Cse In News

How not to lose clean air gains

What is clear is that this joy of nature has come at enormous and unacceptable human cost to millions in the world Sunita Narain On April 22, when the world celebrated Earth Day, we were (and still are) in the midst of the grimmest reminder of nature’s revenge as Covid-19 shut down our economies. However, it is also a fact that today Delhi’s smog has cleared; the air is simply sublime — we can see the blue skies and the birds are just loving it. Their sounds have taken up the silence of the car horns. In all our cities — across the world — as we lock down to deal with this mutant virus, which is killing people and making our world tragic and horrendous, it seems almost that nature is reclaiming her space. There is news of how rivers in Indian cities — earlier called sewage canals and dead because of zero oxygen levels — are bouncing back, practically beaming with life and fresh water. There are images of lions — from the neighbouring forests — venturing out and sunning themselves in the port lands of Junagarh in Gujarat; or civet strolling in the street of a small town in Kerala; many more vibrant flamingos making their way to the salt pans of coastal India; dolphins dancing in the waters. I could go on. But what is clear is that this joy of nature has come at enormous and unacceptable human cost to millions in the world, who have lost their loved ones to the virus or are seeing their livelihoods collapse. I can say with absolute conviction that this is not the way we want to clean our air or our water, however desperately we need this to happen. But what we should remember are two things — for post- Covid-19 times. One, that we did momentarily get this smell of what clean air, clean rivers, and exuberant nature means; we must value it. We must remember this time as the way we want it to be when our lungs can inhale and exhale without stress of toxins. But two, most importantly, we must remember that at the current levels of pollution, it took as much as shutting down everything to get blue skies. Yes, this is what it will take. So, when in winter in Delhi we have smog days again, we must remember that cleaning up will mean taking all vehicles off the road — not play odd and even with a few cars absent. It will mean shutting down all day-to-day businesses so that no trucks need to come into our cities. In this last month, truck movement is down from 4,000 to fewer than 400 per day. It will mean shutting down all industries — not just a few here and there — so that there is just no combustion at all. It means stop to all construction. Everything that makes up life and livelihood. This is how we got from black, smoggy skies to blue skies and clear lungs. I say this not because this is what we must do in winter. This lockdown, I hope, we never have to repeat as these are the darkest days in human history. But I say this, because, if we want to have clear skies then we will have to move heaven and earth to get much more done so that we can have livelihoods and also our right to breathe. No more doing bits and little pieces of stuff, which always keeps us behind the curve. We need to be aggressive about what we do and how fast we get there. This is something again that these terrible Covid-19 times should teach us — we do not want to be in this situation again. So, what will it take to clean our air — to keep it as pristine as the lockdown days when the lockdown is over and behind us. First, it will mean realising that we need to get vehicles, not people, off the road. It means fast-tracking everything we can do so that we move people, not cars, at speed, convenience, and safety — public transport will have to take into account concerns about personal hygiene and goals so that in the next few years (yes, so quickly) we can upgrade our systems so that 70-80 per cent of the daily commute is through high-speed or lowemission transportation — from trains to bicycles. Second, it means not shutting down but shifting all industry — lock, stock and barrel — to clean fuel. Start with natural gas and then ramp up with all combustion moving to electricity from much cleaner power generation. Today, it is the price of natural gas and not its availability that is the obstacle to this transition, as gas competes with the dirtiest and cheapest of fuels, coal. But if the government was to include natural gas in goods and services tax (GST) — I am not talking about all petroleum fuels, only natural gas — it would turn the tables on coal. Currently coal or other such dirty fuels are included in GST and have much lower taxation than cleaner fuels. So, we can do this. But it again needs to be thought about as the big solution — something that can be done fast and at scale. I could go on. But the bottom line is scale and speed. In these Covid-19 times we have seen disorder and disruption at scale that we never thought would happen in our lifetime. So, now we need the same to fix what is broken in our relationship with nature. This then is the biggest challenge of the coming days. Will we do things differently, recognising what Covid-19 has brought to light? Or will we want to rebuild our economies with more smoke and more pollution because we need speed and scale to get back on our feet? The future, like never before, is in our hands. Nature has spoken. Now we should speak gently back to her. Tread lightly on earth.

