Centre for Science and Environment masthead Twitter LinkedIn Facebook Instagram Donate

Cse In News

Cse In News

Drop in mercury and low wind speed turn city air ‘poor’ again

Gurgaon: The city's air quality deteriorated significantly on Sunday to the "poor" level (219) from the previous day's "moderate" level of 176. The highest air quality index (AQI) was recorded at Teri Gram (253), followed by Vikas Sadan (195) and Sector 51 (192). The System of Air Quality and Weather Forecasting and Research (Safar) has predicted that weather conditions will be highly unfavourable for dispersion of pollutants starting from Oct 20. Gurgaon last recorded "poor" air on Friday. "The predominant surface wind, according to SAFAR, is likely to be coming from the northeast or southeast with speed up to 8 kmph and there will also be fog. The maximum mixing depth is likely to be between 600 m2/s and 3,500 m2/s in the region. A ventilation index lower than 6,000 m2/s with an average wind speed of less than 10 kmph is unfavorable for the dispersion of pollutants," it stated. Experts said the AQI is likely to worsen in the coming days. Shubhansh Tiwari, a research associate at the Centre for Science and Environment, attributed the deterioration of air quality to the region entering the winter cycle, which leads to thermal inversion, making pollutants heavy. He also pointed out that local emissions such as vehicular pollution, road dust, garbage burning, and construction dust are very high, and unless policies are implemented to curtail these emissions at sources, pollution will remain a perennial problem. The minimum temperature was recorded at 18.5 degree Celsius on Sunday, while the maximum was logged at 36.4 degree Celsius. The PM2.5 level was highest on Sunday in Sector 51 (289 µg/m³), followed by Teri Gram (222 µg/m³) and Vikas Sadan (198 µg/m³). The level of PM10 was the highest at Sector 51 (267µg/m³), followed by Teri Gram (245 µg/m³). The annual average permissible limits for PM2.5 and PM10 are 60 µg/m³ and 100 µg/m³, respectively, according to Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB). Dr Arunesh Kumar, a senior consultant in respiratory medicine at Paras health said there is a sharp increase in respiratory cases, with hospitals seeing a 30-40% rise in footfall at OPDs. He attributed this surge to worsening air pollution. "Pollutants such as PM2.5, PM10, and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) remain suspended in the air for longer, causing more harm to those who breathe it in. The impact is widespread, with both vulnerable populations — such as children, the elderly, and those with pre-existing respiratory conditions — and healthy people being affected. We often see a spike in cases of asthma and bronchitis, and other respiratory infections. Air pollutants not only exacerbate asthma but can also cause airway inflammation and increase the risk of developing new respiratory conditions," he said.

Homage to Tata from an environmentalist

As we mourn the passing of Ratan Tata, let’s also mourn the passing of the time when business leaders like him ruled our world; when values of frugality and simplicity in personal life were cherished; and when business was not only about private gain but also about securing public good Our first interaction with the late Ratan Tata was not pleasant. Delhi was choking with pollution; our campaign on the right to clean air had been launched. Diesel was a fuel that was being indicted for emissions of tiny particulate matter, PM2.5—this was all new in the mid-1990s, as science was discovering how fuel and vehicle quality, when improved, would lead to an unexpected outcome of smaller particulates, which could go deep into our lungs. So, my late colleague Anil Agarwal and I wrote about the dangers of diesel. And we promptly got a defamation notice of some consequent sum of money from Tata Motors. That was the time when Ratan Tata had just launched his car enterprise; it was riding on the change of fuel—diesel, which would give his company an edge over the petrol variants of Maruti Suzuki and others. We were not the kind to back down. Nor was he. It was a messy battle in the highest court of the country.

Anand Vihar and RK Puram continue to totter as usual suspects see little progress

