Cse In News

PlastiCities: the role of grassroots initiatives to manage waste in cities

In India, many national policies have recognised the role of the informal sector, mainly waste pickers, and have expressed value in their inclusion in the waste ecosystem. Yet, there are many challenges in integrating them into the existing waste infrastructure. Integrating the formal and informal sectors in India will be key to optimising resource recovery and recycling in the future and finding solutions to plug the ‘leak’ of plastics into our oceans. Grassroots organisations that work at the intersection between the formal and informal sectors are important, and policy level changes are needed to adopt a decentralised, cost-efficient blueprint for waste management. Most of us forget about our waste once it is discarded into dustbins or municipal garbage trucks. Municipalities and waste management companies are only at the tip of an iceberg – the formal waste sector – funded, regulated and managed by local governments. This sector is involved with all kinds of waste: organic, inorganic, domestic, hazardous, horticultural refuse, and construction debris, among others. They are responsible for the collection, transport, recycling, and the appropriate disposal of waste which they often execute directly or via an external vendor. Ideally, the segregation of waste into recyclables and non-recyclables should be done at source by the households, residential areas, or business centres that generate waste. Paper, metal, and glass have long been salvaged as they have good potential for recycling. Plastic is the new material that needs immediate attention. While polyethylene terephthalate or PET has a fair recycling value with the plastic-to-textile industry creating high demand, other commonly used plastics have little to no value and are often discarded. Hence, this plastic often reaches landfills, where it is incinerated or buried. Many chemical additives from these plastics leach into the soil and the surrounding ecosystems, often finding their way into rivers and marine ecosystems. In much of the developing world, as in India, recovering recyclable waste between source and landfill is expensive, tedious and labour-intensive. This gap in the waste ecosystem is filled by the informal sector. This informal sector is a near-invisible, shadowy waste economy that we rarely acknowledge or appreciate, because it falls outside the purview of the formal system. The informal sector, often concerned with inorganic waste, has many players. Waste pickers collect and segregate recyclable waste from residential areas, and are incentivised by the chance to earn a livelihood from it. They then sell the waste to small scrap dealers or kabadiwallas. The scrap dealers further segregate the waste and sell it to a (Level 2) small or medium aggregator. From here, it is carted off to a wholesaler or stockist, and finally, to specific recycling units. In India, many national policies have recognised the role of the informal sector, mainly waste pickers, and have expressed value in their inclusion in the waste ecosystem. Yet waste pickers face other challenges while operating within the formal waste economy: outsourcing of waste management to private companies, waste-to-energy plants touted as alternatives to recycling, and urban zoning plans that do not factor in the infrastructure requirements of waste management. Importantly, waste pickers at the frontline of the informal sector work in challenging, often unsanitary conditions that affect their health. They also face uncertainty due to fluctuating market prices of recyclables. Over the decade, grassroots organisations around the country have been working with waste pickers, in a bid to integrate them into the waste economy. Among these are Kabadiwalla Connect (Chennai), Hasiru Dala (Bengaluru), and Chintan (Delhi) that have emerged as waste management solutions and there are a few lessons that can be learnt from them. Informal sector crucial in finding solutions to plug plastic leak “Every year, Chennai generates over 1,30,000 tonnes of waste, of which plastic accounts for 10-15,000 tonnes. It is a huge challenge for the municipality to implement waste segregation at source. Hence, most of the waste, including 10-15% of which can be recycled, ends up in landfills. City authorities spend $200,000 (approximately Rs. 15 million) every day to collect the waste and transport it to the Pallikaranai and Kodungaiyur landfills,” states Siddharth Hande, CEO of Kabadiwalla Connect, a Chennai-based initiative for decentralised waste management. “If cities across India are keen on optimising their resource recovery and recycling in the future and finding solutions to plug the ‘leak’ of plastics into our oceans, integrating the formal and informal waste sectors will be crucial,” adds Hande. Hande also shares that the informal waste system helps Chennai collect roughly 20% of its recyclable waste, over 100,000 tonnes annually. By linking networks of waste pickers and scrap shop owners, he says he believes that almost 70% of the waste being sent to landfills could be diverted. Kabadiwalla Connect helps leverage the city’s existing informal waste infrastructure in the collection, segregation and processing of post-consumer waste, with the help of innovative, technology-based solutions. Its inclusive, cost-efficient, and industry-compliant solutions harness the untapped resource of the informal sector in the supply chain, reduce the health risks faced by waste pickers, and pay rich dividends while tackling plastic waste at urban, and semi-urban levels. “In the informal sector, we rarely talk of the stakeholders beyond waste pickers. Yet there is a nexus of scrap dealers or kabadiwallas, aggregators, wholesalers and recyclers, that are an essential part of the waste ecosystem. This lack of classification is key to the problem of integrating the formal and informal sectors,” explains Hande. The involvement of upstream stakeholders of the value chain, such as plastic manufacturers and retailers is needed to bring about an integration of the waste ecosystem. Bridging gap between waste workers and other stakeholders vital In Bengaluru, the informal waste ecosystem is much the same – the door-to-door collection of waste is done by the municipality, or waste pickers, and is deposited at dry waste collection centres, where it is sorted for recycling. Paper, metal, glass, cloth, and plastics are usually recovered, with plastics like tetra packs, which are technically recyclable but have a poor market value, sent off to waste-to-energy plants or as fuel for cement kilns. Since 2011, Hasiru Dala has been working to bridge the gap between waste workers and other stakeholders, such as the local governments, policymakers, and citizens, while improving the lives and livelihoods of waste pickers. Bengaluru with over 35,000 waste pickers and itinerant buyers, has approximately 3,500 tonnes of plastic traded in the informal economy every single day – rescuing it from landfills, incineration sites and water networks. In 2021, Hasiru Dala actively worked with over 40 wards in the city, and their dry waste collection centres handled a total of 13,656 metric tonnes (T) of waste, of which 4,097 T was recyclable, and 9,559 T was non-recyclable waste. “Often plastics that can be recycled, such as food containers, aren’t washed properly, and hence, have to be discarded. Working with residents and encouraging them to put in the effort to clean food-related waste, often discarded improperly due to convenience, is essential,” says Rohini Malur, Communications Manager at Hasiru Dala. “Putting the onus of cleaning and segregation on households reaps benefits further up the waste ecosystem, as lesser waste, especially plastic, ends up at the highly polluting waste-to-energy plants, “she continues. The pandemic adversely affected the entire informal waste ecosystem, and as single-use plastic consumption soared, recovery and recycling couldn’t keep pace. Waste pickers are essentially daily wage workers, and restricted mobility affects their ability to collect recyclables and earn a livelihood. With waste pickers clocking fewer hours, there was lesser income for scrap shops too. There were months during the first wave when the entire recycling industry shut down. Dry waste collection centres were deemed essential services, yet scrap shops and godowns were not, and had to close down. Collection centres stayed open during the lockdowns yet they had nowhere to send the aggregated waste, causing the waste economy to stagnate. Workers struggled to get by as they could collect but not sell the recovered recyclable waste, payments from the authorities were often in arrears and they had little to no savings to fall back on. “It is crucial for grassroots organisations to amplify the messages of other efforts across India if we are to see a bigger shift in our waste management practises and to realise how vulnerable and essential these waste warriors are,” Malur adds. Waste workers play a crucial environmental role Every day, Delhi produces 12,350 tonnes of solid waste, most of which ends up at three major dumpsites: Ghazipur, Bhalaswa, and Okhla. The city has an estimated 40,000 waste pickers, with other recyclers, itinerant buyers, small and large kabadis, re-processors and other waste workers adding to a total of a 1,50,000 strong informal sector. They collect 15-20 per cent of Delhi’s total waste (in terms of weight) and 55% (in terms of volume) and recycle about 2,000 tonnes of the city’s waste each day. As in other cities, much of this recycling happens due to the toil of waste pickers. In addition, as unsegregated waste accumulates at landfills, rotting wet waste releases methane – a highly combustible gas. This results in spontaneous combustion of waste, with plastics, among other hazardous, polluting materials being set on fire. Sometimes, waste is incinerated at landfills before being buried. This adds significantly to Delhi’s air pollution issues. Waste pickers can help Delhi tackle some of its air pollution problems by diverting waste from reaching dumping sites. As a partner of the CounterMEASURE initiative under the United Nations Environment Programme, funded by Japan, Chintan Environmental Research and Action Group (Chintan) strives for better waste recovery between source and landfills. Their work with waste pickers ensures lesser plastics end up in the Yamuna, and further downstream into the Ganges, and the Bay of Bengal. In 2018, Chintan’s report titled Wastepickers: Delhi’s Forgotten Environmentalists, highlighted the role of the informal sector in tackling the burgeoning problem of waste management and plastic pollution. “Ironically, Delhi’s Master Plan 2041 talks in detail about solid waste management and environmental pollution, yet doesn’t make provisions for the labour involved, nor for the space and infrastructure they require,” says Shruti Sinha, Manager of Policy and Outreach at Chintan. “Recently, many dhalaos (large three-walled concrete structures used by waste pickers to collect garbage from a locality or market), have been put to alternate use. A study by Chintan in 2021 found that 73.8% of waste pickers do not have access to sheltered spaces, which makes it difficult to work through monsoon and winter,” Sinha continues. The Chintan report advocates establishing partnerships between the informal and private sectors, as well as the public, legitimising the informal workers, developing waste management protocols, and training and monitoring waste workers. This would ensure they can operate effectively in their niche while performing key environmental roles. A waste management blueprint The CounterMEASURE initiatives are committed to identifying sources and pathways of plastic pollution and finding solutions to prevent city-sourced plastic from reaching rivers and oceans. Working at the grassroots level with stakeholders in the waste economy, is an effective way to raise awareness about source segregation to reduce mismanaged waste, as well as build on existing knowledge to inform policy decisions. The 2021 report titled Waste-Wise Cities published by the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) and Niti Aayog, inspected solid waste management initiatives in 28 cities to understand the mechanisms that worked best. Across cities, grassroots initiatives concur that the integration of the informal and the formal sector is an effective solution for waste management. The report found that decentralised systems and public-private partnerships would be ideal for India to achieve its ‘smart cities’ objectives. City planners and municipal organisations should take cognisance and find ways to integrate the waste ecosystem. This would not only ensure better living and working standards for the informal sector but also incentivise their role in last-mile resource recovery and recycling, while providing cities with a decentralised, cost-efficient blueprint for waste management.

