी वर्षों में पेड़ द्वारा उत्पादित ऑक्सीजन के मूल्य की कल्पना भी करें. पीठ ने चार सदस्यीय समिति, जिसमें विज्ञान और पर्यावरण केंद्र की पर्यावरणविद् सुनीता नारायण शामिल हैं, को चार सप्ताह में अपनी रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत करने को कहा था. पीठ ने कहा था कि यह मामला पर्यावरण की गिरावट और विकास के बीच सामान्य दुविधा प्रस्तुत करता है. जाहिर है प्रत्येक स्थिति में अलग-अलग विचार शामिल होते हैं. इसमें कहा गया है कि पर्यावरण को होने वाले नुकसान के मूल्यांकन के लिए जो भी तरीका अपनाया जाना है, ये वांछनीय है कि विरासती पेड़ों की प्रस्तावित कटाई के विकल्पों पर विशेषज्ञों द्वारा विचार किया जाए. Read Also: पेड़ के नीचे गद्दा लगाकर तीन दोस्तों ने बनाया 'दुनिया का सबसे खराब Airbnb', देखते ही लोग करने लगे बुकिंग, देखें Video सुनवाई के दौरान पीठ ने पश्चिम बंगाल सरकार से कहा था कि जब एक विरासत के पेड़ को काटते हैं, तो इन सभी वर्षों में ऑक्सीजन के पेड़ के मूल्य की कल्पना करें. इसकी तुलना करें कि इन पेड़ों के बराबर ऑक्सीजन के लिए आपको कितना भुगतान करना होगा, अगर इसे कहीं और से खरीदना है.शुरुआत में एसोसिएशन फॉर प्रोटेक्शन ऑफ डेमोक्रेटिक राइट्स (APDR) के वकील प्रशांत भूषण ने कहा था कि कोई विकल्प नहीं खोजा गया और पेड़ों को गिराने की अनुमति दी गई जो लगभग 80-100 वर्ष की आयु के धरोहर हैं. उन्होंने कहा कि हर कोई ग्लोबल वार्मिंग के बारे में जानता है और अध्ययन में कहा गया है कि यदि वनस्पति की रक्षा नहीं की गई तो अगले 10-20 वर्षों में मानव प्रजाति खतरे में पड़ जाएगी. भूषण ने सुझाव दिया था कि बजाय पुलों के अंडरपास बनाए जा सकते हैं और पेड़ों की कटाई से बचने के लिए सड़कों के संरेखण को बदला जा सकता है. दूसरी ओर पश्चिम बंगाल की ओर से पेश वरिष्ठ वकील अभिषेक मनु सिंघवी ने कहा था कि इसके कारण हर साल 800 लोगों की मौत हो जाती है. कलकत्ता उच्च न्यायालय उन सभी पहलुओं पर विचार कर चुका है जिसके बाद उसने 356 पेड़ गिराने की अनुमति दी गई थी, जो कि RoB के निर्माण और सड़क के चौड़ीकरण के लिए आवश्यक है. दरअसल 31 अगस्त, 2018 को कलकत्ता उच्च न्यायालय ने राष्ट्रीय राजमार्ग के चौड़ीकरण का रास्ता खोला था और जेसोर रोड के चौड़ीकरण के लिए 350 से अधिक पेड़ों की कटाई की अनुमति दी थी, इस शर्त पर कि हर पेड़ काटने के बदले पांच पेड़ लगाए जाएंगे.ये सड़क शहर को भारत-बांग्लादेश सीमा पर पेट्रापोल से जोड़ती है. NH-112 या जेसोर रोड भारत और बांग्लादेश के बीच एक महत्वपूर्ण कड़ी है और राज्य सरकार ने इसे व्यापक बनाने के लिए एक परियोजना शुरू की है.