New Delhi: Anand Vihar has been in the news due to the severe air pollution, measured in the ‘severe' level, this past week. Not surprising, because the locality is one of the 13 pollution hotspots and the most polluted spot in Delhi in 2023 with an annual average PM2.5 concentration of 126 micrograms per cubic metre and the second most polluted in 2022 after Jahangirpuri. Comparably, the national annual standard is 40 micrograms per cubic metre while WHO's guideline is 5 micrograms per cubic metre. While Delhi govt claims to be implementing measures to mitigate pollution at these hotspots identified in 2018, data proves these areas continue to suffer high pollution. Nine of the 13 places recorded higher annual average PM2.5 concentrations in 2023 than in 2022. The Centre for Science and Environment's analysis of the Central Pollution Control Board's real-time air quality data shows that the annual average PM2.5 level at Jahangirpuri in 2024 (till Oct 20) at 100 micrograms per cubic metre was 20 times higher than WHO's annual safe guideline and 2.5 times higher than national ambient air quality standards. The PM2.5 concentration at Jahangirpuri is expected to rise further in Nov and Dec. Jahangirpuri recorded an annual average PM2.5 level of 127 micrograms per cubic metre in 2022 and 123 last year. Another example is RK Puram, which saw annual average PM2.5 levels of 106 micrograms per cubic metre in 2022. It rose further to 120 micrograms per cubic metre in 2023, and this station has already recorded an annual average concentration of 93 micrograms per cubic metre till now. In 2023, when the winter pollution strategy was released, Delhi govt had decided on separate hotspot-specific action plans. Delhi Pollution Control Committee too prepared an inventory of pollution sources at each hotspot, identifying 65 major sources and 4,555 minor ones of pollutants. The agencies concerned were asked to handle these and a survey is under way on how many pollution sources continue to exist. In Sept, it was announced that drones would be used for the first time to monitor real-time sources of pollution at the hotspots. However, this is yet to begin, admitted a govt official. Mukesh Khare, professor emeritus, civil engineering, IIT-Delhi, said CPCB categorised air quality monitoring stations in four categories: residential, commercial, industrial and sensitive areas. "Unlike abroad, we don't have a ‘roadside' category for monitoring stations. Anand Vihar actually falls in this category because it is surrounded by bus and railway stations and the air quality station is located 200-300 metres from the roadside. IITs in Delhi and Kanpur have pointed out to CPCB to recategorise the Anand Vihar station." Khare said in the non-winter months, AQI was mostly in the ‘moderate' category at the hotspots when there is no rain and dust was the major source of pollution, followed by vehicular exhaust. "In a tropical country, dust is transferred from other areas too. Road dust is stirred by movement of vehicles and the time of dust retention is high," he said. "Though dust is a bigger PM10 pollutant, it can also be PM2.5 sized. Water sprinkling and road vacuuming can help." Anumita Roychowdhury, executive director, research and advocacy, CSE, said, "The hotspots management approach was adopted in 2018. Since then, enough inventory taking of pollution sources should have been done. However, as the hotspots continue to record high pollution levels, it means there is a gap in action taken." She added, "Local problems have to be resolved at the hotspots. For instance, Anand Vihar has complex sources, including the inter-state bus terminal there, industrial areas in close proximity and the Ghazipur landfill around 3km away. To reduce pollution at Anand Vihar, a systematic approach is needed to deal with deep-rooted problems like industries in Patparganj and the UP border, the landfill and transiting buses to cleaner fuels." In response, Delhi govt said it was making consistent efforts and taking all steps to fight pollution, which mostly originated in neighbouring states.

Insurance query: Is there a plan to protect my belongings from natural, climatic disasters like rain, floods?

Last week, Chennai and its surrounding districts witnessed heavy to very heavy rainfall as the northeast monsoon season began. The region was placed on high alert due to a developing depression in the Bay of Bengal heading towards the Tamil Nadu coast. The consequential power outages and flight cancellations led to significant disruptions, leaving thousands of residents struggling amidst continuous downpours throughout the week. This incident serves as a poignant example of the escalating frequency of extreme weather events in India. Over the past decade, the country has observed a surge in natural disasters. Between 2000 and 2019, India ranked third globally in the number of natural disaster occurrences. The outlook appears bleak as projections indicate a rise in both the frequency and intensity of these calamities, resulting in substantial financial losses amounting to billions of US dollars. A report from the Centre for Science and Environment reveals that in the initial nine months of 2022 alone, India faced weather-related disasters almost every day. This alarming trend underscores the urgent need for robust disaster preparedness and mitigation measures to safeguard lives and infrastructure in the face of increasingly volatile climatic conditions. Between 2019 and 2023, these disasters led to damages worth $56 billion. Extreme weather events have a significant impact on the economy in two key phases. Initially, there is damage to both human and physical capital. Subsequently, there is a reduction in productivity as resources are diverted towards reconstruction efforts. One effective way to ensure the timely, targeted, and transparent allocation of funds for reconstruction is through the use of specialized climate insurance. Climate insurance operates by providing financial compensation to insurers in the event of a natural disaster. By transferring funds from one party to compensate for the losses of another, albeit at an additional premium cost, climate insurance can play a crucial role in climate adaptation strategies. "The frequency and severity of natural disasters like torrential rains and floods are increasing year on year. To safeguard yourself and your financial assets, it is crucial to prioritize insurance coverage. Whether you live in a city or tier-2 or tier-3 towns, incessant rains causing havoc each year have become common in India. Most metropolitan cities are exposed to urban flooding that disrupts daily lives every season. They have the potential to not only damage and destroy homes but also your two- or four-wheeler vehicles. Floods and rain also bring with them various water-borne, vector-borne, and other types of diseases. It is, hence, crucial to have 360-degree protection and take a comprehensive health, motor, and home insurance plan," said Vivek Chaturvedi, CMO and Head of Direct Sales, Go Digit General Insurance. Insurance cover for home, car Climatic disasters such as cyclones lead to significant damage to many motor vehicles. Affected vehicles may qualify for coverage under comprehensive motor insurance policies. To ensure enhanced protection, consider adding features like zero depreciation and engine protection. Insurance claims can be filed in cases where vehicles have been swept away while parked or involved in collisions due to floods or other unexpected natural disasters. "If your car is stuck in a waterlogged area or drowns due to flooding in your area or basementand gets damaged, comprehensive motor insurance can cover the repair costs. Even if your car is swept away and goes missing and is not found, it can be considered total loss, and you may be able to get a claimfor the same up to the Insured Declared Value (IDV). To provide enhanced protection to your vehicle, consider add-ons like Engine and Gearbox Protect Cover, Return to Invoice Cover, Roadside Assistance Cover, Zero Depreciation Cover, and Consumable Cover," Chaturvedi added. He further said: "Amidst the changing weather and increased risk of waterborne or vector-borne diseases that see a spike when there are floods, taking health insurance is essential. Utilizing the vast network of cashless hospitals would ensure that you receive timely and qualitative care without worrying about any upfront cost." For home insurance, Chaturvedi said: "Your home is not only a place of comfort but also one of the biggest financial investments you make. Any damage to your property can have severe consequences. Comprehensive Home insurance can protect you against any type of inundation caused due to floods, torrential rains, etc.,and pay for the costs of repairing your home structure as well as the contents of the house. and its contents if they are damaged due to flooding." Government's stand During a recent discussion, P K Mishra, the principal secretary to the Prime Minister, expressed concern about the escalating frequency and intensity of disasters. He stressed the pressing need to provide accessible disaster risk insurance to vulnerable communities. Mishra highlighted the importance of public-private partnerships in expanding insurance options and ensuring financial sustainability. For instance, after Cyclone Nilam struck Tamil Nadu in 2010, the insurance industry and the Finance Ministry collaborated to establish a dedicated catastrophe pool to mitigate losses from natural disasters. In February 2024, the Standing Committee on Finance of the 17th Lok Sabha suggested that the government consider ways to provide insurance for homes and properties, particularly for economically vulnerable groups in disaster-prone areas, through collaboration with Central/State Governments. This initiative aims to reduce the financial burden of rebuilding lives after disasters and offer significant relief to citizens, the government, and the insurance sector. If implemented nationwide, the proposed Insurance for Natural Catastrophes and Pandemics (INCIP) could potentially cost up to Rs 5,000 crore. In a 2023 report, the State Bank of India noted: “What we need is a public-private solution, say a Disaster Pool, for natural disaster risk involving the insurance sector could offer many benefits over government crisis loans and grants. If we consider the 2020 floods in India, the total economic loss was of $7.5 billion (Rs 52,500 crore) but insurance cover of only 11 per cent.” the SBI report said. It further noted that besides the loss of human life, natural disasters also lead to significant economic impacts. In India, for instance, there has been a reported economic loss of $150 billion since 1900, with floods accounting for $92.1 billion and storms for $44.7 billion of that total. The frequency and intensity of natural calamities, particularly cyclones, have significantly increased in recent years. Of note, the occurrence of cyclones on the west coast of India, specifically Maharashtra and Gujarat, has seen a notable uptick. Despite this, only 8% of total losses are currently covered by insurance, leaving a protection gap of 93% from 1991 to 2022. It is imperative to take early action to address this gap across all lines of insurance.