Find the Balance

In the early 2010s, most large projects got stuck because of the idiosyncratic behavior of a few people. Now it seems no project will ever get held up due to environmental concerns (see this edit in the Indian Express). Why can’t we have a good balance, where harmful projects whether by the private sector or government are stopped, and non-harmful ones receive quick permission? The Economic Times carried a commentary by me posing this same question and also answering it. Can we not create independent and capable environmental regulators who can stand up to such harmful progress? The alternative is hundreds perhaps thousands of harmful projects over the next 3-4 decades. Each may seem insignificant individually but together will create disaster.

Lack of disposal sites slows work on flattening Delhi’s 3 landfills

A proposal moved by the civic bodies states that the plan is to fill inert waste in pits 2,6,10 and 12 -- spread over an area of 477 acres with a 30m depth. Delhi’s three municipal corporations are on a hunt for a “gigantic” plot -- gigantic enough to accommodate 18 million tonnes of inert waste from the three landfill sites of Okhla, Bhalswa and Ghazipur in Delhi. It is the want of such a space that is proving a major impediment to the ₹250-crore project to flatten the three landfills, said municipal officials. The civic bodies are now eyeing the abandoned Bhatti Mines in the Southern Ridge and a feasibility study will soon be carried out by the Wildlife Institute of India at the behest of the Ridge Management Board (RMB), the body that is mandated to protect the Ridge, a forest department official said, asking not to be named. The three landfills together hold over 28 million tonnes of legacy waste and it has been estimated that about 60-70% of the material recovered after bio mining -- process of using trommel machines to separate legacy waste into plastic, paper, cloth, sand etc-- consists of soil, stones and inert material. Till December, only about 14% of the legacy waste had been excavated and the inert sent to locations such as the eco park being developed in Badarpur, various low-lying areas that face water-logging in the monsoon, a park being developed by filling up the old ash pond sites in ravines of south-east Delhi’s Tajpur Pahadi, and for horticulture purposes. RELATED STORIES Delhi: Civic bodies eye abandoned Bhatti Mines for dumping inert waste Delhi: Civic bodies eye abandoned Bhatti Mines for dumping inert waste Gurugram: 12 waste recovery facilities to lessen burden on Bandhwari landfill Gurugram: 12 waste recovery facilities to lessen burden on Bandhwari landfill Mumbaiites may have to pay ‘user fee’ to BMC over waste collection Mumbaiites may have to pay ‘user fee’ to BMC over waste collection Mumbai logs less than 500 Covid-19 cases as downward trend continues Mumbai logs less than 500 Covid-19 cases as downward trend continues Haryana gets its 1st waste recovery facility in Gurugram’s Badshahpur: Officials Haryana gets its 1st waste recovery facility in Gurugram’s Badshahpur: Officials 53 waterlogging spots to remain this monsoon in Mumbai 53 waterlogging spots to remain this monsoon in Mumbai Mumbai mega-block: 350 suburban locals, 117 mail, express cancelled for 72 hours Mumbai mega-block: 350 suburban locals, 117 mail, express cancelled for 72 hours Air quality in Delhi remains in ‘very poor’ category for second day Air quality in Delhi remains in ‘very poor’ category for second day Municipal officials are now looking at the abandoned Bhatti Mines. A proposal moved by the civic bodies states that the plan is to fill inert waste in pits 2,6,10 and 12 -- spread over an area of 477 acres with a 30m depth. The total estimated volume of these pits is 57,898,200 cubic metres and they can accommodate 69,478,000 metric tonnes of inert soil, the proposal said. The area is also part of the Asola Bhatti Wildlife Sanctuary, however, and experts have opposed the move, citing possible contamination of groundwater that may adversely impact the flora and fauna of the Ridge. In October 2019, the National Green Tribunal (NGT) also turned down a plea by the three civic bodies to use the mines. Chairperson justice Adarsh Kumar Goel asked the south civic body to approach “more appropriate authorities” in this regard. So, a fresh proposal was sent to the RMB in March 2021 by the SDMC on behalf of the three corporations, asking for permission to use Bhatti Mines. While no approval was given by the body, it set up a five-member panel to look into the proposal. Civic officials say the Wildlife Institute of India (WII) has now been asked to carry out a study to ascertain whether dumping inert there could harm the ecology. “Once the study is complete, we will decide on SDMC’s proposal,” said a member of the ridge management board. Already running behind the projected timelines for clearing the landfill sites through bio remediation, the municipal corporations have now submitted fresh deadlines for completion of the NGT-mandated project to flatten the three garbage mounds. The north corporation has revised the deadline to clear Bhalswa landfill site to December 31, 2023; the Okhla landfill needs to be cleared by March 2023 and Ghazipur landfill by December 2024. “We have got the inert material tested and it has been found fit for use in road construction. We are hoping that National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) will use the material,” east Delhi mayor Shyam Sunder Agarwal said. As per the north corporation, it plans to increase the number of trommel machines to 50 the coming month. Once operational, the new units will increase the daily processing from existing 5,000 tonnes per day to 13,000 tonnes per day,” an official claimed, asking not to be named. “NHAI has agreed to use the inert soil in Urban Extension 2 project. The NTPC will take around 300,000 tonnes of inert soil,” the north civic body official said. North corporation also plans to use the low-lying area near the cluster bus depot in Rani Khera for dumping the inert so as to alleviate water-logging issues. Atin Biswas, programme director, municipal solid waste, Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), who is part of an on-going study of landfill sites across the country, said preliminary findings indicate the presence of heavy metals and toxic chemicals in the inert material, suggesting it could be harmful to dump them in open mines in Delhi. “Of India’s 3,159 officially designated dump sites, there is a total legacy waste of around 1,300 million metric tonnes. When bio-mining is carried out, around 70% ends up as inert waste. As part of our ongoing study, in most samples, we found the presence of heavy metals and dumping inert in mines could contaminate the water table,” he said.