Dampak Lockdown Sebulan, Sungai Gangga di India Jadi Lebih Jernih

Merdeka.com - India memperpanjang lockdown untuk menghentikan penyebaran virus corona dengan menutup sekolah, kantor, industri, alat transportasi, dan memaksa orang-orang tetap di rumah. Bonus dampak dari kebijakan ini adalah udara yang lebih bersih, padahal India adalah negara keenam dari 10 negara paling tercemar di dunia. "Ini adalah perubahan yang sangat besar, ”kata Kunal Chopra, yang menderita bronkitis kronis, dilansir dari Alarabiya, Rabu (29/4). Biasanya Chopra mengawali harinya dengan suntikan dan inhaler. "Udara jauh lebih segar dan masalah pernapasanku membaik," ujarnya. Berdasarkan laporan Aliansi Global Kesehatan dan Polusi pada Desember 2019, India bertanggung jawab atas kematian lebih dari 2 juta orang akibat polusi udara. Pada 25 Maret, hari pertama lockdown, tingkat rata-rata PM 2,5 menurun 22 persen dan nitrogen dioksida - yang berasal dari pembakaran bahan bakar fosil - turun 15 persen, menurut data polusi udara yang dianalisis oleh Pusat Penelitian Energi dan Udara bersih. "Ini adalah masa yang luar biasa," kata Direktur Eksekutif Pusat Sains dan Lingkungan, Anumita Roychowdhury, Pusat Sains dan Lingkungan adalah sebuah organisasi penelitian dan advokasi di New Delhi. Dia mengaitkan penurunan polusi udara dengan berkurangnya volume kendaraan di jalan, aktivitas konstruksi, dan penutupan pabrik. "Orang lebih rentan selama pandemi di daerah dengan polusi tinggi," katanya. "Paru-paru dan hati kita sudah terganggu, dan kita tidak bisa melawan virus." India telah melaporkan hampir 20.000 kasus Covid-19 dan lebih dari 600 kematian. Lockdown yang rencananya akan dicabut pada 3 Mei juga berdampak pada sungai yang menjadi lebih bersih. Gambar-gambar perairan jernih Gangga yang murni, sungai terpanjang di India yang dianggap suci oleh umat Hindu, dengan antusias dibagikan di media sosial beberapa pekan setelah lockdown. Badan pemantau polusi India mengatakan jernihnya air sungai membuatnya layak digunakan untuk mandi di beberapa daerah, menurut alat pemantau real time yang ditempatkan di sepanjang sungai yang memiliki panjang 2.575 kilometer (1.600 mil) itu. Sebuah analisis baru-baru ini oleh Badan Pengendalian Pencemaran Delhi menemukan, kualitas Sungai Yamuna yang mengalir di sepanjang New Delhi juga meningkat selama lockdown. Laporan itu mengutip itu penurunan limpasan dari 28 klaster industri dan lebih sedikit sampah. “Lockdown telah memperjelas apa sebenarnya sumber utama pencemaran,” kata pegiat lingkungan hidup dan pendiri Swecha, Vimlendu Jha. Swechha, sebuah organisasi nonpemerintah yang membantu kaum muda memerangi perubahan iklim. "Limbah dipaksa masuk ke badan sungai kami, dan itulah alasan utama mengapa sungai kami hitam." Jha dan para ahli lainnya memperingatkan kondisi membaiknya kualitas lingkungan bisa berlaku singkat karena pemerintah pada akhirnya mencabut lockdown dan aktivitas ekonomi yang merajalela berlanjut. April 30, 2020

Healthy can be tasty! What is the best nutrition for children?

The primary concern for most parents revolves around the junk snacks that children consume in between meals. As per a study conducted by the Centre for Science and Environment in 2016, 93% of children between the age group of 9-17 eat packaged food. Ever wondered why it’s so difficult to convince your little one to eat a bowl of fruits or vegetables? Give them a pack of chips and they devour it in minutes whereas a plate of fresh food requires some bit of pushing and nagging. As the saying ‘Old Habits Die Hard’, the food habits or an eating routine that a child cultivates can carry over to adulthood. Therefore, it’s important for children to develop nutrient rich eating habits right from a very young age. The immediate next question that arises is how do children develop eating habits? As a parent, how can you play a role in this? It’s a no brainer that children learn from what they observe, hear and experience. A parent’s first responsibility in cultivating good eating habits is to walk the talk. Be a healthy eating role model for your little one. If you want your kid to eat broccoli, make sure you are eating them too. If you want them to stop munching on chips, make sure you don’t get them or replace it with something nutritious and equally tasty. Let’s be honest here and accept that children don’t care whether something is healthy or not. They will eat food that’s tasty, may be colourful or packaged in an exciting manner. As a parent, you have to take that extra step to ensure that healthy food can be tasty, colourful and exciting. The primary concern for most parents revolves around the junk snacks that children consume in between meals. As per a study conducted by the Centre for Science and Environment in 2016, 93% of children between the age group of 9-17 eat packaged food. The study also showed that 56% of the children consume packaged sweet products like chocolates and ice-creams more than twice a week and 53% consume packaged salty food like chips. Children today end up consuming snacks that are not suitable for their age and in quantities that are not ideal for a snack. There’s no doubt that all parents want their children to eat healthy food. However, with busy lifestyles and increasing double income households, it’s difficult for parents to ensure balanced meals and healthy snacks every time. This is where healthy and nutrition rich snacks can help ease the burden on parents. Buying snacks for children? Two important pointers! Parents have to keep two key things in mind while buying snacks for children Age appropriate packaged food: A quick stop at the supermarket can result in a number of snack packs that are mostly unhealthy. Most of these are typically meant for grownups, are highly processed, contain high levels of salt and sugar. Growing children have different nutrition requirements. All packaged snacks are not bad or unhealthy. Choose snacks that are appropriate for their age, are made with natural ingredients, contain optimum levels of sugar and salt. In short, be sure you understand everything that’s written on the nutrition label. Quantity of snacks: A snack should never replace a meal. Therefore, the quantity of a snack should be such that it gives them the required nutrients in between meals. It’s unfortunate that we have to categorize our food as healthy and unhealthy. Healthy diet must be a given. Food that’s low in nutrition not only impacts children physically but it does mentally as well. Children develop taste preferences early on. Introduce them to vegetables, fruits and balanced meals right from the start. Never force them or punish them for not wanting to eat. Play the long term game, slowly and steadily introduce them to healthy food in a fun way. If you want your child to have healthy food, make sure you are eating healthy too.