एक्सपोजर विजिट में बच्चों को दी को-ट्रीटमेंट प्लांट की जानकारी

विंध्याचल स्थित 25 केएलडी क्षमता वाले को-ट्रीटमेंट प्लांट का विद्यालय के बच्चों ने शुक्रवार को एक्सपोजर विजिट में भ्रमण किया। प्लांट के कर्मचारियों व स्वच्छ भारत मिशन के अधिकारियों ने बच्चों को प्लांट के कार्यप्रणाली के बारे में जानकारी दी। बच्चों को स्क्रीन चैंबर, स्लज कलेक्शन टैंक, एनारबिक टैंक, क्रॉस फ्लो सेपरेटर, स्क्रू प्रेस और पॉलिशिंग टैंक की प्रक्रिया के बारे में जानकारी दी। संचालन नगर पालिका परिषद के स्वच्छ भारत मिशन के जिला प्रबंधक संजय सिंह और सेंटर फॉर साइंस एंड एनवायरनमेंट (सीएसई) के कार्यक्रम अधिकारी मनीष मिश्रा ने किया। मनीष मिश्रा ने संयंत्र की विभिन्न तकनीकी इकाइयों और उनके उपयोग के बारे में विस्तार से जानकारी दी। दौरा नगर पालिका परिषद मिर्जापुर के कर्मचारियों और छात्रों के लिए महत्वपूर्ण अनुभव रहा। इससे उन्हें ठोस अपशिष्ट प्रबंधन और जल शोधन की नवीनतम तकनीकों के बारे में गहन जानकारी मिली। विजिट में प्लांट ऑपरेटर ने प्लांट को संचालित कर शोधित किए गए जल का सैंपल छात्रों को दिखाया और उनसे फीडबैक लिया।