Our broken system of clearances

The EIA has become a convoluted exercise, designed for futility Sunita Narain Ranking is an instrument to reward the best performers — but more importantly, it signals the best way to do things. So, when the Union Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change says that it will rank the state environmental impact assessment authorities based on the speed at which environmental approvals are given, it basically implies that all it cares about is the “clearance” of projects, not the quality of the assessment or the ability to ensure that the environmental impacts of development projects are mitigated. You could argue that time taken is not an indicator of the level of scrutiny — and that the ministry’s notice is designed only to hold the assessment committees accountable and to ensure that projects are not unnecessarily delayed. But it is not that simple. The fact is this “ranking” is the final nail in the already built coffin of environmental assessments. Over the past decade or so, government after government has systematically decimated the process of decision-making that would allow for assessment or scrutiny. It is a sham and a farce, and in my view this direction by the ministry — set up to purportedly safeguard environmental interests — has only made its contempt for its self-built process apparent. Environmental impact assessments (EIAs) started way back in 1994, when development projects were few and the process remained uncontested. The rot took hold from the early 2000s, when “building” projects were included in this system of scrutiny. There is no question that construction — especially large-scale housing, infrastructure, or commercial projects — has a massive environmental footprint. They add to water usage, wastewater generation, traffic, and solid waste. The problem was the system was never upgraded to handle the huge volume of “building” projects. This led to delays and high transaction costs — corruption, in other words. So in 2006, the ministry decentralised and outsourced the work to states. It replicated the Central system at state level, setting up the state environmental impact assessment authorities. A maze of categories — projects falling into A, B, BI, and B2 — were created, with overlaps and a good measure of discretion thrown in. All in all, the quality of scrutiny has not improved and development projects are not more environmentally compliant. The EIA has become a convoluted exercise, designed for futility. Why do I say this? Just consider how fundamentally flawed the process is today. The project proponent is expected to pay consultants to do the EIA, which is based on the terms of reference (ToR) approved by the Central or state environmental impact assessment authority. Category A projects come to the Centre and Category B projects go to the state, where the state authority then decides if it is B1 (projects requiring detailed assessments) or B2 (that do not require detailed assessments). The committee can approve the ToR, ask for more information, or reject it. After this, the EIA is done. This, in turn, requires the involvement of at least 12 functional area experts and management and monitoring plans. The draft EIA is in English and its summary is in the regional language, which is then put out for public consultation. A detailed process is in place for holding the public hearing, which would be crucial for “listening” to local objections. Then all this goes to the appraisal committee, which has to scrutinise the draft, ask for more information, and accept it with conditions or reject it. In actual fact, projects are rarely “rejected”. In our analysis of projects between July 2015 and August 2020, of the 3,100 projects submitted, only 3 per cent were not recommended. Even these would come back with more information. So, all this fuss, and then nothing. But in the process, proponents are asked — and more so in controversial projects — many times to come back with more data and more clarifications. Finally, the committees “clear” the project, and, in most cases, to protect themselves, they do so with a fistful of conditions that will never really be monitored. The faceless committees are not held responsible for the project after clearance; their “job” ends with this clearance. So you really cannot hold them responsible for the quality of the decision taken. The monitoring is then left to the understaffed regional offices of the ministry — state pollution control boards are not empowered to monitor impacts because this clearance is done under the Environmental Protection Act and not under the laws governing air or water. In all this, there is duplication, lack of scrutiny, and no real intent to ensure that projects are implemented keeping in mind environmental interests. So, when we defend this broken system of “clearances” it only adds fuel to the fire of the extremely false narrative of environment versus development. In reality, environmental interests have already been given a bypass, and development has become mindless, without any regard for what can be done to mitigate and manage harm. The writer is at the Centre for Science and Environment sunita@cseindia.org Twitter: @sunitanar

Mumbai: Unusual increase in air pollution in western India due to dust, scientists suspect climate change

Other areas which recorded very poor AQI were Colaba (348), Malad (346), Chembur (316) and Andheri (306) Mumbai’s Air Quality Index (AQI) continues to remain in the ‘Very Poor’ category and Mumbaikars are likely to have no relief for the next few days as experts pointed out that this was a result of the second dust storm hitting in the last 15 days, which has even left the scientific community surprised. The overall AQI of Mumbai on Sunday evening stood at 361 (very poor). Mazagon in south Mumbai recorded AQI of 426 which is in the severe category. Other areas which recorded very poor AQI were Colaba (348), Malad (346), Chembur (316) and Andheri (306) According to Gufran Beig, Founder Project Director, System of Air Quality Weather Forecasting and Research under IITM-Pune the western part of India is experiencing a very peculiar kind of air quality trend this winter which is very unusual. “During the last 15 days, a second successive dust storm originated on February 3 from the border areas of Rajasthan, Pakistan and Afghanistan. This coincided with the westerly disturbances due to which upper air trough was formed, which aggravated it and it then entered somewhere near Ahmedabad thus making the air quality of Mumbai and Ahmedabad in the Very Poor category, which in this season is mostly in the moderate category,” Beig explained that the AQI of Mumbai is likely to continue to remain in the Very Poor category till February 7 because of calm wind and colder conditions are prevailing in Mumbai. “The cause of this particular successive dust storms coming in when the air is very heavy is what is making all of us think about it reasons and we cannot deny the impact of climate change. A recent analysis of regional air pollution levels, done by the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), has pointed out that air pollution is rapidly becoming a matter of concern in the western states of Maharashtra and Gujarat as well. Winter pollution sets in these states during late December and early January when cooler and calmer conditions trap the local pollution, which is high. "Bad-air days begin to build up in the cities of the western states during the end of December and persist till the end of January. Cities in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region show a more pronounced impact of winter pollution compared to cities of other regions," the CSE analysis report states. According to the analysis of CSE, Over the years, the air quality in Mumbai seems to be declining. Daily AQI analysis based on the 10 oldest stations shows a 20 per cent drop in the number of good AQI days in the city between 2019 and 2021 -- while days with poor or very poor AQI have doubled. South Mumbai has the worst air within the city during winter: CSE In December 2021, the stations in south Mumbai have reported significantly higher PM2.5 levels compared to the rest of the city. Mazgaon with a monthly average of 134 ug/m3 was the most polluted neighbourhood of the city, followed by Navy Nagar-Colaba (124 ug/m3), Kurla (101 ug/m3), Vile Parle West (101 ug/m3) and Worli (97 ug/m3). Khindipada at the edge of Sanjay Gandhi National Park in the suburbs with a monthly average of 54 ug/m3 was the least polluted neighbourhood. Bandra and Malad West reported low numbers, but the values are not considered valid due to significantly large amounts of missing data from these two stations, CSE's report stated.

