This Time, Last Year: Lessons From Blue Skies
New Delhi: A year ago, the so-called janata curfew on March 22 heralded the shutdown of the nation from March 24 to counter Covid-19’s spread. Vehicles went off the roads, industrial units ground to a halt and construction activity ceased. While the economy took a hit, the air over Delhi reached quality highs. By March 28, the air was in the ‘good’ category with the Air Quality Index at just 45. The city went on to record five such ‘good’ air days in the year, the most since the Central Pollution Control Board launched the AQI readings in 2015. By the first week of April, the capital had azure skies, birdsong was audible everywhere and the Yamuna was visibly cleaner.A year on, all environmental gains of the lockdown have been lost. Dipankar Saha, former head of CPCB’s air laboratory, however, does not write off the positives. He explained, “With next to no emissions during the lockdown, we were able to analyse how significant a role dust pollution played in air quality and what effect reduction in vehicular and industrial pollution could have.” Anumita Roy Chowdhury, executive director, research & advocacy, Centre for Science and Environment, said the lockdown showed that reduction in pollutants was possible, but all regions had to clean up their acts and at speed across critical sectors such as vehicles, industries, power plants, waste, construction & open-air burning. “The bouncing back of pollution proves the change can be sustained only with systemic and time-bound action,” she said. “We have to raise the level of ambition to drive compliance with stricter air quality targets.” There are eight key sources of pollution according to source apportionment studies: thermal power plants, vehicles, industries, households, brick kilns, open burning, diesel generator sets and dust. Dr Sagnik Dey, associate professor, Centre for Atmospheric Sciences, IIT-Delhi, pointed out that during the lockdown, only four of these were eliminated, namely vehicles, industries, brick kilns and construction dust. “The power plants were still functioning. Household pollution might, in fact, have slightly increased because people were confined indoors. DG sets and open burning were also prevalent,” said Dey. “So clearly, this reduction in pollution during the lockdown came from the remaining four sources. This needs to be taken into account in the National Clean Air Programme. If we can control vehicular, industrial, brick-kiln and construction pollution, we can attain our PM2.5 and PM10 targets.” CPCB data confirmed the improvement of air during that period. The AQI in March 2020 was 128 (moderate) compared with 184 (moderate) in 2019. The average AQI dropped to 110 (moderate) in April against 211 (poor) in 2019, while the average AQI of 144 (moderate) in May was much less than the 221 of a year earlier. August was the cleanest month of the year, recording four ‘good’ air days and an average AQI of 64 (satisfactory). However, by November, things were returning to ‘normal’. Stubble burning from October on and a late Diwali saw 2020 record a more polluted November than in 2019, while the average AQI in December rose to 332 (very poor). As for the Yamuna, CPCB attributed its temporary improvement to an increase in the flow of water, aided by the closure of industrial units. CPCB tested samples from Palla, Nizamuddin and Okhla, while DPCC from nine locations. The major findings were that the water quality at the three stations had improved significantly against the pre-lockdown quality, with the biological oxygen demand at Nizamuddin and Okhla going up by as much as 90% and similar increases in the chemical oxygen demand. DPCC found BOD levels rising by up to 33%. A DPCC official, however, said, “Industrial effluent is only a small portion of the pollution. Household sewage continues to flow into the river and until that is halted, we cannot see a blue Yamuna again.”