33% of India’s soil degraded

RAJASTHAN: India is witnessing an alarming rise in soil degradation, threatening its agricultural productivity, food security, and environmental sustainability. Soil, a vital resource supporting the livelihoods of millions of farmers and maintaining ecosystem balance, is under siege from various forms of degradation. According to recent estimates, nearly 115 to 120 million hectares (Mha)—roughly 33% of the country’s total geographic area (TGA)—are affected by soil degradation, including water erosion, wind erosion, salinity, and vegetation loss. This growing issue was discussed in detail by all stakeholders at the Climate Week organised by the New-Delhi based Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) at its Anil Agarwal Environment Training Institute in Nimli, Rajasthan. N K Lenka, principal scientist and head, Soil Physics Division of ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil Science, Madhya Pradesh told TNIE on the sidelines of the event: “Out of 360 million hectares of total geographical area, 115 to 120 million hectares are degraded. This data was harmonised from different sources, including ISRO’s Satellite Application Centre (SAC), National Bureau of Soil Survey and Institute of Soil Science. The parameters to categorise soil degradation are chemical and physical. For instance, in the case of chemical degradation, soil would have become acidic. Even if farmers apply loads of urea, the soil will give no produce. Our trials show in some locations, the soil quality came down by 10 times,” he said. The latest Desertification and Land Degradation Atlas of India published by the SAC, which formed the basis for the assessment, reveals that water erosion is the most significant contributor, affecting 11.01% of India’s land. Other major processes include vegetation degradation (9.15%) and wind erosion (5.46%). These processes, compounded by deforestation, poor agricultural practices, and climate change, are particularly prevalent in semi-arid and dry sub-humid regions of the country. The atlas also highlights the growing impact of desertification, with 83.69 Mha of dryland classified as undergoing this process, which has seen a cumulative increase of over 1 million hectares since 2003-05. In addition to natural processes, human-induced activities, such as mining, overgrazing, and industrial pollution have further exacerbated the problem. States like Rajasthan, Maharashtra, Gujarat, and Telangana are among the worst affected, with significant portions of their land showing severe degradation. Rajasthan alone, for example, has over 21 million hectares classified as degraded, largely due to wind erosion in its arid and semi-arid zones. Soil degradation has far-reaching consequences on India’s agricultural sector, which contributes significantly to the national economy and provides employment to a large percentage of the population. The loss of topsoil and nutrients due to erosion has reduced the land’s ability to sustain crops, leading to lower yields and increased vulnerability to extreme weather events. Sunita Narain, Director General of CSE told this newspaper: “Depletion in soil quality means depletion of carbon content and increased need for fertilisers. This adds to Greenhouse Gases emissions. The way ahead is to increase soil carbon through increased use of biomass. There can be many options to do this - from natural farming to increased use of nitrogen fixing crops and increased use of organic manure. This is a win-win as it will add fertility, reduce subsidies for fertilisers and emissions.” Soil degradation in Tamil Nadu Tamil Nadu, a state heavily reliant on agriculture, is also witnessing significant soil degradation. According to the Desertification and Land Degradation Atlas, the state had 1.60 million hectares affected by various forms of degradation as of 2018-19. Water erosion, particularly in the plains and riverine regions, accounts for a substantial portion of the degradation, along with localised salinity issues in coastal areas. In the hilly regions of Tamil Nadu, land degradation manifests through mass movements, where steep slopes and heavy rainfall result in soil loss and landslides. Additionally, unsustainable agricultural practices, such as excessive use of chemical fertilizers and improper irrigation methods, have contributed to soil hardening and reduced fertility in many parts of the state. Ongoing efforts The government, under its commitment to the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification, has set an ambitious target of achieving land degradation neutrality by 2030. This includes the restoration of 26 million hectares of degraded land.

Delhi air pollution: How open burning is adding fuel to fire

NEW DELHI: The share of pollutants emitted by burning of waste in PM2.5 is expected to rise in the coming days. Though open burning is currently insignificant as a factor in pollution at the moment, it assumes bigger proportions as winter sets in when the poor and homeless people burn waste, wood and other combustibles to beat the cold. "The air quality is likely to be in the ‘very poor' to ‘poor' categories for the six days from Oct 21 onwards," forecast the Air Quality Early Warning System for Delhi, the forecasting body under the Union ministry of earth sciences. "Meteorological conditions are highly unfavourable for the effective dispersion of pollutants. Additional emissions from sources such as stubble and waste burning are likely to deteriorate air quality significantly." How open burning is adding fuel to fire According to the real-time source apportionment study undertaken by Delhi Pollution Control Committee and IIT-Kanpur, the share of biomass burning (burning of wood, dung and agricultural residue) was 24% from Nov 2022 to Jan 29, 2023. An IIT-Delhi study in 2021 found that haze episodes in Jan were highly affected by biomass burning, likely from the burning wood, coal or roadside trash for cooking or warming. Similarly, a 2018 joint report by The Energy and Resources Institute and Automotive Research Association of India stated that during winter, fuel (mainly biomass) burning in houses and agricultural fields accounted for an average 14% of PM2.5 and 13% of PM10 pollutants. In Aug, the Commission for Air Quality Management issued an advisory to all residents' welfare associations and housing societies to provide electric heaters or other suitable appliances to security personnel and other staff to help them avoid burning wood to keep themselves warm. Anumita Roychowdhury, executive director, research and advocacy, Centre for Science and Environment, said, "Waste burning can be controlled only when 100% collection, segregation and material recovery is achieved. Alongside, the legacy waste at landfills must be remediated. In fact, the municipality has to implement the Waste Management Rules and central govt programme on this." Delhi Fire Services received 2,425 calls about garbage burning from Jan to May this year compared with 1,498 in the same period last year. "Burning garbage emits such thick smoke that it can hinder rescue operations. It's also hazardous if inhaled," a fire official had earlier told TOI.

