Filter by Dates

 

Filter by Content Types

Climate Change

Global Stocktake

The architecture of the Paris Agreement is a hybrid and provides for both bottom-up and top-down elements. While it can be argued that the Agreement predominantly comprises bottom-up elements, marked by countries choosing their own country-specific climate action plans and targets, there are also topdown mechanisms to consolidate and strengthen the implementation of the Agreement.

'COP of Action' turns out to be 'COP of Distraction': CSE

COP22 was supposed to be Action COP meant to flesh out the finer details of the Paris Agreement Paris Agreement came into force much earlier than expected; countries were not prepared for the negotiations as they expected ratification to happen later Election of Donald Trump dominated the deliberations at COP No raise in ambition from developed countries in terms of emission reductions or financial contributions for pre-2020 period Discussions on issues have been postponed to the next COP

28th Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol, Kigali (Rwanda), October 12, 2016

Is quibbling over the 2020-22/ 2024-26 baseline for A5 parties worthwhile to achieve an ambitious HFC amendment? An analysis and appeal by Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi As we enter the last three days of negotiations in Kigali, we see a sense of accommodation and flexibility within parties. However, this positive environment is being sullied due to quibbling by the A2 parties about the proposed baseline years of the A5 parties.