Cse In News

Kolkata was more polluted than Delhi on some days. But where’s the noise?

I went to work at Victoria Memorial on Saturday afternoon and had to stand at the north gate of Kolkata’s most famous landmark for about 45 minutes. It left me gasping, gagging and gargling for a whole week. So toxic were the fumes spewed out by vehicles that zipped past — only private cars, taxis and two wheelers, mind you, not the usual suspects like autos, goods vehicles, and buses — the air was unbreathable. While we watched New Delhi’s air quality index plummet, what we in Kolkata missed is that this city is playing catch up and on some days this winter, its PM 2.5 count beat Delhi. Poor, unhealthy, hazardous: that’s been the status of Kolkata’s air quality most of this winter. Yet, there has been a deathly silence from the political class on an issue that is fast becoming a matter of life and death. No pretence, even, of trying to tackle the problem. If you can name West Bengal’s environment minister without Google’s help, you deserve a prize. The Delhi government at least seems aware of the problem, appears to be trying to deal with air pollution, and has taken steps like odd-even cars and shutting schools on occasion. In Kolkata, nothing. Data is out India’s diesel capital—that’s what Kolkata was called after a 2016 study by the Centre of Science and Environment found that 65 per cent of new cars and 95 per cent of commercial vehicles in Kolkata ran on diesel, which has a higher carbon content and whose emissions trap more heat than other fuels. In short, diesel kills. Yet, Kolkata remains one of the few metros in the country without any significant supply of CNG. As of December 2022, West Bengal had 46 CNG stations while New Delhi had 470. Bengal Gas, the company responsible for bringing CNG to the state, says in its latest annual report that it has increased the number of CNG stations in the last fiscal to 12 and plans to add another 10 by March 2024. Last year, it laid 55 km of pipelines to transport gas and has targeted another 125 km this fiscal. Vastly inadequate. Auto rickshaws in the city have mostly switched to LPG but monitoring on the outskirts is poor. Waste burning and construction are two other factors worsening air pollution in Kolkata, say environmental activists. But little is being done to control the menace. Guidelines are followed more in the breach than observance. What is worrying environmental activists is that data on Kolkata’s air pollution may be open to question. While Delhi has 37 monitoring stations, for instance, Kolkata has only seven. Of those, three are located in the greenest spots in the city: at Fort William, Rabindra Sarobar (which is the open expanse of Dhakuria Lakes), and Victoria Memorial. When data from all seven stations is averaged, the numbers look rosier than things really may be. Doubts are exacerbated, they say, when surface monitoring data is compared to data from satellite monitoring. Numerous studies show air pollution is directly impacting the health of citizens. One out of every four persons in the city has reported upper respiratory distress this winter. Teenagers and senior citizens were identified as worst affected by this study. There has, according to reports, been a rise in the incidence of asthma among pre-teenagers who have no family history of the problem. Levels of PM 2.5 are soaring to dangerous levels. The most toxic pollutant that can penetrate deep into the lungs, PM 2.5 levels in the city was about 92 micrograms per cubic metre in the last week of December while the country’s permissible limit is 60 micrograms per cubic metre.

CAQM submits action plan to NGT, mostly in line with CSE recommendations

The action plan incorporates the updating of emission inventories and source apportionment studies across the entire NCR The Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) presented an action plan January 2, 2024 to the National Green Tribunal (NGT) aimed at improving the air quality in the National Capital Region (NCR) and its surrounding areas. The document was in response to a directive issued December 6, 2023 (application number 663 of 2023) with reference to a news piece in the newspaper The Indian Express from October 7, 2023 about the commencement of GRAP stage 1. CAQM’s proposed plan is multi-sectoral, detailing specific timelines and identifying responsible nodal agencies. Key aspects of the plan include reducing industrial pollution, curtailing air pollution from diesel generators (DG) sets and tackling emissions from thermal power plants (TPP). A significant portion of these measures aligns with the recommendations made by the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) in their air pollution abatement reports over the last few years. The action plan incorporates the updating of emission inventories and source apportionment studies across the entire NCR. Echoing a June 2020 CSE report titled Report on Assessment Of Industrial Air Pollution In Delhi-NCR, CAQM emphasised the necessity for comprehensive, current and accurate inventories to identify critical areas and sectors for environmental pollution mitigation. The report had highlighted the inadequacy of existing inventories in Delhi-NCR’s seven districts and advocated for distinct inventories for industries emitting fuel-based emissions and those with for fugitive dust issues. The same CSE report proposed centralised steam generation units to counteract air pollution from numerous small boilers in NCR’s industrial areas. Following this, the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) released guidelines on community boilers last year. The CAQM plan includes formulating a strategy for communal boilers in industrial clusters, adhering to these guidelines by December 2024, and developing a model guideline by the CPCB. Additionally, the CAQM action plan focuses on establishing performance standards and certification systems for Continuous Emission and Monitoring Systems (CEMS), a point also emphasised in CSE’s January 2022 report CEMS Certification System in India – CSE Proposal. This report underlined the need for well-defined certification and quality assurance systems and their respective guidelines and protocols for implementation of CEMS regime. CSE’s January 2021 report Feasibility Assessment- Replacing Diesel-Based with Gas-Based Generators indicated that switching to natural gas generators could significantly reduce air pollution and be cost-effective. Partially accepting this recommendation, CAQM included a directive to inspect and ensure compliance with retro-fitment of emission control systems and dual fuel modes in DG sets in the NCR, a deadline for which was January 1, 2024. CAQM has also instructed the 11 thermal power plants (TPP) in the NCR to comply with the earlier directive by the Union Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change to co-fire 5-10 per cent biomass, ensuring at least a 5 per cent co-firing rate by March 31, 2024. This addresses the issue of minimal or nonexistent biomass co-firing in NCR’s thermal power plants, as highlighted by CSE in its 2023 report Status of Biomass Co-Firing in Coal Based Thermal Power Plants in Delhi NCR. Advancing CSE’s recommendations on the compliance status of TPPs in the NCR, the CAQM has included an action point to conduct emission compliance checks by the CPCB and make the emission data publicly available. However, it remains unclear whether this action specifically targets NCR power plants. Overall, the CAQM’s action plan appears to incorporate major recommendations from CSE’s various studies for NCR. The extent of its implementation on the ground, however, remains to be seen in the coming years. We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.