Winter Pollution in Delhi: Stubble Burning, Emissions, and Traffic Cited as Major Factors

With winter approaching, the national capital braces for a recurring issue: deteriorating air quality. Environment expert Vivek Chattopadhyay emphasized multiple factors contributing to the seasonal spike in pollution, including emissions, traffic congestion, and industrial activities. According to Chattopadhyay, Principal Program Manager at the Air Pollution Centre for Science and Environment, “The major factor is the sudden change in weather conditions, which is not allowing pollutants to disperse. Emissions are rising, and new sources, such as biomass and garbage burning, also add to the pollution load.” He noted that the differences between summer and winter pollution are stark, with winter’s lack of wind trapping emissions and creating the infamous haze over Delhi. Traffic congestion and industrial emissions continue to aggravate the situation. Chattopadhyay stressed the need for clean fuel in industries and called for action against coal-based plants outside Delhi to mitigate the issue. “We need to address this at a regional level to optimize solutions,” he added. One of the most pressing contributors to pollution in northern India remains stubble burning by farmers in states like Punjab and Haryana. Despite various measures, the issue persists, and the Supreme Court has stepped in, summoning the Chief Secretaries of both states for a report on why stricter legal actions have not been implemented. Aam Aadmi Party leader Jasmine Shah shared a mixed report, stating a 27% reduction in stubble burning incidents in Punjab this year, while Haryana saw a 23% increase. “We are witnessing a reduction in Punjab, but efforts in Haryana need to intensify,” Shah said during a press conference.

Anand Vihar’s air quality nearly twice as bad as rest of Delhi

Anand Vihar – a location notorious for its air pollution problem – is once again at the centre of alarm as toxic pollutants blanket the area at a time when Delhi’s annual spectre of pollution is starting to into gear. Pollution levels in the area have already soared far beyond permissible limits, with its average air quality index (AQI) already hovering more than 100 points higher than the citywide average. On Thursday, Delhi environment minister Gopal Rai issued urgent directives to officials, calling for immediate action to curb rising pollution at the city’s designated hot spots – calling for a particular focus on the situation in Anand Vihar. Rai has scheduled a high-level meeting on Friday to address conditions at Anand Vihar and 12 other critical pollution hotspots across the city. “The meeting will look at the reasons behind high pollution at Anand Vihar, with the minister also taking a review of the other 12 hotspots and what measures are being taken there,” said a government official. Anand Vihar is among the 13 pollution hotspots identified jointly by the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) and the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) in 2018, and it remains one of Delhi’s most polluted locations throughout the year. The average AQI at the station has already touched “severe” – over 400 – in the past few days, at a time when Delhi is hovering in the “poor” zone. Experts say a series of factors combine to make Anand Vihar particularly prone to high pollution. The main issue is the heavy traffic from the ISBT and highways, nearby industrial zones, construction activity. The station comes under the DPCC, however, queries sent to both CPCB and DPCC were unanswered. An AQI of 51 to 100 is classified as “satisfactory”, between 101 and 200 is classified as “moderate”, between 201 and 300 is classified as “poor”, between 301 and 400 is classified as “very poor” and over 400 is “severe”. Data available for Anand Vihar from past days showed the average AQI there has remained between “very poor” and “severe” this past week and is significantly higher than the Delhi average. On Wednesday, the AQI was 429 (severe); it was 424 (severe) on Tuesday; 313 (very poor) on Monday; 374 (very poor) on Sunday; 376 (very poor) on Saturday; and 330 (very poor) on Friday. In comparison, Delhi’s average AQI has touched “poor” at its worst so far this season. Delhi’s average AQI was 285 (poor) on Thursday; it was 230 (poor) on Wednesday; 198 (moderate) on Tuesday; 234 (poor) on Monday; 224 (poor) on Sunday; 155 (moderate) on Saturday and 141 (moderate) on Friday. CPCB data showed it the primary pollutant in the area is PM10 – with an hourly average concentration shooting up to 934 micrograms per cubic metre (µg/m3) at 10am (over nine times the safe standard of 100µg/m3). As a rule of thumb, high PM10 levels indicates dust pollution. In comparison, the peak PM2.5 concentration in the same time period was 320µg/m3 – over five times the safe limit of 60µg/m3. Experts said though dust may be posing a great challenge now, Anand Vihar faces a similar, if not higher influx of vehicular and industrial emissions, which can spike PM2.5. “Anand Vihar has unique challenges. The ISBT there and the highway induce massive intra-city and inter-city traffic, as well as heavy duty truck movement. It also falls within the influence zone of nearby industrial areas. Other sources include the RRTS construction site, the Ghazipur dumpsite, which is near, and other localised but smaller sources,” said Anumita Roychowdhury, executive director of research and advocacy at the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE). Locals meanwhile said traffic and congestion remain the biggest problem for the area. “When you have an ISBT, a metro station and a railway station, there is bound to be traffic, which is not properly managed. You also have buses coming over from UP, which should be regulated better. People stay stuck in traffic throughout the year and these emissions can accumulate,” Vinod Kumar, 56, who is the RWA president of DDA flats in Anand Vihar.