Urban planning for the postpandemic world

How architecture and design can evolve to make sense in a post-pandemic world It’s no doubt that the coronavirus has come with a new set of learnings. Apart from raising environmental awareness, the pandemic has raised several questions about the shape of our cities, the spatial planning of our homes, and the layout of our neighbourhoods. With social distancing likely to be the norm over the near future, we need to analyse how a city’s design impacts health, social mobility and disease control, among other things. And how, in the coming months, India’s dense cities need to adapt. And quickly. We speak to urban design experts and an anthropologist for their recommendations. URBAN DESIGN Siddhartha Benninger, Project Planner Centre for Development Studies and Activities, Pune Good urban design has always been a necessity, but it needs data and feedback loops. For most cities, the data is not really structured for planning and research. Our Quantified Cities Movement (QCM) was created to ask relevant planning questions and facilitate data collection. Powered by a mobile application called iNagrik (the Android version will be out in a month), a realtime online mapping system, and a dashboard that is linked to the app’s uploads, QCM encourages citizens to report various situations linked to qualityof- life indicators (walkability, bus stop surveys, feedback on roads, etc) through the app. Once the lockdown ends, we aim to continue enabling young citizens to collect data on various such indicators including, but not limited to, the incidence of diseases at Pune’s hospitals and clinics. This is to assist the city in carrying out ‘passive disease surveillance’. The data is crucial for identifying better urban management protocols and evolving a better built environment. The changes I’d like to see: 1. City densities ranging between 400 and 600 persons per hectare (this number can increase based on facilities and services available, but I would advise against it) 2. Sanitation facilities and safety information at bus and metro stops, rail stations, inside buses and trains, in public toilets, other public spaces 3. Wider footpaths and walkable streets so that people don’t crowd together on narrow footpaths. 4. An upgrade to health facilities HOUSING Anumita Roychowdhury, Executive Director, Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi The emergency has reinforced the fact that housing policies and interventions will have to change in the post-pandemic period. In order to ensure liveability and comfort in homes across income classes, projects will have to consider several factors: building typology, resource efficiency, common services related to water, energy, and waste, locational aspects, connectivity, urban greenery, etc. We now need comprehensive guidelines and mandates on material and architectural design to reduce airconditioned hours for energy savings, optimise access to daylight, and maintain humidity, wind and temperature standards inside structures. Designs must integrate adequate green spaces that allow mutual shading of buildings and reduce heat load and heat island effect in the immediate neighbourhood. Locations should be earmarked in master plans to improve area advantages, transport connectivity of affordable housing and self-constructed settlements. This will reduce economic and social costs of living. It’s also important to understand that lowincome groups construct their own homes; providing them with technical knowledge and professional help is needed. This will enable them to build airy and bright spaces. Professional architects and planners have come together to provide design support and training to the self-constructed settlements of Dharavi and Shivaji Nagar in Mumbai, and Mangolpuri in New Delhi. This initiative must be taken forward in other cities. MOBILITY Aswathy Dilip, Senior Programme Manager, Institute for Transportation and Development Policy, Chennai In all Indian cities, formal and informal public transport — including rail, bus and auto-rickshaws — are the backbone of mobility. In Mumbai, a whopping 12 million+ trips are made daily on buses and sub-urban rail — 65% of the city’s motorised trips. So, as we resume activities, these modes will need strategic planning to be efficient as before. They can become hotspots for transmission if they get too crowded. Under these challenging conditions, cities across the world are radically re-imagining the allocation of street space to promote sustainable mobility that is resilient to future shocks and equitable. Earlier this month, in Bogota, South America, 76 km of temporary cycle lanes were added (to its 550 km cycling network) along the Transmilenio, the city’s BRT routes. Berlin is using tapes and mobile markers to create quick ‘pop-up’ cycle lanes and has listed cycle service shops as an essential service. Milan plans to encourage walking and cycling with low-cost temporary cycle lanes, new widened sidewalks, reducing speed limits to 30 kph, etc. To ensure physical distancing in shopping districts, London and Dublin are widening sidewalks with temporary cones. Due to the severe heat and the absence of safe infrastructure, cycling has not been popular in Indian cities. However, with a surge in cycling groups, this could be the golden opportunity for cities to embrace cycling. Cities like Chennai and Pune have created over 100 km of pedestrianfriendly streets since 2014. Further, Chennai is quadrupling its efforts this year through the Mega Streets programme, inspired by which the State has expanded the programme to 10 more cities. As cities take proactive actions to encourage walking and cycling, they are also taking strong measures to reduce virus transmission on public transportation. Bogota, Auckland, and Singapore are marking seating and standing positions to ensure physical distance on public transport, and transit apps help track occupancy within buses. Masks are compulsory for staff and commuters. China’s Shenzhen bus group has established the Emergency Health and Safety Working group, and vehicles, terminals, and offices are regularly cleaned and sanitised. These solutions must be contextualised for India. In addition to sanitation measures, we need to find innovative ways to avoid crowding. The current crisis is an opportunity to reimagine a future where we create self-sufficient neighbourhoods with safe walking and cycling infrastructure. As well as build safe and accessible public transport for all sections of society. SPATIAL PLANNING Karen Coelho, Associate Professor, Madras Institute of Development Studies, Chennai As in every disaster or crisis — whether floods, cyclones or this pandemic — areas with dense concentrations of the urban poor are impacted far more than the rest of the city. These are places where infrastructure and amenities are poor even in normal times. Erratic water supply, broken drains, patchy electricity, absent streetlights, inadequate classrooms and childcare centres, in addition to precarious livelihoods and few opportunities results in a high incidence of social pathologies like alcoholism, drug abuse, and youth crime. The large resettlement colonies in Chennai have all these problems, exacerbated by their distance from the city centre. The pandemic has highlighted again the need for building spaces that are not ghettos, but non-segregated mixed-class, mixed-use neighbourhoods that allow people to support each other. Such mixing would ensure that neglect and poverty is not locked into pockets, that vulnerable populations have access to the city centre and its resources, and they’re not neglected during a crisis.