Cry me a lake

According to a report by the Centre-for-Science-and-Environment the amount of faecal matter in sewage is monitored through coliform count — a water quality parameter that acts as an indicator of pathogens that most commonly cause diarrhoea, typhoid and a host of enteric or intestinal diseases. While coliform is not a cause of illness, it does indicate pathogens of faecal origin such as bacteria, virus or protozoa. <br> <br>According to the <keyword keytype="General" smid="0" usetype="2" source="Orion" keywordseo="Central-Pollution-Control-Board" keynameseo="central-pollution-control-board" actualkeyword="central pollution control board">Central Pollution Control Board</keyword> (CPCB), the total coliform organism or MPN/100 ml (most probable number) for drinking water source, without conventional treatment but after disinfection, should be 50 or less. <br> <br>For outdoor bathing, MPN/100 ml should be less than 500, and drinking water source after conventional treatment and disinfection, MPN/100 ml shall be 5,000 or less. <br> <br>In Doddakallasandra Lake, however, the water sample showed much higher value at 350x102, showcasing a high amount of coliform bacteria, which does not qualify as safe. <br> <br>Raghvendra B Pachhapur, resident of <keyword keytype="General" smid="0" usetype="2" source="Orion" keywordseo="Doddakalasandra" keynameseo="doddakalasandra" actualkeyword="doddakalasandra">Doddakalasandra</keyword> and ActionAid, India’s programme manager, said: “The high value of coliform indicates bad water quality. <br> <br>Sewage is still entering the lake. Other parameters like pH, dissolved oxygen and conductivity are good.” <br> <br>The report also showed an increase in biochemical oxygen demand. Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) represents the amount of oxygen consumed by bacteria and other microorganisms while they decompose organic matter under aerobic conditions (when oxygen is present) at a specified temperature. The decay of organic matter in water is measured as biochemical or chemical oxygen demand.

Record Breaking: Delhi Experiences Coldest Day in Almost a Decade, Leaving Homeless Dead

Although Delhi had its chilliest season in almost a decade ago, a penniless gentleman on the city 's alleys survived over the evening while carrying a rotting corpse next to him, until officials from an organization came to assist. Rajkumar, a low paid laborer, has been in Delhi for 5 years and is yet to find a place to dwell. A statistic campaigners estimate is likely to be less than a third of the true total for street campers in the metropolis in which Rajkumar is among the town's overall total of 46,724 homeless individuals. Although a trip around the metropolis reveals a growing amount of the state's rough sleepers, who mostly seek sanctuary beneath crossings, in playgrounds, and on sidewalks, the administration's approach to reducing fatalities among the destitute was restricted to the establishment of overnight facilities. Experts claim that all three seasons, namely, wintertime, summertime, and monsoon, inevitably endanger the lives of homeless persons in the region. In an interview with a homeless shelter organizer with the nonprofit Aashray Adhikar Abhiyan, Sanjay Kumar, he informed Independent - that almost all homeless folks work in the informal employment, in which they are compensated daily. While in an unpublished study by the Centre for Holistic Development (CHD), a charity comprised of peaceful helpers such as attorneys and political scholars that assisted Rajkumar, at least 176 living on the streets individuals perished in Delhi in January as a result of contact to severe weather. Often times, lifeless corpses are discarded on the pavements, while the authorities figure out about the fatalities after some time. Coldest Day in Delhi Results to More Deaths Owing to the inadequacy of government documents on homeless fatalities, finding a comparison to last year is challenging. However, 152 casualties were documented in India, owing to winter surges in 2020, as per the India Environment Portal (IEP). According to a reportnin Al Jazeera, CHD experts used material from community centers in India as well as municipal reports of fatalities on pavements, as well as their independent assessments, to calculate the death toll in January. According to campaigners, the overwhelming of the state's homeless community is made up of individuals who serve in informal economy as laborers and assistants, or who are forced to plead or trade things on the roads. Volunteers believe that an estimate of 1% of the town's inhabitants are socially isolated. Sanjay Kumar also believes that there is a climatic influence on all of these events, stressing that although one incident may not be wholly ascribed to global warming, the magnitude of these occurrences are. As per CHD, fatalities have been increasing in congested regions like as eastern and northern Delhi, wherein various micro enterprises are situated and where individuals come from neighboring countries in quest of jobs. Advocates have often expressed worry about an absence of statistics when it concerns to measuring the number of homeless people, which is also in movement since many employees relocate to communities just over a specific timeframe. According to Aarti Khosla, the head of Weather Forecasts, a climate information program, the extreme cold circumstances this year are partially due to La Nina, an oceanographic and meteorological phenomenon that is the harsher equivalent of El Nino and drags air temperature lower.

Crop yield, net returns and soil health – organic farming leads on all counts, finds CSE study

In its latest report, Centre for Science and Environment presents irrefutable evidence of the benefits of non-chemical farming, supported by its analysis on crop yield recorded during 2014-19. The yields were found to be the highest with organic farming, followed by integrated agriculture and finally, the inorganic approach. On February 1, while presenting the Union Budget 2022, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said that chemical-free farming will be promoted across the country and the foundation for it would begin with fields within a five kilometre (km) wide corridor along the Ganges. A day later, on February 2, Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), a New Delhi-based research and advocacy group, released its report titled Evidence (2004-20) on holistic benefits of organic and natural farming in India, which presents irrefutable evidence of the benefits of non-chemical agriculture. With respect to crop yield, the CSE report highlighted that out of the 504 times that yield results were recorded during 2014-19, the yields were found to be highest 41 per cent with organic approach, followed by 33 per cent with integrated, and 26 per cent with inorganic approach. “In the case of vegetables, oilseeds and cereals, yield with organic approach was highest more times than integrated and inorganic approach. In pulses and spices, it was highest more times with integrated approach than with organic and inorganic approach,” the report observed. Similarly, cropping systems with an organic approach have scored the highest in terms of all the parameters on soil health – organic carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. The report’s findings on soil bulk density, soil bacteria, fungi, micronutrients etc also offered a similar verdict. Also Read: A village in Bihar goes organic, transforming the lives of its women “Despite the push given to it through periodic pronouncements from India’s leaders, the country’s efforts to upscale non-chemical farming practises have largely remained half-hearted at best,” said Sunita Narain, director general of CSE during the virtual event of the launch of the report. “CSE’s new report on the subject presents robust evidence which makes it clear that we can upscale organic and natural farming. It is time to invest adequately in a well-funded nation-wide programme for this,” she said. The CSE report compares results of three approaches – organic farming, integrated (which partly involves chemicals) agriculture, and inorganic (dependent on chemicals) farming. These results documented in the report are based on the evidence collected on various factors like crop yield, cost of cultivation, income, livelihood, soil health and environment, and food quality and nutrients. The report is based on two sets of sources – the results of the All-India Network Project on Organic Farming (AI-NPOF), 2004-19; and the CSE researchers combed through about 90 scientific studies on organic and natural farming published between 2010 and 2020 in India. The CSE report has brought forward some key points with regard to crop yield, income and livelihood and health of the soil. It presents a comparison between the three approaches of organic, integrated and inorganic farming. “Among three approaches, out of 63 cropping systems, cost of cultivation was highest in 63 per cent cropping systems with organic approach at 15 centres, 8 per cent with integrated approach at three centres, and 29 per cent with inorganic approach at eight centres. With organic approach, the cost of cultivation was lowest in five per cent cropping systems,” notes the new report. With organic approach, the mean cost of cultivation was lower than inorganic in 19 per cent cropping systems. The report goes on to say that the cost of cultivation is higher with organic approach than an integrated approach. “This high cost is explained by the fact that organic and bio-inputs used in the AI-NPOF are largely purchased from the market and not produced on-farm, as the project involves experimental farms. Whereas, organic inputs cost less if produced on-farm by farmers,” reads the report. The food quality and nutrition with organic approach were also found to be better than inorganic and slightly better than the integrated approach, the CSE report observed. Also Read: Non-pesticidal management in agriculture is a win-win for farmers and consumers While the report’s release came a day after the announcement made by FM for promotion of chemical-free natural farming, Amit Kumar, programme director, Sustainable Food Systems programme, CSE, and co-author of the CSE report, said that these are relatively small steps compared to the need of the hour. “Hopefully, our new report, which highlights that there is strong long-term evidence that organic and natural farming is not only profitable and sustainable but also productive, will propel the country to invest more adequately to upscale and encourage such a mass movement,” he added. Recommendations of the report CSE researchers have called for development of a roadmap to set the long-term agenda for adoption of agro-ecological approaches across different parts of the country in view of their benefits on multiple and cross- cutting aspects such as nutrition, livelihood of farmers, natural resource conservation, biodiversity, resource efficiency, soil- health, disease resilience and mitigation of climate crisis. In addition to that, the report has also demanded to shift the focus on supporting farmers during the transition to organic and natural farming through technical and financial support. Apart from this, it has called for a targeted, ambitious and well-funded nationwide programme developed to drive the change towards organic and natural farming and promotion of organic fertilisers and biofertilizers instead of chemical fertilisers. The report also recommended that states should step up their action in a concerted way to promote organic and natural farming. “This should be done through a series of measures such as those related to organic seeds, bio-inputs, capacity building of farmers and providing market linkages,” the report stated.