Explained: Why A New Climate Finance Goal Already Has Countries Fighting

Mumbai: Even though India’s southwest monsoon season is officially over, it left much loss and damage in its wake. The most devastating disaster this season was the landslide in Kerala’s Wayanad which killed over 400. The impact of climate change on India’s weather systems is well recorded. As every season becomes more intense and deadly, people are grappling with more intense and longer droughts, floods, landslides, cyclones, heatwaves and such. Against this backdrop, world leaders will convene in Azerbaijan next month for the 29th annual climate conference or COP29. The conference will go on for two weeks, but its centrepiece is likely to be the next climate finance goal. Historically, there has been a schism between members of this conference over money to deal with climate change. Developed countries were supposed to provide $100 billion per year up to 2020 to developing countries in order to deal with the effects of climate change such as for adaptation and taking steps to curb global warming. However, developed countries did not meet that deadline, and even when they have completed the target now, there are questions around it, furthering the atmosphere of distrust. As per the Paris Agreement, countries are supposed to agree on the next finance goal that will come into effect 2025 onwards, taking the $100 billion as the floor and raising it suitably as per developing countries’ needs. This new corpus will be called the New Collective Quantified Goal on Finance or NCQG. India was one of the few countries in the world to put a number to this finance goal, demanding that the developing world be given around $1 trillion per year, starting from 2025. But NCQG’s journey has already been rocky, with disagreements over what kind of finance, paid by whom, to whom and related matters. Since all countries are supposed to revise their climate pledges by February 2025, developing countries need to see the money in order to finalise their plans. As COP29 starts in less than a month, we explain what is at stake. What is NCQG? Money has always been at the heart of global climate negotiations because the world will need this sum to curb global warming and deal with the effects of climate change while transitioning away from fossil fuel. In fact, money has been crucial from the beginning. In 2009, at the then 15th annual climate conference or COP15, it was decided that developed countries would provide $100 billion in finance to developing countries to combat climate change. The rationale behind this is that it is the developed countries that have historically contributed the most to greenhouse gas emissions and therefore, have a greater responsibility. At the conference’s 21st session in 2015, countries decided to extend the $100 billion goal through 2025 and to set the NCQG by then. They agreed that $100 billion per year would be a floor for the new goal, which means that the new goal will build on that. Then, what would the ceiling be? Developing countries require about $5.8-5.9 trillion up until 2030 in order to meet their climate goals and comply with what they promised as per the Paris Agreement, according to the United Nations’ Framework Convention on Climate Change’s (UNFCCC) own estimate. Meanwhile, during COP27, the Independent High Level Expert Group had stated that annual investments in climate action need to increase to $2.4 trillion annually by 2030 for developing countries (excluding China) to ensure accelerated energy transition, investment in resilience and the protection of nature. Of this, $1.4 trillion needs to be mobilised from domestic sources, whereas $1 trillion a year will be needed in external climate finance by 2030. India had become one of the first countries earlier this year to put a number to what developing nations need, in its official submission to UNFCCC over the NCQG. It had said that developed countries should provide at least $1 trillion in climate finance to developing countries every year from 2025 onwards. It also mentioned that this should be in the form of grants and concessional finance, while suggesting a 10-year time frame. Formal NCQG deliberations have been going on for about three to four years now. There is an ad hoc working programme, high level ministerial dialogue, regular stocktake and guidance, along with many other elements to the day-to-day deliberations on NCQG. The process was supposed to have moved closer to completion at the recently concluded talks in Bonn, Germany, but many sticking points led to a disappointing result. Avantika Goswami, programme manager (climate change) at the Centre for Science and Environment, said that the floor has to be $100 billion but whether that will be a token increase of a few billions higher or climb into the trillions is a bit uncertain right now. “Some developed countries are positive about the figure being in trillions, but they are doing some clever workshopping by saying that there will be a larger private finance mobilisation goal,” Goswami said. “Now that's a bit dicier because there's no accountability and guarantee in the private sector. Private capital mobilisation for climate needs has been underwhelming so far. Most of the funding has been through public sources.” How the cookie crumbles Disagreements started with the earlier finance goal. Developed countries failed to fulfill the promise of $100 billion by 2020. It was only in May 2024 that data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) showed that, for the first time, developing countries had in fact hit that target. The OECD’s seventh assessment found that in 2022, developed countries provided and mobilised a total of $115.9 billion in climate finance for developing countries, exceeding the annual goal for the first time. At the request of donor countries, the OECD has been tracking progress towards this goal since 2015. However, Oxfam research shows that while nearly $92 billion of the reported amount was provided as public finance, nearly 70% of this money was again in the form of loans provided at profitable market rates, all adding to the debt levels of the Global South countries. “Oxfam estimates that the ‘true value’ of climate finance provided by rich countries in 2022 is only between $28 billion and $35 billion, with at most only $15 billion earmarked for adaptation,” it stated. Against this backdrop, the NCQG too is facing issues such as who should pay and how much. Currently, “developed countries” are defined as the 24 countries that were OECD members in 1992, when the Framework Convention was signed. There are some developed countries which believe that this list needs to be updated now, since there are countries beyond the original 24 that are capable of paying. Similarly, there is debate over who should get the funding--whether it should go to the most vulnerable countries only, or to all developing countries. The other important issue is the quality of finance. Since most climate-vulnerable countries are also financially vulnerable, high interest loans will push them further into debt. Therefore, developing countries are demanding concessional loans, a clear delivery mechanism and a timeline on NCQG. Both Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) have jointly called for financial flows in the trillions under NCQG, and said that “it must consider the special circumstances of SIDS [Small Island Developing States] and LDCs, as per the provisions of the Paris Agreement.” Bonn gone However, progress on NCQG was slow in the recently concluded climate change conference in Bonn, Germany. There are disagreements over almost every aspect of the new finance target, including the amount of money that should be provided, who should provide it, who should receive it and what kind of funds should be included. “Despite pressure to seek compromises, the text essentially remained a summary of all the proposals on the table – including many that directly contradicted each other,” reported Carbon Brief, a UK-based website covering climate change. “As the last meeting came to a close, deep divisions remained between the parties.” The text in question here is an input paper released at the end of the Bonn conference. During discussions, there was no consensus on the donor base, but developing countries maintained that NCQG is the next finance goal and not the right forum to redefine donor base etc. The G77+ China bloc (an international grouping that started with 77 countries in 1964 wherein China is not a full time member but provides support) argued that the question of who else should provide climate finance was outside the mandate of the NCQG. Besides, there was no consensus on what the final amount in NCQG should be. “The need for non-debt-creating finance has been highlighted by the G77 and affiliated groups,” said Goswami. “So now, if the developed countries respond with delivery of just market-rate loans, it's going to be a pretty bad-faith response to what the actual demand is. A lot rests on what the US and China decide among themselves on the sidelines. The final outcome is likely to be political rather than a wholly technically informed outcome, which is an unfortunate reality.” “We’ve taken modest steps forward here in Bonn,” said UN Climate Change Executive Secretary Simon Stiell in his closing speech. “[But] too many items are still on the table… We’ve left ourselves with a very steep mountain to climb to achieve ambitious outcomes in Baku.” IndiaSpend wrote to the Union environment ministry for comment on India’s stance on some arguments made by developed countries at Bonn, how much of the $1 trillion it has asked for does it expect to get, how critical is this climate finance for our climate goals, and how does India plan to utilise it. This story will be updated when we receive a response. Arjun Dutt, senior programme lead at the Delhi-based think-tank Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW), said that according to their estimates, India’s net-zero goal for 2070 faces an investment gap of $3.5 trillion spread over 50 years which may be bridged using $1.4 trillion in external, grant financing, which is why decisions like NCQG are important. “Now, of course, $1 trillion is a huge jump on $100 billion, so there is some resistance to setting a target of this kind of magnitude,” said Dutt. “Plus, we need to keep in mind that it is not just the number but what it should constitute. NCQG should represent actual disbursals and not just commitments. This finance should be new, additional and not a reclassification of existing developmental aid. It should have public capital either in the form of direct grants or grant-equivalent components of concessional finance. But it should not include private finance that is flowing of its own accord.” The question is, will countries be able to come to terms and adopt the new finance goal at the upcoming COP? “Often technical logjams are resolved by high-level ministerial and political interventions,” said Dutt. “So, sometimes it is a matter of political will.”