Forging a fresh order

In 2024, we must rework trade rules for a different kind of globalisation. This is important both for the economies in the Global South and the fight against climate change. Many yesterdays ago, when the world was discussing the possibility of a climate crisis, it was also negotiating a new trade agreement. In early 1990, when the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change was agreed at the Rio Summit, the World Trade Organization (WTO) was also set up and global rules to facilitate free trade between nations was signed on. The deal was simple: the cost of manufacturing would come down when goods were produced in countries with lower labour costs and environmental standards. The export-economies would drive prosperity in the still-developing world, but most importantly in the rich world where consumers would benefit from cheaper goods and the boom in services. The tectonic shift came in 2001, with the acceptance of China into WTO. China had massive workforce; no trade unions; little environmental safeguards; and an authoritarian government. After joining WTO, China’s share of global CO2 emissions rose from 5 per cent in 1990 to 21 per cent in 2019. Trade boomed but the age of global prosperity did not come, and an increased trade meant that CO2 emission increased. In 20 years, this idea of globalisation has soured—the proponents of the grand scheme are turning their backs to the idea of unfettered global trade, which was designed to be without distortions of subsidy and support by national governments. The question is how will these new globalisation rules take shape in a climate-risked and war-torn world? Today the most hyped issue is US’ position against China. This is being talked about as the fight against autocratic and undemocratic regimes (which is true). But the real reason is to gain control over resources and technologies needed for the future, including the green economy that the world so desperately needs. China today dominates the supply chains for batteries; it processes over half of the world’s lithium, cobalt and graphite; and it is an established leader in solar energy. To fight this “enemy”, the US has decided to give up all its ideological qualms about subsidies; the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) is providing finance to companies to manufacture low-carbon products in the US. The issue is if the western world’s mission to break this stranglehold will lead to higher costs of the green transition and even delay it? Or will it be successful in doing the impossible—securing access to rare minerals and rebuilding its manufacturing industry, despite the higher costs of labour and environmental standards. This could lead to de-globalisation or localisation as more countries decide to maximise their advantage as holders of natural resources, and technology and the knowledge that goes with it. It is also a possibility that there are new breakthroughs in technology, which would make the China-dominated supply chain redundant. For instance, there is talk about sodiumion batteries that could take down the need for lithium batteries. De-globalisation could equally mean that the pace of green transition is disrupted. For instance, the US, through IRA, is providing support to local manufacturing of electric vehicles. It has notified that electric vehicles that include Chinese-made battery components will not be eligible for full subsidies. It goes on to say that these vehicles will not qualify for IRA if they have “significant” ties to the Chinese government or are produced with a licensing agreement with a China-based or -controlled operator. Given the near-complete control of China in the raw mineral and battery manufacturing segment, this disengagement may delay the electric vehicle transition or make it more expensive. The Chinese electric car manufacturer, BYD, has already overtaken Elon Musk’s Tesla. According to the Financial Times, in the fourth quarter of 2023, BYD sold a record 526,000 battery-only electric vehicles, as compared to Tesla’s 484,000. Therefore, managing the twin objectives of localisation and a speedy green transition in today’s China-dominated world could be a challenge. Also Read - Echoes of chaos It is the same in India. We have decided—and rightly so—to invest in local capacity for solar industry. The Indian government has announced fiscal incentives for solar cell and module manufacture and imposed higher import duties on Chinese products. It is difficult to say, as yet, if this will impede India’s ambitious renewable programme, as domestic production may not be able to keep pace or be cost-competitive. On the other hand, there is an obvious advantage in building our industry. The gradual closing of the free-trade world will also have implications for Indian industry’s exports. All in all, there is a new game in town and we need to see if this time around the rules of trade will work for or against the people and the Planet. DTE The writer is the Director-General of CSE and editor of DownToEarth. Views expressed are personal

Integral role of women in waste management

Having gender inclusion into waste management policymaking can lead to more comprehensive and inclusive solutions Women have long been at the forefront of waste collection activities, especially in developing economies where informal waste picking is prevalent. Research indicates that women are often responsible for household waste segregation and collection, contributing significantly to the initial stages of the waste management process. Moreover, many studies highlight the active involvement of women in informal recycling activities, where they play a crucial role in sorting and recycling materials, particularly paper and plastic. Globally, women make a strong contribution to the solid waste management sector and circular economy. Both from the home front and at work as engineers, collectors, recyclers to informal waste collectors and processors. They contribute to positions such as activists, researchers, policymakers as well as higher-level managers and ministers of government. A 2018 global online survey titled Mapping the status of women in the global waste management sector conducted by Women of Waste (WOW), an initiative led by women in the waste sector and supported by the International Solid Waste Association, revealed that women contribute massively to the global waste management sector, in a variety of roles across the waste management hierarchy, and through a diversity of organisations, even though they are not very ‘visible’ in society. The data was collected across 73 countries of 626 women. The majority of responses were received from upper-middle and high-income countries; however, many highly qualified and experienced women were active in low- and lower-middle-income countries. For example, the survey found that the majority of respondents currently work in local government (30.2 per cent), followed by private waste management companies (14.4 per cent) and consulting / engineering companies (13.3 per cent). Moreover, women have been increasingly active in promoting waste prevention, in reuse, recycling and recovery of materials: In other words, proactive jobs and activities to help break the waste crisis. It was reported that women are entering the sector at various stages along their career, from young, new entrants to well-established, highly experienced women. Nearly 12.5 per cent of the respondents were in landfill management; 51.6 per cent worked in waste prevention, reuse / repair / refurbishment and recycling, this shows a change in thinking happening in the sector. A major chunk of the respondents currently work in the local government (30.2 per cent), followed by private waste management companies (14.4 per cent) and consulting / engineering companies (13.3 per cent). Main area of work in countries CP: Cleaner production In the developing economies including India, women’s involvement in this field tends to be dominant at the grassroot levels of the waste value chain. These include collection and segregation of wastes as well as informal waste recycling. Even though a chunk of women in the developing economies receive low-paying jobs, these are the potential contributors of the waste management chain. A significant fraction of the workforce in the waste management sector in cities like Pune and Ambikapur that performed well in Swachh Sarvekshan, according to research done by Delhi-based think tank Centre for Science and Environment in collaboration with NITI Aayog. Women were particularly engaged in door-to-door collection and segregation, the report published in 2022 showed. Another study conducted by the Ocean Conservancy in Pune reported that 90 per cent of the street recycling pickers, also known as the informal workers, comprises women. Out of this, 25 per cent of them are widowed, 30 per cent were households headed by women and 8 per cent are the sole earners of the family. Bengaluru has women primarily participating within the waste workforce. They are called ‘pourakarmikas’, a term used for formal waste collectors and street sweepers. They earn an extra income by separating recyclables from the waste. According to Hasiru Dala, an NGO active in waste management, stated that women are not working as itinerant buyers or scrap dealers. Businesses such as aggregators and preprocessors, which are at the end of the value chain, are dominated by male registered owners. Sorting of the collected waste is typically a women’s task across all geographies. Men are usually considered more suitable for roles such as collection, loading and packing of materials by employers in aggregation of recyclable materials. Women are typically employed in repetitive and time-consuming tasks, while on the other hand men tend to participate more in lifting and loading and ‘heavy’ tasks. Indian and Vietnamese recycling processors label collection of materials as a woman’s task in contrast to the Philippines and Indonesia. However, the recycling collector profession in Indonesia is heavily dominated by men. It is important to note that participation of women in processing and recycling factories is also unregulated and women are engaged primarily as daily wage workers. This results in women earning half that of what men earn in the sector. Involvement of women in solid waste management processes in India (informal sector) Source: The Role of Gender in Waste Management comissioned by Ocean Conservancy Women are usually the first to notice deterioration of environmental conditions. The reason for this is that they are usually associated with the responsibility for cleanliness of their own households and for the health of the family. They observe a direct impact of the unsanitary conditions such as infectious diseases and childhood diseases, accumulating waste and lack of sanitation. Since they also play a role in maintenance of the living space and the health of children, they have a keen sense of civic responsibility and a desire to improve their living conditions and health situation. As a result, it is critical to integrate a gender perspective into decision-making and policy formulation within the waste management sector. Waste management policies must be designed to address gender-specific needs, with robust monitoring to ensure implementation on ground. Policy interventions should prioritise creating opportunities for women across various levels of the waste management value chain, starting from the grassroot levels, as well as promoting their roles as leaders and waste entrepreneurs. “Women’s participation in decision-making roles in the waste sector is not just about gender equality; it is also about leveraging their unique perspectives and skills for better environmental management and sustainable development,” said Aditi Ramola, Technical Director, International Solid Waste Association. Having gender inclusion into policymaking can bring different perspectives and experiences to the table, which can lead to more comprehensive and inclusive solutions, she added. “This representation is important for breaking stereotypes and encouraging more women to pursue careers in environmental sciences and waste management.” It is important to note that providing equal opportunities for both women and men is critical in the waste sector. Offering training opportunities, specifically for women, in fields with significant gender disparities such as entrepreneurship, finance, trade, engineering, and decision-making administrative roles, has the potential to address existing imbalances. Similarly, initiatives such as awareness campaigns and training programs to integrate the informal and community-based practices related to waste management in the city solid waste action plan is extremely important. We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together. https://www.downtoearth.org.in/blog/waste/integral-role-of-women-in-waste-management-93886