Dialogue with Development Partners for a Collaborative Response to COVID-19 in Uttar Pradesh

The Programme Support Unit - DoUD, Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), under the aegis of ‘Alliance for Urban Transformation’, Department of Urban Development (DoUD), Government of Uttar Pradesh (GoUP), organized ‘Dialogue with Development Partners for a collaborative response to COVID-19 in Uttar Pradesh’. Development partners were invited through virtual meeting to share their initiatives and suggestions for supporting the COVID-19 response in cities Uttar Pradesh.This was the second meeting of the ‘Alliance for Urban Transformation – DoUD GoUP’, acting as a forum for state partners for scaling-up partnerships. The meeting was chaired by Dr. Kajal (IAS), Director, Directorate of Local Bodies, (Government of Uttar Pradesh) and was attended by 15 development partners which including the likes of UNICEF, UNDP, WaterAid, KPMG, E&Y, Oxfam, Tata Trusts, ActionAid, AIILSG and Aga Khan Foundation to name a few. The meeting was also attended city officials from Lucknow, Unnao, Bijnor and Chunar. Dr. Kajal set the context of the dialogue with addressing the need for a collaborative response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the state of Uttar Pradesh and developing synergies among development partners in the state. Some issues deliberated by development partners in the meeting included relief work related to the vulnerable community, livelihood generation for the returning migrant daily wagers through skill development programs, using GIS / digital applications for tracking relief work, information dissemination through various means including public address systems, leveraging ASHA workers and SHGs in COVID-19 response activities, developing communication collaterals, capacity building & training of vulnerable section, support in personal protective equipment, hygiene related products, ensuring hygiene for informal settlements though mobile / contactless handwashing basins. CSE highlighted its commitment towards supporting COVID-19 response in the state by providing protective gear for sanitation workers, providing access to handwashing facilities for vulnerable people, dissemination of information related to COVID-19 response and build capacities of Self Help Groups and other local stakeholders for the fight against the virus. The meeting was concluded by Dr. Kajal who thanked CSE for initiating this dialogue and suggested developing a quick action plan for a collaborative response to COVID in Uttar Pradesh. All the development partners were urged to collaborate on some critical issues which include protection of all sanitation workers, livelihood opportunities and relief efforts for returning migrant workers as well as ensuring advisories issued by various ministries reach all concerned stakeholders.