CERAWeek by IHS Markit 2021 to Convene Energy CEOs, Government Officials, and Business and Technology Leaders for World’s Preeminent Energy Conference

HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The world’s energy industry leaders, experts, government officials and policymakers, as well as leaders from the technology, financial and industrial communities will convene at the world’s preeminent energy conference, CERAWeek by IHS Markit 2021, to be held virtually March 1-5. “We are pleased to welcome Bill Gates among the distinguished group of speakers at CERAWeek 2021” Tweet this CERAWeek 2021: The New Map: Energy, Climate and Charting the Future will examine a new global map being shaped by dramatic shifts in energy and geopolitics—a map defined by changing policies, technology, alliances, geopolitics, and possibly collisions in global commerce and politics. Inspired by the new book, The New Map: Energy, Climate and the Clash of Nations by IHS Markit Vice Chairman and CERAWeek Chairman Daniel Yergin, the conference program will focus on key themes related to Energy Transition; Geopolitics, Economics and Markets; Investment and Financing; Technology and Innovation; Mobility and the Future Workforce. 2021 marks the 39th edition of the conference and is the first time that it will be an all-virtual event. The conference is produced by IHS Markit (NYSE: INFO), a world leader in critical information, analytics and solutions. Bill Gates will be among the speakers for CERAWeek by IHS Markit 2021. The co-chair of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, founder of Breakthrough Energy and author of the forthcoming book, How to Avoid a Climate Disaster: The Solutions We Have and the Breakthroughs We Need, Mr. Gates will join energy leaders, experts, government officials and policymakers, as well as leaders from the automotive, environmental, technology, financial and industrial sectors addressing the conference. “We are pleased to welcome Bill Gates among the distinguished group of speakers at CERAWeek 2021,” said Daniel Yergin, conference chair and vice chairman of IHS Markit. “Through an unmatched career at the forefront of technology, innovation and philanthropy—and now as the author of a much-anticipated new book—his unique perspective on climate change and the work he’s doing through Breakthrough Energy will be a timely addition to the critical dialogues taking place at this year’s conference. “There has perhaps never been a more important time for the CERAWeek community to come together. The past year has seen the novel coronavirus alter our world in profound ways. The great disruption it has wrought made more complex a broader transformation that had already been under way—one redrawing the map of global energy and geopolitics. The forces shaping this new map are still coming into view, and the past year has made the path forward all the more important to discern. At the same time a new Administration in the United States has sharply turned the corner on energy policy, both domestically and internationally. The CERAWeek 2021 program and its distinguished speakers will set out to bring clarity and perspective to this new and uncharted landscape.” CERAWeek 2021 and the related Innovation Agora will feature more than 245 speakers from 29 countries. Speakers will include (partial list): Bill Gates – co-chair, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and founder, Breakthrough Energy Amin Nasser – president and CEO, Saudi Aramco Bernard Looney – group chief executive, BP Ben van Beurden – CEO, Royal Dutch Shell Patrick Pouyanné – chairman and CEO, TOTAL S.A. Ryan Lance – chairman and CEO, ConocoPhillips Vicki Hollub – president and CEO, Occidental Petroleum Mike Wirth – chairman of the board and CEO, Chevron H.E. Mohammad Sanusi Barkindo – secretary general, OPEC Gina McCarthy – national climate advisor, The White House Hon. Joe Manchin – chairman, U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, U.S. Senator, State of West Virginia Hon. Daniel Sullivan – U.S. Senator, State of Alaska Lynn J. Good – chairman, president and CEO, Duke Energy Noubar Afeyan – co-founder and chairman, Moderna Pratima Rangarajan – CEO, OGCI Climate Investments Hon. Tina Bru, minister of petroleum and energy, Norway Hon. Sylvester Turner – mayor, City of Houston Susan Hockfield – president emerita and professor of neuroscience, MIT Walter Isaacson – author and professor of history, Tulane University Allison Herren Lee – acting chair, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Sunita Narain – director general, Centre for Science and Environment Ben Fowke – chairman of the board, president and CEO, Xcel Energy Nick Akins – chairman, president and CEO, AEP Ignacio S. Galán – chairman and CEO, Iberdrola S.A. Visit www.ceraweek.com for a complete list of speakers and the most up-to-date program information (subject to change). Registration Information CERAWeek by IHS Markit 2021 will be held virtually March 1-5. Further information and delegate registration is available at www.ceraweek.com. Media Accreditation Media registration is now open. Members of the media interested in covering CERAWeek 2021 are required to apply for accreditation. Applications can be submitted via the following link: https://ceraweek.com/about/press.html About IHS Markit (www.ihsmarkit.com) IHS Markit (NYSE: INFO) is a world leader in critical information, analytics and solutions for the major industries and markets that drive economies worldwide. The company delivers next-generation information, analytics and solutions to customers in business, finance and government, improving their operational efficiency and providing deep insights that lead to well-informed, confident decisions. IHS Markit has more than 50,000 business and government customers, including 80 percent of the Fortune Global 500 and the world’s leading financial institutions. Headquartered in London, IHS Markit is committed to sustainable, profitable growth. IHS Markit is a registered trademark of IHS Markit Ltd. and/or its affiliates. All other company and product names may be trademarks of their respective owners © 2021 IHS Markit Ltd. All rights reserved.