Finger at Ganga Sagar wind for higher pollution in south Kolkata than north

South Kolkata residents have of late been bearing the brunt of the city’s air pollution, activities in the Ganga Sagar region being one of the culprits. The northern part of the city is usually more polluted compared to the southern and central parts of the city, as found in the statistics generated by Rabindra Bharati university station, but there has been a turnaround recently. The analysis of the average air quality index (AQI) at 6pm on Monday, measured over the preceding 24 hours, shows that 5 measuring stations located in south Kolkata and adjacent central Kolkata have recorded higher AQI values compared to two north Kolkata measuring stations. The average AQI in Fort William was 321 from 6pm on Sunday to 6pm on Monday; followed by Ballygunge with 319, Jadavpur with 317, Victoria Memorial with 308 and Rabindra Sarobar with 285. In contrast, Bidhannagar and Rabindra Bharati recorded far less AQI values; 233 and 179 respectively. The Plurals found that the trend was similar in the preceding two days, on Friday and Saturday. A scientist and air pollution expert from Bose Institute said the sea breeze coming to the city from its southern fringes could have been the trigger. “Kolkata, having close proximity to the sea, gets influenced by the land breeze and sea breeze irrespective of the season. The sea breeze blows in from the Bay of Bengal during daytime. The huge amount of anthropogenic activities in recent times over the Ganga Sagar region could emit high amounts of pollutants that get transported to Kolkata. During the transport of pollutants, AQI could be higher over the southern part of Kolkata,” said Abhijit Chatterjee, a professor in Bose Institute and also an adviser to the National Clean Air Programme. Midnight menace Around midnight on Sunday, the air quality in Kolkata reached ‘very poor’ in most of the pollution measuring stations run by the CPCB. Experts, including Chatterjee, pointed out to The Plurals that a sharp dip in the temperature, leading to pollutants being stagnated close to surface due to inversion phenomenon, coupled with transboundary pollutants coming in the city through the Indo-Gangetic plain from north-west; as well as locally generated pollution have combined to worsen the air quality level in the city. According to the CPCB data, accessed by this reporter, the AQI values of 6 out of the 7 automatic stations — Ballygunge, Bidhannagar, Fort William, Victoria Memorial, Jadavpur and Rabindra Sarobar — were in excess of 300, and hence ‘very poor’ around midnight; while Rabindra Bharati showed ‘moderate’ pollution. According to CPCB, prolonged exposure to ‘very poor’ air quality may trigger respiratory illnesses to all. “Kolkata should stress on pollution sources like vehicles, industries, construction and waste burning along with combating road dust if it has to significantly cut its pollution level and reach closer to the national permissible limit,” said Anumita Roychowdhury, an air pollution expert from Delhi-based think tank Centre for Science and Environment.

Marginal triumph at COP28

Each year there are great expectations from the UN’s climate conference. And rightly so. Each year the quotient of the crisis increases; global temperatures rise; and extreme weather impacts become more evident and devastating. There is no doubt today that the world must act decisively to cut emissions that cause this existential crisis. The question is what countries will do to reinvent growth so that it is less carbon-intensive and how this will be done in a world that is intensely unequal; the still-to-develop parts of the world need funds to grow and fiscal space to grow differently. This is the crux of the endless climate negotiations that the world has seen. The recently concluded climate conference (COP28) in Dubai came at a time when the world is more divided than ever; and this is bad news as climate change needs more cooperation than ever. COP28 also came at a time when the world is, one, acutely and painfully aware of the dangers of climate change; two, it knows that the poor are most vulnerable and indeed victims of climate change; three, there is a combined insecurity, which is fast spreading across the world; and four, most importantly, the scale of actions are pathetically inadequate for the required transformation. In all this, I believe COP28 has been a move ahead—not because it has radically transformed action, but because it has changed the narrative so that meaningful action is possible in future. First, it has brought to the fore the importance not just of the quantity of finance but also its quality. The “Outcome of the First Global Stocktake” notes, for the very first time, that countries of the South need grant-based concessional finance and fiscal space for the energy transformation. This put out the issue of the debt burden of the most vulnerable countries and underscored the need to rework financial structures so that fi-nance is affordable and accessible to countries. The same document also includes an agenda on fossil fuels—again, this is not radical by half; it does not go far enough to set deadlines for phaseout of fossil fuel in the already industrialised world and then the rest of the world. It also includes the need for transitional fuels, which could become a handy loophole for the continuation of natural gas. But the fact is that the issue of fossil fuel is now out in the open; it will need to be discussed and it will need to be worked upon. This is just the start. The critical issue now is to operationalise the finance clause and to set up the roadmap for fossil fuel use. In fact, climate justice must now get operationalised so that there is differentiation in the use of fossil fuel based on the remaining share of the carbon budget. We cannot have a climate-secure world unless it is a climate-fair world. This is why we need to ensure that the phaseout of fossil fuels is fair and funded. The urgency is growing and so must our response. (Writer is Director General of CSE and editor of Down To Earth, an environmentalist who pushes for changes in policies, practices and mindsets. Courtesy: https://www.downtoearth.org.in/)