‘POV’ slates its first miniseries for June

The PBS-featured doc strand ‘POV’ is set to air its first mini-series via And She Could Be Next, a two-part documentary series on women of color transforming American politics from Peabody Awardwinner Grace Lee and Iranian documentary filmmaker Marjan Safinia. Filmed from 2018 through 2019, the Tribeca Film Festival official selection follows candidates and organizers such as Stacey Abrams, Bushra Amiwala, Maria Elena Durazo, Veronica Escobar, Lucy McBath, Rashida Tlaib, and Nse Ufot. Having acquired the U.S. broadcast and streaming rights for the doc, PBS will air the program as a two-night special presentation in June in the summer’s Trailblazers initiative, which celebrates the centennial of the women’s vote. Announced during the TCA Winter Press Tour, this is the first miniseries to be coproduced by POV, and was made with a crew comprised entirely of women of color. our societies. We’re running out of time, but there is still hope. “If ever there was a moment where we need to be reminded of the leadership of women of color, that time is now,” said Ava DuVernay, one of the film’s executive producers, in a statement. “If you’re an immigrant, a young person, a person of faith, or simply someone who has felt unseen for too long, you will find yourself reflected in this story.” In association with POV, And She Could Be Next is produced by Grace Lee, Marjan Safinia and Jyoti Sarda and directed by Grace Lee and Marjan Safinia. Ava DuVernay is an executive producer and Justine Nagan and Chris White are the executive producers for POV. Another new doc coming to PBS, Climate Change – The Facts, is set to premiere on Earth Day (April 22). Hosted by natural historian and legendary presenter Sir David Attenborough, Climate Change – The Facts examines scientific evidence of global warming impacts and possible solutions to the crisis. In the previously announced one-hour special, leading climate scientists examines the consequences of rising temperatures of ice sheets, fragile ecosystems, developing communities and extreme weather events. Experts include Dr. James Hansen, former director of NASA Goddard Institute for Science Studies; professor Naomi Oreskes, science historian at Harvard University; professor Michael Mann, climate scientist at Penn State University; Richard Black, director of the UK Energy & Climate Intelligence Unit; professor Andrew Shepherd, climate scientist at the University of Leeds; Sunita Narain, director general of India’s Centre for Science and Environment; and Greta Thunberg, climate advocate. The special is a BBC Studios and IWC Media production for PBS. Bill Gardner is executive in charge for PBS and Tom McDonald is commissioning editor for BBC Studios. The program is executive produced by Sacha Baveystock, Andrew Cohen and Jonathan Renouf. Serena Davies is the series producer and director. “In the 20 years since I first started talking about the impact of climate change on our world, conditions have changed far faster than I ever imagined,” said Sir David Attenborough in Climate Change – The Facts. “It may sound frightening, but the scientific evidence is that if we have not taken dramatic action within the next decade, we could face irreversible damage to the natural world and the collapse of

Are Environment Policies And Goals Blaming The Poor For Environmental Degradation?

