Environmental Clearance System in India: A Call for Radical Overhaul by Sunita Narain
In a candid revelation to PTI, Sunita Narain, the renowned environmentalist and director general of the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), voiced her strong critique of India's environmental clearance system. Stressing the system's ineffectiveness, Narain advocated for a complete shutdown, urging a reformation to reconcile environmental conservation with development needs. Broken Beyond Repair Narain described the current mechanism for granting environmental and forest clearances, along with penalizing polluters, as 'broken beyond repair'. Highlighting the superficiality of the environmental impact assessments, she pointed out the lack of accountability and transparency in the process. Narain criticized the environmental clearance committees for laying down conditions without ensuring compliance or making information public. Furthermore, she raised concerns over the understaffed regional offices of the environment ministry, which lack the capacity to monitor and enforce compliance effectively. Hydropower Projects in the Himalayas: A Case in Point The construction of consecutive hydropower projects in the Himalayas served as a prime example of the system's failures. Narain called the environmental clearance process for these projects a 'sham', emphasizing the detrimental re-engineering of rivers like the Ganga. Each project, cleared by separate committees without a holistic view of the cumulative impact, exemplifies the flawed approach to environmental preservation under the current clearance system. Looking Towards the Future Narain urged a redesign of the environmental clearance system fit for the 21st century, aiming to return to the original goal of mitigating adverse environmental impacts. She also stressed the importance of developing a globally accepted methodology for climate attribution studies to avoid politicization and ensure fair compensation in future loss-and-damage agreements. This call for reform highlights the need for a balanced approach that honors both environmental sustainability and development objectives, a challenge that India faces amidst rapid modernization and climate change. As the dialogue around environmental governance grows louder, Narain's critique presents an opportunity for reflection and action. Her insights compel us to reconsider our strategies for environmental preservation and development, advocating for a system that is transparent, accountable, and effective. The path forward requires a collective effort to reimagine and reconstruct our approach to environmental clearances, ensuring that it serves the planet and its people equitably.