Extreme weather events most severe global risks over next 10 years: WEF

Through 2026, extreme weather events in top 3 risks in 13 countries; climate tipping points expected to change weather patterns Extreme weather events have scaled up the ladder from last year to emerge as the most severe risk the world needs to prepare for in 2024 through 2026, according to the Global Risks Report 2024. They also rank as the most severe global risks over the next 10 years through 2034 in the 19th edition of the annual report launched by the World Economic Forum, on January 10, 2024. El Nino or the warming phase of the alternating El Nino Southern Oscillation cycle is expected to strengthen and persist until May 2024. This could continue to set new records in heat conditions, with extreme heatwaves, droughts, wildfires and flooding anticipated, said the WEF report. Global risk is defined as the possibility of the occurrence of an event or condition which, if it occurs, would negatively impact a significant proportion of global gross domestic product, population or natural resources. The Global Risks Report examines some of the most serious worldwide threats that may arise over the next 10 years, taking into account the planet’s warming, economic instability, rapid technological advancement and conflict. Global risks have been classified as economic, environmental, geopolitical, societal and technological over short-term (one to two years) and long term (10-year) horizons to assist decision-makers in adopting a dual vision that balances short and longer-term risks. In short term, extreme weather events among top five risks in 24 countries Extreme weather events figure among the top five risks in 24 countries in the short term or in the next two years, according to the report. In 13 countries, these events are perceived as the top three risks in the short term or in the next two years. According to Delhi-based think tank Centre for Science and Environment, India experienced extreme weather events on 235 of the 273 days — a little over 86 per cent of the days — from January 1, 2023 to September 30, 2023. But these events do not emerge as the top five risks in the WEF report. In India, the top five risks in the short term are misinformation and disinformation (1st), infectious diseases (2nd), illicit economic activity (3rd), inequality (wealth and income) (4th) and labour shortage (5th). Critical change to Earth systems, biodiversity loss, natural resource shortage Along with extreme weather events, critical changes to Earth systems, biodiversity loss, ecosystem collapse and natural resource shortages feature among the top four global risks in the long term. These have been categorised as environmental risks. Of these, critical change to Earth systems is the latest entrant. The report has defined these as long term, potentially irreversible and self-perpetuating changes to critical planetary systems. These occurred as a result of breaching a critical threshold or ‘tipping point’, at a regional or global level, that had abrupt and severe impacts on planet health or human welfare. This includes, but is not limited to, sea-level rise from collapsing ice sheets, carbon release from thawing permafrost and disruption of ocean or atmospheric currents. In October 2023, the United Nations University — Institute for Environment and Human Security too alerted the world about the risks of the six interconnected risk tipping points. “The global environmental risks, including the extreme weather events, are inter-related and mutually reinforcing,” said Gill Einhorn, head of innovation and transformation for Centre for Nature and Climate, World Economic Forum. Many of the climate tipping points are expected to change weather patterns and increase extreme weather, which will lead to positive feedback loops of greenhouse gas emissions, according to the WEF report. This is of concern as there is a greater chance of extreme weather occurrences and ecosystem breakdowns in places where there are inadequate adaptations to new climates due to abrupt and irreversible changes to Earth systems. Climate tipping points in the long term could exacerbate existing hazards, resulting in socio-environmental risks. Over the next 10 years, these global and environmental changes may have a significant impact on economic growth and will also drive food, water and health insecurity. The immediate effects might lower agricultural output and perhaps result in simultaneous harvest failures in important areas. Contrary to expectations, more than 80 per cent of respondents in this year’s research stated that their primary concerns are no longer the energy and food crises, which were listed among the top threats of 2023. This might be a result of the report based on the global survey carried out in September 2023. However, the outlook may have since shifted given the conflict in West Asia, particularly if hostilities escalate. Further, the climate pressures may yet drive prices higher, said the report. A warmer winter in the Northern Hemisphere, for example, followed by the easing of the El Nino cycle over the summer, could partially alleviate further energy price spikes resulting from any escalation of the Israel-Gaza or Russia-Ukraine conflicts, the report said Worrying developments emerging today have the potential to become chronic global risks over the next decade. But the WEF report and experts said there remain key opportunities for action that can significantly reduce the impact of global risks. Research and development can boost preparedness for inevitable environmental risks. For example, a major advancement in research that makes nuclear fusion power generation feasible might be a game-changer, accelerating the shift to Net Zero and producing clean energy while lowering the danger of pollution. “The future is not fixed. A multiplicity of different futures is conceivable over the next decade. Although this drives uncertainty in the short term, it also allows room for hope,” said Saadia Zahidi, managing director, WEF, in the report. We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.