Impurities in honey market In 2017, the FSSAI ordered that honey should be tested for adulteration with corn, sugarcane, rice and beetroot syrups.

In 2013, India started using Neonicotinoid pesticides in order to protect a crop that Monsanto had promised the Indian farmer he would not have to use pesticides on. These are the worst pesticides in the world and they have been indicted for having killed billions of bees on the planet. I called a meeting of ICAR in 2014 to ask for the ban of these pesticides. ICAR refused, even though they admitted that the bee population has gone down sharply. They said cotton was more important than fruit, grain and flowers which are dependent on bee pollination! If the bees have gone down in number drastically, how has the honey production tripled? Till 2013,&nbsp;the yearly growth rate was only 0-4.8%.From 2013-14 the growth rate rocketed&nbsp;&nbsp;from 5.3 to 11.1 %!!! This could not have happened naturally. How have hundreds of honey companies come into the market? This question has always troubled me. I don’t eat honey. Last month the environment magazine, Down to Earth, answered this question in a deeply detailed investigation that they took months over. You should read it. We do not take food adulteration seriously and yet it is the highest form of corruption, and should have the death penalty on it. I will attempt to encapsulate what they have discovered, but again, I repeat, go onto their website and read the expose. Let's start with the basics: Honey is eaten because it is known to be an antioxidant and has anti microbial (killing germs) properties. It is expensive to create, because thousands of bees have to be maintained and fed a steady diet of flowers. Sugar has no nutrient value and is known to add weight and cause chronic disease. It is cheap. The FSSAI is the government organisation in charge of food standards. In 2017, the FSSAI ordered that honey should be tested for adulteration with corn, sugarcane, rice and beetroot syrups. The test was called C3 and C4. The tests were isotope tests, SMR, TMR, foreign oligosaccharides tests and pollen counts. In 2019, FSSAI&nbsp;&nbsp;mysteriously issued a directive revising, and downgrading, the parameters and allowing the adulteration to go undetected. The Director of the National Bee Board told Down to Earth that he had written a letter to the government saying that by reducing pollen count FSSAI has legalised the practice of adulterating and selling rice syrup and corn syrup as honey. The cheating of the consumer, by honey processors, has been legalised "You can understand why". By now the companies selling honey have increased massively and become very powerful. Baba Ramdev had jumped in as well. But strangely enough, the honey farmers were all going bankrupt because these companies had stopped buying their honey. So, we have a huge honey industry which uses no honey? So what do the “honey” bottles contain? Sugar syrup import into India from China have increased steadily. Fructose and glucose syrup was being imported from China to India in bulk amounts. In 2014, 10,000 MT came in. By 2017 it was more than 4,300 MT. These syrups are imported under the names of “Fructose syrup (F55/F42)”, “Honey blend syrup”, “Tapioca fructose syrup”, “Golden fructose glucose syrup”, even “ Fructose Rice Syrup for Honey”. Anyone from India can look up the marketing portals like Alibaba, Okchem and Tradewheel, and order from a host of Chinese companies. The FSSAI issued directives to sugar importers saying they had evidence that this Chinese import was being used to adulterate honey. The FSSAI announced in 2020 that the&nbsp;Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (NMR) was now mandatory for any company exporting honey (the Indian consumer is expendable, of course, so the standards for detecting adulteration in honey remained the low ones revised in 2019.) Did the fructose syrup import stop? No. It simply changed its name. The Chinese were not hiding their product. On all the large Chinese portals they were advertising a sugar syrup&nbsp;&nbsp;called the All Pass Syrup. The advertisements claim that the chemical mixture, called syrup, can pass the honey adulteration tests – C 3, C4, TMR, SMT, Oligosaccharides and even NMR!! Companies in India are importing this chemical mixture, which was being sent to India in some cases as “industrial raw material”,&nbsp;and even&nbsp;“paint mixture”, from China. 