Pollutant in ‘scary’ Kolkata air exceeds 13 times the WHO limit

Sprinkling water on roads, the experts pointed out, will not achieve much The average level of PM (particulate matter) 2.5 in Kolkata’s air last year was more than 1.5 times the national standard and more than 13 times the standard set by the World Health Organization (WHO), shows an analysis by the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE). PM 2.5 is considered the most toxic of all air pollutants. They can enter deep into the lungs and trigger a range of critical diseases, including cancer. Experts from the Delhi-based CSE who were associated with the study pointed out that the city needed to address “big items like pollution from vehicles” to minimise air pollution. Sprinkling water on roads, the experts pointed out, will not achieve much. Mayor Firhad Hakim, who is also Bengal’s transport minister, admitted that the city’s pollution scene is “scary”. “We have to address the problem. Addressing air pollution is one of the priority areas during my current tenure (as mayor),” he said. In 2021, Kolkata was the only metropolis city after Delhi where the level of PM 2.5 — 66 micrograms per cubic metre of air - remained significantly higher than the national permissible limit. The national limit is 40 micrograms and WHO standard is 5 micrograms. Delhi’s average PM 2.5 level last year was 109 micrograms. The cities that fared better than Kolkata included Bangalore (33 micrograms), Chennai (25 micrograms), Hyderabad (41 micrograms) and Mumbai (34 micrograms). A study carried out by the National Environmental Engineering Research Institute, at the behest of the state pollution control board, shows household emission accounts for the maximum share of PM 2.5 in the city — 28 per cent share. Then comes road dust (25 per cent) and emission from vehicles (24 per cent). “Vehicles are the major problem in Kolkata. All apportionment studies are showing that, but you are constantly focusing on sprinkling of water. The big-ticket problems like the vehicle count or automobile pollution are being ignored,” said Anumita Roy Chowdhury of CSE, who led the analysis.

Union Budget 2022: Single window environmental clearance, will this usher sustainability in economy?

During the Union Budget 2022 speech, the Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said: “A single-window portal, PARIVESH, for all green clearances was launched in 2018. It has been instrumental in reducing the time required for approvals significantly”. PARIVESH has been developed as one-stop workflow application where online submissions and monitoring of green projects can be submitted for clearances related to the environment, forest, wildlife and coastal regulation zone (CRZ), from central, state and even district-level authorities. An Environmental clearance refers to an approval that is required before an organization can proceed with building an infrastructure, undertaking mining, processing or manufacturing that can potentially be detrimental to the environment. Depending on its nature, the State or Centre may issue a clearance. This has been done in order to promote fast, efficient and red-tapism free decision for any project needed. But if we are to believe various studies including the one published by Pulitzer Center, most of the projects appearing for environmental clearance, are ‘rarely rejected’ by Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MOEFCC). For instance, in between 2014-2020, nearly 2053 projects out of a total of 2,115 projects were granted Environment Clearances (ECs) by MOEFCC. Out of these, 278 are within and immediately around the country’s sensitive Protected Areas (PA). The word of mouth is that the projects lacking the clearances above, might have been asked to return with more information or more clarification. An ecological clearance requires various stakeholders (including the PAP, Project Affected Person) to put forward their perspectives, analysis and discuss for the benefit of all: ecosystem, land-utilization, society at large.\ This fast paced approval will leave this process in doldrums, with no proper investigation, biased approval and industry centric, as India still seeks to improve its ranking on Ease of doing business, that has been earlier published by the World Bank but now stands stalled amidst controversies. Are environmental concerns serving as the impediments to economic growth? The projects at times are stalled with no pretext related to the environmental health. The top five infrastructure projects: Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor, Pollavaram irrigation project, Delhi-Jaipur Expressway, Navi Mumbai International Airport and Nariyara Coal Power Plant, have all been delayed because of reasons other environmental clearances. These clearances have long been a safeguard for Nature and sustainability in depth, it is the bureaucratic process that derails it all. In actuality, mindless and irresponsible development with benefits in short run have long bypassed country’s environmental interests. Is it always easy to choose sides for a human? When all this appears to be favoring human-made business and industry rather than compassion and respect for the environment that we yield for, can there be no benefit so important that we need to bring in single-window clearance for environment too? One needs to note that India being the country seeking growth, harbors huge volume of “building” projects and naturally, most of them dealing with the scarce natural resource fulfilling the insatiable need of the country and World, have to undergo clearance. However, with even such drastic progress in volumes, the system was never upgraded and quality of scrutiny never improved. Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) has advocated a single window clearance system since 2014 in its report Strengthen Institutions, reform laws and streamline processes: Agenda for Improving Environmental Governance in India. The report accentuated the need for a better environmental governance in India through a single point of clearance and better, digitally. Through Parivesh, all the regulating authorities will have relevant information existing for a project at one location. Even the independent researchers will gain a 360-degree view along with the probable impacts probed, analysis provided that too multilaterally. Experts have claimed that such a digital provision will render transparency to a complex system of environmental disclosures. Once expanded, MOEFCC has aimed to provide all four approvals, i.e. Environment, Forest, Wildlife and CRZ (Coastal Regulation Zones) Clearances, embedded in a single form (several experts have advocated that wildlife clearance to be separate from the others). This allows an automated, easy and clear tracking of the processes involved to ascertain the status of the intended project along with quick editing and updation as needed, reducing the greater work in the silos with heavy procrastination. But India being a country of options and illegible solutions, any betterment in the system can lead to uncertainties in outcomes. Will single window environmental clearance do ay better for business and environment remains to be seen? As indicated by our FM complying with the image India has portrayed as a leader in climate diplomacy, climate action shall dictate the growth of this country. That can be done if we begin to include sustainability at any cost in every sector possible. We need to avert the climate crisis, that is only possible if we prosper but not at the cost of our environment.

अमरजीत सिंह कोहली : कल्पना चावला को पद्म पुरस्कार क्यों नहीं?