We Should Mainstream Weather Forecasting For Everyday Life, IMD Chief Says

Mumbai: In 2023, the world experienced the hottest global temperatures in over 100,000 years, and heat records were broken on every continent. India experienced extreme weather events on 235 of the 273 days (a little over 86%) in the first nine months of 2023--from heat and cold waves, cyclones and lightning to heavy rain, floods and landslides, according to the Centre for Science and Environment. These events killed 2,923 people and over 92,000 animals, affected 1.84 million hectares of crops, and destroyed 80,000 homes, it estimated. Advertisement The India Meteorological Department (IMD), the national meteorological service of the country which was formed in the year 1875, enters its 150th year on January 15. The milestone comes on the backdrop of India experiencing a weak winter so far and overall large variations in weather events year on year. For example, from 2013-2022, an average of 29% of India’s land area experienced over three months of extreme drought per year. The amount of land experiencing at least one month of extreme drought per year has increased 138% from 1951-1960 to 2013-2022. The intensity and frequency of heatwaves, extreme rainfall, floods, droughts, landslides, cyclones and every other weather event is changing annually. IndiaSpend spoke with IMD’s Director General Mrutyunjay Mohapatra, 58, on concerns around the agency’s weather forecasting accuracy, the need for improvement in technology, the role of climate change and the IMD’s future plans. Edited excerpts from the interview: As IMD enters its 150th year, what are your reflections and what plans does it have for the coming year? With a very humble beginning in 1875, IMD has undergone several phases of evolution. It so happened that on October 5, 1864, a massive cyclone came and devastated Calcutta wherein 80,000 people died. In the same year, 40,000 people died in Andhra Pradesh when a cyclone hit Machilipatnam. This event was followed by the 1866 famine because of monsoon failure followed by another famine in 1871. All this led the then government to form a meteorological committee. Henry Francis Blanford was appointed as the Imperial Meteorological Reporter. He joined on January 15, 1875 in Mumbai, and that’s why we celebrate the day as the formation day of the IMD. As of today, we have more than 1,000 automatic weather stations, 6,000 rain gauges and 550 departmental observatories. With all our scientific interventions, we have come a long way but there are certain science gaps. We need to improve forecasts for lightning and cloudbursts--right now, there is no forecast in the world. We have increased the number of doppler radars but we have to improve our infrastructure further to improve forecasts. That requires models to be improved which is possible only with higher computing power, and improved resolution of models. Our ambitious plan is that each household and each person should get forecast. Is that where Artificial Intelligence comes in the picture for IMD? In the next five years, AI and machine learning will help improve our decision making, forecast accuracy and it will help in sectoral applications. For example, how do we downscale agromet services [forecasts for farming] from block to village level? Similarly in urban areas, how do we reach out to each ward for urban flooding? AI will compliment numerical models. And to do all these things, you need computing platforms which we are developing within the IMD. Also, we have identified eight startup agencies and will be supporting them to develop tools and technology in the future. How will AI, our models and our human forecasting abilities come together--especially because a former Ministry of Earth Sciences secretary had said that our model has a certain bias: It normally under-predicts heavier rainfall and can only give an indication of heavy to very heavy rainfall. Every day we analyse all our model guidance. Our 26 state offices analyse observational products, forecast products and come to a consensus. So objective consensus is modulated by the subjective consensus derived from the knowledge and experience of forecasters across the country. Only then are bulletins prepared. In future also, these processes will be helped by machine learning. Coming to the question of bias, you are correct. Model always underestimates rainfall. That’s why we have forecasters. If we compare model performance vis-à-vis forecasters’ performance, there is improvement in forecast accuracy by 10-15% by the forecasters from the model performance. In December, after parts of Tamil Nadu received as much as 950 mm rainfall in 24 hours, chief minister M.K. Stalin had criticised the IMD saying its forecast failed to convey the magnitude of rain in Tamil Nadu and that a red alert was issued too late. There are two aspects here. The first thing is, what was the quantum of rainfall? It was around 94 cm [940 mm]. Such an exceptionally high rainfall is not predicted or cannot be predicted by the models. At present, whatever models are there in the world, it is not possible to predict this type of rainfall. We had issued the warning for extremely heavy rainfall but until now, there is no such modelling system in the world where you can predict 90 cm rainfall in 24 hours. It is a cloudburst and worldwide, it cannot be predicted. We are improving our observational systems; [for that] you need mesoscale observation network which can provide data [mesoscale meteorology pertains to atmospheric phenomena having horizontal scales ranging from a few to several hundred kilometres]. At the same time, you need computing systems for the processing of the data and you need some kind of understanding of the physical processes shown in a testbed format [an environment for experimentation]. So, all these are the science gaps for which the IMD and various agencies are working together. But if you compare the toll from the 2005 Mumbai floods [also 944 mm rainfall in 24 hours], when there was no such forecast either, to 2023, there is a significant improvement. There is an improvement in lead period [early warning] in 2023; we have been giving the damage expected from weather events, and there has been forecast not just from state level but also from the district level, the block level and the location-specific level. Also, in the case of Tamil Nadu cloud burst, we provided a yellow alert five days ahead, then an orange alert three days ahead. We said be prepared to take action with the orange warning. So, I will request all the disaster managers and stakeholders to pay attention to these warnings also [and not just wait for a red alert]. Early warning needs to be supported by early action. The government had said that there has been a 40% to 50% improvement in severe weather forecasts with a lead period of five days in the last five years. Can this be improved further? In the last five years, the IMD has come up with a seamless weather forecasting system. There has been a 40% to 50% improvement in forecast accuracy for all types of severe weather compared to the previous five years. There was no ‘nowcasting’ [weather forecast for next few hours] before 2013 which was started in 2013 at 120 stations and now, we have it in about 1,200 cities and towns. If I look at the forecast for heavy rainfall, it is accurate up to about 80% for 24 hours ahead which used to be about 60% five years ago. If you consider the five-day forecast, the forecast accuracy is about 60% at present. Also, our lead period has gone up from one day to five days with similar accuracy. Then in terms of cyclones, our forecast accuracy is better than all leading countries. Thunderstorm forecast accuracy is about 86% which was around 58% or so in 2013. Similarly heatwave and coldwave accuracy is 92%; there has been significant improvement. But still there are challenges with respect to cloudburst and lightning. The number of deaths due to lightning strikes has not decreased. So, we are going to establish a research testbed, where we will be studying and trying to improve lightning forecast. Only five countries in the world are doing this because there are still gap areas here. Our target is we want to reach out to every panchayat in India and involve all village-level stakeholders. For example, if a person is constructing a house or a contractor is building a road, they should consider what is the climate of the place, what are the extremes of that particular place, what materials should they use. So what I want is we should mainstream weather and climate information in each and every activity of the human being and the society. In the last decade, we saw that our long range forecasts [monsoon season forecast] did not meet the 5% margin of error in all years except two. Why is that, and how can that be improved? We have the five best models in the world and that has improved the forecast accuracy and service delivery at a very small-scale error. Between recent 15 years and previous 15 years, there is a 17% improvement and I am hoping we will improve it further. Critics still say that IMD is unable to forecast the exact regions that will be affected by a certain weather event and the number of houses, structures, fishing boats, people who will be affected. Your comments? We are open to criticism. Our attempt is to show people what the weather will do tomorrow, to the population, to the infrastructure, to the various communities, to the people in the slums, the people in cities, villages. We have done the risk assessment at the village level where you can find out how many houses will be damaged, how many electric poles, how many telephone poles, how much agricultural area will be affected. All these things are calculated nowadays in a dynamic platform and we also convey the expected losses to the government. All the socio-economic data with respect to heatwaves, cold waves, heavy rainfall, thunderstorms has to be integrated in the system. As the impact of climate change on Indian weather will become more prominent in coming decades, how is IMD preparing itself? One is the detection as to whether climate change is occurring or not. Every year in the month of January, the IMD issues a statement on our weather features, what is our long term data, what are the extremes and which records were broken. But climate change limits the predictability [of weather]. If I could forecast a particular heavy rainfall event five days in advance, I'll be able to predict it only two-and-a-half days in advance. The science gets limited because of climate change. But if I look at the past 10 years, our accuracy and lead period has improved. That is how IMD has taken care of the impact of climate change and we will continue to improve on these.

National Clean Air Programme missed 2024 target to push back pollution, study shows