Wind slowing down, AQI is likely to become ‘very poor’ in a week

Gurgaon: With a drop in wind speed from 6 kmph to 2kmph, the city's AQI saw a slight increase on Thursday, rising from 174 to 178, though it remained within the ‘moderate' category. According to the central govt's System of Air Quality and Weather Forecasting and Research (Safar), the AQI could worsen to the ‘poor' or ‘very poor' category over the next six days. "Meteorological conditions are highly unfavourable for the effective dispersion of pollutants. Additional emissions from stubble/waste burning are likely to deteriorate air quality significantly," it stated. The Central Pollution Control Board's (CPCB) 24-hour average data showed that the air monitoring station in Teri Gram near the Aravalis recorded the day's worst AQI at 201 (poor), while it was ‘moderate' at Sector 51 (189) and Vikas Sadan (149). On Thursday, both PM2.5 and PM10 levels were far above the permissible limits, indicating pollutants from local sources, including vehicular emissions and dust. The PM2.5 level was highest in Teri Gram (305 µg/m³), followed by Sector 51 (205 µg/m³) and Vikas Sadan (122 µg/m³), as per CPCB's data. PM10 levels were also highest in Teri Gram (302 µg/m³), followed by Sector 51 (201 µg/m³), though Vikas Sadan does not record PM10 data. According to the CPCB, the annual average permissible limits for PM2.5 and PM10 are 60 µg/m³ and 100 µg/m³, respectively. Experts highlighted that year-round monitoring of pollution sources and a reduction in emissions is necessary to address the air pollution issue. "To improve air quality during the winter months, it's crucial to prepare our systems throughout the rest of the year. Pollution control boards and civic agencies should consistently monitor local sources, implement solutions to reduce emissions, and ensure accountability across all departments," said Shubhansh Tiwari, a research associate at the Centre for Science and Environment. The minimum temperature dropped to 18 degrees Celcius on Thursday, 1.2 degrees lower than the previous day. Despite clear skies and sunshine, the maximum temperature too dipped slightly to 35.8 degrees Celcius. According to the India Meteorological Department (IMD), the gradual temperature decline is due to the sun's natural shift, with a significant drop expected only after snowfall is triggered by a western disturbance, likely in Nov. "Temperatures will remain steady for another week, with a progressive decline starting in the third week of Oct," an IMD official said. Meanwhile, health experts warned that patients with existing respiratory or medical conditions are at a higher risk of being affected by worsening air quality, especially as the region enters the winter cycle. Dr Neeraj Gupta, associate director of pulmonology, respiratory critical care, and sleep medicine at Max Hospital, Gurgaon, said, "During this change of season, we are seeing an increase in respiratory illnesses due to worsening air quality. Our daily OPDs have seen a 20-30% rise. To stay safe, one should wear a mask, use an air purifier as it can help significantly, and try to avoid exposure to pollution. It's important to eat healthily, avoid outside and junk food, and maintain an active lifestyle with regular physical activity."