A few years ago, 193 countries of UN General Assembly adopted SDG (Sustainable Development Goals), setting a target of completing 17 worldwide goals within a period of 15 years, ie 2015-2030. These SDG replaced MDG (Millennium Development Goals), proving the inefficiency in fulfilling global targets. Under SDG, our first and prime aim is “to eradicate global poverty”. This goal is the foremost goal as, with the eradication of poverty, many of our other objectives will automatically be taken under consideration. Poor people, due to lack of efficient resources, are more prone to the effects of environmental degradation. Similarly, if we observe other aspects, it is true that environmental changes may lead one to poverty. Hence, poverty and environment are interrelated to one another, and their balance is necessary for the fulfillment of our sustainable development goals, ie SDG. Poverty and environment have long been seen as separate units of developmental issues, causing nations to adopt a singular approach to each of them. However, since 1970s, it has been almost universally agreed that poverty and environmental degradation are inextricably linked. The Brundtland Commission of 1987 states that “Poverty is a major cause and effect of global environmental problems.” Hence, it would have been futile to contain the larger issue of environmental degradation without alleviation of poverty. Clean air volunteers demand clean air Action at the Ministry of Environment and Forests in New Delhi Image courtesy: Greenpeace India Environmental degradation and poverty alleviation are urgent global issues that have a lot in common. They must not be treated separately, because their interrelation is key to sustainable world. The evident skewness of wealth created by incorrect, selfish capitalistic policies has bifurcated the line of development from sustainability. Shall The Poor Be Blamed? Recognising the Forest Rights Act gives a significant right to forest dwellers: the right to protect, regenerate or conserve or manage any community forest resource that they have been traditionally protecting or conserving for sustainable use. Encouraging poor people to adopt green technology by giving them tax holiday and promoting ease of doing business in sustainable technologies will go a long way in creating utilitarian world. However, once the linkage between poverty and environment got accepted, the global approach moved towards ‘blame the victim’ approach. Indira Gandhi in her speech at Stockholm Conference in 1972 stated: “Are not poverty and need the greatest polluters?” This idea can find an echo in the Brundtland Commission as well, which gave ‘Sustainable Development’ itself. It implies that the poor are unable to utilise the resources sustainably and will destroy their immediate environment in order to survive. This logic provides us with the future action that the alleviation of poverty will lead to sustainable environmental use, and for that, equity in development has to be reached. This approach ignores two empirical realities: firstly, the poor may or may not be the greatest polluters, but they are indeed the greatest sufferers; and secondly, ‘development’ of the poor, on the same line as of the rich, may equip them to handle the vagaries of nature, but it will not directly stop environmental degradation. The second part is rightly explained by Delhi-based environment organisation, Centre for Science and Environment, which says that if the poor world were to develop and consume in the same manner as the West to achieve the same living standards, “we would need two additional planet Earths to produce resources and absorb wastes.. and good planets are hard to find!” So, to get to the right approach, one must first explore the differential impact of the rich and poor on the environment, and the impact of environmental degradation on the globe. Since the industrial revolution was fuelled by energy, mostly from fossil fuels, and major industrialised nations have a higher incidence of wealthy people, it’s pretty obvious that, historically speaking, richer nations have contributed a lot more towards environmental degradation than the poorer colonies. This fact has been conformed too in the CBDR and ‘Loss and Damage’ clauses of the climate change agreements. Even today, the biggest per capita emitters of greenhouse gases are the developed countries such as the US. The poor being projected as a foe of the environment could not be further away from the truth. While it might be true that they might not be much versed with the technical aspects of sustainable development strategies, evidence suggests that they traditionally respect nature, and even if they want to, they cannot exploit it unsustainably, given the limitation of resources. For example, Canadian lumberjacks using large machines to clear out forest can do a lot more damage than a villager cutting trees and branches for construction of a hut or basket. In fact, the strong dependence of the poor on nature encourages them to protect it, sometimes even attaching supernatural importance to them. For instance, sacred groves are revered by tribal communities in the mangrove forest. The Forest Rights Act 2006 has recognised the forest dwellers’ ‘right to conserve’, given their traditional expertise in this field. Despite the establishment of the fact that the rich are more capable of exploiting the environment, many studies, including one conducted by the World Bank, have found that the poor are more at the receiving end of the vagaries of the environment and climate change. The logic flows from the already-stated fact that the poor are more directly dependent on the environment for their survival and less capable to deal with the adverse affects of climate change. Indira Gandhi in her speech at Stockholm Conference in 1972 stated: “Are not poverty and need the greatest polluters?” This idea can find an echo in the Brundtland Commission as well. For instance, rain-fed agriculture, the mainstay of many of the poor, suffers the most with an increase in the uncertainty of rainfall patterns. Coastal farmers and fishermen are the most affected by coastal floods, cyclones or tsunamis. Rise in the sea level threatens the existence of small island nations. It’s not surprising that Marshall Islands filed a suit against nine nuclear powers to prevent an increase in nuclear activity. It is true that deforestation leads to a decrease in carbon sink of the world, but the fact often ignored is that it also uproots the lives of forest dwellers, destroying their homes. Sadly, despite knowing about the above situation, most countries have denied to stop their fast developmental progress at the cost of environmental degradation and higher incidence of income disparity due to various socio-political or economic reasons. The Trump administration pulled out of the landmark Paris Pact, incurring a serious blow to the international fight against climate change. India And Its Environment Policies Even in India, which has vociferously advocated for renewable energy, industrial development continues to take priority over environmental conservation. For instance, to skip EIA, many hydel power plants show their capacity to be 4.99 MW, given the fact that above 5 MW, the EIA would be made compulsory. Recently, the Narmada Control Authority announced raising the height of the Sardar Sarovar Dam to its full potential, despite its earlier repercussions evident with protests led by Narmada Bachao Andolan, Supreme Court judgments, and even a documentary made on the issue. This is slated to submerge more than 176 villages and poses the risk to cause flooding in backwaters due to increased siltation. The silver lining can be seen in many countries’ decision to finally link the issue of poverty with environment degradation, which can be seen in the adoption of the SDGs. Promotion of renewable energy in countries like India and China is a welcome step in this direction. While China has exponentially increased its solar energy production, India has led from the front by creating International Solar Alliance and targeting the adoption of 100 GW of solar power by 2022. Going a step further, Sweden has announced that it will run entirely on renewable energy by 2040. However, there is still a long way to go given the numerous impediments in the approach. The Poor Are Not The Only Stakeholders Countries, especially India, must approach a right-based approach instead of ‘charity’ approach by making the poor as the stakeholders of environmental conservation. The role of grassroots level organisations like Gram Sabha in India needs to be properly identified while conducting EIA of developmental projects. The traditional relationship of forest dwellers and the environment must be respected and their development should be in lines of their own genius. Stringent regulations are needed on direct industrial discharge and waster water treatment to prevent river pollution. Sustainable measure can be adopted by utilising natural coping mechanisms that will benefit both the environment and the poor, for instance, by increasing mangrove cover given their resistance to flooding. On the international front, technology transfer and equitable development must be accelerated given the urgency of the issue. Diplomatic pressure must be exerted on the US as being the largest emitter; it needs to be a part of alliance against climate change. Trading of sustainable technologies, instead of emission trading, must be prioritised. Poverty and Environmental degradation must be seen as a global issue, as only a joint effort can alleviate the threat posed by both. The only effective solution can arise when we shed the attitude of ‘not my problem’. As General Eisenhower had said, “The world must learn to work together, or finally it will not work at all”. There seems to be an optimistic approach by most countries. However, the effectiveness of their plans is yet to be seen. The era of being in denial that ‘poor are the biggest polluters’ has longed passed and the need of the hour is to develop an integrated plan for poverty alleviation and environmental conservation at the policy level. | April 30, 2020