Durgapur in West Bengal deteriorated most; Varanasi in Uttar Pradesh saw most improvement during 2019-2024 The National Clean Action Programme (NCAP) was launched in 2019 with a target of reducing 20 to 30 per cent particulate pollution by 2024, which was then further increased to 40 per cent by 2026. However, most major cities in the country are way behind the 2024 benchmark, according to a recently released study. The cities fell short despite about Rs 9,650 crore being pumped into controlling air pollution across 131 non-attainment cities so far, out of which nearly 60 per cent — Rs 5,835 crore — being utilised by the cities. Non-attainment cities are designated as such if they consistently fail to meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for fine particulate matter (PM10 that has a diameter of 10 microns or less) or nitrogen dioxide over a five-year period. The study, conducted by research-based consulting and capacity-building initiative Climate Trends and group of climate scientists and engineers Respirer Living Sciences, was based on data generated by Central Pollution Control Board. Out of 46 cities tracked over the years (others do not have continuous data, which is a failure in and of itself), the PM10 level in 22 cities has deteriorated over the last five years, while only 8 cities have met the initial target of reducing pollution levels by 20 to 30 per cent, it found. “Air pollution levels are higher than the NAAQS of 40 microgrammes per cubic metre (µg/m3) and 60 µg/m3 for PM2.5 (ultrafine particles) and PM10, respectively, in most cities,” read the report, adding that “PM2.5 and PM10 levels are higher than the World Health Organization’s air quality guidelines for both pollutants in all the cities where on ground monitoring is being done.” “The NCAP has made noteworthy progress in tackling air pollution, witnessing notable reductions in PM2.5 and PM10 levels in top polluted cities, but persistent challenges exist, with some urban areas facing an uptick in pollution concentrations,” pointed out Aarti Khosla, director for Climate Trends. Sachchida N Tripathi, a professor and air pollution expert from Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur called NCAP a “limited success”. “While many cities could not achieve desirable results yet, there has been significant improvement in capacity development, monitoring, fund flow and overall awareness in identifying air pollution as a key agenda,” said the expert. Unless more technology is brought into the exercise and clean air is prioritised in planning and implementation, achieving the overall target would be difficult, Tripathi added. “Curtailing particulate concentration to 20 to 30 per cent by 2024 was a tough ask. Many cities did well, while others did not. However, we are reviewing and have now linked the fund release with the performance and expect them to do better in coming years,” said a Union ministry of environment, forest and climate change official who did not want to be named. West Bengal, Maharashtra cities worst performers in PM10 Durgapur in West Bengal has been the poorest performing city. Its PM10 level surged above 53 per cent during 2019-24 — to 118.2 µg/m3 in 2023 from 77.2 µg/m3 in 2019. It was followed by four Maharashtra cities: Thane, Mumbai, Navi Mumbai and Aurangabad. Asansole in West Bengal is next in line. Varanasi in Uttar Pradesh, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s electoral constituency, has been the most improved city, with a whopping cut of 63 per cent in PM10 concentration in 2023 compared to 2019. Talcher in Odisha was the next-best performer. The performance was for PM2.5, as the pollution level got poorer in 22 cities out of 49 assessed and only 16 cities could go beyond the 20 per cent reduction target. Navi Mumbai in Maharashtra, with about 47 per cent increase, was the most deteriorated city for PM2.5, and was closely followed by Ujjain in Madhya Pradesh. Varanasi claimed the most improved city tag again for PM2.5, with a 72 per cent reduction in the last five years, followed by Agra at 53 per cent. While PM10 is small enough to penetrate the respiratory system, PM2.5 is much smaller and can move deeper into the lungs and trigger a range of diseases, including fatal ones. Durgapur, Asansol and Haldia are known as industrial cities with high industrial emissions but are also dust-laden regions, said professor Abhijit Chatterjee, a scientist at Bose Institute, Kolkata and an NCAP advisor. “Close proximity to the highways and construction works and vehicle-driven road dust within the city could be the main drivers for such hikes in PM10,” said Chatterjee. “Such activities emit huge amounts of larger particles, which usually fall in the range of 2.5 to 10 microns. Therefore, these larger particles probably contribute to increasing the entire PM10 load.” More stringent actions to suppress dust emissions are needed, along with actions to minimise biomass burning, solid fuel burning (especially low-grade coal) and solid waste burning, which would reduce particulates, especially the finer particles (PM2.5), the professor said. Metro cities lag, most non-compliant with standards Mumbai was the worst-performing metropolis, with its PM10 level shooting up almost 37 per cent in the last five years — from 80.6 µg/m3 in 2019 to 110.3 µg/m3 in 2023 — though the pollution statistic has gone down marginally in the last year. In the case of the PM2.5 pollutant, the slide has been found to be even higher — 38 per cent. All other metro cities improved marginally but are way behind the target for 2024. Delhi showed barely a 4 per cent improvement in the last five years. Though in 2023, its PM10 average concentration stood at 208.4 µg/m3, more than thrice above the national annual permissible standard of 60 µg/m3. PM10 levels for Kolkata and Bengaluru since 2019 have improved by around 14 per cent and 11 per cent, respectively, though both cities need to reduce levels significantly to meet the 40 per cent reduction target in 2026. Kolkata, which had a PM10 level of about 93 µg/m3 in 2023, must reduce its level by around a third, compared to the present level, within two years. The same stands for Bengaluru. Chennai, where the measurement started in 2020 and hence does not qualify to be compared with others, has a similar PM10 load to Bengaluru. “Kolkata should stress on pollution sources like vehicles, industries, construction and waste burning along with combating road dust if it has to reach close to 40 per cent particulate reduction target by 2026, compared to 2019 PM10 pollution levels,” observed Anumita Roychowdhury, executive director of Delhi-based think tank Centre for Science and Environment and a frontline air pollution expert. Out of 93 cities with PM10 data for 2023, only seven (less than 10 per cent) met the national standard of 60 µg/m3. Meanwhile, 32 cities met the national standard for PM2.5 at 40 µg/m3. Funds flow, but so do pollutants While funding is critical for combating pollution, many cities have deteriorated or improved only slightly over the last five years, despite receiving significant amounts of money. Mumbai is a case in point. Between 2019 and 2023, it received Rs 939 crore and utilised Rs 680 crore, but its pollution levels still soared. Similarly, Kolkata also utilised Rs 636 crore but managed just a 17 per cent improvement in PM2.5 levels and 14 per cent in PM10 levels. The same goes for Hyderabad, which, despite spending Rs 366 crore, improved by only about 7 per cent. Delhi and Bengaluru, on the other hand, received pitiful funds from the NCAP and the 15th Finance Commission to combat air pollution but still managed to make some progress. “Unless NCAP focuses on bridging the gap between policy and implementation using a city-level action plan and there is a more equitable distribution of funding for tackling pollution from all possible sources rather than stressing heavily on combating road dust, which is the present trend, it is difficult to meet the overall target,” added Roychowdhury, observing that currently 64 per cent funds get utilised to combat road dust, a low-hanging exercise. The present NCAP policy of curtailing pollution in select cities does not seem to be working, opined another air pollution expert. “Firstly, the reduction has not happened as desired and most cities are unlikely to meet the target of 40 per cent reduction by 2026; secondly, many of the cities beyond these so-called non-attainment cities are now found to be highly polluted, as well as the peri-urban areas and villages. Clearly, we need to focus on air shade management rather than countering air pollution in select cities,” the expert added. We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.