1 फरवरी 2022, अंतरिक्ष यात्री कल्पना चावला की 19वीं पुण्यतिथि थी, जिनकी 1 फरवरी 2003 को अंतरिक्ष शटल कोलंबिया के दुर्घटना में मृत्यु हो गई थी। यह तस्वीर 2010 में दिल्ली में उनकी 7वीं पुण्यतिथि पर उन्हें श्रद्धांजलि देते हुए दिखाई दी थी। साथ ही पुलिस अधिकारी किरण बेदी (पहली महिला आईपीएस अधिकारी और मैगसेसे पुरस्कार विजेता) कल्पना चावला के पिता श्री बनारसी लाल चावला उत्कृष्टता पुरस्कार प्राप्त कर रहे हैं, जबकि मैं बीच में खड़ा हूं। ये पुरस्कार 2006 में स्थापित किए गए थे और हर साल 1 फरवरी को दिए जाते हैं। 1967 में दिल्ली में स्थापित पंजाब इंजीनियरिंग कॉलेज चंडीगढ़ ओल्ड बॉयज एसोसिएशन (PECOBA) के संस्थापक जनरल सेकेरी के रूप में मेरे द्वारा समारोह का आयोजन किया गया था। PEC के 1962 बैच के एक अरुणकुमार संस्थापक अध्यक्ष थे। जब मैंने 1964 में PEC, चंडीगढ़ से Mech Engg की डिग्री पूरी की, कल्पना चावला ने PEC से 1982 में वैमानिकी इंजीनियरिंग में अपनी डिग्री पूरी की। एक अन्य अमेरिकी अंतरिक्ष यात्री सुनीता विलियम्स, जिन्होंने पहली बार दिसंबर 2006 में स्पेस शटल डिस्कवरी में उड़ान भरी थी, को 2008 में पद्म भूषण से सम्मानित किया गया था, लेकिन कल्पना चावला को नहीं, जिन्होंने सुनीता विलियम्स से पूरे 9 साल पहले 1997 में पहली बार अमेरिकी अंतरिक्ष यान कोलंबिया में उड़ान भरी थी। कल्पना चावला ने 2003 में एयरक्रैश में अपनी जान भी गंवा दी। इसके अलावा, कल्पना चावला का जन्म भारत के करनाल में हुआ था जबकि सुनीता विलियम्स का जन्म और पालन-पोषण यूएसए में हुआ था। मुझे यह जोड़ना होगा कि PECOBA द्वारा स्थापित कल्पना चावला उत्कृष्टता पुरस्कार पद्म विभूषण पुरस्कार विजेता दिवंगत कैप्टन लक्ष्मी सहगल द्वारा स्वीकार किए गए थे, जो नेताजी सुभाष चंद्र बोस की INA की रानी झांसी रेजिमेंट के कमांडर थे। वह 2010 में कानपुर में रहने वाली 96 साल की थीं। जब मैंने उससे बात की तो वह इसे स्वीकार करने में बहुत खुश हुई और उसने अपनी बेटी अनीसा पुरी को पुरस्कार लेने के लिए भेजा क्योंकि वह बहुत कमजोर थी और दिल्ली जाने की स्थिति में नहीं थी। अन्य पुरस्कार प्राप्त करने वालों में व्यक्तिगत रूप से पद्म भूषण उमा शर्मा (कथक नर्तक), पद्मश्री नफीसा अली सोढ़ी (अभिनेत्री, राष्ट्रीय तैराकी चैंपियन), पद्मश्री सुनीता नारायण (पर्यावरण सूची), अलवर की पद्मश्री भुवनेश्वरी कुमारी (16 बार राष्ट्रीय स्क्वैश चैंपियन), पद्मश्री शामिल हैं। शांति हीरानंद (अनुभवी गायक), पद्मश्री अजीत कौर (पंजाबी साहित्यकार)। जब मैं इस पुरस्कार समारोह की तुलना कर रहा था, मैं हर समय सोचता रहता था कि क्या विडंबना है कि अगर ये सभी पद्म पुरस्कार विजेता कल्पना चावला के नाम पर एक पुरस्कार स्वीकार कर रहे हैं, फिर भी कल्पना चावला को अभी तक कोई पद्म पुरस्कार नहीं दिया गया है, यहां तक ​​कि पद्मश्री भी नहीं। हालांकि वह भारत रत्न की हकदार हैं। कल्पना चावला उत्कृष्टता पुरस्कार कल्पना चावला के पिता श्री बीएल चावला द्वारा 2016 तक पूरे 11 वर्षों के लिए कैबिनेट मंत्रियों की उपस्थिति में प्रदान किए गए हैं और बहुत बड़ी संख्या में पद्म पुरस्कार विजेताओं और प्रसिद्ध हस्तियों (जैसे किरण मजूमदार शाह, सीएमडी, बायोकॉन) ने स्वीकार किया है।

Crop yield, net returns and soil health – organic farming leads on all counts, finds CSE study

In its latest report, Centre for Science and Environment presents irrefutable evidence of the benefits of non-chemical farming, supported by its analysis on crop yield recorded during 2014-19. The yields were found to be the highest with organic farming, followed by integrated agriculture and finally, the inorganic approach. On February 1, while presenting the Union Budget 2022, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said that chemical-free farming will be promoted across the country and the foundation for it would begin with fields within a five kilometre (km) wide corridor along the Ganges. A day later, on February 2, Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), a New Delhi-based research and advocacy group, released its report titled Evidence (2004-20) on holistic benefits of organic and natural farming in India, which presents irrefutable evidence of the benefits of non-chemical agriculture. With respect to crop yield, the CSE report highlighted that out of the 504 times that yield results were recorded during 2014-19, the yields were found to be highest 41 per cent with organic approach, followed by 33 per cent with integrated, and 26 per cent with inorganic approach. Similarly, cropping systems with an organic approach have scored the highest in terms of all the parameters on soil health – organic carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. “In the case of vegetables, oilseeds and cereals, yield with organic approach was highest more times than integrated and inorganic approach. In pulses and spices, it was highest more times with integrated approach than with organic and inorganic approach,” the report observed. Similarly, cropping systems with an organic approach have scored the highest in terms of all the parameters on soil health – organic carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. The report’s findings on soil bulk density, soil bacteria, fungi, micronutrients etc also offered a similar verdict. Also Read: A village in Bihar goes organic, transforming the lives of its women “Despite the push given to it through periodic pronouncements from India’s leaders, the country’s efforts to upscale non-chemical farming practises have largely remained half-hearted at best,” said Sunita Narain, director general of CSE during the virtual event of the launch of the report. “CSE’s new report on the subject presents robust evidence which makes it clear that we can upscale organic and natural farming. It is time to invest adequately in a well-funded nation-wide programme for this,” she said. The CSE report compares results of three approaches – organic farming, integrated (which partly involves chemicals) agriculture, and inorganic (dependent on chemicals) farming. These results documented in the report are based on the evidence collected on various factors like crop yield, cost of cultivation, income, livelihood, soil health and environment, and food quality and nutrients. The report is based on two sets of sources – the results of the All-India Network Project on Organic Farming (AI-NPOF), 2004-19; and the CSE researchers combed through about 90 scientific studies on organic and natural farming published between 2010 and 2020 in India. Key findings of the report The CSE report has brought forward some key points with regard to crop yield, income and livelihood and health of the soil. It presents a comparison between the three approaches of organic, integrated and inorganic farming. “Among three approaches, out of 63 cropping systems, cost of cultivation was highest in 63 per cent cropping systems with organic approach at 15 centres, 8 per cent with integrated approach at three centres, and 29 per cent with inorganic approach at eight centres. With organic approach, the cost of cultivation was lowest in five per cent cropping systems,” notes the new report. The CSE report has brought forward some key points with regard to crop yield, income and livelihood and health of the soil. With organic approach, the mean cost of cultivation was lower than inorganic in 19 per cent cropping systems. The report goes on to say that the cost of cultivation is higher with organic approach than an integrated approach. “This high cost is explained by the fact that organic and bio-inputs used in the AI-NPOF are largely purchased from the market and not produced on-farm, as the project involves experimental farms. Whereas, organic inputs cost less if produced on-farm by farmers,” reads the report. The food quality and nutrition with organic approach were also found to be better than inorganic and slightly better than the integrated approach, the CSE report observed. Also Read: Non-pesticidal management in agriculture is a win-win for farmers and consumers While the report’s release came a day after the announcement made by FM for promotion of chemical-free natural farming, Amit Kumar, programme director, Sustainable Food Systems programme, CSE, and co-author of the CSE report, said that these are relatively small steps compared to the need of the hour. “Hopefully, our new report, which highlights that there is strong long-term evidence that organic and natural farming is not only profitable and sustainable but also productive, will propel the country to invest more adequately to upscale and encourage such a mass movement,” he added. The food quality and nutrition with organic approach were also found to be better than inorganic and slightly better than the integrated approach, the CSE report observed. Also Read: Using indigenous seeds to sustain livelihoods, fight climate change and pay off loans Recommendations of the report CSE researchers have called for development of a roadmap to set the long-term agenda for adoption of agro-ecological approaches across different parts of the country in view of their benefits on multiple and cross- cutting aspects such as nutrition, livelihood of farmers, natural resource conservation, biodiversity, resource efficiency, soil- health, disease resilience and mitigation of climate crisis. In addition to that, the report has also demanded to shift the focus on supporting farmers during the transition to organic and natural farming through technical and financial support. Apart from this, it has called for a targeted, ambitious and well-funded nationwide programme developed to drive the change towards organic and natural farming and promotion of organic fertilisers and biofertilizers instead of chemical fertilisers. Also Read: Madhya Pradesh farmers say organic farming is profitable, and at the same time saves on medical bills The report also recommended that states should step up their action in a concerted way to promote organic and natural farming. “This should be done through a series of measures such as those related to organic seeds, bio-inputs, capacity building of farmers and providing market linkages,” the report stated.