Salute dei bambini a rischio in tutto il mondo: è allarme

Secondo una ricerca realizzata da Unicef, Oms (Organizzazione mondiale della sanità) e pubblicata sulla rivista scientifica the Lancet, la salute dei bambini è a rischio, colpa anche di una vita poco sana e dei cambiamenti climatici. La salute perde terreno “Nonostante la salute dei bambini e degli adolescenti sia migliorata negli ultimi 20 anni, i progressi si sono fermati e sono destinati a tornare indietro”, osserva Helen Clark, ex primo Ministro della Nuova Zelanda e copresidente della Commissione che ha redatto il rapporto “A Future for the World’s Children?”. La situazione in 180 Paesi del mondo Lo studio include un nuovo indice globale di 180 Paesi e valuta il benessere dei più piccoli in termine di salute, istruzione e nutrizione, con l’indice della sostenibilità, ovvero una misurazione indicativa delle emissioni di gas serra e i divari di reddito. “Si stima – prosegue Helen Clark – che circa 250 milioni di bambini sotto i 5 anni nei Paesi a medio e basso reddito rischino di non raggiungere il loro potenziale di sviluppo, secondo misurazioni indicative sulla malnutrizione cronica e la povertà. Ma è ancor più preoccupante che ogni bambino nel mondo affronti attualmente minacce per la sua vita, a causa del cambiamento climatico e delle pressioni commerciali”. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, direttore generale dell’Oms, dichiara che questo rapporto: “Mostra che i decision makers del mondo stanno deludendo, troppo spesso, i bambini e i giovani di oggi: non proteggono la loro salute, i loro diritti, il loro pianeta”. Il rapporto avverte che le eccessive emissioni di anidride carbonica, che provengono in gran parte dai Paesi ricchi, minacciano il futuro dei bambini di tutto il mondo. Se il riscaldamento globale supererà i quattro gradi Celsius entro il 2100, in linea con le attuali proiezioni, la crisi climatica avrà “conseguenze devastanti per i bambini, attraverso l’aumento degli oceani, le ondate di calore, la diffusione di malattie come la malaria, la febbre dengue e la malnutrizione. Penso che sia importante per il mondo riconoscere che la salute del pianeta e la salute delle persone sono interconnesse”, ha detto Sunita Narain, Direttore Generale del Centro per la scienza e l’ambiente di Nuova Delhi -. “Da un lato, i bambini sono quelli che erediteranno questo pianeta, ma è anche vero che la loro salute oggi è a grave rischio a causa del degrado ambientale”. Solo 9 Paesi virtuosi Lo studio Oms-Unicef indica che ci sono nove Paesi che sono “sulla buona strada” per raggiungere gli obiettivi di emissione di CO2 pro capite del 2030 e allo stesso tempo sono tra i primi 70 nella classifica dello “sviluppo infantile”: Albania, Armenia, Grenada, Giordania, Moldavia, Sri Lanka, Tunisia, Uruguay e Vietnam. Il documento pubblicato da “The Lancet” sottolinea che la pubblicità aggressiva per alcuni prodotti è un altro grande rischio per i bambini a livello globale. In alcuni Paesi, un bambino vede pubblicità di cibo spazzatura() e bevande zuccherate quotidianamente. I bambini e adolescenti obesi nel mondo sono aumentati da 11 milioni nel 1975 a 124 milioni nel 2016, un aumento “allarmante” per gli specialisti. “L’autoregolamentazione dell’industria è fallita”, ha detto il professore dell’University College di Londra Anthony Costello, uno dei coordinatori del rapporto. “Nonostante l’impegno dell’industria per l’autoregolamentazione in Australia, i bambini e i giovani sono ancora esposti a 51 milioni di pubblicità di alcolici in un solo anno di calcio, cricket e rugby in televisione”, ha detto. Come è messa l’Italia L’Italia assicura una qualità di vita relativamente buona ai bambini e agli adolescenti, ma non pensa al loro futuro, visto che precipita nella classifica della ‘sostenibilità’. È 26a su 180 Paesi per l’indice di sopravvivenza e del benessere dei più piccoli, ma precipita al 134° posto per quanto riguarda le emissioni di anidride carbonica pro-capite. Dall’analisi emerge che i primi 5 posti che assicurano ai bambini le migliori condizioni sono Norvegia, Repubblica di Corea, Paesi Bassi, Francia, Irlanda. | April 30, 2020

CSE releases report on agromet advisory systems; to help farmers cope with extreme weather events