Data: Reporting of Solid Waste Generation Data Improves but Still Inadequate

In the contemporary world of increasing population, urbanization, lifestyle changes, and other anthropogenic activities, the management of generation and disposal of Solid Waste (SW) has become one of the major global challenges and pressing issues with multiple negative impacts on the environment and people. As per the recent estimates of World Bank (WB), about 2.24 billion tonnes of SW was generated in the year 2020 alone with a per capita footprint of 0.79 kilograms per day. The same is projected to increase by 73% to 3.88 billion tonnes by 2050. Further, as of 2022, less than 20% of globally generated solid waste is recycled, leaving the rest of the waste either as open dumps or in landfills. As per another 2016 report of WB, about 1.6 billion tonnes (about 5% of total emissions) of the global Green House Gases (GHG) emissions were caused primarily by open dumping and landfilling solid waste without capturing landfill gaseous emissions. The same report also estimates that by 2050, the GHG emissions of SW will increase to 2.4 billion tonnes if no improvements are made in the management of SW. In this story, we look at the SW generation, recycling, and disposal in India Methodology The Data has been sourced from the Solid Waste Datasets collection by Dataful, which has compiled different types of SW data from the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) Annual Reports and data provided in the responses given by the government in Parliament. The analysis presented in the story is limited to data given in both these sources. Limitations in Data recorded by the CPCB The CPCB only compiles different types of SW data submitted by States of India. The CPCB also records in their annual reports that some of the states have not submitted different types of SW data during different years. The SW data presented in CPCB reports is only based on the SW data recorded by States, but not the complete data of actual SW generation, collection, treatment, and disposal. For both the above reasons, the different types of SW data may not be complete and are expected to be significantly more than the data presented in CPCB reports. CPCB Records 6 types of Solid Waste Data The ‘Solid Waste’ as per Solid Waste Management Rules (SWMR) in India is defined as Solid or Semi-Solid Waste generated from domestic, commercial, sanitary, agricultural, dairy, horticulture, bio-medical (including treated bio-medical), electronic, radioactive, battery and other sources. In other words, multiple types of sources generate Solid Waste in India every day. The CPCB maintains data about the following 6 types of SW in India, details of which along with the sources from which each of SW is generated are provided below. Complete Data of SW Generation is not recorded in India In the previous story on Plastic Waste, it was highlighted that Plastic Waste generation data is not being completely recorded and is not being provided by some of the states and local bodies. The analysis of other types of SW generation data also reveals that the same issue prevails for other types of SW as well. For example, the analysis of Construction and Demolition (C&D) waste data furnished by CPCB in the parliament shows that 28 out of the 36 States and Union Territories (UTs) have not submitted data about C&D waste in the year 2021-22. Apart from 2021-22, there is no information in the public domain about C&D waste for the previous years. Therefore, it shows that C&D waste generated over the years in India has not been indented and recorded. The partial data submitted by 8 States and UTs shows that about 7,505 tonnes of C&D waste is generated per day in the year 2021-22. Similarly, the analysis of other types of SW data also shows that several states have not submitted the data of different types of SW generated over the years. Data shows that from the year 2016-17 to 2021-22, an average of 19% of states have not provided information about one or more types of solid waste. Only Bio-medical waste has been consistently recorded and submitted by most of the states over the years. The other types of SW such as Hazardous, Electronic and Plastic Waste have not been consistently reported across the years by the states. It is only from the year 2018-19 onwards that most of the states have begun to consistently report about different types of SW. Progressively, the situation has improved and as of 2020-21, most of the states have reported about different kinds of waste. However, as reported earlier, the data that is recorded and submitted by states even from the year 2020-21 do not reflect the actual volumes of different types of SW generated in India. For example, the 2020-21 CPCB annual report on Hazardous Report notes that “Out of 76,235 units (Hazardous Waste units), only 48,764 units (i.e. 64%) have submitted annual returns to concerned SPCB/PCCs” Thus, the data recorded on Hazardous Waste is limited. Similarly, Plastic, Electronic, and other types of SW recorded by State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) are based on the firms, institutions, local bodies, and other such agencies that from time to time provide these details. The SW data which is not recorded by these bodies does not get indented by SPCBs and hence does not become part of the information submitted by SPCBs to the CPCB. In essence, the yearly figures for different types of Solid Waste provided by the CPCB do not reflect the actual SW generated in India. Recorded Data shows steep increase in the SW waste generated with Lower Rates of Recycling The analysis of data recorded from 2018-19 to 2020-21(except electronic waste for which data is recorded from 2017-18 to 2019-20) shows that 5 types of SW generated in India have shown an increase, except C&D waste data where only 2021-22 data of few states has been provided. The data shows that within three years, the generation of Municipal, Electronic, Hazardous, Bio-Medical, and Plastic Waste generation has increased by 2,94,900 (5%), 3,06,516 (30%), 5,98,876 (6%), 15,289 (6%) and 7,66,765 (18%) tonnes, respectively. However, the rates of recycling of SW in India are very low. As mentioned above, the C&D waste generated is not indented so far in India, except for 2021-22. According to a study conducted by the Center for Science and Environment (CSE), India recovers and recycles only 1% of this C&D waste. Further, as per the 2019-20 data, the total Electronic SW that is sent to dismantlers and for recycling is only 22% of the total e-waste generated. Similarly, the 2018 TERI report notes that only about 28.4% of plastic waste generated in India is recycled. Furthermore, the CPCB’s annual report notes that only about 27.4% (25,34,726 tonnes) of total 92,38,103 tonnes of Hazardous SW generated in 2020-21 is recyclable. Even the total Municipal SW which is recycled is only about 50% of the total generated in 2020-21. Overall, the data shows that the rate of recycling of different types of SW generated in India is very low as of date. When each of these 6 types of SW remains unutilized in open dumps or landfills, they are well known to have consequential negative impacts on the environment, people, and also on flora and fauna. These negative impacts include pollution of air, water, and soil, GHG emissions, climate change, health problems such as respiratory, cancer, neurological, and brain disorders, and shortage of life expectancy, among many others. SW Carrying Capacity of India is a serious issue which needs to be addressed Factly’s previous story on Plastic Waste highlighted the fact that the global Plastic Waste generation alone has overshot the carrying capacity of the Earth by 157 days in the year 2023. In India, the limited data compiled by CPCB shows a total of 21,24,85,564 tonnes of SW is generated within a span of 6 years from the year 2017-18 to 2021-22. Of this, the recycling of different types of SW suggests that an average of only 30% of total SW is recycled. The rest of the unutilized SW of about 14,87,39,894.8 tonnes at 70% remains either in landfills or in the open dumps. The Supreme Court of India decades ago held in C. Kenchappa case that “The pollution created as a consequence of development must not exceed the carrying capacity of ecosystem” In the present scenario, the SW data certainly suggests rising levels of waste generation. This poses serious questions on the carrying capacity of India and calls for robust measures.

What worked, and what didn’t, for Delhi in cleanliness rankings

To be sure, this was the first Swachh Survekshan for the unified MCD which was set up by merging North, South and East MCD in May 2022 The New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) was judged to be seventh cleanest region nationally among local bodies with more than 100,000 population, and the cleanest city within Union territories, according to the Swachh Survekshan report released by the Union ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs on Thursday. The Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) area, which covers more than 94% of city’s geographical area, was ranked 90 out of 446 urban local bodies in the category of cities with a population of more than 100,000, while the Delhi Cantonment Board area slipped two spots — ranking seventh out of 61 — in the cantonment category. To be sure, this was the first Swachh Survekshan for the unified MCD, set up by merging North, South and East MCDs in May 2022. This year’s survey also carried changed baseline levels, with urban local bodies being eligible to earn 9,500 points in various categories in comparison to 7,500 points in the 2022 version of the survey. Additionally, the latest survey clubbed urban local bodies in two categories — cities with more than 100,000 and those with populations fewer than this number. In contrast, for the 2022 assessment, cities were divided into two buckets: one with 100,000 to 1 million population, and the other with over a million population. Under the 2023 Swachh Survekshan, Indore and Surat secured the joint top positions, with both securing 9,348.39 out of 9,500 points. In comparison, NDMC was awarded 8,728.30 points while MCD got 6,114.70 points. Among the major areas where the MCD lost out was in landfill sites. The MCD’s project for biomining and bioremediation of the Okhla, Bhalswa and Ghazipur landfills has been slow and has missed several deadlines. After multiple revisions, the latest deadline – from an initial one of 2019 — to clear these sites has been set at December 2024. HT earlier reported that the addition of fresh waste remains the main hurdle ahead of this project. NDMC was awarded 100% marks in this category as it does not have any dumpsite, its waste instead goes to the Okhla landfill – which falls under MCD. Delhi generates 11,328 tonnes of waste everyday with 11,000 tonnes per day (TPD) coming from MCD areas, 256 TPD from NDMC and 72 TPD from cantonment area. NDMC was judged to have the highest processing level at 100%, followed by MCD with 86% and Delhi Cantt at 75%. The report card awarded 71% marks to MCD for door-to-door waste collection and 99% to NDMC on the same parameter. Similarly, MCD got 86% marks for waste processing while NDMC had 100% on the same parameter. The only area where MCD outperformed NDMC is in waste segregation: MCD received 100% points for waste segregation, an area in which NDMC was awarded 87%. Domestic municipal waste comprises wet waste (kitchen) and dry waste (paper, bags, plastic etc). Though it is mandatory for households to segregate waste at a household level, source segregation remains minimal, said experts, expressing incredulity at MCD’s score. Even Indore secured 98% in this category. Atin Biswas, programme director of municipal solid waste sector in Centre for Science and Environment, said 100% points awarded to MCD for waste segregation cannot be true. “I have been living in Delhi for a long time and most of the segregation is done by the informal sector and waste pickers. The segregation level in the city would not be even 10% in reality. The survey should be more transparent and finding must be released for public feedback before rankings are fixed,” he said. The survey also awarded 100% marks to MCD on the cleanliness of waterbodies falling in its areas. An MCD spokesperson did not comment on the findings but the mayor’s office said cleanliness systems in the Capital were better than before. “According to the Swachh Survekshan-2023 report, Delhi has been ranked 28th this time among cities with a population of more than one million. Whereas according to the report of Swachh Survekshan 2022, north MCD ranked 37th, east MCD ranked 31st and south MCD ranked 28th. In such a situation, last year’s data clearly shows MCD has made a lot of improvement in the cleanliness system this year,” the office said in a statement.