Holistic benefits of organic farming

A new scientific report on the benefits of organic farming released by the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) has much to cheer for farmers and entrepreneurs engaged in the production, processing and marketing of organic farm produce in India's northeast region. The potential of the region has remained untapped as the implementation of various flagship schemes and programmes promoting organic and natural farming have failed to gain the desired momentum. The CSE report titled "Evidence (2004-20) on holistic benefits of organic and natural farming in India" states long-term trends of crop yield revealed that the organic approach is better than inorganic and is at par with integrated. Besides scientific studies found that crop yields can be higher with organic and natural farming approaches in comparison to other approaches with chemicals, it adds. The report presents CSE's findings on the benefits of organic and natural farming on crop yield, income and livelihood, soil health and environment, and food quality by analysing the results of the government's long-term research project from 2004 and other scientific studies over the last decade. The two sources from which results were collected, collated and analysed for compiling the report are- All India Network Project on Organic Farming (AI-NPOF), a pan India research project of the Indian Council of Agriculture Research during 2014–19 and scientific studies conducted across the country. A key finding is that of the 504 times that yield results were recorded, 41 per cent of the times yields were the highest with an organic approach, followed by 33 per cent with integrated and 26 per cent with the inorganic approach. In the case of vegetables, oilseeds and cereals, yield with organic approach was the highest more times than integrated and inorganic approach. In pulses and spices, however, the yield was the highest more times with an integrated approach than with an organic and inorganic approach. "When five-year mean yields are compared, in 27 out of 31 crops (87per cent) yields were higher with organic approach than with inorganic approach as part of one or more cropping systems. Out of this, in 14 crops (52 per cent), the mean yield was significantly higher (>20 per cent)" state the reports and adds that these crops are tomato, potato, French bean, ladyfinger, linseed, black gram, pigeon pea, chickpea, ginger, coriander, black pepper, basmati rice, rice and maize.These 14 crops were grown at 12 centres including Umiam in Meghalaya and Gangtok in Sikkim. These studies also highlighted the importance of bio-inputs and organic inputs like farmyard manure, vermicompost, poultry manure, foliar spray of banana pseudostem, green manure and liquid bio-fertilizer. The study found that the cost of cultivation is higher with the organic approach than the integrated approach which is explained by the fact that organic, and bio-inputs used in the experimental farms under the AI-NPOF are largely purchased from the market and not produced on-farm, but organic inputs cost less if produced on-farm by farmers. However, net returns are much better with the organic approach than with integrated or inorganic approaches and despite the high cost of cultivation with the organic approach, net returns are more favourable than the integrated approach. Another key finding highlighted is that the food quality and nutrition with the organic approach are found to be better than inorganic, and also slightly better than the integrated approach. The Northeast region is a hub of organic cultivation by default these studies will bolster initiatives of promoting organic farming. The chemicals-driven green revolution in the country bypassing the northeast region is a blessing in disguise as these scientific studies will help demonstrate the traditional knowledge base of farmers in organic cultivation to draw global attention towards the region as India's natural organic food basket. Only 2.7 per cent of the net sown area of the country has been covered under various schemes and programmes for the promotion of organic and natural farming. The report also lists a set of recommendations for policy planning and implementation. These include improving the organic certification process to make it farmer-friendly and low-cost states playing an instrumental role in helping farmers sell their organic and natural products by developing organic value chains, procuring organic produce and helping farmers get remunerative prices, mainstreaming organic and natural farming in agriculture education and research systems and prioritizing adequate production and availability of quality organic fertilizers bio-fertilizers at low cost. It also harps on the importance of enabling the farmers to choose between chemical and organic fertilizers through the transfer of the huge ongoing subsidies allocated for chemical fertilizers to chemical-free farming. The report presents strong scientific evidence for the States in the region to prioritize organic and natural farming to capitalize on various Central government-funded schemes and policies to unlock the huge potential of the region. For the growers and entrepreneurs in agriculture and horticulture in the northeast region, the CSE's report will reinforce confidence in the traditional knowledge base of communities in organic farming.

COVID-19 Impact Analysis

In March 2020, the WHO declared coronavirus as a pandemic. To date, the pandemic has resulted in 3.5 million people falling sick and 247,744 deaths across the globe. One of the key recommendations to contain the disease is to wash hands frequently with soap and water. According to the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), every person needs to clean his/ her hands at least 10 times a day, instead of the usual average of five times a day, in this situation. This has led to an increased in water consumption. Fresh water is required to cater to the demand and supply of water. Thus, rise in demand for fresh water is anticipated to propel the demand for stormwater management, as stormwater management helps improve the quality of water by reducing and channeling rainwater runoff or melted snow from lawns or streets. Buy Now :https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/checkout.php?rep_id=82962&ltype=S Read more: https://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/stormwater-management-market-poised-to-expand-at-a-robust-pace-over-2021-2031#ixzz7JtAeIIvE