BATHINDA: Researched by climate change unit of Centre for Science and Environment(CSE) has released new report on Agrometeorological advisories in India themed ‘weather and the farmer’. The report is about how climate adaptation actually works on the ground in vulnerable sectors. The aim of the report is two-fold to shift the global debate about adaptation and the role of the public versus the private sector. Secondly, to use the Indian experience to guide the development of similar tools in other climate-vulnerable countries. “The report assesses the agromet advisory system – the inter-linked institutions, technologies and actors who collect weather data to generate forecasts and combine these forecasts with crop data and expertise to generate practical advice for farmers. This system is critical because it can enable farmers to cope with increasing climate uncertainty, which is overwhelming traditional knowledge of weather and cropping patterns. India’s agromet system is properly understood as three connected systems – weather forecasting, crop data collection and research, and agricultural ‘extension’ (which reaches technology and expertise to farmers). The CSE report breaks down the system into three sub-sectors – weather data and forecasting, creation of agromet advisories, and dissemination of advisories”, says CSE Director General Sunita Narain and writer of report Tarun Gopalakrishnan. “We see significant investment in technology in India – including in automatic weather stations and mobile technology to disseminate advisories. But there is a lack of quality control of data, gaps in data sharing, a lack of specificity in forecasts and advisories and uneven investment across different states. Worse, investment in critical human resources has decreased – especially the expertise required to create advisories tailored to farmers’ economic and geographical context, and the human power which trains farmers to implement the advice," says the report. CSE recommends to define the responsibilities of different government ministries and departments particularly the responsibility to collect and manage weather data versus crop data.

CSE launches report on how Indian farmers can deal with adverse weather conditions

The Centre for Science and Environment has released a report on how farmers can deal with adverse and changing weather conditions. The report is on agromet advisory systems—focusing on weather data collection and forecasting, agricultural expertise and analysis of crop data that can lead to generation of practical advice for farmers. The CSE underlines the need for similar assessments of agromet systems in other countries to build adaptation and resilience for “frontline victims of climate change”. The report on Agrometeorological Advisories in India was released at a webinar on ‘Weather and the Farmer’ by Sunita Narain, director general, CSE. Speaking at the release, Narain said, “We keep hearing that we have to give farmers a greater ability to cope with extreme weather events. How do we do it? What does it really mean? What we've done here is to put flesh and form into the word “adaptation”,” said Narain as she introduced the report. Researched and put together by CSE’s Climate Change Unit, the new report grew out of a mission to understand how climate adaptation actually works on the ground in vulnerable sectors. Apart from informing Indian policymaking, the broader aim of the report is two-fold, says Tarun Gopalakrishnan, one of the writers—“firstly, to shift the global debate about adaptation, which is currently stuck in disputes over how much additional finance is needed for adaptation, and the role of the public versus the private sector. Secondly, to use the Indian experience (positive and negative) to guide the development of similar tools in other climate-vulnerable countries.” The report assesses the agromet advisory system—the inter-linked institutions, technologies and actors who collect weather data to generate forecasts, and combine these forecasts with crop data and expertise to generate practical advice for farmers. This system is critical because, in theory, it can enable farmers to cope with increasing climate uncertainty, which is overwhelming traditional (as well a lot of scientific) knowledge of weather and cropping patterns. Developed under the primary leadership of the India Meteorological Department (IMD), India’s agromet system is understood as three connected systems—weather forecasting, crop data collection and research, and agricultural ‘extension’ (which reaches technology and expertise to farmers). The CSE report, therefore, breaks down the system into three sub-sectors—weather data and forecasting, creation of agromet advisories, and dissemination of advisories. Says Gopalakrishnan: “We see significant investment in technology in India, including in automatic weather stations and mobile technology to disseminate advisories. But there is a lack of quality control of data, gaps in data sharing, a lack of specificity in forecasts and advisories and uneven investment across different states. Worse, investment in critical human resources has decreased—especially the expertise required to create advisories tailored to farmers’ economic and geographical context, and the human power which trains farmers to implement the advice.” The CSE has made the following recommendations to help farmers tackle weather changes better: Define the responsibilities of different government ministries and departments—particularly the responsibility to collect and manage weather data versus crop data. The IMD could take over the responsibility to expand, coordinate and strengthen the weather forecasting system; the state agriculture departments should work on for improving crop data and the agro-portion of advisories. Coordinate priorities and budgets between Central and state governments, for developing district- and block-level infrastructure for data collection and specific advisory generation. Integrate weather data collected on a common platform—by law, all weather data collected in the country, public or private, and across government departments and levels, must flow into a central database. Support the private sector on its strengths, such as innovation, but ensure that agromet advisories remain a public good that are affordable for subsistence farmers. Provide viability gap financing to private sector to ensure standardisation of weather equipment and data, including metadata. Help states increase investments in (i) creating a demand for block/local-level satellite data, and (ii) local agromet expertise and numbers of extension professionals