মহানগৰীত ভয়াৱহভাৱে বৃদ্ধি পাইছে বায়ু প্রদূষণ

মহানগৰীত ভয়াৱহভাৱে বৃদ্ধি পাইছে বায়ু প্রদূষণ Air pollution in guwahati: ভয়াবহ বায়ু প্ৰদূষণৰ কৱলত পৰিছে গুৱাহাটীকে আদি কৰি অসমৰ কেবাখনো জিলা । Central Govt environment and forest ministry য়ে প্ৰকাশ কৰিছে এক ভয়ংকৰ তথ্য । মহানগৰীত ভয়াৱহভাৱে বৃদ্ধি পাইছে বায়ু প্রদূষণ Air pollution in guwahati: ভয়াবহ বায়ু প্ৰদূষণৰ কৱলত পৰিছে গুৱাহাটীকে আদি কৰি অসমৰ কেবাখনো জিলা । Central Govt environment and forest ministry য়ে প্ৰকাশ কৰিছে এক ভয়ংকৰ তথ্য । Read more at: https://www.etvbharat.com/assamese/assam/state/kamrup-metropolitan/air-pollution-is-on-the-rise-in-the-city/assam20240111230018569569022

पर्यावरण In 2023, for the first time ever, each day was at least 1°C warmer. Why this is worrying

Close to 50% of the days in 2023 were 1.5°C warmer than 1850-1900, compared to just over 20% in 2016 The year 2023 was the first in history when every day the average daily temperature was at least a degree higher than the average of the preindustrial period from 1850-1900. Close to half the days in 2023 were in excess of 1.5°C warmer than 1850-1900. This was the case for just over 20 per cent of the days in 2016, the previous warmest year on record, stated the European Union’s Copernicus Climate Services on January 9, 2024. It was from December 2-15, 2015, when for the first time, the temperatures consistently exceeded the average of 1850-1900 by at least 1.5°C. Two days in November 2023 were more than 2°C warmer. This was the first time the 2°C threshold was surpassed, said EU Copernicus Climate Change Service (CCCS) in the yearly climate summary Global climate highlights 2023. This annual report with concise analysis of the climate of the past year, noted that in 2023, the average temperature surpassed that of 2016 by 0.17°C, thus replacing 2016 as the warmest calendar year on record. According to the ERA5 dataset, the global-average temperature for 2023 was 14.98°C. In fact, 2023 was the warmest year on record by a “huge margin”. This suggests that the climate is significantly changing. The observed rise in global temperature was mostly ascribed to the ongoing increase in carbon dioxide emissions, which was further exacerbated by the reappearance of El Niño, a natural climate phenomena. The carbon dioxide values in 2023 are roughly 2.4 parts per million (+/- 0.4 ppm) higher than those in 2022, according to CCCS data. As a result, the average annual carbon dioxide concentration for 2023 was roughly 419.3 parts per million. Warm temperatures over the ocean were linked to a sizable portion of the temperature anomaly increase from May to August of 2023. The transition from La Niña to El Niño over the Pacific Ocean and the overall warming of the Atlantic and Indian oceans are linked to the temperature anomalies over the tropical ocean, which changed from negative in 2022 to positive in 2023. Significant contributions from land and ocean are linked to the exceptionally large anomalies in the last four months of 2023, mainly from the northern extratropics (especially over land) and the tropics (especially over ocean). Why this worrying Elevated temperatures in 2023 led to flooding, wildfires, drought and extreme heat, causing widespread damage to lives and livelihoods worldwide. Attribution studies by the World Weather Attribution Network revealed that extreme weather events experienced across all major continents – Africa, Asia, Africa, North America, Latin America and the Caribbean, Oceania — would have been nearly impossible without the influence of human-induced global warming. For instance, the devastating Cyclone Freddy, with a major impact on Madagascar and Mozambique, and Storm Daniel, which led to floods in Libya, have been attributed to climate change. India experienced extreme weather events on 86 per cent of days from January to September 2023, according to an assessment by the Delhi-based think tank Centre for Science and Environment and Down To Earth. But 2024 could be warmer still than 2023, according to scientific forecasts. There is a high likelihood of surpassing the 1.5 degrees Celsius threshold within the next 12 months, said the EU CCCS. The 12 consecutive months ending in January and / or February 2024 will exceed the 1.5°C level, according to EU CCCS and emphasised on the urgency of addressing the escalating climate challenges. The storm Henk and the extreme floods in the UK during the first week of 2024 has a link with climate change, showed scientific studies. Climate change is leading to warmer and wetter winters in the UK, stated by the Oxford University in 2014. The recent devastating floods in Democratic Republic of the Congo, said to be the worst in 60 years, has been said to be the marker of climate change, according to the experts in a media report. “I have been involved in flood modelling and resilience for 40 years and in recent years flooding appears to have been getting worse, particularly in terms of rainfall intensity and more frequent flood events. These changes in weather patterns would appear to be as predicted by climate meteorologists and those specialising in climate change,” said Roger Falconer, emeritus professor of water and environmental engineering, Cardiff University. Way forward In 2015, 195 countries committed to addressing climate change through the Paris Agreement, which set the stretch target of 1.5°C. By the end of the century, the accord seeks to keep global warming “well below” 2°C and “pursue efforts” to keep temperature under the safer 1.5°C level. But the world’s progress towards Paris Agreement targets have fallen short, according to the largest-ever UN assessment. The final text on Global Stocktake adopted at COP28 proposed key actions to keep the global temperature rise within the ambit of 1.5°C. Going forward, a strong political will, with effective policies and actions are needed to adapt and prepare for the challenges in the warming world. We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together. https://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/climate-change/in-2023-for-the-first-time-ever-each-day-was-at-least-1-c-warmer-why-this-is-worrying-93812