An MIT economist said environmentalism is elite concern. India ‘too poor to be green’

The great British historian E.P. Thompson once remarked that ‘India is not an important country, but perhaps the most important country for the future of the world. Here is a country that merits no one’s condescension. All the convergent influences of the world run through this society: Hindu, Moslem, Christian, secular; Stalinist, liberal, Maoist, democratic socialist, Gandhian. There is not a thought that is being thought in the West or East which is not active in some Indian mind. Some may cavil at E.P. Thompson’s assertion that India is (or ever was) the most ‘important’ country for the future of the world. But I want rather to focus on his other claim—namely, that there has been an astonishing diversity of intellectual opinion in India. This is a product of the country’s size, its cultural heterogeneity, and its daring (if admittedly imperfect) attempt to construct a democratic political system in a deeply hierarchical society. Indeed, among the countries of the so-called ‘Global South’, India is notable for the vigour, sophistication and self-confidence of its intellectual traditions. In this respect it stands out; to be contrasted not only with the smaller countries of Asia and Africa, but also with its even larger neighbour, China, where the scholarly traditions of the past have been brutally crushed by a totalitarian state. This book explores a significant yet somewhat neglected strand of Indian intellectual life—that pertaining to the past, present and possible future of human relations with the natural world. By the canons of orthodox social science, countries like India are not supposed to have an environmental consciousness. They are, as it were, ‘too poor to be green’. As the MIT economist Lester Thurow famously (or notoriously) remarked in 1980: ‘If you look at the countries that are interested in environmentalism, or at the individuals who support environmentalism within each country, one is struck by the extent to which environmentalism is an interest of the upper middle class. Poor countries and poor individuals simply aren’t interested.’ This magisterial dismissal of any possibility of poor countries being interested in environmentalism was, at least with regard to India, several years out of date. In the spring of 1973, a popular peasant movement in the Himalaya, known as Chipko, threatened to hug the hill forests to stop them from being felled by commercial loggers. Many of the participants were unlettered; however, the leaders, though themselves from peasant backgrounds, were informed and articulate about wider issues. They wrote essays and tracts (usually in Hindi) tracing the direct link between industrial forestry, soil erosion, landslides and floods. These showed that what at one level was an economic conflict—between the subsistence demands of peasants for fuel, fodder, etc., and the commercial motivations of paper and plywood companies—had deeper ecological implications as well. Chipko was followed by a series of other grassroots initiatives around community access to forests, pasture and water. They likewise posited subsistence versus commerce, the village versus the city, the peasant versus the state, the subaltern versus the elite. Studying and reflecting on these conflicts, scholars argued that they showed the way to reconfiguring India’s development path. Given the country’s population densities and the fragility of tropical ecologies, India had erred in following the energyintensive, capital-intensive, resource-intensive model of economic development pioneered by the West. When the country got its freedom from British rule in 1947, it should have instead adopted a more bottom-up, community-oriented and environmentally prudent pattern of development. However, the argument further proceeded, it was not too late to make amends. The state and the citizen should both heed the lesson of Chipko and modify public policies and social behaviour accordingly. The environmental debate in India was at its most vigorous in the decade of the 1980s. Scientists, social scientists, journalists and grassroots activists all contributed to it. The debate operated at many levels: philosophical, political, social, technological. It touched on the moral and cultural aspects of humanity’s relations with nature; on the changes required in the distribution of power to promote environmental sustainability; on the design of appropriate technologies that could simultaneously meet economic as well as ecological objectives. The debate embraced all resource sectors—forests, water, soil, transport, energy, biodiversity, pollution and industrial safety. The post-Chipko environmental upsurge led to some institutional changes within India. New laws seeking to conserve forests, protect wildlife and control pollution were enacted. In 1980 the Government of India started a new Department of Environment, upgraded later into a full-fledged Ministry of Environment and Forests. New centres of ecological research were set up in Indian universities. Terms such as ‘ecological history’, ‘environmental sociology’ and ‘ecological economics’ began entering the teaching curriculum and research agendas of the academy. A new breed of ‘environmental journalists’ came into existence; their reports on forests, pollution, biodiversity and grassroots struggles featured in newspapers and magazines. In those years, thinkers and activists in India played a profound role in shaping global conversations about humanity’s relationship with nature as well. Indian scholars posited the idea of ‘livelihood environmentalism’ in contrast to the ‘full-stomach environmentalism’ of the affluent world. Some of the most pungent criticisms of overconsumption in the West came from Indian writers. Scientists like Madhav Gadgil and A.K.N. Reddy, journalists like Anil Agarwal and Sunita Narain, and activists like Medha Patkar and Ashish Kothari acquired international reputations. Ideas originally developed in India were discussed and debated in other countries and continents.