Holistic benefits of organic farming

A new scientific report on the benefits of organic farming released by the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) has much to cheer for farmers and entrepreneurs engaged in the production A new scientific report on the benefits of organic farming released by the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) has much to cheer for farmers and entrepreneurs engaged in the production, processing and marketing of organic farm produce in India's northeast region. The potential of the region has remained untapped as the implementation of various flagship schemes and programmes promoting organic and natural farming have failed to gain the desired momentum. The CSE report titled "Evidence (2004-20) on holistic benefits of organic and natural farming in India" states long-term trends of crop yield revealed that the organic approach is better than inorganic and is at par with integrated. Besides scientific studies found that crop yields can be higher with organic and natural farming approaches in comparison to other approaches with chemicals, it adds. The report presents CSE's findings on the benefits of organic and natural farming on crop yield, income and livelihood, soil health and environment, and food quality by analysing the results of the government's long-term research project from 2004 and other scientific studies over the last decade. The two sources from which results were collected, collated and analysed for compiling the report are- All India Network Project on Organic Farming (AI-NPOF), a pan India research project of the Indian Council of Agriculture Research during 2014–19 and scientific studies conducted across the country. A key finding is that of the 504 times that yield results were recorded, 41 per cent of the times yields were the highest with an organic approach, followed by 33 per cent with integrated and 26 per cent with the inorganic approach. In the case of vegetables, oilseeds and cereals, yield with organic approach was the highest more times than integrated and inorganic approach. In pulses and spices, however, the yield was the highest more times with an integrated approach than with an organic and inorganic approach. "When five-year mean yields are compared, in 27 out of 31 crops (87per cent) yields were higher with organic approach than with inorganic approach as part of one or more cropping systems. Out of this, in 14 crops (52 per cent), the mean yield was significantly higher (>20 per cent)" state the reports and adds that these crops are tomato, potato, French bean, ladyfinger, linseed, black gram, pigeon pea, chickpea, ginger, coriander, black pepper, basmati rice, rice and maize.These 14 crops were grown at 12 centres including Umiam in Meghalaya and Gangtok in Sikkim. These studies also highlighted the importance of bio-inputs and organic inputs like farmyard manure, vermicompost, poultry manure, foliar spray of banana pseudostem, green manure and liquid bio-fertilizer. The study found that the cost of cultivation is higher with the organic approach than the integrated approach which is explained by the fact that organic, and bio-inputs used in the experimental farms under the AI-NPOF are largely purchased from the market and not produced on-farm, but organic inputs cost less if produced on-farm by farmers. However, net returns are much better with the organic approach than with integrated or inorganic approaches and despite the high cost of cultivation with the organic approach, net returns are more favourable than the integrated approach. Another key finding highlighted is that the food quality and nutrition with the organic approach are found to be better than inorganic, and also slightly better than the integrated approach. The Northeast region is a hub of organic cultivation by default these studies will bolster initiatives of promoting organic farming. The chemicals-driven green revolution in the country bypassing the northeast region is a blessing in disguise as these scientific studies will help demonstrate the traditional knowledge base of farmers in organic cultivation to draw global attention towards the region as India's natural organic food basket. Only 2.7 per cent of the net sown area of the country has been covered under various schemes and programmes for the promotion of organic and natural farming. The report also lists a set of recommendations for policy planning and implementation. These include improving the organic certification process to make it farmer-friendly and low-cost states playing an instrumental role in helping farmers sell their organic and natural products by developing organic value chains, procuring organic produce and helping farmers get remunerative prices, mainstreaming organic and natural farming in agriculture education and research systems and prioritizing adequate production and availability of quality organic fertilizers bio-fertilizers at low cost. It also harps on the importance of enabling the farmers to choose between chemical and organic fertilizers through the transfer of the huge ongoing subsidies allocated for chemical fertilizers to chemical-free farming. The report presents strong scientific evidence for the States in the region to prioritize organic and natural farming to capitalize on various Central government-funded schemes and policies to unlock the huge potential of the region. For the growers and entrepreneurs in agriculture and horticulture in the northeast region, the CSE's report will reinforce confidence in the traditional knowledge base of communities in organic farming.

What Centre’s push to power plant biomass co-firing means to farmers, air quality

Blending eco-friendly biomass pellets with coal in electricity generation will reduce CO2 emissions and reduce fly ash – a highly toxic blend of harmful chemicals Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman’s Budget speech declaring a scheme to push for use of biomass in coal-fired thermal power plants is just one step towards addressing the ever-evolving challenge of environmental hazards posed by coal-based power generation plants. Termed SAMARTH (Sustainable Agrarian Mission on use of Agro Residue in Thermal Power Plants), the scheme entails blending 5 per cent biomass pellets with coal while gradually increasing the blend to 7 per cent within two years. Also called thermal power plants, the coal-based units are known to be world’s most resource-intensive and polluting industries. Nevertheless, they remain the mainstay of India’s energy sources with roughly 75% of electricity coming from thermal power plants. The FM said in her speech that about 5-7% biomass pellets will be used in thermal power plants, which will cut carbon dioxide emissions by 38 million tonnes annually. “This will also provide extra income to farmers, give job opportunities to locals and help avoid stubble burning in agricultural fields,” the minister added. Advertisement What is biomass co-firing? Blending agriculture residue or urban waste (in the form of pellets) with coal in older power stations is called biomass co-firing. It is a practice followed by several old power plants across the globe and also in India of late. Till December 2021, about 59,000 metric tonnes of biomass has been co-fired in thermal power plants in India, while tenders for 12 million metric tonnes are in the pipeline. Need for biomass in power plants Emissions from thermal power plants don’t just give out CO2, but also release heavy amounts of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, mercury among other pollutants in the form of coal ash also called fly ash. Areas around power plants report piling ash in the form of slurry in ash ponds and in the dry form in open fields. Several studies have confirmed contamination of drinking water in areas around Koradi and Khaparkheda power plants in Nagpur (Maharashtra). Delhi has for long paid the price for fly ash disposed of unscientifically by power plants located in close vicinity to the national capital. Scientists say that long-term exposure to fly ash in the air can lead to serious pulmonary illnesses and even cancer. Despite several legislations and litigations in the past, the utilisation of fly ash has not gained momentum mainly because power plants have been lax in disposing off such toxic waste in an environment-friendly way. The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has ordered the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) to ensure all thermal power plants in India make 100% ash utilisation. Yet, 21 years after the first notification was issued, almost 50% power plants are yet to comply with the 100% ash utilisation order. Many plants do not even have a 50% annual ash utilisation rate. Meanwhile, despite strong commitments at the Paris Climate Change summit in 2015 and at COP-26 in Glasgow last year, India’s reliance on coal energy has only increased. As per ‘State of India’s Environment Report 2021’, about 64 per cent (132 GW) coal power capacity has been added in the last decade. Annual fly ash generation rose from 123 million tonnes to 217 million tonnes during the same period, the report adds. What is equally concerning is the amount of residual or legacy ash that has accumulated over the years due to low utilisation of existing ash. A recent report from Centre for Science and Environment found that the unused ash stock from coal power plants of India in the last 10 years is 627 million tonnes. This is three times the current annual ash generation of 200 million tonnes. It is unfortunate that despite a well-defined policy and regulatory framework for 100 per cent utilisation of fly ash, thermal power plants have failed to achieve the targets for one reason or the other. Hence, the blending of biomass (made from crop residue and organic waste) with coal will go a long way in minimising the harmful effects of coal-based energy. Centre’s efforts so far The National Mission on Use of Biomass in Thermal Power Plants has been promoting use of biomass in power plants by way of ad campaigns, awareness missions and extensive training programmes. Aggressive promotion in Haryana, Punjab and Uttar Pradesh is showing results. Power plants in the NCR region (around Delhi) have used 21,000 tonnes of biomass so far and have issued tenders for procuring 5.5 million tonnes more. State-owned power generator NTPC has alone co-fired 58,000 tonnes of biomass, while issuing tenders for 10.7 million tonnes recently. Benefit to farmers Stubble burning by farmers of Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh and the consequent air pollution in the entire north India hits the headlines every winter. A resident of Daryaganj in Delhi may whine about the “bad agriculture practices” of farmers which causes health hazards to his family, but farmers over the years have been constrained by labour shortage and excess production (rice and wheat) aided by mechanisation, which has only added to stubble load. They are left with no viable option but to burn the agriculture waste, which increases air pollution. Also read: Better use of waste biomass critical to meet 20% ethanol blending target This farm residue can be converted into biomass pellets, which can then be supplied to power plants for biomass co-firing, which reduces CO2 emissions significantly while offering an alternative to stubble burning and mitigating harmful effects of coal burning like fly ash generation. Soundaram Ramanatham of Centre for Science and Environment quotes power ministry data to say that about 0.25 million tonnes of biomass pellets are needed to produce one gigawatt capacity at the rate of seven per cent co-firing. Thus, for 100 GW capacity, nearly 25-30 million tonnes of biomass pellets will be required. This is a huge opportunity for farmers to increase their income while cutting down on air pollution. Biomass use – an answer to coal shortage An unprecedented coal shortage in September-October last year resulted in power cuts across the country and intense competition among state power utilities to secure enough energy from the grid to keep its industry and cities working. Blending biomass pellets (5-7 per cent) with coal can cut the need for coal and aid India’s gradual transition towards clean and renewable energy sources like solar and wind. There are ample examples of successful biomass co-firing reducing carbon footprint of coal power plants in Europe and the US. The International Energy Agency (IEA) has documented evidence to prove that biomass pellets made from agricultural residue have calorific value equal to that of coal. So, increasing use of biomass in coal-based power plants will not only help the country reduce its carbon emissions, but also meet its Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) for net zero emissions target in 2070. Thus, increasing use of biomass in electricity generation is a win-win for farmers, coal-based power plants and citizens who have the right to clean and ambient air.