11,000 tonnes of this mixture has come in annually. Nasik, Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh and Punjab. The factories that make this syrup are all “legitimate food processing businesses.”&nbsp;The FSSAI chooses to look the other way. Down to Earth ordered samples online from two Chinese suppliers called Wuhu Foods and CNN Foods. In their order they specifically stated that they wanted this syrup to pass all the government tests. Both companies wrote that their product could pass any Indian tests, even if the adulteration was upto 80%, and added that their Indian clients used this percentage in their so called honey bottles. The samples that Fedex brought in simply said “syrup” and “paint pigment emulsion.” Down to Earth took pure raw honey and mixed it themselves with the Chinese and Indian adulterants (from a company in Jaspur) in different proportions – from 25% to 75% – and sent these to the Gujarat based lab Centre for Analysis and Learning in Livestock and Food (CALF) of the National Dairy Development Board. The samples passed all the tests upto 75% adulteration! In August 2020, Down to Earth bought honey marketed by 13 companies and sent them to the same Gujarati Laboratory. All the large companies passed the tests except for Apis Himalaya Honey (they probably put more than 75%!) Three of the smaller brands: Dadev, Hi Honey and Societe Naturelle, failed and even the C 3 test showed that they had more than 20-27% cane sugar. All these three are labelled as Raw Unprocessed Natural Honey! But Down to Earth did not stop there. They sent all the brands for the gold standard test - the Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Test (NMR). Dabur and Saffola have put it on their bottles that their honey has passed the NMR test. There is only one testing point in India – the Export Inspection Council (EIC) in Mumbai. They refused to do the tests. So, Down to Earth contacted a well known German Lab, which specialises only in honey adulteration tests including the NMR, and sent the samples – from the same batch that had passed the tests in Gujarat. They sent 17 samples from these 13 companies: Patanjali, Baidyanatha, Zandu, Saffola, Markfed Sohna, Nature’s Nectar, Dabur, Apis Himalaya, Hitkari, Dadev, Indigenous, Hi Honey, Societe Naturelle. Only THREE companies passed the tests: Saffola, Markfed Sohna and Nature’s Nectar. All the others FAILED – including Dabur and Saffola, who put it on their labels that their honey has passed the NMR Tests. Which means ONLY these THREE companies are selling us pure honey. The rest are all massively adulterated with chemical sugar syrup. In any other country, these people would be in jail and the company would be shut down. The Down to Earth article is meticulous in its exposure. But FSSAI has ignored the expose. Obviously FSSAI is implicated in the scandal – after all, they agreed to previous attempts at adulteration by deliberately lowering the standards for the large honey companies. These honey companies have even failed the lowered standards of adulteration – with no action being taken against them. During the COVID lockdown, people went all out to improve their health. Honey sales from March 2020 went up by 35%. But instead of making their bodies healthier, people were actually starting the day with shots of sugar syrup, which is just poison. Sugar increases the inflammation in the body, suppresses immunity and makes the body vulnerable to disease, including diabetes, and Corona. If you are angry, this is what you should do: 1. Banning of ALL sugar syrup imports from China, and closing down the factories importing it. 2. Every honey company MUST be able to trace the origins of the company – which beekeepers they buy it from. Each beekeeper should be licensed. This is mandatory for many food products in Europe. When eggs were discovered with pesticide in them, the labelling immediately showed 21 poultries in the Netherlands and they were shut down. 3. The testing requirements, that FSSAI lowered, should be brought back and NMR should be made compulsory. 4. The FSSAI has no data at all on honey producers, syrup producers. The Beekeeping Development Committee, which is directly under the Prime Minister’s Economic Council, has no data on honey production, sale or beekeepers!! 5. These 10 companies should be prosecuted and shut down. It is antinational to poison the people of India